网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00746

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以58名女性为研究对象, 用网约车场景来考察声誉和面孔可信度对其信任判断的影响, 并探讨直觉性思维的调节作用。结果表明声誉和面孔可信度会影响女性在选乘网约车时的信任判断, 她们更愿意信任声誉良好和面孔可信度高的司机; 相比低直觉性思维女性而言, 声誉对高直觉性思维女性的信任判断影响较小, 而面孔可信度对高直觉女性的信任判断影响较大。

关键词: 信任决策, 声誉, 面孔, 直觉性思维, 网约车

Abstract:

The present study (N = 58) investigated the influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment as well as the moderating effect of intuitive thinking by setting up the scene of car-hailing. The results showed that reputation and face trustworthiness could influence women’s trust judgment of car-hailing choices. In other words, they were more likely to trust drivers with good reputation and trustworthy face. Reputation had less influence on women’s trust judgment in high intuitive thinking group as compared to low intuitive thinking group, while face trustworthiness had more influence on trust judgment of women with high intuitive thinking.

Key words: trust decision, reputation, face, intuitive thinking, car-hailing

中图分类号:

B849:C91

李庆功, 王震炎, 孙捷元, 师妍. (2020). 网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用. 心理科学进展 , 28(5), 746-751.

LI Qinggong, WANG Zhenyan, SUN Jieyuan, SHI Yan. (2020). The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(5), 746-751.

图/表 4

参考文献 28

1	陈欣, 叶浩生 . ( 2009). 行为博弈视野下信任研究的回顾. 心理科学, 32( 3), 636-639.
2	洪名勇, 钱龙 . ( 2014). 信任、声誉及其内在逻辑. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 32( 1), 34-39.
3	李彬, 徐富明, 王伟, 张慧, 罗寒冰 . ( 2015). 决策的加工过程及个体差异: 模糊痕迹理论视角. 心理科学进展, 23( 2), 316-324.
4	李延喜, 吴笛, 肖峰雷, 姚宏 . ( 2010). 声誉理论研究述评. 管理评论, 22( 10), 3-11.
5	李易尚, 朱双洋 . ( 2018). 守住网约车的安全底线. 人民法治, ( 15), 94-95.
6	刘国芳, 辛自强 . ( 2011). 间接互惠中的声誉机制: 印象、名声、标签及其传递. 心理科学进展, 19( 2), 233-242.
7	施丽芳, 廖飞, 丁德明 . ( 2012). 个人声誉关注作为心理不确定的缓解器: 程序公平/合作关系下的实证研究. 管理世界, ( 12), 97-114.
8	文跃兰 . ( 2012). 大学生理性—经验思维方式的个体差异及其与社会问题解决的关系(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
9	于会会, 徐富明, 黄宝珍, 文桂婵, 王岚 . ( 2012). 框架效应中的个体差异. 心理科学进展, 20( 6), 894-901.
10	武洁, 杨建春 . ( 2014). 张、王、李、赵谁最多: 2010年人口普查姓氏结构和分布特点. 中国统计, ( 6), 21-22.
11	Bailey P. E., Szczap P., Mclennan S. N., Slessor G., Ruffman T., & Rendell P. G . ( 2015). Age-related similarities and differences in first impressions of trustworthiness. Cognition and Emotion, 30( 5), 1017-1026.
12	Boero R., Bravo G., Castellani M., & Squazzoni F . ( 2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38( 6), 871-877.
13	Cox J.C . ( 2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46( 2), 260-281.
14	Delgado M. R., Frank R. H., & Phelps E. A . ( 2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8( 11), 1611-1618.
15	Denes-Raj V. &Epstein S. , ( 1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66( 5), 819-829.
16	DeSteno D . ( 2014).The truth about trust: How it determines success in life, love, learning, and more . New York: Hudson Street Press.
17	Heyman G.D . ( 2008). Children's critical thinking when learning from others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17( 5), 344-347.
18	Kreps D. M., Milgrom P., Roberts J., & Wilson R . ( 1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27( 2), 245-252.
19	Li Q., Heyman G. D., Mei J., & Lee K . ( 2019). Judging a book by its cover: Children’s facial trustworthiness as judged by strangers predicts their real-world trustworthiness and peer relationships. Child Development, 90( 2), 562-575.
20	Li T., Liu X., Pan J., & Zhou G . ( 2017). The interactive effect of facial appearance and behavior statement on trust belief and trust behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 117( 1), 60-65.
21	Mahoney K. T., Buboltz W., Levin I. P., Doverspike D., & Svyantek D. J . ( 2011). Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51( 3), 248-257.
22	Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D . ( 1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20( 3), 709-734.
23	Pacini R. &Epstein S. , ( 1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 6), 972-987.
24	Slepian M. L., &Ames D. R . ( 2015). Internalized Impressions: The link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior is mediated by targets’ expectations of how they will be judged. Psychological Science, 27( 2), 282-288.
25	Stirrat M. &Perrett D. I . ( 2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 349-354.
26	Uleman J. S., Newman L. S., & Moskowitz G. B . ( 1996). People as flexible interpreters: evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28( 8), 211-279.
27	van't Wout, M., &Sanfey A. G . ( 2008). Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108( 3), 796-803.
28	Willis J. &Todorov A. , ( 2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17( 7), 592-598.

