心理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 2035-2045.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02035
梅宏玉, 吴嵩
收稿日期:
2017-11-02
出版日期:
2018-11-15
发布日期:
2018-09-26
基金资助:
MEI Hongyu, WU Song
Received:
2017-11-02
Online:
2018-11-15
Published:
2018-09-26
摘要:
在谎言识别研究中, 最重要的发现之一就是人们在意识层面上识别谎言的正确率仅仅略高于随机水平。于是, 大量的研究转而考察无意识加工对谎言识别的影响。本文从测谎者的角度出发, 考察测谎者的无意识加工是否可以提高其谎言识别的正确率。本文梳理了关于无意识谎言识别的理论建构, 总结了无意识谎言识别的实证研究, 从无意识的信息接收、信息接收后的无意识思维以及无意识判断决策三个方面详细介绍了近年来的重要的成果和主要的争议。针对目前研究的困境, 本文提出未来的研究应该重点关注理论建构、交互式谎言情境、线索加工匹配效应、测试生理和脑激活指标以及无意识谎言识别的应用等五个方面。
中图分类号:
梅宏玉, 吴嵩. (2018). 测谎者的无意识加工对谎言识别的影响. 心理科学进展 , 26(11), 2035-2045.
MEI Hongyu, WU Song. (2018). The influence of detectors’ unconscious process on deception detection. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(11), 2035-2045.
[1] | 郭秀艳 . ( 2002). 再认中意识和无意识的贡献大小——兼论内隐记忆的抗老化现象. 心理科学, 25( 5), 535-537. |
[2] | 郭晓娟, 苏彦捷 . ( 2000). 心理生理测谎技术的研究与应用. 心理科学, 23( 6), 752-753. |
[3] | 李建升, 王丹, 沈模卫 . ( 2016). 无意识思维:理论、质疑与回应. 心理科学, 39( 2), 318-323. |
[4] | 梁静, 李开云, 曲方炳, 陈宥辛, 颜文靖, 傅小兰 . ( 2014). 说谎的非言语视觉线索. 心理科学进展, 22( 6), 995-1005. |
[5] | 申寻兵, 隋华杰, 傅小兰 . ( 2017). 微表情在欺骗检测中的应用. 心理科学进展, 25( 2), 211-220. |
[6] | 吴嵩, 蔡頠, 孙嘉卿, 章哲明, 金盛华 . ( 2012). 谎言判断的双加工理论. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20( 6), 785-788. |
[7] | 吴嵩, 金盛华, 蔡頠, 李绍颛 . ( 2012). 基于语言内容的谎言识别. 心理科学进展, 20( 3), 457-466 |
[8] | 张亭玉, 张雨青 . ( 2008). 说谎行为及其识别的心理学研究. 心理科学进展, 16( 4), 651-660. |
[9] | Aamondt, M.G., & Custer, H.( 2006). Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15( 1), 6-11. |
[10] |
Albrechtsen, J. S., Meissner, C. A., & Susa, K. J. ( 2009). Can intuition improve deception detection performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 4), 1052-1055.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.017 URL |
[11] |
Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. ( 2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10( 3), 214-234.
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 URL |
[12] |
Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. ( 2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134( 4), 477-492.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477 URL |
[13] |
Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K . ( 1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6( 3), 203-242.
doi: 10.1111/comt.1996.6.issue-3 URL |
[14] | Buss, D.M. (Ed) ( 2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Omegatype Typography. |
[15] |
Byrne, R.W., & Corp, N.( 2004). Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271( 1549), 1693-1699.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2780 URL |
[16] |
DePaulo, B.M., & Kashy, D.A . ( 1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74( 1), 63-79.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63 URL |
[17] |
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. ( 2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129( 1), 74-118.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 URL |
[18] | DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L . ( 2004). Discerning lies from truths:behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition.In P. Granhag & L. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press. |
[19] |
DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Green, C. R., & Rosenkrantz, J. ( 1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18( 5), 433-446.
doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90064-6 URL |
[20] |
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B.( 2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311( 5763), 1005-1007.
doi: 10.1126/science.1121629 URL |
[21] |
Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L.F. ( 2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1( 2), 95-109.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x URL |
[22] | Ekman, P.( 1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, WW-NORTON & COMPANY. |
[23] |
Feeley, T.H., & Young, M.J . ( 2000). Self‐reported cues about deceptive and truthful communication: The effects of cognitive capacity and communicator veracity. Communication Quarterly, 48( 2), 101-119.
doi: 10.1080/01463370009385585 URL |
[24] |
Forrest, J.A., & Feldman, R.S . ( 2000). Detecting deception and judge's involvement: Lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26( 1), 118-125.
doi: 10.1177/0146167200261011 URL |
[25] |
Franz, V. H., & von Luxburg, U.( 2015). No evidence for unconscious lie detection: A significant difference does not imply accurate classification. Psychological Science, 26( 10), 1646-1648.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615597333 URL |
[26] |
Ham, J., van den Bos, K., & van Doorn, E. A.( 2009). Lady justice thinks unconsciously: unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments. Social Cognition, 27( 4), 509-521.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509 URL |
[27] |
Handley, I.M., & Runnion, B.M . ( 2011). Evidence that unconscious thinking influences persuasion based on argument quality. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 668-682.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.668 URL |
[28] |
Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F., Jr. ( 2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137( 4), 643-659.
doi: 10.1037/a0023589 URL |
[29] |
Levine, T. R., & Bond, C. F., Jr. ( 2014). Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: A reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014). Psychological Science, 25( 10), 1960-1961.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614536740 URL |
[30] |
Li, J., Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Li, X., Zhang, M., & Shen, M. ( 2014). Bias or equality? Unconscious thought equally integrates temporally scattered information. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 77-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.012 URL |
[31] |
Masip, J., Alonso, H., Herrero, C., & Garrido, E. ( 2016). Experienced and novice officers’ generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 40( 2), 169-181.
doi: 10.1037/lhb0000169 URL pmid: 26844912 |
[32] |
Messner, C., Wäenke, M., & Weibel, C. ( 2011). Unconscious personnel selection. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 699-710.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.699 URL |
[33] | Moi, W.Y., & Shanks, D.R . ( 2015). Can lies be detected unconsciously? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1221. |
[34] | Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. ( 2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making, 10( 1), 1-17. |
[35] |
Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. ( 2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69( 2), 144-157.
doi: 10.1080/714041710 URL |
[36] |
Porter, S., McCabe, S., Woodworth, M., & Peace, K. A. ( 2007). Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12( 2), 297-309.
doi: 10.1348/135532506X143958 URL |
[37] |
Reinhard, M.-A.( 2010). Need for Cognition and the process of lie detection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 6), 961-971.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.002 URL |
[38] |
Reinhard, M.-A., Greifeneder, R., & Scharmach, M. ( 2013). Unconscious processes improve lie detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105( 5), 721-739.
doi: 10.1037/a0034352 URL pmid: 24219784 |
[39] |
Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S.L. ( 2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44( 3), 477-488.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.012 URL |
[40] |
Street, C. N.H., & Kingstone, A.( 2017). Aligning spinoza with descartes: an informed cartesian account of the truth bias. British Journal of Psychology, 108( 3), 453-466.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12210 URL pmid: 27511287 |
[41] |
Street, C. N.H., & Masip, J.( 2015). The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56( 3), 254-263.
