ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4): 706-713.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

读者的元理解监测为什么不精确?

陈启山;常蕤   

  1. (1华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州 510631) (2香港中文大学教育心理系,香港) (3香港考试及评核局,香港)
  • 收稿日期:2008-07-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-07-15 发布日期:2009-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈启山

Which Factors Constrain the Accuracy of Metacomprehension Monitoring?

CHEN Qi-Shan;CHANG Rui   

  1. (1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China) (2 Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China) (3 Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Hong Kong, China)
  • Received:2008-07-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-07-15 Published:2009-07-15
  • Contact: CHEN Qi-Shan

摘要:

精确的元理解监测对随后的元理解控制和阅读理解有重要作用,但是,通常情况下,读者的元理解监测并不精确。回顾20余年的元理解监测研究,发现元理解监测的精确性主要受制于阅读材料特征、监测线索与标准测验特征等因素。未来研究应注意元理解监测的判断形式、监测线索及评价标准对元理解监测精确性的交互关联影响。

关键词: 元理解监测, 判断形式, 监测线索, 标准测验, 精确性

Abstract: Accurate metacomprehension monitoring is crucial to effective metacomprehension control and reading comprehension. However, previous research has showed that metacomprehension monitoring accuracy is far less impressive. Hence, the key issues were addressed in our paper: what factors constrain the accuracy of metacomprehension monitoring. Variables that affected the accuracy of metacomprehension monitoring include that the characters of texts, the orienting activity that may provide cues for the monitoring judgment, and the types of criterion tests. Finally, we made some suggestions and presented new ideas in terms of the research of metacomprehension monitoring accuracy. In particular, we proposed that concordance among monitoring judgment forms, monitoring cues, and criterion test is the key for accurate metacomprehension monitoring.

Key words: metacomprehension monitoring, judgment forms, monitoring cues, criterion test, accuracy