心理科学进展 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 2183-2189.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.02183
收稿日期:
2023-02-07
出版日期:
2023-11-15
发布日期:
2023-08-28
通讯作者:
辛迅, E-mail: xinxun0629@163.com
基金资助:
Received:
2023-02-07
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-08-28
摘要:
全球劳动力正在经历老龄化。工作中成功老龄化在促进年长员工生产效率提升、职业发展和工作价值实现方面具有重要作用, 近年来受到了学者们的广泛关注。通过对74篇相关文献进行内容分析, 影响工作中成功老龄化的因素可被概括为组织与工作环境、适应性策略、主动性策略和个人特征四类, 并据此提出发生机制的综合模型。未来应从探索“结构性”因素和跨学科理论的联合使用、前因和发生机制的进一步探索, 以及研究方法和设计的优化三个方面展开更为深入的研究。
中图分类号:
辛迅, 刘婷婷. (2023). 工作中成功老龄化的前因机制. 心理科学进展 , 31(11), 2183-2189.
XIN Xun, LIU Tingting. (2023). The antecedent mechanisms of successful aging at work. Advances in Psychological Science, 31(11), 2183-2189.
作者数量 | 时间 | 合计 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002及以前 | 2003~2007 | 2008~2012 | 2013~2017 | 2018及以后 | ||
国家或地区的统计 | ||||||
美国 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 38 | 59 |
荷兰 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 16 | 49 |
德国 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 24 | 46 |
中国 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 27 |
澳大利亚 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
英国 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
奥地利 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
挪威 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
其他 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 19 |
合计 | 6 | 6 | 26 | 65 | 127 | 230 |
机构 | ||||||
Tilburg University | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 24 |
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 18 |
Dusseldorf University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
The University of Tulsa | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
VU university | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
Rice University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
University of Macao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
Radboud University | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
其他 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 41 | 96 | 151 |
合计 | 6 | 6 | 27 | 71 | 137 | 247 |
研究领域 | ||||||
心理学 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 28 | 55 |
管理学 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 29 |
劳资关系和劳动 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
老年学 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
商业 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
老年病学 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
公共、环境与职业健康 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
其他 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
合计 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 34 | 64 | 127 |
表1 作者所在国家、研究机构及研究领域
作者数量 | 时间 | 合计 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002及以前 | 2003~2007 | 2008~2012 | 2013~2017 | 2018及以后 | ||
国家或地区的统计 | ||||||
美国 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 38 | 59 |
荷兰 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 16 | 49 |
德国 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 24 | 46 |
中国 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 27 |
澳大利亚 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
英国 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
