ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 932-952.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2026.0932 cstr: 32111.14.2026.0932

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

人机共生体验的形成机制与作用效果

李纯青, 郝日艳, 刘伟   

  1. 西北大学经济管理学院, 西安 710127
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-08 出版日期:2026-06-15 发布日期:2026-04-17
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72572127), 国家社会科学基金一般项目(23BGL150)资助

The formation mechanism and effectiveness of the human-machine symbiotic experience

LI Chunqing, HAO Riyan, LIU Wei   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi 'an 710127, China
  • Received:2025-09-08 Online:2026-06-15 Published:2026-04-17

摘要: 随着数字化与智能化技术的迅速发展, 人机协同构成的营销与体验生态发生了深刻变化。不同于以人为中心的传统客户体验, 人机共生体验(Human-machine Symbiosis Experience, HSX)作为新兴互动模式, 强调人与机器的相互作用及其所涌现的能力, 具有提升用户体验、优化企业决策与促进社会福利的潜力, 在推动经济发展与改善民生中意义重大。因此, 在万物互联、实时交互的数字生态中, 如何创造更高的用户价值成为亟需解决的问题。围绕HSX的动态过程, 本研究拟分三个层面展开探讨:研究1聚焦概念与测量, 系统梳理HSX的内涵、维度与结构特征, 开发相应测量工具; 研究2关注形成机理, 从智商与情商双维度协同的视角揭示HSX的涌现机制与演化规律, 并提出阶段性演化模型; 研究3着眼于作用机制与效果, 实证检验HSX在积极与消极结果上的双螺旋效应, 并探讨其边界条件。研究将不仅为企业开展基于HSX的营销战略和智能应用提供实践启示, 也为政府推进“人工智能+”行动和数字生态治理提供重要的理论支撑。

关键词: 客户体验, 参与者体验, 人机共生交互, 人工智能, 数字生态系统

Abstract: This study advances beyond the traditional “human-centered” paradigm of experience research by constructing a theoretical framework of Human-Machine Symbiotic Experience (HSX) that treats the “human-machine assemblage” as the core unit of analysis. It emphasizes that experience does not originate solely from isolated individual cognition, but rather emerges as a relational outcome during continuous interaction between humans and intelligent machines. HSX is characterized by functional coupling, adaptive co-evolution, and value co-creation.
First, at the conceptual level, this study provides a precise definition of HSX. Contrary to conventional views that equate experience with individual subjective feelings, HSX is defined here as a holistic subjective experience formed through the continuous interaction between humans and intelligent systems, reflecting the perceived state and evolution of the human-machine relationship. Meanwhile, the study does not attribute consciousness, emotion, or sentience to machines. Instead, it conceptualizes machine-side components from a functional perspective, referring to observable operational states such as algorithmic response patterns, system feedback structures, and learning trajectories. This definitional choice avoids philosophical and psychological category confusions while offering clear and operational theoretical boundaries for subsequent empirical measurement.
Second, the study proposes a developmental path model for HSX formation based on human-machine matching and co-evolution mechanisms. Three distinct developmental patterns are identified: Model I (unidirectional-passive), Model II (bidirectional-passive), and Model III (bidirectional-active). More importantly, the study introduces the concept of the “experience gap,” arguing that transitions from Model II to Model III are hindered by multidimensional barriers, including cognitive gaps (e.g., expectation violations and increased cognitive load), emotional gaps (e.g., discomfort and distrust induced by the uncanny valley effect), and behavioral gaps (e.g., mismatches between human action rhythms and machine learning rhythms). This framework not only explains why higher-order human-machine symbiosis remains difficult to achieve, but also offers a theoretical foundation for bridging these gaps.
Third, based on the above theoretical construction, the study proposes a multi-dimensional measurement framework for HSX, incorporating both human experiential dimensions and machine functional dimensions. This measurement design provides an analytically rigorous and operational tool for future empirical validation, and establishes a methodological basis for examining the structural properties and causal pathways of HSX.
Finally, at the theoretical level, the study hypothesizes that HSX may generate a “dual-helix effect” on individual and societal outcomes. On one hand, well-balanced HSX may enhance well-being, engagement, learning performance, and value co-creation intentions. On the other hand, imbalanced or excessive HSX may induce negative consequences such as decision dependence, emotional substitution, and ethical risks. Furthermore, these effects are not linear or one-directional; rather, they feed back into and reshape subsequent HSX formation processes, resulting in positive or negative spiral dynamics. The study also identifies key boundary conditions that influence both the formation and effects of HSX, thereby enabling the amplification of positive outcomes and mitigation of potential risks to support the sustainable development of human-machine symbiosis.
In conclusion, this research advances the theoretical system of HSX by: (1) clarifying the conceptual meaning and structural dimensions of HSX, (2) revealing the dynamic emergence and stage-based evolution of HSX, and (3) elucidating the mechanisms and boundary conditions affecting HSX outcomes. These contributions not only address the practical challenges of reconfiguring human-machine relations in the digital intelligence era, but also offer important theoretical support for “AI+” strategic initiatives and enterprise intelligent transformation.

Key words: customer experience, actor experience, human-machine symbiotic interaction, artificial intelligence, digital ecosystem