评价中心的结构效度研究

心理科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 426-432.

评价中心的结构效度研究

王忠军,龙立荣

华中师范大学心理学院，武汉 430079

华中科技大学管理学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2005-07-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-05-15 发布日期:2006-05-15
通讯作者: 龙立荣

The Construct Validity of Assessment Center

Wang Zhongjun,Long Lirong

School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2005-07-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-05-15 Published:2006-05-15
Contact: Long Lirong

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 评价中心虽然具备很高的预测效度，但其结构效度指标却不太理想，如研究普遍发现其汇聚效度和区分效度较低。影响评价中心结构效度的因素众多，如评分维度因素（数量和类型）、评价者因素（培训方式和人员类型）、测评方法因素（情景导向特征、特质激活潜力、测评活动形式）以及系统的观察与评价程序。该文从上述因素出发，综述了评价中心结构效度的相关研究，总结了提高评价中心结构效度的措施，并指出了未来的研究方向

关键词: 评价中心, 结构效度, 汇聚效度, 区分效度

Abstract: Despite evidence of high predictive validity, research has shown less support for the construct validity of assessment center rating. Low convergent validity and low discriminant validity were consistently found in most studies. Many factors influence construct validity of assessment center, eg. rating dimension factor(number and types), assessor factor(types of assessor and training), assessment method factor(situational specificity, trait-activation potential, assessment exercises), systematic observation and evaluation procedures. This article review related researches about all those factors mentioned above, and summarize recommendations to increase construct validity of assessment center. New perspectives for future research are described

Key words: assessment center, construct validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity

中图分类号:

B849:C93

王忠军,龙立荣. (2006). 评价中心的结构效度研究. 心理科学进展 , 14(3), 426-432.

Wang Zhongjun,Long Lirong. (2006). The Construct Validity of Assessment Center. , 14(3), 426-432.

[1]	卞冉;高钦;车宏生. 评价中心的构想效度谜题：测量维度还是活动？[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2): 358-371.
[2]	祁可可;冯敏;孟肖路;李勇辉;朱宁;隋南. 树鼩的社会挫败抑郁模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1787-1793.
[3]	王小华,车宏生. 评价中心的评分维度和评分效果[J]. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12(4): 601-607.