ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 460-478.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00460

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

五因素取向人格测验的发展与比较

陈基越1;徐建平1;黎红艳1;范业鑫1,2;路晓兰1   

  1. (1北京师范大学心理学院; 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 北京 100875) (2首都医科大学宣武医院, 北京 100053)
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-28 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 徐建平, E-mail: xujp@bnu.edu.cn

The Evolution and Comparison of Personality Tests Based on the Five-Factor Approach

CHEN Jiyue1; XU Jianping1; LI Hongyan1; FAN Yexin1,2; LU Xiaolan1   

  1. (1 School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University; Beijing Key Lab for Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875, China) (2 Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China)
  • Received:2014-02-28 Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-15
  • Contact: XU Jianping, E-mail: xujp@bnu.edu.cn

摘要:

五因素取向人格测验是目前评价个体人格特质时被广泛应用的一大类重要人格测验工具。该类测验数量众多, 长度各异, 形式多样。根据其题目呈现的特点, 可将现有的30余种五因素取向人格测验分为自陈式、核检表式、非言语式三类。在不同研究和实践情境下, 各个五因素取向人格测验具有各自独特的优劣势, 信效度的变化都不同。在实际应用中, 应根据不同研究需求区别使用, 并注意测量目的、施测次数、测验长度、被试特点、文化差异性等对测验结果的影响。当前, 五因素取向人格测验的开发正向着简明、全面、跨文化方向发展。

关键词: 五因素取向, 大五, 五因素模型, 人格测验

Abstract:

This review aims to examine different aspects of existing personality tests that have been developed to fit the five factor approach. The analyses indicated that there are more than 30 types of five-factor approach personality tests of various lengths and forms. These tests can be classified into three board categories: self-report inventory, adjective checklist and nonverbal inventory. Each test appears to have unique advantages and disadvantages when applied to different research and practical situations. Their reliability and validity also varies across situations. Taken together, these results suggest that researchers should be careful when choosing personality tests and take into account factors such as the test length, the test purpose, and cultural differences.

Key words: five-factor approach, big five, five-factor model, personality test