直觉性思维	低面孔可信度			高面孔可信度
直觉性思维	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉
低	0.52 ± 1.06	3.59 ± 1.62	4.55 ± 0.78	0.93 ± 1.28	3.97 ± 1.50	4.90 ± 0.31
高	0.83 ± 1.31	2.93 ± 1.67	3.97 ± 1.43	1.76 ± 1.88	4.00 ± 1.13	4.59 ± 0.98
总计	0.67 ± 1.19	3.26 ± 1.66	4.26 ± 1.18	1.34 ± 1.65	3.98 ± 1.31	4.74 ± 0.74

直觉性思维	低面孔可信度			高面孔可信度
直觉性思维	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉	低声誉	中声誉	高声誉
低	0.52 ± 1.06	3.59 ± 1.62	4.55 ± 0.78	0.93 ± 1.28	3.97 ± 1.50	4.90 ± 0.31
高	0.83 ± 1.31	2.93 ± 1.67	3.97 ± 1.43	1.76 ± 1.88	4.00 ± 1.13	4.59 ± 0.98
总计	0.67 ± 1.19	3.26 ± 1.66	4.26 ± 1.18	1.34 ± 1.65	3.98 ± 1.31	4.74 ± 0.74

[1]	陈子炜, 付迪, 刘勋. 错认总比错过好——面孔视错觉的发生机制及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 240-255.
[2]	周国梅, 郑若颖, 林佳, 刘心阁. 面孔吸引力的整体表征及其动态性增强[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1429-1438.
[3]	齐玥, 秦邵天, 王可昕, 陈文锋. 面孔可信度评价调节：经验迁移假说的提出与验证[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(4): 715-722.
[4]	刘俊材, 冉光明, 张琪. 不同情绪载体的神经活动及其异同——脑成像研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 536-555.
[5]	李东, 吴琦, 闫向博, 崔倩, 蒋重清. 第一印象中面孔-人格知觉和语音-人格知觉的异同[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 684-692.
[6]	张超, 卫旭华, 黎英明. 面相识人：基于认知视角的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 308-323.
[7]	朱传林, 刘电芝, 罗文波. 情绪体验影响估算策略运用的认知与脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2639-2649.
[8]	田珈源, 龙彦伶, 杨虹, 吴惠芳, 薛鹏, 蒋重清. 面孔-人格知觉中眼部线索及其效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(12): 2735-2745.
[9]	侯文霞, 田欣然, 刘立志, 易冰, 欧玉晓, 陈文锋, 尚俊辰. 面孔吸引力同化的连续性效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1210-1215.
[10]	荆伟, 张婕, 付锦霞, 田琳, 赵微. 婴幼儿面孔注意偏向：先天倾向与发展轨迹——来自正常和孤独症婴幼儿的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1216-1230.
[11]	李雅宁, 田杨阳, 吴琦, 冷海州, 蒋重清, 杨伊生. 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1022-1029.
[12]	何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772.
[13]	霍鹏辉, 冯成志, 陈庭继. 注视者及观察者因素对注视知觉的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 238-251.
[14]	明莉莉, 胡学平. 人类嗓音加工的神经机制——来自正常视力者和盲人的脑神经证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(12): 2147-2160.
[15]	那宇亭, 赵宇雯, 关丽丽. 自我面孔识别的神经机制：基于fMRI研究的ALE元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(10): 1783-1795.