ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 780-796.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0780

• 研究构想 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会网络视角下临时团队协作历史对协作主动行为的影响

林钰莹1, 赵锴2   

  1. 1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632;
    2中国人民大学劳动人事学院, 北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-12 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-03-20
  • 基金资助:
    *国家自然科学基金项目(72302101, 72272147), 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(23JNQN11)资助

The influence of temporary team’s collaboration history on proactive collaborative behavior based on a social network perspective

LIN Yuying1, ZHAO Kai2   

  1. 1School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
    2School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Received:2024-10-12 Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-03-20

摘要: 动态变化和竞争激烈的环境催生了大量的临时团队。如何推动临时团队在限定合作时间预期和互动过程被压缩的情况下进行积极主动的内部协作, 对团队发展至关重要。目前研究大多聚焦在影响临时团队绩效的涌现状态和行为上, 较少关注临时团队组建时的已有联系, 这不利于临时团队发挥初始社会资源的优势以提升协作主动性。因此, 本文基于社会网络视角, 探讨临时团队协作历史与协作主动行为的关系, 在个体层次探索协作历史网络位置对个体协作主动行为的影响和机制, 在团队层次探索团队协作历史网络结构对协作主动行为的影响和机制。本文旨在拓展临时团队协作研究的视角, 阐明协作历史网络影响协作主动行为的内在机制和边界条件, 为企业通过合理组建临时团队来推动协作提供启示。

关键词: 临时团队, 协作历史, 社会网络, 协作主动行为

Abstract: Dynamic changes and competitive environment have spawned a large number of temporary teams. Temporary team can be defined as a type of team where a temporally bounded group of interdependent members, form to complete a specific task over certain time periods. Compared to regular teams with long-term shared goals and rich interaction bases, members of temporary teams focus more on individual tasks, lack common cognitive and emotional foundations, and are thus less motivated to collaborate with each other. How to promote proactive collaborations of temporary teams under circumstances of limited teamwork-time expectations and compressed interaction process is crucial to team development. Existing research has mainly focused on emergent states and behaviors that affect temporary team performance, neglecting the important role of existent connections when a temporary team is first built. This is not conducive for temporary teams to leverage of initial social resources in order to improve the proactive collaborative behaviors. Therefore, this paper draws upon social network perspective to explore how a temporary team’s collaboration history network influences proactive collaborative behaviors from views of individual network position and team network structure in three theoretical models.
Specifically, at the individual level, this paper first examines the cognitive and emotional approaches through which individual collaboration history network centrality impacts individual proactive collaborative behavior, as well as the contingency effect of leader behaviors (model 1). Further at the team level, this study investigates the influences (model 2) and mechanisms (model 3) of the interaction between team collaboration history network structure (i.e., centralization and density) and contextual factors (task and team member characteristics) on team proactive collaborative behaviors.
This study makes four primary theoretical contributions. First, the existing literature of the temporary team has focused on the emergence states and behaviors that can improve team performance. This study is one of the few research efforts to introduce individuals’ existent connections at the formation stage of a temporary team when studying team effectiveness, offering a new perspective for the development of temporary team research. Secondly, this paper further discusses the important effects, influencing mechanisms and boundary conditions of the temporary team’s collaboration history network, which expands the theoretical explorations in the field of collaboration history network. In addition, previous research on collaboration history has mainly concentrated on its quantity. This paper enriches the measurement of collaboration history by incorporating a network perspective including individual network position and team network structure, which more accurately captures the essential attributes of collaboration history and advances research methodologies. Finally, this paper integrates both individual and team levels to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how a temporary team’s collaboration history network can affect members’ proactive collaborative behaviors, thereby enriching the research level of temporary team literature.
This study also has some practical implications. First, we highlight the important role of past collaborative experiences in shaping members’ proactive collaborative behaviors in a temporary team. Thus, managers should recognize that collaborations among temporary team members are not “one-shot deals” and the collaboration history network should be paid attention to before teaming up. An appropriate collaboration history network together with a “collaboration-friendly” social context can facilitate and amplify positive collaborative connections in more temporary teams. Besides, organizations are recommended to boost individuals’ proactive collaborative behaviors by carefully arranging their positions within a temporary team’s collaboration history network. Additionally, teams’ proactive collaborative behaviors can be promoted by adopting different collaboration history network structures in various situations.
In sum, this paper reveals a new perspective on the research of temporary teams’ collaboration, clarifies the mechanisms and boundary conditions of collaboration history network on proactive collaborative behavior, and provides insights for enterprises to promote collaboration through strategic formation of temporary teams.

Key words: temporary team, collaboration history, social network, proactive collaborative behavior

中图分类号: