心理科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 711-725.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00711
收稿日期:
2018-01-18
出版日期:
2019-04-15
发布日期:
2019-02-22
通讯作者:
郎艺
E-mail:langyi@bfsu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHANG Hongyu1, LI Wen1, LANG Yi2()
Received:
2018-01-18
Online:
2019-04-15
Published:
2019-02-22
Contact:
LANG Yi
E-mail:langyi@bfsu.edu.cn
摘要:
根据调节焦点理论, 个体在追求目标和选择行动策略的过程中存在两种调节焦点:促进型调节焦点的个体以利益最大化为目标, 倾向用“接近式”的方式达成目标; 防御型调节焦点的个体以损失最小化为目标, 倾向用“避免式”的方式达成目标。近年来, 调节焦点理论在领导力领域的研究中得到了广泛应用, 但关于两种调节焦点之间的关系及两者共同作用的研究却十分稀少。在回顾调节焦点在领导力领域研究的应用现状的基础上, 本文指出了矛盾视角的必要性和可行性, 并基于矛盾理论, 提出了未来研究的发展方向。
中图分类号:
张宏宇, 李文, 郎艺. (2019). 矛盾视角下调节焦点在领导力领域的应用. 心理科学进展 , 27(4), 711-725.
ZHANG Hongyu, LI Wen, LANG Yi. (2019). Regulatory focus in leadership research: From the perspective of paradox theory. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(4), 711-725.
促进焦点 | 防御焦点 | |
---|---|---|
需求层次 | 成长和自我实现需要 | 安全需要 |
核心关注点 | 我将得到什么 | 我将失去什么 |
期望的目标状态 | 成长、进步和有所突破 | 稳定、安全和责任 |
自我导向 | 理想自我导向 | 应该自我导向 |
结果敏感 倾向 | “获取” vs. “没有获取” | “失去” vs. “没有失去” |
目标导向 | 最大化“获取” | 最大化“没有失去” |
担心侧重点 | 错过 | 错误 |
情绪 | 从高兴到沮丧 | 从不安到平静 |
表1 促进焦点和防御焦点的比较
促进焦点 | 防御焦点 | |
---|---|---|
需求层次 | 成长和自我实现需要 | 安全需要 |
核心关注点 | 我将得到什么 | 我将失去什么 |
期望的目标状态 | 成长、进步和有所突破 | 稳定、安全和责任 |
自我导向 | 理想自我导向 | 应该自我导向 |
结果敏感 倾向 | “获取” vs. “没有获取” | “失去” vs. “没有失去” |
目标导向 | 最大化“获取” | 最大化“没有失去” |
担心侧重点 | 错过 | 错误 |
情绪 | 从高兴到沮丧 | 从不安到平静 |
使用量表 | 文章作者 | 相关性 |
---|---|---|
工作情境调节焦点量表 (Regulatory Focus at Work Scale; | 0.53** | |
0.01 | ||
工作调节焦点量表 (Work Regulatory Focus Scale; | 0.05 | |
0.15 | ||
0.25* | ||
0.08 | ||
0.37** | ||
调节焦点问卷 (Regulatory Focus Questionnaire; | 0.08 | |
-0.08 | ||
一般调节焦点量表 (General Regulatory Focus Scale; | 0.37 | |
-0.10 | ||
0.35** | ||
0.13 |
表2 促进焦点与防御焦点相关性的实证结果总结
使用量表 | 文章作者 | 相关性 |
---|---|---|
工作情境调节焦点量表 (Regulatory Focus at Work Scale; | 0.53** | |
0.01 | ||
工作调节焦点量表 (Work Regulatory Focus Scale; | 0.05 | |
0.15 | ||
0.25* | ||
0.08 | ||
0.37** | ||
调节焦点问卷 (Regulatory Focus Questionnaire; | 0.08 | |
-0.08 | ||
一般调节焦点量表 (General Regulatory Focus Scale; | 0.37 | |
-0.10 | ||
0.35** | ||
0.13 |
[1] |
曹元坤, 徐红丹 . ( 2017). 调节焦点理论在组织管理中的应用述评. 管理学报, 14 (8), 1254-1262.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2017.08.017 URL |
[2] |
雷星晖, 单志汶, 苏涛永, 杨元飞 . ( 2015). 谦卑型领导行为对员工创造力的影响研究. 管理科学, 28 (2), 115-125.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2015.02.011 URL |
[3] |
李磊, 尚玉钒 . ( 2011). 基于调节焦点理论的领导对下属创造力影响机理研究. 南开管理评论, 14 (5), 4-11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.05.002 URL |
[4] |
毛畅果 . ( 2017). 调节焦点理论: 组织管理中的应用. 心理科学进展, 25 (4), 682-690.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00682 URL |
[5] | 尚玉钒, 李磊 . ( 2015). 领导行为示范、 工作复杂性、 工作调节焦点与创造力. 科学学与科学技术管理, 36 (6), 147-158. |
[6] |
夏绪梅, 纪晓阳 . ( 2017). 辱虐管理对员工创新行为的影响——心理授权的中介作用. 西安财经学院学报, 30, (2), 62-67.
