触觉二维图像识别中2D-3D空间信息转换的认知机制

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01804

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可触摸的触觉二维图像是视觉障碍人群获取图像信息的重要方式。目前大多数触觉二维图像都是直接由视觉二维图像转化为的可触摸线条图。在视觉二维图像中, 通常运用透视和视角等视觉原理将三维空间关系转换为二维平面关系。视觉系统经过长期大量知觉学习, 习得了这种二维到三维的映射关系。但是触觉识别二维图像时, 触觉系统如何建立二维平面与三维空间的映射, 目前尚有待进一步的研究。影响触觉识别二维图像中二维-三维空间信息转换的视觉因素主要有透视、视角、遮挡、纹理梯度和镂空, 直接将视觉二维图像转化为的触觉二维图像时, 图像中包含的上述视觉因素通常会干扰触觉识别。结合已有研究, 试图提出“双表象加工模型”来解释触摸二维图像时二维到三维空间信息转换的认知机制。该模型认为触觉识别二维图像依赖于两个表象系统的整合, 即物体表象系统(涉及物体的大小、形状和纹理)与空间表象系统(涉及物体的空间关系、透视和视角)。两种表象系统的信息最终进行整合, 在物体表象和空间表象成功匹配的基础上建立二维图像与三维空间之间的映射, 通达长时记忆中的三维物体表征。双表象加工模型将有助于我们深入认识触知觉的认知机制, 也将为触觉二维图像的设计提供理论依据。

关键词: 触觉, 二维图像, 触觉识别, 透视, 视角

Abstract:

Two-dimensional (2D) tangible image is an important alternative way for visually impaired people to obtain image information. Most existing tactile 2D images are tangible line drawings directly transformed from visual 2D images. The expression of spatial information in the visual 2D images usually follows principles of perspective and viewpoint transforming three-dimensional (3D) space into 2D planar. The mapping from 2D image to 3D space in visual system is learned through long-time perceptual learning. However, it still needs further exploration about cognitive mechanisms of 2D-to-3D spatial information transformation established by haptic system in haptic recognition of 2D images. The visual features of 2D images, including perspective, viewpoint, occlusion, texture gradient and hollow-out, affect the 2D-to-3D spatial information transformation in haptic recognition of 2D images mainly. These visual factors usually interfere with the recognition of 2D tactile images which are directly transformed from 2D visual images. Therefore, visual factors, such as perspective and viewpoint, cannot be directly transferred to tactile 2D images. Based on the findings of existing researches, a dual-imagery processing model is proposed to explain the mechanisms of 2D-to-3D spatial information transformation when touching 2D tangible images, and the cognitive mechanism concerning about how visual factors modulate the 2D-to-3D spatial information transformation. The following are key points of this model:

Firstly, the cognitive process of haptic recognition of 2D images consists of three modules: haptic perception, working memory and long-term memory. (1) The "haptic perception" module receives tactile and proprioceptive information, obtains the texture, shape and size information of the object, then forms the spatial relationship information of each part of the object, including perspective and viewpoint, by further sensory integration; (2) The "working memory" contains two sub-modules: Object-imagery-based sub-module forms the object imagery of the 2D images using the object information (texture, shape and size) offered by the "haptic perception", In contrast, spatial-imagery-based sub-module forms the spatial imagery of 2D images using the space information (spatial relationship, perspective, and viewpoint) offered by the "haptic perception" module; (3) The "long-term memory" module stores the individual's prior knowledge, experience, and representation of the objects and interacts with other two modules

Secondly, haptic recognition of 2D images depends on the coordination of object imagery and spatial imagery. Successful haptic recognition of 2D images requires the effective integration of object imagery and spatial imagery. Otherwise, the 2D images cannot be recognized by touching. The dual-imagery processing model could contribute to the further exploration of haptic recognition and its cognitive mechanism, and provide theoretical guidance for the design of 2D tangible images.

Key words: haptics, two-dimensional image, haptic recognition, perspective, viewpoint

中图分类号:

B842

覃缨惠, 於文苑, 傅小兰, 刘烨. (2022). 触觉二维图像识别中2D-3D空间信息转换的认知机制. 心理科学进展 , 30(8), 1804-1817.

