ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 749-754.

• 研究方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

内隐联想测验新变式述评:基于规范性分析框架

李西营;王晓丽;赵玉焕;徐青林   

  1. (1河南师范大学教科院, 河南新乡 453007) (2北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875)
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 李西营

A Review on the New Variants of Implicit Association Test: Based on the Normative Analysis

LI Xi-Ying;WANG Xiao-Li;ZHAO Yu-Huan;XU Qing-Lin   

  1. (1 College of Education Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China)
    (2 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
  • Received:2010-11-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-15
  • Contact: LI Xi-Ying

摘要: 规范性分析详细描述了一个理想的、完美的内隐测验所应当具有的一系列标准和特征。通过对内隐联想测验的三个新变式在多大程度上符合这些规范性特征和标准的检验, 发现相对于简式内隐联想测验而言, 无再编码和单区组内隐联想测验更符合What标准和How标准, 未来的研究应更多关注内隐标准。

关键词: 规范性分析, 简式内隐联想测验, 无再编码内隐联想测验, 单区组内隐联想测验

Abstract: Normative Analysis details description of a series of criteria and characteristics that an ideal, perfect implicit association test should has. An examination of the extent to which the three new variants meet the criteria of Normative Analysis shows that IAT-FR and SB-IAT, comparing with BIAT, conforms more to What criterion and How criterion. Future researches should pay more attention to implicit criterion.

Key words: normative analysis, BIAT, IAT-FR, SB-IAT