doi: 10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.20170315.001 URL |
[7] | 许灏颖, 杜晨朵, 王震 . ( 2014). 道德领导对员工越轨行为的影响: 道德调节焦点和道德认同的作用. 中国人力资源开发, (11), 38-45. |
[8] |
许晟 . ( 2018). 调节焦点视角员工追随选择分化: 前因与后果的影响机制. 心理科学进展, 26 (3), 400-410.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00400 URL |
[9] | 郑雯, 汪玲, 方平, 李迪斯 . ( 2015). 如何道歉更有效: 调节聚焦与信息框架的作用. 心理科学, 38 (1), 166-171. |
[10] |
Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., & Levine D. I . ( 1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10 (1), 43-68.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 URL |
[11] |
Adomako S., Opoku R. A., & Frimpong K . ( 2017). The moderating influence of competitive intensity on the relationship between CEOs' regulatory foci and SME internationalization. Journal of International Management, 23 (3), 268-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2017.02.001 URL |
[12] |
Ahmadi S., Khanagha S., Berchicci L., & Jansen J. J . ( 2017). Are managers motivated to explore in the face of a new technological change? The role of regulatory focus, fit, and complexity of decision-making. Journal of Management Studies, 54 (2), 209-237.
doi: 10.1111/joms.12257 URL |
[13] | Andriopoulos C., &Lewis M.W . ( 2009). Exploitation- exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20 (4), 696-717. |
[14] |
Aryee S., &Hsiung H.H . ( 2016). Regulatory focus and safety outcomes: An examination of the mediating influence of safety behavior. Safety Science, 86, 27-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.011 URL |
[15] | Ashforth B.E., &Reingen P.H . ( 2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59 (3), 474-516. |
[16] |
Auh S.., &Menguc B. ( 2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58 (12), 1652-1661.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007 URL |
[17] | Bass B.M . ( 1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics, 13 (3), 26-40. |
[18] |
Beckman C.M . ( 2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 741-758.
doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083030 URL |
[19] | Beech N., Burns H., De Caestecker L., MacIntosh R., & MacLean D . ( 2004). Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations, 57 (10), 1313-1332. |
[20] |
Boal K.B., &Hooijberg R. ( 2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11 (4), 515-549.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6 URL |
[21] |
Chen Y. S., Wen Z. L., & Ye M. L . ( 2017). Exploring profiles of work regulatory focus: A person-centered approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 116 (1), 16-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.019 URL |
[22] |
Chiu C. Y., Owens B. P., & Tesluk P. E . ( 2016). Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101 (12), 1705-1720.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000159 URL pmid: 27618409 |
[23] | Cooper J . ( 2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. |
[24] |
Crowe E., &Higgins E.T . ( 1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision- making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69 (2), 117-132.
doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.2675 URL |
[25] | Das T.K., &Kumar R. ( 2011). Regulatory focus and opportunism in the alliance development process. Journal of Management, 37 (3), 682-708. |
[26] |
De Jong, K., & De Goede M. ( 2015). Why do some therapists not deal with outcome monitoring feedback? A feasibility study on the effect of regulatory focus and person-organization fit on attitude and outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 25 (6), 661-668.
doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1076198 URL pmid: 26337457 |
[27] |
Delegach M., Kark R., Katz-Navon T., & Van Dijk D . ( 2017). A focus on commitment: The roles of transformational and transactional leadership and self-regulatory focus in fostering organizational and safety commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26 (5), 724-740.
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1345884 URL |
[28] | Duncan R.B . ( 1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1, 167-188. |
[29] | Festinger L . ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston. IL: Row, Peterson. |
[30] | Fransen M.L., & ter Hoeven C.L . ( 2013). Matching the message: The role of regulatory fit in negative managerial communication. Communication Research, 40 (6), 818-837. |
[31] |
Freeman D., &Siegfried R.L . ( 2015). Entrepreneurial leadership in the context of company start-up and growth. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8 (4), 35-39.
doi: 10.1002/jls.21351 URL |
[32] |
Freitas A. L., Liberman N., Salovey P., & Higgins E. T . ( 2002). When to begin? Regulatory focus and initiating goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (1), 121-130.
doi: 10.1177/0146167202281011 URL |
[33] |
Gaim M., &Wåhlin N. ( 2016). In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32 (1), 33-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2015.12.002 URL |
[34] | Gamache D. L., McNamara G., Mannor M. J., & Johnson R. E . ( 2015). Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions . Academy of Management Journal, 58 (4), 1261-1282. |
[35] | García-Granero A., Fernández-Mesa A., Jansen J. J. P., & Vega-Jurado J . ( 2018). Top management team diversity and ambidexterity: The contingent role of shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust. Long Range Planning, 51, (6), 881-893. |
[36] |
Gebert D., Boerner S., & Kearney E . ( 2010). Fostering team innovation: Why is it important to combine opposing action strategies? Organization Science, 21 (3), 593-608.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0485 URL |
[37] | Gibson C.B., &Birkinshaw J. ( 2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (2), 209-226. |
[38] |
Gorman C. A., Meriac J. P., Overstreet B. L., Apodaca S., McIntyre A. L., Park P., & Godbey J. N . ( 2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80 (1), 160-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.005 URL |
[39] |
Halevi M. Y., Carmeli A., & Brueller N. N . ( 2015). Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT behavioral integration and environmental dynamism. Human Resource Management, 54 (S1), 223-238.
doi: 10.1002/hrm.21665 URL |
[40] |
Hamstra M. R. W., Sassenberg K., Van Yperen N. W., & Wisse B . ( 2014). Followers feel valued—When leaders' regulatory focus makes leaders exhibit behavior that fits followers' regulatory focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 34-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.003 URL |
[41] |
Hamstra M. R. W., Van Yperen N. W., Wisse B., & Sassenberg K . ( 2014). On the perceived effectiveness of transformational-transactional leadership: The role of encouraged strategies and followers' regulatory focus. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44 (6), 643-656.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2027 URL |
[42] |
Hatch M.J . ( 1997). Irony and the social construction of contradiction in the humor of a management team . Organization Science, 8 (3), 275-288.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.8.3.275 URL |
[43] | Heavey C., &Simsek Z. ( 2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43 (3), 919-945. |
[44] |
Heine S.J., &Buchtel E.E . ( 2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60 (1), 369-394.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163655 URL pmid: 19035827 |
[45] | Higgins E.T . ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52 (12), 1280-1300. |
[46] | Higgins E. T. ( 1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York, NY: Academic Press. |
[47] | Higgins E.T . ( 2001). Promotion and prevention experiences: Relating emotions to nonemotional motivational states. In J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Handbook of affect and social cognition( pp. 186-211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[48] | Higgins E. T., & Spiegel, S. ( 2004) . Promotion and prevention strategies for self- regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 171-187). New York: Guilford Press. |