QIN Yinghui, YU Wenyuan, FU Xiaolan, LIU Ye. (2022). Cognitive mechanisms of 2D-to-3D spatial information transformation in haptic recognition of 2D images. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(8), 1804-1817.

图/表 3

参考文献 87

[1]	龚江涛, 於文苑, 曲同, 刘烨, 傅小兰, 徐迎庆. (2018). 影响触觉图像识别因素的量化分析. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 30(8), 1438-1445. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1089.2018.16799 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1089.2018.16799
[2]	焦阳, 龚江涛, 徐迎庆. (2016). 盲人触觉图像显示器graile设计研究. 装饰, 273(1), 96-98. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZSHI.0.2016-01-031 doi: CNKI:SUN:ZSHI.0.2016-01-031
[3]	王葛彤, 席洁, 陈霓虹, 黄昌兵. (2021). 双眼视差的神经机制与知觉学习效应. 心理科学进展, 29(1), 56-69. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00056 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.00056
[4]	於文苑, 刘烨, 傅小兰, 龚江涛, 徐迎庆. (2019). 触觉二维图像识别的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 27(4), 611-622. doi: 10.3724/sp.J.1042.2019.00611 doi: 10.3724/sp.J.1042.2019.00611
[5]	Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., & Zohary E. (2002). Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cerebral Cortex, 12(11), 1202-1212. doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202 doi: 10.1093/cercor/12.11.1202 pmid: 12379608
[6]	Bara F., Gentaz E., & Valente D. (2018). The effect of tactile illustrations on comprehension of storybooks by three children with visual impairments: An exploratory study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(6), 759-765. doi: 10.1177/0145482X1811200610 doi: 10.1177/0145482X1811200610
[7]	Bauer C., Yazzolino L., Hirsch G., Cattaneo Z., Vecchi T., & Merabet L. B. (2015). Neural correlates associated with superior tactile symmetry perception in the early blind. Cortex, 63, 104-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.003 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.003 URL
[8]	Bergmann J., Genç E., Kohler A., Singer W., & Pearson J. (2016). Smaller primary visual cortex is associated with stronger, but less precise mental imagery. Cerebral Cortex, 26(9), 3838-3850. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv186 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv186 URL
[9]	Blajenkova O., Kozhevnikov M., & Motes M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239-263. doi: 10.1002/acp.1182 doi: 10.1002/acp.1182 URL
[10]	Braille Authority of North America. (2010). Guidelines and standards for tactile graphics. The Braille Authority of North America. Retrieved from http://www.brailleauthority.org/tg/web-manual/index.html
[11]	Cacciamani L., & Likova L. T. (2016). Tactile object familiarity in the blind brain reveals the supramodal perceptual-mnemonic nature of the perirhinal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 92. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00092 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00092 pmid: 27148002
[12]	Camponogara I., & Volcic R. (2019). Grasping adjustments to haptic, visual, and visuo-haptic object perturbations are contingent on the sensory modality. Journal of Neurophysiology, 122(6), 2614-2620. doi: 10.1152/jn.00452.2019 doi: 10.1152/jn.00452.2019 pmid: 31693442
[13]	Cavazos Quero L., Bartolomé J. I., & Cho J. (2021). Accessible visual artworks for blind and visually impaired people: Comparing a multimodal approach with tactile graphics. Electronics, 10(3), 297. doi: 10.3390/electronics10030297 doi: 10.3390/electronics10030297
[14]	Cornoldi C., Tinti C., Mammarella I. C., Re A. M., & Varotto D. (2009). Memory for an imagined pathway and strategy effects in sighted and in totally congenitally blind individuals. Acta Psychologica, 130(1), 11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.012 pmid: 19013547
[15]	de Borst A. W., & de Gelder B. (2016). fMRI-based multivariate pattern analyses reveal imagery modality and imagery content specific representations in primary somatosensory, motor and auditory cortices. Cerebral Cortex, 27(8), 3994-4009. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw211 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw211
[16]	de Borst A. W., & de Gelder B. (2019). Mental imagery follows similar cortical reorganization as perception: Intra-modal and cross-modal plasticity in congenitally blind. Cerebral Cortex, 29(7), 2859-2875. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy151 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy151
[17]	Delhaye B. P., Long K. H., & Bensmaia S. J. (2018). Neural basis of touch and proprioception in primate cortex. Comprehensive Physiology, 8(4), 1575-1602. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170033 doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170033 pmid: 30215864
[18]	Desmarais G., Meade M., Wells T., & Nadeau M. (2017). Visuo-haptic integration in object identification using novel objects. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 79(8), 2478-2498. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1382-x doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1382-x
[19]	Dijkstra N., Bosch S. E., & van Gerven M. A. J. (2017). Vividness of visual imagery depends on the neural overlap with perception in visual areas. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(5), 1367-1373. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016 URL
[20]	Eck J., Kaas A. L., Mulders J. L., Hausfeld L., Kourtzi Z., & Goebel R. (2016). The effect of task instruction on haptic texture processing: The neural underpinning of roughness and spatial density perception. Cerebral Cortex, 26(1), 384-401. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu294 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu294 URL
[21]	Ernst M. O., & Banks M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433. doi: 10.1038/415429a doi: 10.1038/415429a URL
[22]	Flaxman S. R., Bourne R. R. A., Resnikoff S., Ackland P., Braithwaite T., Cicinelli M. V.,... Taylor H. R. (2017). Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 5(12),1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30393-5 doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30393-5
[23]	Freud E., Culham J. C., Plaut D. C., & Behrmann M. (2017). The large-scale organization of shape processing in the ventral and dorsal pathways. Elife, 6, 27576. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27576 doi: 10.7554/eLife.27576
[24]	Garcia G. G., Grau R. R., Aldrich F. K., & Cheng P. C. (2020). Multi-touch interaction data analysis system (MIDAS) for 2-D tactile display research. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 813-837. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01279-1 doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01279-1 URL
[25]	Gong J., Yu W., Ni L., Jiao Y., Liu Y., Fu X., & Xu Y. (2020, October). ”I can’t name it, but I can perceive it” conceptual and operational design of ”tactile accuracy” assisting tactile image cognition. Paper presented at the The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Virtual Event, Greece. doi: 10.1145/3373625.3417015 doi: 10.1145/3373625.3417015
[26]	Gori M., Del Viva M., Sandini G., & Burr D. C. (2008). Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology, 18(9), 694-698. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.036 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.036 URL
[27]	Heed T., Buchholz V. N., Engel A. K., & Röder B. (2015). Tactile remapping: From coordinate transformation to integration in sensorimotor processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.001 URL
[28]	Heller M. A., Brackett D. D., Scroggs E., Steffen H., Heatherly K., & Salik S. (2002). Tangible pictures: Viewpoint effects and linear perspective in visually impaired people. Perception, 31(6), 747-769. doi: 10.1068/p3253 doi: 10.1068/p3253 URL
[29]	Heller M. A., Kennedy J. M., Clark A., McCarthy M., Borgert A., Wemple L.,... Riddle T. (2006). Viewpoint and orientation influence picture recognition in the blind. Perception, 35(10), 1397-1420. doi: 10.1068/p5460 doi: 10.1068/p5460 URL
[30]	Heller M., Riddle T., Fulkerson E., Wemple L., Walk A., Guthrie S.,... Klaus P. (2009). The influence of viewpoint and object detail in blind people when matching pictures to complex objects. Perception, 38, 1234-1250. doi: 10.1068/p5596 doi: 10.1068/p5596 URL
[31]	Henson R. N. A., Cansino S., Herron J. E., Robb W. G. K., & Rugg M. D. (2003). A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? Hippocampus, 13(2), 301-304. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10117 doi: 10.1002/hipo.10117 pmid: 12699337
[32]	Hernandez-Perez R., Cuaya L. V., Rojas-Hortelano E., Reyes-Aguilar A., Concha L., & de Lafuente V. (2017). Tactile object categories can be decoded from the parietal and lateral-occipital cortices. Neuroscience, 352, 226-235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.038 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.038 URL
[33]	Höffler T. N., Koć-Januchta M., & Leutner D. (2017). More evidence for three types of cognitive style: Validating the object-spatial imagery and verbal questionnaire using eye tracking when learning with texts and pictures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 109-115. doi: 10.1002/acp.3300 doi: 10.1002/acp.3300 pmid: 28163372
[34]	Holdstock J. S., Hocking J., Notley P., Devlin J. T., & Price C. J. (2009). Integrating visual and tactile information in the perirhinal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2993-3000. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp073 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp073 URL