奥地利 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
挪威 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
其他 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 19 |
合计 | 6 | 6 | 26 | 65 | 127 | 230 |
机构 | ||||||
Tilburg University | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 24 |
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 18 |
Dusseldorf University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 |
The University of Tulsa | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
VU university | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
Rice University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
University of Macao | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
Radboud University | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
其他 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 41 | 96 | 151 |
合计 | 6 | 6 | 27 | 71 | 137 | 247 |
研究领域 | ||||||
心理学 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 28 | 55 |
管理学 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 29 |
劳资关系和劳动 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 |
老年学 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
商业 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
老年病学 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
公共、环境与职业健康 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
其他 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
合计 | 4 | 3 | 22 | 34 | 64 | 127 |
理论视角及主要内容 | 研究者 | 自变量 | 中介变量 | 因变量 | SAW操作化定义 | 研究类型 | 被引次数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC (Baltes & Baltes, | Abraham & Hansson, | SOC策略 | SAW | 绩效/能力维持 | 实证研究 | 297 | |
Zacher & Frese, | 年龄、工作复杂性、SOC策略 | SAW | 对机会的关注 | 实证研究 | 309 | ||
Kooij et al., | 适应性工作重塑、发展性工作重塑、应用性工作重塑 | SAW | 维持工作积极性和工作能力 | 研究设想 | 156 | ||
Ng & Law, | SOC策略 | SAW | 应对职场(资源)变化、维持工作运转 | 质性研究 | 120 | ||
Müller et al., | 工作控制 | SOC策略 | SAW | 工作能力 | 实证研究 | 61 | |
SST (Carstensen et al., | Zacher & Yang, | 年龄 | 关注机会 | SAW | 工作满意度、组织承诺、继续工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 92 |
Le Blanc et al., | 日历年龄、组织年龄、功能年龄、寿命年龄 | SAW | 可持续就业能力(继续工作的能力、动机、机会) | 实证研究 | 51 | ||
Toomey & Rudolph, | 情绪唤起事件 | 共情 | SAW | 情绪劳动 | 实证研究 | 21 | |
Thrasher et al., | 概念化年龄(主观年龄、功能年龄、未来时间视角) | SAW | 发展动机、晋升动机、安全动机、社会动机 | 实证研究 | 18 | ||
MTLD (Heckhausen et al., | Akkermans et al., | 实际年龄、主观年龄 | SAW | 内在工作动机、外在工作动机、继续工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 79 | |
Wong & Tetrick, | 任务重塑、关系重塑、认知重塑 | SAW | 适应工作变化、维持人−工作匹配、提升工作积极性和工作认同 | 研究设想 | 62 | ||
COR (Hobfoll et al., | Cheung & Wu, | 工作压力源(工作家庭冲突和年龄歧视)、应对资源(感知组织支持、支持性人力资源政策以及来自朋友和家人的社会支持) | SAW | 适应性与健康、积极关系、职业成长、个人安全、持续关注目标 | 实证研究 | 37 | |
Pak et al., | 人力资源实践(适应性、应用性、维持性、发展性) | SAW | 感知工作能力、首选退休年龄 | 实证研究 | 12 | ||
JD-R模型 (Demerouti et al., | de Lange et al., | 日历年龄、工作要求(即工作量、身体要求、情感要求和精神要求)、工作资源(自主性、上级支持和同事支持) | SAW | 可持续就业能力(活力、就业能力和工作能力) | 实证研究 | 12 | |
Pak et al., | 工作要求(身体要求、情感要求和精神要求)、工作资源(自主性和社会支持) | SAW | 感知工作能力、继续从事当前工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 1 | ||
SOC、SST | Taneva & Arnold, | SOC策略、人力资源实践 | 工作繁荣 工作生存 | SAW | 工作绩效(角色内绩效、角色外绩效、任务绩效) | 实证研究 | 38 |
SOC、COR | Weigl et al., | SOC策略、年龄、工作控制 | SAW | 工作能力 | 实证研究 | 145 | |
Weber et al., | 学习机会、SOC策略 | SAW | 外周血白细胞端粒长度 | 实证研究 | 6 | ||
