[1] 崔智淞, 贾建锋, 邹纯龙, 李瑞芹. (2024). 组织如何应对职场摸鱼?职场网络闲逛行为的作用结果及其反馈效应.心理科学进展, 32(5), 738-753. [2] 段光, 庞长伟, 金辉. (2015). 多团队成员身份研究述评.管理学报, 12(12), 1872-1881. [3] 方琪, 栾琨. (2022). 多团队成员身份及其作用机制.心理科学进展, 30(5), 1143-1157. [4] 林筠, 韩鑫, 张敏. (2017). 结合型与桥接型社会资本对双元创新的影响.科学学研究, 35(10), 1557-1566. [5] 刘薇, 沈晓玲. (2022). 团队行动中反思与团队创新关系研究的动态视角——认知与情绪的双元路径.心理科学进展, 30(8), 1759-1769. [6] 刘智强, 许玉平, 许建伟, 周蓉, 龙立荣. (2023). 创新期望差距与团队突破性创新: 自我调节理论视角.心理学报, 55(2), 272-285. [7] 万文海, 刘夏怡, 姜绍静.(2022). 工作要求-资源模型视角下多团队成员身份对员工创造力的影响研究.管理学报, 19(5), 687-695. [8] 王甜, 曹洲涛, 宋一晓, 廖琳. (2025). 内外兼修: 多重网络交互影响下的自组织团队创造力研究.南开管理评论, 28(6), 51-62. [9] 魏昕, 张志学. (2018). 团队的和谐型创新激情: 前因、结果及边界条件. 管理世界, 34(7), 100-113+184. [10] 卫旭华, 陈子萌. (2025). 家族企业实控人突然离世背景下组织韧性的影响要素与形成路径——历史计量、扎根研究与定性比较分析.商业经济与管理, 45(10), 32-51. [11] 谢小云, 左玉涵, 胡琼晶. (2021). 数字化时代的人力资源管理: 基于人与技术交互的视角. 管理世界, 37(1), 200-216+213. [12] 熊立, 年鹏翔, 余薇, 陆文珠. (2025). 从创新人员即兴倾向到团队创新变革的路径机制与边界条件.科研管理, 46(2), 149-157. [13] 张少峰, 吴义伦, 陈於婷, 胡登峰. (2025). 多团队成员身份对知识型员工创新绩效的作用机制研究——基于交易压力理论视角.科学决策, (1), 125-139. [14] 赵富强, 祝含秋, 陈耘, 陈文东. (2024). 多团队成员身份对个体创新绩效的双刃剑效应研究.管理学报, 21(1), 66-76. [15] 赵锴, 向姝婷. (2021). 如何解决团队创新悖论?基于成员认知风格“组型”与“构型”视角的探究.心理科学进展, 29(1), 1-18. [16] 朱棣, 葛建华, 杨繁. (2023). 聚合还是桥接: 社会资本整合问题的研究图景与展望.南开管理评论, 26(3), 123-136. [17] Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(10), 123-167. [18] Antonelli C., Crespi F., & Quatraro F. (2022). Knowledge complexity and the mechanisms of knowledge generation and exploitation: The European evidence.Research Policy, 51(8), 104081. [19] Argote L., Aven B. L., & Kush J. (2018). The effects of communication networks and turnover on transactive memory and group performance.Organization Science, 29(2), 191-206. [20] Backmann J., Wimmer J., Mortensen M., Hartmann S., Hoegl M., & Peus C. (2024). A resource-based view on individual absorption in the context of multiple team memberships. Organization Science, 35(4), 1473-1488. [21] Berger, S., & Bruch, H. (2021). Role strain and role accumulation across multiple teams: The moderating role of employees' polychronic orientation.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(7), 835-850. [22] Berger S., van de Brake, H. J., & Bruch H. (2022). Resource leverage, resource depletion: A multilevel perspective on multiple team membership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 298-309. [23] Bertolotti F., Mattarelli E., Vignoli M., & Macrì D. M. (2015). Exploring the relationship between multiple team membership and team performance: The role of social networks and collaborative technology.Research Policy, 44(4), 911-924. [24] Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital.Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345-423. [25] Busch, C. (2024). Towards a theory of serendipity: A systematic review and conceptualization.Journal of Management Studies, 61(3), 1110-1151. [26] Busch, C., & Barkema, H. (2020). Planned luck: How incubators can facilitate serendipity for nascent entrepreneurs through fostering network embeddedness.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(4), 884-919. [27] Campion E. D., & Csillag B. (2022). Multiple jobholding motivations and experiences: A typology and latent profile analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(8), 1261-1287. [28] Chan K. -Y., Oerlemans L., & Meslec N. (2021). The impact of multiple project team membership on individual and team learning: A micro-meso multi-level empirical study.International Journal of Project Management, 39(3), 308-320. [29] Chen W., Zhang J., Xiao Y., Wang B., Gu X., & Bai Z. (2024). Benefit or cost? The “double-edged sword” effect of multiple team membership on creativity.Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), 100485. [30] Chen W. L., Zhang J., Yan J. L., Xiao Y. C., & Wang B. H. (2025). Multiple team membership and creativity: Ambidexterity knowledge search.Management Decision, 64(6), 2544-2565. [31] Choi Y., Ingram P., & Han S. W. (2023). Cultural breadth and embeddedness: The individual adoption of organizational culture as a determinant of creativity.Administrative Science Quarterly, 68(2), 429-464. [32] Cirillo B., Brusoni S., & Valentini G. (2014). The rejuvenation of inventors through corporate spinouts.Organization Science, 25(6), 1764-1784. [33] Crawford, E. R., & Lepine, J. A. (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork.Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 32-48. [34] Cummings, J. N., & Haas, M. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 316-341. [35] Cunha M. P., Clegg S. R., & Mendonça S. (2010). On serendipity and organizing.European Management Journal, 28(5), 319-330. [36] Damadzic A., Winchester C., Medeiros K. E., & Griffith J. A. (2022). Re thinking outside the box: A meta-analysis of constraints and creative performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(8), 1330-1357. [37] De Dreu, C. K. (2007).Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective.Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 628-638. [38] Finuf K. D., Sachdev A. R., & Grossman R. (2022). Multiple team memberships and employee well-being: Exploring polychronicity and support as moderators. Occupational Health Science, 6(2), 183-205. [39] Fultz, A. E., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2021). The art of discovering and exploiting unexpected opportunities: The roles of organizational improvisation and serendipity in new venture performance.Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106121. [40] Grant, A. M., & Patil, S. V. (2012). Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units.Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 547-568. [41] Halbesleben J. R. B., Neveu J. P., Paustian-Underdahl S. C., & Westman M. (2014). Getting to the "COR": Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory.Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334-1364. [42] Han J., Han J., & Brass D. J. (2014). Human capital diversity in the creation of social capital for team creativity.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 54-71. [43] Hill, S. A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival.Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 423-444. [44] Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. (2015). The double‐edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation.Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1435-1457. [45] Kauppila O. P., Bizzi L., & Obstfeld D. (2017). Connecting and creating: Tertius iungens, individual creativity, and strategic decision processes.Strategic Management Journal, 39(3), 697-719. [46] Kim M. S., Methot J. R., Park W. W., & Gully S. M. (2022). The paradox of building bridges: Examining countervailing effects of leader external brokerage on team performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 36-51. [47] Lang T. T., De Vries T. A., Li H. Y., & Shaw J. D. (2026). The dualities of multiple team membership: Implications for team performance and adaptability.Academy of Management Journal, 69(1), 176-203. [48] Liang J., Shu R., & Farh, C. I. C. (2019). Differential implications of team member promotive and prohibitive voice on innovation performance in research and development project teams: A dialectic perspective.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 91-104. [49] Mannucci, P. V., & Perry-Smith, J. (2024). Social networks and novelty recognition: A review and research agenda.Innovation: Organization & Management, 26(3), 460-472. [50] Mannucci, P. V., & Yong, K. (2018). The differential impact of knowledge depth and knowledge breadth on creativity over individual careers.Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1741-1763. [51] Mayo A. T., Woolley A. W., John L., March C., Witchel S., & Nowalk A. (2025). Coordination in dynamic teams: Investigating a learning-productivity trade-off.Organization Science, 36(2), 967-992. [52] Mistry S., Kirkman B. L., Moore O. A., Hanna A. A., & Rapp T. L. (2023). Too many teams? Examining the impact of multiple team memberships and permanent team identification on employees’ identity strain, cognitive depletion, and turnover.Personnel Psychology, 76(3), 885-912. [53] Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance.Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129-1151. [54] O’Leary M. B., Mortensen M., & Woolley A. W. (2011). Multiple team membership: A theoretical model of its effects on productivity and learning for individuals and teams.Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 461-478. [55] Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey.Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53-79. [56] Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: The role of member nationality-heterogeneous ties outside of the team.Organization Science, 25(5), 1434-1452. [57] Pflügner K., Maier C., Thatcher J., Mattke J., & Weitzel T. (2024). Deconstructing technostress: A configurational approach to explaining job burnout and job performance.MIS Quarterly, 48(2), 679-698. [58] Post C., Lokshin B., & Boone C. (2022). What changes after women enter top management teams? A gender-based model of strategic renewal.Academy of Management Journal, 65(1), 273-303. [59] Rapp, T. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements.Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 303-320. [60] Rhee, L., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Which pathway to good ideas? An attention-based view of innovation in social networks.Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1188-1215. [61] Schippers M. C., Homan A. C., & Van Knippenberg D. (2013). To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 6-23. [62] Schippers M. C., West M. A., & Dawson J. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context.Journal of Management, 41(3), 769-788. [63] Sessions, H., & Pychlau, S. (2024). Self-inconsistency or self-expansion from wearing multiple hats? The daily effects of enacting multiple professional identities on work meaningfulness.Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(6), 897-920. [64] Sirmon D. G., Hitt M. A., & Ireland R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box.Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292. [65] Sirmon D. G., Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., & Gilbert B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects.Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390-1412. [66] Soda G., Mannucci P. V., & Burt R. S. (2021). Networks, creativity, and time: Staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation.Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1164-1190. [67] Stollberger J., Ali Al-Atwi A., & De Cremer D. (2023). Untangling the team social capital-team innovation link: The role of proportional task conflict as well as group-and differentiated individual-focused transformational leadership.Human Relations, 76(6), 871-900. [68] Ter Wal A. L., Criscuolo P., McEvily B., & Salter A. (2020). Dual networking: How collaborators network in their quest for innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(4), 887-930. [69] Tortoriello M., Reagans R., & McEvily B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units.Organization Science, 23(4), 1024-1039. [70] Tsui A. S., Pearce J. L., Porter L. W., & Tripoli A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off?Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089-1121. [71] van de Brake, H. J., & Berger, S. (2023). Can I leave my hat on? A cross-level study of multiple team membership role separation.Personnel Psychology, 76(1), 221-248. [72] van de Brake, H. J., van der Vegt, G. S., & Essens, P. J. M. D. (2024). More than just a number: Different conceptualizations of multiple team membership and their relationships with emotional exhaustion and turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(5), 714-729. [73] van de Brake, H. J., Walter F., Rink F. A., Essens P. J. M. D., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2020). Benefits and disadvantages of individuals’ multiple team membership: The moderating role of organizational tenure.Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1502-1530. [74] Venkataramani, V., & Tang, C. (2024). When does external knowledge benefit team creativity? The role of internal team network structure and task complexity. Organization Science, 35(1), 92-115. [75] Venkataramani V., Lu S. Y., Bartol K. M., Zheng X. M., & Ni D. (2025). Seeing value in novelty: Manager and employee social networks as keys in managers’ idea evaluation and implementation decisions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(3), 358-380. [76] Wei X., Liao H., Zhang Z. X., Dong Y. T., & Li N. (2024). Does passion matter for team innovation? The conditional indirect effects of team harmonious versus obsessive passion via team reflexivity.Personnel Psychology, 77(2), 891-916. |