[35]	Kaas A. L., van Mier H., Visser M., & Goebel R. (2013). The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1148-1162. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21500 doi: 10.1002/hbm.21500 URL
[36]	Katus T., & Eimer M. (2020a). Retrospective selection in visual and tactile working memory is mediated by shared control mechanisms. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(3), 546-557. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01492 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01492 URL
[37]	Katus T., & Eimer M. (2020b). Shifts of spatial attention in visual and tactile working memory are controlled by independent modality-specific mechanisms. Cerebral Cortex, 30(1), 296-310. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz088 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz088 URL
[38]	Kennedy J. M., & Juricevic I. (2016). Foreshortening, convergence and drawings from a blind adult. Perception, 35(6), 847-851. doi: 10.1068/p5316 doi: 10.1068/p5316 URL
[39]	Kim S., Park E.-S., & Ryu E.-S. (2019). Multimedia vision for the visually impaired through 2d multiarray braille display. Applied Sciences, 9(5), 878. doi: 10.3390/app9050878 doi: 10.3390/app9050878
[40]	Kitada R. (2016). The brain network for haptic object recogniton. In Kajimoto H., Saga S., Konyo M. (Eds) Pervasive Haptics (pp. 21-37). Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55772-2_2
[41]	Kitada R., Ng M., Tan Z. Y., Lee X. E., & Kochiyama T. (2021). Physical correlates of human-like softness elicit high tactile pleasantness. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 16510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96044-w doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96044-w
[42]	Klatzky R. L., & Lederman S. J. (1988). The intelligent hand. In G. H. Bower (Ed.). Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 121-151): Elsevier Science & Technology. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60027-4 doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60027-4
[43]	Klatzky R. L., & Lederman S. J. (2011). Haptic object perception: Spatial dimensionality and relation to vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1581), 3097-3105. doi: 10.1098/ rstb.2011.0153 doi: 10.1098/ rstb.2011.0153 URL
[44]	Lacey S., Lin J. B., & Sathian K. (2011). Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations. Experimental Brain Research, 213(2), 267-273. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2623-1 doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2623-1 URL
[45]	Lacey S., Pappas M., Kreps A., Lee K., & Sathian K. (2009). Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo- haptic object representations. Experimental Brain Research, 198(2-3), 329-337. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1856-8 doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1856-8 URL
[46]	Lacey S., Peters A., & Sathian K. (2007). Cross-modal object recognition is viewpoint-independent. PloS One, 2(9), e890-e890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000890 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000890
[47]	Lacey S., & Sathian K. (2014). Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00730 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00730
[48]	Lebaz S., Jouffrais C., & Picard D. (2012). Haptic identification of raised-line drawings: High visuospatial imagers outperform low visuospatial imagers. Psychological Research, 76(5), 667-675. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0351-6 doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0351-6 URL
[49]	Lebreton P. (2016). Assessing human depth perception for 2D and 3D stereoscopic images and video and its relation with the overall 3D QoE. (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Technische Universitaet Berlin, Germany. doi: 10.14279/depositonce-5126 doi: 10.14279/depositonce-5126
[50]	Lederman S. J., Klatzky R. L., Chataway C., & Summers C. D. (1990). Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 47(1), 54-64. doi: 10.3758/BF03208164 doi: 10.3758/BF03208164 URL
[51]	Likova L. T. (2012). Drawing enhances cross-modal memory plasticity in the human brain: A case study in a totally blind adult. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 44-44. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00044 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00044 pmid: 22593738
[52]	Loomis J. M., Klatzky R. L., & Lederman S. J. (1991). Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view. Perception, 20(2), 167-177. doi: 10.1068/p200167 doi: 10.1068/p200167 pmid: 1745589