SST、COR | Cheung et al., | 认知限制、职业未来时间视角、发展主动性 | SAW | 适应性与健康、积极关系、职业成长、个人安全、持续关注目标 | 实证研究 | 13 |
表2 工作中成功老龄化前因研究的理论视角
理论视角及主要内容 | 研究者 | 自变量 | 中介变量 | 因变量 | SAW操作化定义 | 研究类型 | 被引次数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOC (Baltes & Baltes, | Abraham & Hansson, | SOC策略 | SAW | 绩效/能力维持 | 实证研究 | 297 | |
Zacher & Frese, | 年龄、工作复杂性、SOC策略 | SAW | 对机会的关注 | 实证研究 | 309 | ||
Kooij et al., | 适应性工作重塑、发展性工作重塑、应用性工作重塑 | SAW | 维持工作积极性和工作能力 | 研究设想 | 156 | ||
Ng & Law, | SOC策略 | SAW | 应对职场(资源)变化、维持工作运转 | 质性研究 | 120 | ||
Müller et al., | 工作控制 | SOC策略 | SAW | 工作能力 | 实证研究 | 61 | |
SST (Carstensen et al., | Zacher & Yang, | 年龄 | 关注机会 | SAW | 工作满意度、组织承诺、继续工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 92 |
Le Blanc et al., | 日历年龄、组织年龄、功能年龄、寿命年龄 | SAW | 可持续就业能力(继续工作的能力、动机、机会) | 实证研究 | 51 | ||
Toomey & Rudolph, | 情绪唤起事件 | 共情 | SAW | 情绪劳动 | 实证研究 | 21 | |
Thrasher et al., | 概念化年龄(主观年龄、功能年龄、未来时间视角) | SAW | 发展动机、晋升动机、安全动机、社会动机 | 实证研究 | 18 | ||
MTLD (Heckhausen et al., | Akkermans et al., | 实际年龄、主观年龄 | SAW | 内在工作动机、外在工作动机、继续工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 79 | |
Wong & Tetrick, | 任务重塑、关系重塑、认知重塑 | SAW | 适应工作变化、维持人−工作匹配、提升工作积极性和工作认同 | 研究设想 | 62 | ||
COR (Hobfoll et al., | Cheung & Wu, | 工作压力源(工作家庭冲突和年龄歧视)、应对资源(感知组织支持、支持性人力资源政策以及来自朋友和家人的社会支持) | SAW | 适应性与健康、积极关系、职业成长、个人安全、持续关注目标 | 实证研究 | 37 | |
Pak et al., | 人力资源实践(适应性、应用性、维持性、发展性) | SAW | 感知工作能力、首选退休年龄 | 实证研究 | 12 | ||
JD-R模型 (Demerouti et al., | de Lange et al., | 日历年龄、工作要求(即工作量、身体要求、情感要求和精神要求)、工作资源(自主性、上级支持和同事支持) | SAW | 可持续就业能力(活力、就业能力和工作能力) | 实证研究 | 12 | |
Pak et al., | 工作要求(身体要求、情感要求和精神要求)、工作资源(自主性和社会支持) | SAW | 感知工作能力、继续从事当前工作的动机 | 实证研究 | 1 | ||
SOC、SST | Taneva & Arnold, | SOC策略、人力资源实践 | 工作繁荣 工作生存 | SAW | 工作绩效(角色内绩效、角色外绩效、任务绩效) | 实证研究 | 38 |
SOC、COR | Weigl et al., | SOC策略、年龄、工作控制 | SAW | 工作能力 | 实证研究 | 145 | |
Weber et al., | 学习机会、SOC策略 | SAW | 外周血白细胞端粒长度 | 实证研究 | 6 | ||
SST、COR | Cheung et al., | 认知限制、职业未来时间视角、发展主动性 | SAW | 适应性与健康、积极关系、职业成长、个人安全、持续关注目标 | 实证研究 | 13 |
[1] | 彭息强, 田喜洲, 彭小平, 姜梦媛, 焦青松. (2022). 莫道桑榆晚:老龄员工职场成功的前因、后果及实现策略. 外国经济与管理, 44(8), 90-105. |
[2] |
王忠军, 张丽瑶, 杨茵茵, 王仁华, 彭义升. (2019). 职业生涯晚期工作重塑与工作中成功老龄化. 心理科学进展, 27(9), 1643-1655.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01643 |
[3] | Abraham, J. D., & Hansson, R. O. (1995). Successful aging at work: An applied study of selection, optimization, and compensation through impression management. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50(2), 94-103. |
[4] |
Akkermans, J., de Lange, A. H., van der Heijden, B. I., Kooij, D. T., Jansen, P. G., & Dikkers, J. S. (2016). What about time? Examining chronological and subjective age and their relation to work motivation. Career Development International, 21(4), 419-439.
doi: 10.1108/CDI-04-2016-0063 URL |
[5] | Andrei, D. M., & Parker, S. K. (2022). Organizational metastrategies for younger and older workers. In H.Zacher, & C. W.Rudolph (Eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 310-327). New York: Routledge. |
[6] |
Bal, P. M., van Kleef, M., & Jansen, P. G. (2015). The impact of career customization on work outcomes: Boundary conditions of manager support and employee age. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 421-440.
doi: 10.1002/job.v36.3 URL |
[7] |
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52(4), 366-380.
