ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 740-748.

• 研究方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

情境判断测验的效度研究述评

刘晓梅;卞冉;车宏生;王丽娜;邵燕萍   

  1. 北京市应用实验心理重点实验室, 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2010-12-17 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 卞冉

The Validity of Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Recent Research

LIU Xiao-Mei;BIAN Ran;CHE Hong-Sheng;WANG Li-Na;SHAO Yan-Ping   

  1. Beijing Key Lab for Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University,
    Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2010-12-17 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-15
  • Contact: BIAN Ran

PDF (PC)

1943

被引次数

16

摘要： 情境判断测验是一种为作答者呈现工作相关的典型情境以及该情境下可能的行为反应, 要求根据指导语提示进行选择或评价的测验形式。随着其理论和实践的发展, 研究者越来越关注情境判断测验的效度研究, 包括对其构想效度、效标关联效度和递增效度的探讨, 以及指导语类型、情境保真度以及计分方式等因素对其效度的影响。基于这些研究进展, 未来情境判断测验实践领域可能的方向是：(1)开发针对特定构想的情境判断测验; (2)结合具体构想选用相应的指导语; (3)应用作假和培训对效度影响的研究结果指导实践。

关键词: 情境判断测验, 构想效度, 效标关联效度, 递增效度

Abstract: Situational judgment tests are popular personnel selection tests in which the participants are presented the typical work-related situations and the probable behavioral responses, and are required to select or evaluate them according to the instructions. With the development of the theory and practices of SJTs, researchers are paying more attention to its validity, including construct validity, criterion-related validity, incremental validity, and impacts of instruction types, situational fidelity, scoring and other factors on its validity. On this premise, the future practices of situational judgment tests may include: (1) developing tests that are fit for specific constructs; (2) adopting appropriate instructions according to specific constructs; (3) applying the findings of the impacts of faking and training on validity to practices.

Key words: situational judgment test, construct validity, criterion-related validity, incremental validity