[49] |
Higgins E. T., Friedman R. S., Harlow R. E., Idson L. C., Ayduk O. N., & Taylor A . ( 2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1), 3-23.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.27 URL |
[50] |
Higgins E. T., Roney C. J., Crowe E., & Hymes C . ( 1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (2), 276-286.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.276 URL pmid: 8195986 |
[51] | Jay J .( 2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56, (1), 137-159. |
[52] |
Jin X. T., Wang L., & Dong H. Z . ( 2016). The relationship between self-construal and creativity — Regulatory focus as moderator. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 282-288.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.044 URL |
[53] | Johnson J.D . ( 2016). Tensions between teams and their leaders. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11 (3), 117-126. |
[54] |
Johnson R. E., Chang C. H., & Lord R. G . ( 2006). Moving from cognition to behavior: What the research says. Psychological Bulletin, 132 (3), 381-415.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.381 URL pmid: 16719567 |
[55] |
Johnson R. E., Chang C. H., Meyer T., Lanaj K., & Way J . ( 2013). Approaching success or avoiding failure? Approach and avoidance motives in the work domain. European Journal of Personality, 27 (5), 424-441.
doi: 10.1002/per.1883 URL |
[56] |
Johnson R. E., King D. D., Lin S. H. J., Scott B. A., Walker E. M. J., & Wang M . ( 2017). Regulatory focus trickle-down: How leader regulatory focus and behavior shape follower regulatory focus. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 140, 29-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.03.002 URL |
[57] |
Johnson R. E., Lin S. H. J., Kark R., Van Dijk D., King D. D., & Esformes E . ( 2017). Consequences of regulatory fit for leader-follower relationship quality and commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90 (3), 379-406.
doi: 10.1111/joop.12176 URL |
[58] |
Kammerlander N., Burger D., Fust A., & Fueglistaller U . ( 2015). Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of CEOs' regulatory focus. Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (4), 582-602.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.004 URL |
[59] |
Kark R., & Van Dijk D. ( 2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 500-528.
doi: 10.2307/20159313 URL |
[60] |
Kark R., Dijk D. V., & Vashdi D. R . ( 2018). Motivated or demotivated to be creative: The role of self-regulatory focus in transformational and transactional leadership processes. Applied Psychology, 67 (1), 186-224.
doi: 10.1111/apps.12122 URL |
[61] |
Keller J., &Bless H. ( 2006). Regulatory fit and cognitive performance: The interactive effect of chronic and situationally induced self-regulatory mechanisms on test performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36 (3), 393-405.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.307 URL |
[62] |
Khazanchi S., Lewis M. W., & Boyer K. K . ( 2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (4), 871-884.
doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003 URL |
[63] |
Klarner P., &Raisch S. ( 2013). Move to the beat— Rhythms of change and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (1), 160-184.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0767 URL |
[64] |
Lanaj K., Chang C. H., & Johnson R. E . ( 2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta- analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138 (5), 998-1034
doi: 10.1037/a0027723 URL pmid: 22468880 |
[65] |
Lavie D., &Rosenkopf L. ( 2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4), 797-818.
doi: 10.2307/20159799 URL |
[66] | Lempiälä T., &Vanharanta O . ( 2018). Rethinking the control-freedom paradox in innovation: Toward a multifaceted understanding of creative freedom. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54, (1), 62-87. |
[67] |
Lewis M.W . ( 2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 760-776.
doi: 10.2307/259204 URL |
[68] | Lewis M.W., &Smith W.K . ( 2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50 (2), 127-149. |
[69] | Li G. Q., Liu H. X., Shang Y. F., & Xi Y. M . ( 2014). Leader feedback and knowledge sharing: A regulatory focus theory perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 20 (6), 749-763. |
[70] |
Lockwood P., Jordan C. H., & Kunda Z . ( 2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4), 854-864.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854 pmid: 12374440 |
[71] |
Lüscher L.S., &Lewis M.W . ( 2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (2), 221-240.
doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.31767217 URL |
[72] |
Memmert D., Plessner H., Hüttermann S., Froese G., Peterhänsel C., & Unkelbach C . ( 2015). Collective fit increases team performances: Extending regulatory fit from individuals to dyadic teams. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45 (5), 274-281.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.12294 URL |
[73] |
Nauta A., De Dreu C. K. W., & Van Der Vaart T. ( 2002). Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem-solving behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (2), 199-213.
doi: 10.1002/job.136 URL |
[74] |
Neubert M. J., Kacmar K. M., Carlson D. S., Chonko L. B., & Roberts J. A . ( 2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the influence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (6), 1220-1233.
doi: 10.1037/a0012695 URL pmid: 19025244 |
[75] |
Park T. Y., Kim S., & Sung L. K . ( 2017). Fair pay dispersion: A regulatory focus theory view. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142 (1), 1-11.
doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.14969abstract URL |
[76] |
Peng K.P., &Nisbett R.E . ( 1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54 (9), 741-754.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.9.741 URL |
[77] |
Poole M.S., & Van De Ven A.H . ( 1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 562-578.
doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4308389 URL |
[78] |
Qiu J., Donaldson L., & Luo B. N . ( 2012). The benefits of persisting with paradigms in organizational research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 26 (1), 93-104.
doi: 10.5465/amp.2011.0125 URL |
[79] |
Sacramento C. A., Fay D., & West M. A . ( 2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121 (2), 141-157.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.008 URL |
[80] | Saeidipour B., Kazemi S. M. M., Mohamadabadi A. J., & Azizi M . ( 2016). The study of the relationship between transformative leadership and individual creativity of staff in organizations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (4S1), 234-241. |
[81] |
Schad J., Lewis M. W., Raisch S., & Smith W. K . ( 2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10 (1), 5-64.
doi: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162422 URL |
[82] |
Schmitt A., &Raisch S. ( 2013). Corporate turnarounds: The duality of retrenchment and recovery. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (7), 1216-1244.
doi: 10.1111/joms.12045 URL |
[83] | Schneider K.J . ( 1990). The paradoxical self: Toward an understanding of our contradictory nature. New York: Insight Books |
[84] | Schuh S. C., Van Quaquebeke N., Göritz A. S., Xin K. R., De Cremer D., & Van Dick R . ( 2016). Mixed feelings, mixed blessing? How ambivalence in organizational identification relates to employees’ regulatory focus and citizenship behaviors. Human Relations, 69 (12), 2224-2249. |
[85] | Shin Y., Kim M., Choi J. N., & Lee S. H . ( 2016). Does team culture matter? Roles of team culture and collective regulatory focus in team task and creative performance. Group & Organization Management, 41 (2), 232-265. |
[86] |
Simmons S. A., Carr J. C., Hsu D. K., & Shu C . ( 2016). The regulatory fit of serial entrepreneurship intentions. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65 (3), 603-627.
doi: 10.1111/apps.12070 URL |
[87] |
Smith W.K . ( 2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57 (6), 1592-1623.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0932 URL |
[88] |
Smith W.K., &Lewis M.W . ( 2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 381-403.
doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958 URL |
[89] |
Smith W.K., &Tushman M.L . ( 2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16 (5), 522-536.
doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 URL |
[90] | Smith W. K., Lewis M. W., & Tushman M. L . ( 2016). “Both/and” leadership. Harvard Business Review, 94 (5), 62-70. |
[91] |
Spencer-Rodgers J., Peng K., Wang L., & Hou Y . ( 2004). Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (11), 1416-1432.
doi: 10.1177/0146167204264243 URL pmid: 15448306 |
[92] | Stam D. A., Van Knippenberg D., & Wisse B . ( 2010). The role of regulatory fit in visionary leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31 (4), 499-518. |
[93] | Suedfeld P., Tetlock P. E., & Streufert S. ( 1992) . Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith (Eds.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analyses (pp. 393-400). New York: Cambridge University Press. |
[94] | Teece D.J . ( 2006). Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, 35 (8), 1131-1146. |
[95] |
Tuan Pham M., &Chang H.H . ( 2010). Regulatory focus, regulatory fit, and the search and consideration of choice alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 626-640.
doi: 10.1086/655668 URL |
[96] |
Tuncdogan A., Van Den Bosch F., & Volberda H . ( 2015). Regulatory focus as a psychological micro-foundation of leaders' exploration and exploitation activities. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (5), 838-850.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.004 URL |
[97] |
Tung F.C . ( 2016). Does transformational, ambidextrous, transactional leadership promote employee creativity? Mediating effects of empowerment and promotion focus. International Journal of Manpower, 37 (8), 1250-1263.
doi: 10.1108/IJM-09-2014-0177 URL |
[98] |
Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. A., Fenollosa A., Kleinbaum A. M., & McGrath D . ( 2007). Relevance and rigor: Executive education as a lever in shaping practice and research. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6 (3), 345-362.
doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2007.26361625 URL |
[99] | Vermunt J. K., & Magidson J .( 2002) . Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89-106). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. |
[100] | Wadhwa A., Freitas I. M. B., & Sarkar M. B . ( 2017). The paradox of openness and value protection strategies: Effect of extramural R&D on innovative performance. Organization Science, 28 (5), 873-893. |
[101] |
Wallace C., &Chen G .( 2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59 (3), 529-557.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00046.x URL |
[102] |
Wallace J. C., Little L. M., Hill A. D., & Ridge J. W . ( 2010). CEO regulatory foci, environmental dynamism, and small firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 48 (4), 580-604.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00309.x URL |
[103] |
Wang J., Wang L., Liu R. D., & Dong H. Z . ( 2017). How expected evaluation influences creativity: Regulatory focus as moderator. Motivation and Emotion, 41 (2), 147-157.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-016-9598-y URL |
[104] |
Zhang Y., Waldman D. A., Han Y. L., & Li X. B . ( 2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58 (2), 538-566.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0995 URL |
[1] | 肖素芳, 徐正丽. 领导纳谏内涵及其对工作行为的影响:基于调节焦点理论的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 697-708. |
[2] | 邹艳春, 章惠敏, 彭坚, 田一雯. 环保服务型领导:效果与机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(5): 827-839. |
[3] | 李倩, 李超凡, 龚诗阳, 周琦玮, 可祎. 多元文化经历对领导者能力及发展的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(9): 1922-1943. |
[4] | 陈晓, 谢彬, 彭坚, 聂琦. 职场孤独感的形成原因与作用机理:基于调节匹配理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(7): 1463-1481. |
[5] | 马冰, 杨蓉, 杜旌, 马贵梅. 居危思变?工作不安全感对创新行为的差异化影响?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(11): 2381-2394. |
[6] | 彭坚, 王震, 侯楠. 你和上司合拍吗?组织中的上下级匹配[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(2): 370-380. |
[7] | 许 晟. 调节焦点视角员工追随选择分化: 前因与后果的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 400-410. |
[8] | 吕鸿江, 韩承轩, 王道金. 领导者情绪智力对领导力效能影响的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 204-220. |
[9] | 毛畅果. 调节焦点理论:组织管理中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 682-690. |
[10] | 张志学;施俊琦;刘军. 组织行为与领导力研究的进展与前沿[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(3): 317-326. |
[11] | 曹花蕊;杜伟强;姚唐;范秀成. 顾客参与内容创造的个体心理和群体创造机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 746-759. |
[12] | 彭坚; 刘毅; 路红; 刘映杰; 吴伟炯. 情绪领导力:概念、测量、发展与模型建构[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1757-1769. |
[13] | 黄攸立;刘筱. 国外工作场所负面人格特质研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(1): 85-93. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||