pmid: 9109347 |
[8] | Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging:The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B.Baltes, & M. M.Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[9] |
Beier, M. E., Kanfer, R., Kooij, D. T., & Truxillo, D. M. (2022). What's age got to do with it? A primer and review of the workplace aging literature. Personnel Psychology, 75(4), 779-804.
doi: 10.1111/peps.v75.4 URL |
[10] |
Beier, M. E., LoPilato, A. C., & Kanfer, R. (2018). Successful motivational aging at work: Antecedents and retirement-related outcomes. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 213-224.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wax034 URL |
[11] |
Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103-123.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024569803230 URL |
[12] |
Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. (2012). An investigation of predictors of successful aging in the workplace among Hong Kong Chinese older workers. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(3), 449-464.
doi: 10.1017/S104161021100192X URL |
[13] |
Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. (2013). Older workers' successful aging and intention to stay. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 645-660.
doi: 10.1108/JPM-09-2011-0062 URL |
[14] |
Cheung, F., & Wu, A. M. (2014). Social identification, perception of aging, and successful aging in the workplace. Journal of Career Development, 41(3), 218-236.
doi: 10.1177/0894845313486353 URL |
[15] |
Cheung, F., Yeung, D. Y., & Wu, A. M. (2018). Employees’ perception of leadership styles and successful aging in the workplace. Journal of Career Development, 45(6), 610-624.
doi: 10.1177/0894845317727617 URL |
[16] |
Cheung, F., Yeung, D. Y., & Wu, A. M. (2019). Occupational future time perspective and successful aging at work. Journal of Career Development, 46(1), 3-16.
doi: 10.1177/0894845317696805 |
[17] |
de Lange, A. H., Pak, K., Osagie, E., van Dam, K., Christensen, M., Furunes, T., … Detaille, S. (2020). An open time perspective and social support to sustain in healthcare work: Results of a two-wave complete panel study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1308.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01308 pmid: 32625151 |
[18] |
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512.
pmid: 11419809 |
[19] |
Gielnik, M. M., Zacher, H., & Wang, M. (2018). Age in the entrepreneurial process: The role of future time perspective and prior entrepreneurial experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(10), 1067-1085.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000322 pmid: 29952578 |
[20] |
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32-60.
doi: 10.1037/a0017668 pmid: 20063963 |
[21] |
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103-128.
doi: 10.1146/orgpsych.2018.5.issue-1 URL |
[22] | Hommelhoff, S., & Scheibe, S. (2022). Conducting experiments and intervention studies to understand age and work. In H.Zacher, & C. W.Rudolph (Eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 186-201). New York: Routledge. |
[23] |
Katz, I. M., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Age and career commitment: Meta-analytic tests of competing linear versus curvilinear relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 396-416.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.001 |
[24] |
Kooij, D. T. (2015). Successful aging at work: The active role of employees. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(4), 309-319.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wav018 URL |
[25] | Kooij, D. T., & van de Voorde, K. (2015). Strategic HRM for older workers. In P. M.Bal, D. T.Kooij, & D. M.Rousseau (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship (pp. 57-72). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. |
[26] |
Kooij, D. T., De Lange, A. H., & Van De Voorde, K. (2022). Stimulating job crafting behaviors of older workers: The influence of opportunity-enhancing human resource practices and psychological empowerment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 22-34.
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2021.1899161 URL |
[27] | Kooij, D. T., Tims, M., & Kanfer, R. (2015). Successful aging at work:The role of job crafting. In P. M.Bal, D. T.Kooij, & D. M.Rousseau (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship (pp. 145-161). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. |
[28] |
Kooij, D. T., van Woerkom, M., Wilkenloh, J., Dorenbosch, L., & Denissen, J. J. (2017). Job crafting towards strengths and interests: The effects of a job crafting intervention on person-job fit and the role of age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 971-981.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000194 pmid: 28277726 |
[29] |
Kooij, D. T., Zacher, H., Wang, M., & Heckhausen, J. (2020). Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 345-365.