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12204 URL pmid: 25707774 |
[42] |
Street, C. N.H., & Vadillo, M.A . ( 2016). Can the unconscious boost lie-detection accuracy? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25( 4), 246-250.
doi: 10.1177/0963721416656348 URL |
[43] |
Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdsma, A., van Baaren, R. B., & Nordgren, L. F. ( 2011). A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 738-762.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738 URL |
[44] |
ten Brinke, L., Stimson, D., & Carney, D. R. ( 2014). Some evidence for unconscious lie detection. Psychological Science, 25( 5), 1098-1105.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614524421 URL pmid: 24659190 |
[45] |
ten Brinke, L., Vohs, K. D., & Carney, D. R. ( 2016). Can ordinary people detect deception after all? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20( 8), 579-588.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.012 URL |
[46] | van't Veer, A. E., Gallucci, M., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. ( 2015). Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments- results of a registered report. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 672. |
[47] | Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. ( 2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22( 1), 1-21. |
[48] |
Vrij, A., & Granhag, P.A. ( 2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1( 2), 110-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004 URL |
[49] |
Weiss, B., & Feldman, R.S. ( 2006). Looking good and lying to do it: Deception as an impression management strategy in job interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36( 4), 1070-1086.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.2006.36.issue-4 URL |
[50] |
Wheeler, B.C. ( 2010). Decrease in alarm call response among tufted capuchins in competitive feeding contexts: Possible evidence for counterdeception. International Journal of Primatology, 31( 4), 665-675.
doi: 10.1007/s10764-010-9419-1 URL |
[51] |
Wu, S., Cai, W., & Jin, S. ( 2015). Motivation enhances the ability to detect truth from deception in audio-only messages. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 12( 2), 119-126.
doi: 10.1002/jip.v12.2 URL |
[52] | Wu, S., Cai, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Jin, S.(in press). Impact of adult attachment anxiety on deception judgments: Examining the moderating effect of motivation.Psychological Reports, 121( 2), 253-264. |
[53] |
Yang, H., Chattopadhyay, A., Zhang, K., & Dahl, D. W. ( 2012). Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22( 4), 573-581.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.002 URL |
[54] |
Zhong, C.-B., Dijksterhuis, A., & Galinsky, A. D. ( 2008). The merits of unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological Science, 19( 9), 912-918.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.x URL pmid: 18947357 |
[1] | 杨珍芝, 曾红. 正念训练对冲动性不同要素的影响:基于双加工理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2023, 31(2): 274-287. |
[2] | 贺汝婉, 李斌, 张淑颖, 崔馨月, 雷励. 时间与金钱概念对消费者购买决策的不同影响及其心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1684-1695. |
[3] | 徐科朋, 杨凌倩, 吴家虹, 薛宏, 张姝玥. CNI模型在道德决策研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113. |
[4] | 李斌, 卫海英, 李爱梅, 李方君, 陈晓曦. 体验性消费与实物性消费的双加工理论模型: 现象、机制及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 761-769. |
[5] | 袁杰, 胡晓晴, 傅世敏. 无意识种族信息知觉加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 42-42. |
[6] | 贾磊;祝书荣;张常洁;张庆林. 外显与内隐刻板印象的分布式表征及其激活过程——基于认知神经科学视角的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(10): 1519-1533. |
[7] | 赵广平;郭秀艳. 熟悉性与回想分离的新证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(7): 1122-1128. |
[8] | 刘程浩;徐富明;史燕伟;李燕;张慧. 判断与决策中的基线比例忽略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(10): 1637-1646. |
[9] | 罗俊龙;张恩涛;岳彩镇;唐晓晨;钟俊;张庆林. 基于双加工理论解释下信念偏差效应的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(5): 800-807. |
[10] | 沈汪兵;刘昌. 道德伪善的心理学研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 745-756. |
[11] | 翟坤;张志杰. 表征动量的理论模型述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(4): 528-536. |
[12] | 喻丰;彭凯平;韩婷婷;柴方圆;柏阳. 道德困境之困境—— 情与理的辩争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712. |
[13] | 尹华站;李祚山;李丹;黄希庭. 时距加工“长度效应”研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(6): 887-891. |
[14] | 肖前国;罗乐;余林. 推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 321-324. |
[15] | 王瑞明,莫雷,闫秀梅. 文本阅读研究的技术模型和新观点[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(3): 346-353. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||