主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01787

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

主动控制感指预计动作和实际感觉反馈匹配会产生一种控制自己动作、作用于环境的主观体验, 是人类心理活动的基本特征之一。本文系统介绍主动控制感的测量方式, 尤其是主动动作的时间压缩效应这一内隐手段; 并从主观意识、动作的发生方式和动作结果特征三个方面探讨主动控制感的影响因素。基于动作的比较器模型, 解释主动控制感的产生原因; 并提供了主动控制感的认知神经脑机制的证据, 强调额叶和顶叶在主动控制感中的作用。未来研究应该更加注重外显与内隐测量的一致性, 特殊群体以及主动控制感的脑网络研究。

关键词: 主动控制感, 时间压缩效应, 反馈, 意识

Abstract:

“Sense of agency” refers to the sense of controlling one’s actions and the course of events in the outside world. It is based on the match between the expected action and the real sensory feedback. The first part of this article introduces a method for implicit measurement of sense of agency. The second part deals with the factors that influence the sense of agency from the aspects of intentionality and sensory feedback. Part three provides the conclusion. With an emphasis on the functions of the prefrontal and parietal lobes, this article provides evidence to explain the mechanism of sense of agency through the theoretical model and cognitive neuroscience.

Key words: sense of agency, binding effect, feedback, intentionality

张淼, 吴迪, 李明, 凌懿白, 张明, 赵科. (2018). 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制. 心理科学进展 , 26(10), 1787-1793.

ZHANG Miao, WU Di, LI Ming, LING Yibai, ZHANG Ming, ZHAO Ke. (2018). The measurement and neural mechanism of sense of agency. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(10), 1787-1793.

图/表 2

参考文献 48

1	Blakemore S. J., Wolpert D., & Frith C . ( 2000). Why can't you tickle yourself?. Neuroreport, 11( 11), R11-R16.
2	Blanke O., Ortigue S., Landis T., & Seeck M . ( 2002). Neuropsychology: Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419( 6904), 269-270.
3	Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2009). Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20( 10), 1221-1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02435.x URL pmid: 19732384
4	Buehner M. J., & Humphreys, G. R . ( 2010). Causal contraction: Spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 21( 1), 44-48.
5	Buehner, M. J . ( 2012). Understanding the past, predicting the future: Causation, not intentional action, is the root of temporal binding. Psychological Science, 23( 12), 1490-1497.
6	Caspar E. A., Christensen J. F., Cleeremans A., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Coercion changes the sense of agency in the human brain. Current Biology, 26( 5), 585-592. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.12.067 URL pmid: 4791480
7	Cavazzana A., Begliomini C., & Bisiacchi P. S . ( 2017). Intentional binding as a marker of agency across the lifespan. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.016 URL pmid: 28501697
8	Chambon V., Wenke D., Fleming S. M., Prinz W., & Haggard P . ( 2013). An online neural substrate for sense of agency. Cerebral Cortex, 23( 5), 1031-1037. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs059 URL pmid: 22510529
9	Chambon V., Moore J. W., & Haggard P . ( 2015). TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Structure and Function, 220( 6), 3627-3639. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6 URL pmid: 25134684
10	Crivelli D., & Balcon, M. ( 2017). The agent brain: A review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies on sensing agency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00229 URL
11	Ebert J. P., & Wegner, D. M . ( 2010). Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 19( 1), 481-489. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.002 URL pmid: 19896868
12	Engbert K., & Wohlschläger, A. ( 2007). Intentions and expectations in temporal binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 2), 255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.010 URL pmid: 17113309
13	Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., Thomas R., & Haggard P . ( 2007). Agency, subjective time, and other minds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1261-1268. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1261 URL pmid: 18085941
14	Engbert K., Wohlschläger A., & Haggard P . ( 2008). Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Cognition, 107( 2), 693-704. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.021 URL pmid: 17825813
15	Elsner B., & Hommel, B. ( 2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 138-154. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8 URL pmid: 14685854
16	Farrer C., & Frith, C. D . ( 2002). Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: The neural correlates of the experience of agency. NeuroImage, 15( 3), 596-603.
17	Fink G. R., Marshall J. C., Halligan P. W., Frith C. D., Driver J., Frackowiak R. S. J., & Dolan R. J . ( 1999). The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain, 122( 3), 497-512. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.3.497 URL pmid: 10094258
18	Frith, C. D . ( 2014). Action, agency and responsibility. Neuropsychologia, 55, 137-142.
19	Gomes G., ( 2002). The interpretation of Libet's results on the timing of conscious events: A commentary. Consciousness and Cognition, 11( 2), 221-230. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2002.0556 URL
20	Haggard P., ( 2017). Sense of agency in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18( 4), 196-207. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.14 URL pmid: 28251993
21	Haggard P., Clark S., & Kalogeras J . ( 2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5( 4), 382-385. doi: 10.1038/nn827 URL
22	Hascalovitz A. C., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2015). Personality and intentional binding: An exploratory study using the narcissistic personality inventory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00013
23	Helmholtz, H. V . ( 1866). Concerning the perceptions in general. Treatise on physiological optics.
24	Humphreys G. R., & Buehner, M. J . ( 2009). Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35( 5), 1542-1549. doi: 10.1037/a0014492 URL pmid: 19803655
25	James W., ( 1890). The Principles of. Psychology, 2.
26	Jo H. G., Wittmann M., Hinterberger T., & Schmidt S . ( 2014). The readiness potential reflects intentional binding. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 421-421. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00421 URL pmid: 24959135
27	Kawato M., ( 1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9( 6), 718-727. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8 URL pmid: 10607637
28	Khalighinejad N., & Haggard, P. ( 2015). Modulating human sense of agency with non-invasive brain stimulation. Cortex, 69, 93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.015 URL pmid: 26004997
29	Khalighinejad N., Di C S., & Haggard P . ( 2016). Endogenous action selection processes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex contribute to sense of agency: A meta- analysis of tDCS studies of ‘intentional binding’. Brain Stimulation, 9( 3), 372-379.
30	Libet B., Gleason C. A., Wright E. W., & Pearl D. K . ( 1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential) the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106( 3), 623-642.
31	Lindner A., Haarmeier T., Erb M., Grodd W., & Thier P . ( 2006). Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18( 11), 1899-1912.
32	MacDonald P. A., & Paus, T. ( 2003). The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 13( 9), 962-967.
33	Moore J. W., & Obhi, S. S . ( 2012). Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 21( 1), 546-561. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002 URL pmid: 22240158
34	Moore J. W., Ruge D., Wenke D., Rothwell J., & Haggard P . ( 2010). Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: Pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2503-2509.
35	Shibasaki H., & Hallett, M. ( 2006). What is the Bereitschaftspotential?. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117( 11), 2341-2356. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.025 URL pmid: 16876476
36	Sirigu A., Daprati E., Pradat-Diehl P., Franck N., & Jeannerod M . ( 1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122( 10), 1867-1874. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1867 URL pmid: 10506089
37	Sperduti M., Delaveau P., Fossati P., & Nadel J . ( 2011). Different brain structures related to self-and external- agency attribution: A brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 216( 2), 151-157.
38	Stetson C., Cui X., Montague P. R., & Eagleman D. M . ( 2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron, 51( 5), 651-659.
39	Synofzik M., Vosgerau G., & Newen A . ( 2008). Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17( 1), 219-239. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010 URL pmid: 17482480
40	Tapal A., Oren E., Dar R., & Eitam B . ( 2017). The Sense of Agency Scale: A Measure of Consciously Perceived Control over One's Mind, Body, and the Immediate Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1552.
41	Voss M., Chambon V., Wenke D., Kühn S., & Haggard P . ( 2017). In and out of control: brain mechanisms linking fluency of action selection to self-agency in patients with schizophrenia. Brain, 140( 8), 2226-2239.
42	Wolpert D. M., Ghahramani Z., & Jordan M. I . ( 1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269( 5232), 1880-1882.
43	Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2013). Negative emotional outcomes attenuate sense of agency over voluntary actions. Current Biology, 23( 20), 2028-2032. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.034 URL pmid: 24094850
44	Yoshie M., & Haggard, P. ( 2017). Effects of emotional valence on sense of agency require a predictive model. Scientific Reports, 7( 1), 8733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08803-3 URL pmid: 5562802
45	Zhao K., Chen Y. H., Yan W. J., & Fu X. L . ( 2013). To bind or not to bind? Different temporal binding effects from voluntary pressing and releasing actions. PloS One, 8( 5), e64819.
46	Zhao K., Gu R. L., Wang L., Xiao P., Chen Y. H., Liang J ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2014). Voluntary pressing and releasing actions induce different senses of time: Evidence from event-related brain responses. Scientific Reports, 4, 6047.
47	Zhao K., Hu L., Qu F. B., Cui Q., Piao Q. H., Xu H ., .. & Fu, X. L. ( 2016). Voluntary action and tactile sensory feedback in the intentional binding effect. Experimental Brain Research, 234( 8), 2283-2292. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4633-5 URL pmid: 27038203
48	Ziessler M., Nattkemper D., & Frensch P. A . ( 2004). The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research, 68( 2-3), 163-175. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0153-6 URL pmid: 14634810