doi: 10.1017/iop.2020.1 URL |
[30] |
Kuijpers, E., Kooij, D. T., & van Woerkom, M. (2020). Align your job with yourself: The relationship between a job crafting intervention and work engagement, and the role of workload. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(1), 1-16.
doi: 10.1037/ocp0000175 pmid: 31829662 |
[31] |
Le Blanc, P. M., Van der Heijden, B., & Van Vuuren, T. (2017). "I will survive" a construct validation study on the measurement of sustainable employability using different age conceptualizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1690.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01690 pmid: 29033875 |
[32] |
Marcus, J. (2020). Clarifying multilevel and temporal influences on successful aging at work: An ecological systems perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(3), 408-412.
doi: 10.1017/iop.2020.67 URL |
[33] |
Marcus, J., Fritzsche, B. A., & Ng, Y. L. (2019). On the interactive effects of objective and subjective age on work outcomes for men and women. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(4), 287-306.
doi: 10.1093/workar/waz018 URL |
[34] |
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA, Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 pmid: 19622511 |
[35] |
Müller, A., & Weigl, M. (2017). SOC strategies and organizational citizenship behaviors toward the benefits of co-workers: A multi-source study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1740.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01740 pmid: 29085315 |
[36] |
Müller, A., Angerer, P., Becker, A., Gantner, M., Gündel, H., Heiden, B., ... Maatouk, I. (2018). Bringing successful aging theories to occupational practice: Is selective optimization with compensation trainable. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 161-174.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wax033 URL |
[37] | Müller, A., Weigl, M., Heiden, B., Glaser, J., & Angerer, P. (2012). Promoting work ability and well-being in hospital nursing: The interplay of age, job control, and successful ageing strategies. Work, 41(Suppl. 1), 5137-5144. |
[38] |
Ng, E. S., & Law, A. (2014). Keeping up! Older workers' adaptation in the workplace after age 55. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 33(1), 1-14.
doi: 10.1017/S0714980813000639 URL |
[39] | Olson, D. A., & Shultz, K. S. (2019). Lifespan perspectives on successful aging at work. In B. B.Baltes, C. W.Rudolph, & H.Zacher (Eds.), Work across the lifespan (pp. 215-234). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press. |
[40] |
Pak, K., Kooij, D. T., De Lange, A. H., van den Heuvel, S., & Van Veldhoven, M. J. (2021). The influence of human resource practices on perceived work ability and the preferred retirement age: A latent growth modelling approach. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 311-325.
doi: 10.1111/hrmj.v31.1 URL |
[41] | Pak, K., Kooij, D. T., De Lange, A. H., van den Heuvel, S., & Van Veldhoven, M. J. (2020, July). Successful aging at work:The role of work design in growth trajectories of older workers. In K.Pak (Eds.), Human resource management and the extension of working lives: Examining the role of job demands, job resources, HR practices, and major life events in the maintenance and development of the ability, motivation, and opportunity to continue working (pp. 71-93). Ridderprint. |
[42] |
Pak, K., Renkema, M., & van der Kruijssen, D. T. (2023). A conceptual review of the love-hate relationship between technology and successful aging at work: Identifying fits and misfits through job design. Human Resource Management Review, 33, 100955.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100955 URL |
[43] |
Robson, S. M., & Hansson, R. O. (2007). Strategic self development for successful aging at work. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 64(4), 331-359.
doi: 10.2190/Q303-171U-7686-8517 URL |
[44] | Rudolph, C. W. & Zacher, H. (2022). Research on age (ing) at work has “come of age”. In H.Zacher, & C. W.Rudolph (Eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice (SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series, pp. 3-24). New York: Routledge. |
[45] |
Rudolph, C. W., Kunze, F., & Zacher, H. (2019). Getting objective about subjective age: Introduction to a special issue. Work, Aging and Retirement, 5(4), 265-272.
doi: 10.1093/workar/waz019 URL |
[46] |
Sanders, M. J., & McCready, J. (2009). A qualitative study of two older workers' adaptation to physically demanding work. Work, 32(2), 111-122.
doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0797 pmid: 19289864 |
[47] |
Sanders, M. J., & McCready, J. W. (2010). Does work contribute to successful aging outcomes in older workers. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 71(3), 209-229.
doi: 10.2190/AG.71.3.c URL |
[48] |
Taneva, S. K., & Arnold, J. (2018). Thriving, surviving and performing in late career: A mixed-method study of pathways to successful aging in organizations. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 189-212.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wax027 URL |
[49] |
Taneva, S. K., Arnold, J., & Nicolson, R. (2016). The experience of being an older worker in an organization: A qualitative analysis. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(4), 396-414.
doi: 10.1093/workar/waw011 URL |
[50] |
Thrasher, G. R., Zabel, K. L., Bramble, R. J., & Baltes, B. B. (2018). Who is aging successfully at work? A latent profile analysis of successful agers and their work motives. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 175-188.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wax026 URL |
[51] |
Tomlinson, J., Baird, M., Berg, P., & Cooper, R. (2018). Flexible careers across the life course: Advancing theory, research and practice. Human Relations, 71(1), 4-22.
doi: 10.1177/0018726717733313 URL |
[52] |
Toomey, E. C., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Age-conditional effects in the affective arousal, empathy, and emotional labor linkage: Within-person evidence from an experience sampling study. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 145-160.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wax018 URL |
[53] |
Weber, J., Jörres, R., Kronseder, A., Müller, A., Weigl, M., & Chmelar, C. (2019). Learning on the job, the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies, and their association with telomere length as an indicator of biological aging. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92(3), 361-370.
doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01408-5 pmid: 30671630 |
[54] |
Weigl, M., Müller, A., Hornung, S., Zacher, H., & Angerer, P. (2013). The moderating effects of job control and selection, optimization, and compensation strategies on the age-work ability relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(5), 607-628.
doi: 10.1002/job.v34.5 URL |
[55] | Wang, M., & Fang, Y. (2022). Longitudinal and diary methods to study age and work. In H.Zacher, & C. W.Rudolph (Eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 169-185). New York: Routledge. |
[56] |
Wong, C. M., & Tetrick, L. E. (2017). Job crafting: Older workers' mechanism for maintaining person-job fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1548.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01548 pmid: 28943859 |
[57] |
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.
doi: 10.2307/259118 URL |
[58] |
Zacher, H. (2015). Successful aging at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1), 4-25.
doi: 10.1093/workar/wau006 URL |
[59] |
Zacher, H., Ambiel, R. A., & Noronha, A. P. (2015). Career adaptability and career entrenchment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 164-173.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.03.006 URL |
[60] |
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2011). Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: The interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 291-318.
doi: 10.1002/job.v32.2 URL |
[61] |
Zacher, H., Jimmieson, N. L., & Bordia, P. (2014). Time pressure and coworker support mediate the curvilinear relationship between age and occupational well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(4), 462-475.
doi: 10.1037/a0036995 pmid: 24885685 |
[62] |
Zacher, H., Kooij, D. T., & Beier, M. E. (2018). Successful aging at work: Empirical and methodological advancements. Work, Aging and Retirement, 4(2), 123-128.
doi: 10.1093/workar/way002 URL |
[63] | Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2017). Successful aging at work and beyond:A review and critical perspective. In S.Profili, A.Sammarra, & L.Innocenti (Eds.), Age diversity in the workplace: Vol. 17: Advanced series in management (pp. 35-64). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. |
[64] |
Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2019). Why do we act as old as we feel? The role of occupational future time perspective and core self-evaluations in the relationship between subjective age and job crafting behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 831-844.
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2019.1677609 URL |
[65] |
Zacher, H., & Schmitt, A. (2016). Work characteristics and occupational well-being: The role of age. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1411.
pmid: 27713711 |
[66] |
Zacher, H., & Yang, J. (2016). Organizational climate for successful aging. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1007.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01007 pmid: 27458405 |
[1] | 王忠军, 张丽瑶, 杨茵茵, 王仁华, 彭义升. 职业生涯晚期工作重塑与工作中成功老龄化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1643-1655. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||