[53]	Mazella A., Albaret J.-M., & Picard D. (2018). The development of haptic processing skills from childhood to adulthood by means of two-dimensional materials. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 48-57. doi: 10.1037/cep0000121 doi: 10.1037/cep0000121 URL
[54]	Newell F., Ernst M., Tjan B., & Bülthoff H. (2001). Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 37-42. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280. 00307 doi: 10.1111/1467-9280. 00307 pmid: 11294226
[55]	Nguyen A. M., Ferro T. J., & Pawluk D. T. V. (2018). Effectiveness of using local cues to indicate perspective in tactile diagrams for people with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(6), 731-744. doi: 10.1177/0145482X1811200608 doi: 10.1177/0145482X1811200608
[56]	Occelli V., Lacey S., Stephens C., John T., & Sathian K. (2016). Haptic object recognition is view-independent in early blind but not sighted people. Perception, 45(3), 337-345. doi: 10.1177/0301006615614489 doi: 10.1177/0301006615614489 URL
[57]	Overvliet K. E., & Krampe R. T. (2018). Haptic two- dimensional shape identification in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 567-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.024 doi: S0022-0965(16)30272-7 pmid: 29102839
[58]	Overvliet K. E., Wagemans J., & Krampe R. T. (2013). The effects of aging on haptic 2D shape recognition. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1057-1069. doi: 10.1037/a0033415 doi: 10.1037/a0033415 pmid: 23978010
[59]	Pasqualotto A., Ng M., Tan Z. Y., & Kitada R. (2020). Tactile perception of pleasantness in relation to perceived softness. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 11189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68034-x doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68034-x
[60]	Pearson J. (2019). The human imagination: The cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 624-634. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 pmid: 31384033
[61]	Perini F., Powell T., Watt S. J., & Downing P. E. (2020). Neural representations of haptic object size in the human brain revealed by multivoxel fMRI patterns. Journal of Neurophysiology, 124(1), 218-231. doi: 10.1152/jn.00160.2020 doi: 10.1152/jn.00160.2020 URL
[62]	Picard D., Lebaz S., Jouffrais C., & Monnier C. (2010). Haptic recognition of two-dimensional raised-line patterns by early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded sighted adults. Perception, 39(2), 224-235. doi: 10.1068/p6527 doi: 10.1068/p6527 URL
[63]	Prather S. C., Votaw J. R., & Sathian K. (2004). Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception. Neuropsychologia, 42(8), 1079-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.013 pmid: 15093147
[64]	Qian J., & Petrov Y. (2016). A depth illusion supports the model of general object constancy: Size and depth constancies related by a same distance-scaling factor. Vision Research, 129, 77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.015 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.09.015 URL
[65]	Roldan S. M. (2017). Object recognition in mental representations: Directions for exploring diagnostic features through visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(5), 833-833. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00833 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00833 URL
[66]	Sathian K. (2016). Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 116(4), 1795-1806. doi: 10.1152/jn.00546.2015 doi: 10.1152/jn.00546.2015 pmid: 27440247
[67]	Sathian K., Lacey S., Stilla R., Gibson G. O., Deshpande G., Hu X.,... Glielmi C. (2011). Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information. NeuroImage, 57(2), 462-475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.001 pmid: 21575727
[68]	Senna I., Andres E., McKyton A., Ben-Zion I., Zohary E., & Ernst M. O. (2021). Development of multisensory integration following prolonged early-onset visual deprivation. Current Biology, 31(21), 4879-4885.e4876. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.060 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.060 URL
[69]	Sheldon S., Amaral R., & Levine B. (2017). Individual differences in visual imagery determine how event information is remembered. Memory, 25(3), 360-369. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1178777 doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1178777 pmid: 27149558
[70]	Sinha P., & Kalia A. A. (2012). Tactile picture recognition: Errors are in shape acquistion or object matching? Seeing Perceiving, 25(3-4), 287-302. doi: 10.1163/187847511X584443 doi: 10.1163/187847511X584443 pmid: 21871145