[1]	蒋涵. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童教育康复线上模式的构建[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8): 1747-1758.
[2]	张光磊, 黄婷, 殷向洲. 非体面工作者职业污名的作用机制及其应对策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(3): 703-714.
[3]	李子逸, 张泽, 张莹, 罗劲. 创造性思维的酝酿效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(2): 291-307.
[4]	秦浩方, 黄蓉, 贾世伟. 反馈相关负波：一种抑郁症的生物标记物[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 404-413.
[5]	赵科, 顾晶金, 黄冠华, 郑爽, 傅小兰. 主动控制感在大脑表征中的时空标记[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(11): 1901-1910.
[6]	沈蕾, 江黛苔, 陈宁, 刘伟. 自豪感的神经基础：比较的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 131-139.
[7]	陈乐乐, 黄蓉, 贾世伟. 反馈相关负波与成瘾[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 959-968.
[8]	张建平, 秦传燕, 刘善仕. 寻求反馈能改善绩效吗?——反馈寻求行为与个体绩效关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 549-565.
[9]	蔡笑, 张清芳. 言语运动系统中前馈和反馈控制整合加工的作用机制 ^*[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 588-603.
[10]	万楠, 朱树青, 贾世伟. 反馈间隔影响反馈加工：整合行为和电生理研究的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 230-239.
[11]	马舒, 章薇, 史金磊, 杨振. 基于认知机制的有条件自动驾驶接管中的人因问题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 150-160.
[12]	张悦, 唐日新. 视觉反馈的过去经验在抓握行为中的时间效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 53-53.
[13]	何岭, 李孟津, 郭冰冰, 孟明. 训练方式和训练时长对追踪能力、特征检测及视觉意识控制的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(suppl.): 142-142.
[14]	李倩, 龚诗阳, 李超凡. 团队文化多样性对团队创新的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1521-1539.
[15]	陈圣栋, 陈永强, 高伟, 罗利, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦. 认知加工的自动化现象：从二分法到渐进观[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.