ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 348-356.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00348

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

西方心理学理论分类体系的反思与建构

姜永志   

  1. 内蒙古民族大学教育科学学院/民族教育研究所, 内蒙古通辽 028043
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-09 出版日期:2014-02-15 发布日期:2014-02-15
  • 通讯作者: 姜永志

The Reflection and Construction of Western Theoretical Classification Standard of Psychology

JIANG Yongzhi   

  1. (School of Education Sciences; Institute of Ethnic Education, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028042, Inner Mongolia, China)
  • Received:2013-07-09 Online:2014-02-15 Published:2014-02-15
  • Contact: JIANG Yongzhi

摘要:

当代心理学不仅在研究对象上存在着分歧, 而且在理论和方法论取向上也是四分五裂, 以至于很难用一种逻辑标准将各种理论体系进行归类。西方心理学大多数采用的是时间逻辑分类标准, 将理论体系的发展变化通过时间线索呈现, 这样的理论分类虽然能帮助我们理顺理论流派的发展脉络, 但我们往往因无法比较而抓不住各理论流派的主要特征。近年西方理论心理学界提出以因果关系逻辑为标准的理论分类体系, 将心理学理论分为机体中心论、环境中心论、社会中心论和关系中心论, 这种标准容易混淆某些相近的理论, 出现理论的多向归属和无归属现象。文章提出以内容特征为指向的分类体系, 包括意识中心倾向、行为中心倾向、机制中心倾向和意义中心倾向。这种分类标准能部分弥补因果关系分类体系和时间逻辑分类的不足。而进一步开发出能够适应理论快速发展变化的理论分类体系将成为未来理论心理学的研究领域之一。

关键词: 心理学, 理论, 构建, 分类, 因果关系

Abstract:

Contemporary psychology was not only divided in research object, but also on the orientation theory and methodology, so it is difficult to use a kind of logical criteria to classify the various theories. Western psychology often used the classification criteria of theory with time, This classification criteria of theory can help us to handle the development of the theory of sequence, but e are often unable to catch the main characteristics of the theories, due to it difficult to comparison. In recent years, western psychologists put forward on a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the causality. They think that psychology theory can be divided into organocentrism, envirocentrism, sociocentrism and noncentrism, this classification standard can make us understand the causality between theories, but often easily confused some relevant theories (such as ecological psychology and environmental psychology). This paper proposes a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the content directivity, including the orientation for consciousness, behavior, mechanisms, and meaning. This theoretical classification standard pay more attention is not the time sequence, also is not causality, but theory content directivity. In causality classification system, the most problems are that the multidirectional attribution and no attribution, due to definition is not clear of causality. This theoretical classification standard can make up for insufficient of other two kinds of classification criteria.

Key words: psychology, Theory, construction, theoretical classification, causality