[71]	Stoesz M. R., Zhang M., Weisser V. D., Prather S. C., Mao H., & Sathian K. (2003). Neural networks active during tactile form perception: Common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(1-2),41-49. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00123-5 doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00123-5 pmid: 14511835
[72]	Szubielska M., Niestorowicz E., & Marek B. (2019). The relevance of object size to the recognizability of drawings by individuals with congenital blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(3), 295-310. doi: 10.1177/0145482x19860015 doi: 10.1177/0145482x19860015
[73]	Tarr M. J., & Hayward W. G. (2017). The concurrent encoding of viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent information in visual object recognition. Visual Cognition, 25(1-3), 100-121. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1324933 doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1324933 URL
[74]	Theurel A., Witt A., Claudet P., Hatwell Y., & Gentaz E. (2013). Tactile picture recognition by early blind children: The effect of illustration technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(3), 233-240. doi: 10.1037/a0034255 doi: 10.1037/a0034255 URL
[75]	Thompson L. J., Chronicle E. P., & Collins A. F. (2006). Enhancing 2-D tactile picture design from knowledge of 3-D haptic object recognition. European Psychologist, 11(2), 110-118. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.110 doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.110 URL
[76]	Toprak S., Navarro-Guerrero N., & Wermter S. (2018). Evaluating integration strategies for visuo-haptic object recognition. Cognitive Computation, 10(3), 408-425. doi: 10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7 doi: 10.1007/s12559-017-9536-7 pmid: 29881470
[77]	Vinter A., Bonin P., & Morgan P. (2018). The severity of the visual impairment and practice matter for drawing ability in children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 78, 15-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.04.027 doi: S0891-4222(18)30103-3 pmid: 29730506
[78]	Vinter A., Orlandi O., & Morgan P. (2020). Identification of textured tactile pictures in visually impaired and blindfolded sighted children. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00345 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00345 pmid: 32210879
[79]	Wan C., Cai P., Guo X., Wang M., Matsuhisa N., Yang L., Lv Z., Luo Y., Loh X. J., & Chen X. (2020). An artificial sensory neuron with visual-haptic fusion. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4602. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020- 18375-y doi: 10.1038/s41467-020- 18375-y URL
[80]	Withagen A., Kappers A. M. L., Vervloed M. P. J., Knoors H., & Verhoeven L. (2013). The use of exploratory procedures by blind and sighted adults and children. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1451-1464. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0479-0 doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0479-0
[81]	Woods A. T., Moore A., & Newell F. N. (2008). Canonical views in haptic object perception. Perception, 37(12), 1867-1878. doi: 10.1068/p6038 doi: 10.1068/p6038 URL
[82]	Yang J., Yu Y., Kunita A., Huang Q., Wu J., Sawamoto N., & Fukuyama H. (2014). Tactile priming modulates the activation of the fronto-parietal circuit during tactile angle match and non-match processing: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 926-926. doi: 10.3389/fnhum. 2014.00926 doi: 10.3389/fnhum. 2014.00926
[83]	Yasaka K., Mori T., Yamaguchi M., & Kaba H. (2019). Representations of microgeometric tactile information during object recognition. Cognitive Processing, 20(1), 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0892-3 doi: 10.1007/s10339-018-0892-3 URL
[84]	Yau J. M., Kim S. S., Thakur P. H., & Bensmaia S. J. (2016). Feeling form: The neural basis of haptic shape perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 115(2), 631-642. doi: 10.1152/jn.00598.2015 doi: 10.1152/jn.00598.2015 URL
[85]	Yoshida T., Yamaguchi A., Tsutsui H., & Wake T. (2015). Tactile search for change has less memory than visual search for change. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77(4), 1200-1211. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0829-6 doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0829-6
[86]	Yu J., Wu Q., Yang J., Takahashi S., Ejima Y., & Wu J. (2017, August). A study of shape discrimination for tactile guide maps. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) (pp. 565-570). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICMA.2017.8015879 doi: 10.1109/ICMA.2017.8015879
[87]	Zhang Q., & Li S. (2020). The roles of spatial frequency in category-level visual search of real-world scenes. PsyCh Journal, 9(1), 44-55. doi: 10.1002/pchj.294 doi: 10.1002/pchj.294 pmid: 31155857