ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2008, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 833-843.

• 主编特邀 •    下一篇

心理学能从自身的历史发展中学到什么?

Kurt Pawlik   

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Germany
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-15 发布日期:2008-11-15
  • 通讯作者: Kurt Pawlik

What Psychology Can Learn from Its History?

Kurt Pawlik   

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Germany
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-11-15 Published:2008-11-15
  • Contact: Kurt Pawlik

摘要: 本文在将心理学视为一门学科同时也是一种职业的前提下,超越各种具体条件和内容之上对心理学进行了总结。为此,考察了心理学在其发展中所体现的规律性,为了更好地表达,可以称之为从心理学历史所归纳出的“经验教训”。首先,从心理学作为一门科学的历史,可以总结出6条规律:1)心理学具有双重学科的地位。心理学既是一门科学,也是一门综合了生物学、社会学和文化学研究方法的“桥梁”学科;2)必须以实验学作为方法学的指南;3)基础研究和应用研究成果的整合利用;4)需要接受各方面的启发;5)全球化和本土化的相互补充;6)心理学在科学发展史中的学科力量。从将心理学视为一种职业来考察心理学发展史,还可以看到3条普遍的规律:1)职业化的快速发展;2)需要科学研究与实际应用之间的双向交流;3)跨学科专业知识的相互启发

关键词: 心理学, 历史, 经验教训

Abstract: The paper looks into regularities in the history of psychology as a science and as a profession that may stand generalization beyond conditions and contexts. Lacking a better term they are referred to as “lessons” to be deduced from history. As to the first, the history of psychology as a science, six such regularities are proposed: (i) dual status of psychology as a scientific discipline and a “bridge” science due, integrating biological, social and cultural methods; (ii) indispensability of empiricism as methodological guideline; (iii) cross-over utility of results from basic and applied research; (iv) need of alternative heuristic scales; (v) compatibility of universality and indigenization; and (vi) disciplinary strength of psychology in scientific development. Another additional 3 regularities are proposed from a examination of psychology’s history as a profession: (i) rapidity of professionalization; (ii) need of two-way transfer between academia and practice; and (iii) lessons to be learned from cross-disciplinary give and take of expertise

Key words: psychology, history, lesson

中图分类号: