心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12): 2145-2156.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.02145
• 研究前沿 • 上一篇 下一篇
邱俊杰; 黄希庭; 于晓琳
收稿日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
通讯作者:
基金资助:
QIU Junjie; HUANG Xiting; YU Xiaolin
Received:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
Supported by:
摘要： 节律时间期待指人们利用节律时间信息预测下一个刺激何时出现的能力。然而, 目前对于节律时间期待在多大程度上独立于注意控制过程还存在争议。对于该问题的探讨, 首先介绍了节律时间期待的相关理论, 包括动态注意理论和选择振荡理论, 并对这两种理论进行了比较分析。然后重点回顾了注意控制与节律时间期待相关的研究, 以往研究主要集中在听觉通道, 且节律刺激以较快的速度呈现。将来的研究可以关注其他感觉通道和不同时间尺度下, 注意控制是否影响节律时间期待。
关键词: 注意控制, 节律时间期待, 动态注意理论, 选择振荡假设
Abstract: Rhythmic temporal expectation (RTE) is defined as the ability to predict the point in time at which a sensory event will occur in rhythmic context. However, it remains currently unclear whether RTE is independent of attention control. In the present review, we firstly introduced and compared RTE related theories including dynamic attending theory and selective oscillation hypothesis. Then we reviewed studies on the relationship between attention control and RTE as well as their limitation. Finally, we proposed potential directions for the future research to investigate the effects of attention control on RTE.
Key words: attention control, rhythmic temporal expectation, dynamic attending theory, selective oscillation hypothesis
中图分类号:
B842
邱俊杰, 黄希庭, 于晓琳. (2017). 注意控制是否影响节律时间期待？. 心理科学进展 , 25(12), 2145-2156.
QIU Junjie, HUANG Xiting, YU Xiaolin. (2017). Does attention control affect rhythmic temporal expectation？. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(12), 2145-2156.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/ 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.02145
https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/Y2017/V25/I12/2145
