亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 *

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01111

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

亲组织不道德行为(unethical pro-organizational behavior, UPB)是指旨在促成组织有效运作, 而违背社会的核心价值观、法律、或道德标准的行为。这一概念从一个全新的角度解释不道德行为的心理机制, 引起各界广泛关注。研究者梳理了UPB的概念与测量, 分析了与其他相关概念之间的比较, 建立了多层次的整合模型。未来研究应进一步完善UPB的概念、维度与测量, 开展其跨层次研究, 关注UPB的本土化研究。

关键词: 亲组织不道德行为, 多层次整合模型, 组织认同

Abstract:

Unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) involves actions of employees or employers in any business or organization or company that benefits such organization in a seemingly positive way, but lacks moral, ethical and/or societal standards and codes of conduct. The available research on this concept dives into how much of an impact this behavior makes, as well as how wide-spread it is throughout the corporate world. By systematically clarifying the conception and measurement of UPB, comparison with relevant behaviors, this research establishes a multi-level integrated model. It also identifies the trends of future study in this field and discusses their implications for UPB’s conceptualization, dimension and measurement, research levels and localization research.

Key words: unethical pro-organizational behavior, multi-level integrated model, organizational identification

中图分类号:

B849:C93

王晓辰, 高欣洁, 郭攀博. (2018). 亲组织不道德行为的多层次模型 ^*. 心理科学进展 , 26(6), 1111-1120.

WANG Xiaochen, GAO Xinjie, GUO Panbo. (2018). A multi-level integrated model of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 26(6), 1111-1120.

图/表 2

参考文献 41

[1]	林英晖, 程垦 . ( 2016). 领导–部属交换与员工亲组织非伦理行为: 差序格局视角. 管理科学, 29( 5), 57-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.05.005 URL
[2]	谭亚莉, 廖建桥, 李骥 . ( 2011). 管理者非伦理行为到组织腐败的衍变过程、机制与干预: 基于心理社会微观视角的分析. 管理世界, ( 12), 68-77.
[3]	吴明证, 沈斌, 孙晓玲 . ( 2016). 组织承诺和亲组织的非伦理行为关系: 道德认同的调节作用. 心理科学, 39( 2), 392-398.
[4]	张桂平 . ( 2016). 职场排斥对员工亲组织性非伦理行为的影响机制研究. 管理科学, 29( 4), 104-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.04.009 URL
[5]	赵红丹, 周君 . ( 2017). 企业伪善、道德推脱与亲组织非伦理行为: 有调节的中介效应. 外国经济与管理, 39( 1), 15-28.
[6]	郑睦凡, 赵俊华 . ( 2013). 权力如何影响道德判断行为: 情境卷入的效应. 心理学报, 45( 11), 1274-1282.
[7]	Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1-52. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2 URL
[8]	Astakhova, M. N., & Porter, G. (2015). Understanding the work passion-performance relationship: The mediating role of organizational identification and moderating role of fit at work. Human Relations, 68( 8), 1315-1346. doi: 10.1177/0018726714555204 URL
[9]	Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3( 3), 193-209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 URL pmid: 15661671
[10]	Bersoff, D. M . ( 1999). Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25( 1), 28-39. doi: 10.1016/S1529-2096(01)03015-2 URL
[11]	Castille C. M., Buckner J. E., & Thoroughgood C. N . ( 2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9 doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9 URL
[12]	Chen M., Chen C. C., & Sheldon O. J . ( 2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101( 8), 1082-1096. doi: 10.1037/apl0000111 URL pmid: 27100068
[13]	Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S . ( 2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31( 6), 874-900.
[14]	DeCelles K. A., DeRue D. S., Margolis J. D., & Ceranic T. L . ( 2012). Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 681-689. doi: 10.1037/a0026811 URL pmid: 22250668
[15]	Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W . ( 1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19( 2), 252-284. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1994.9410210749 URL
[16]	Effelsberg D., Solga M., & Gurt J . ( 2014). Transformational leadership and follower’s unethical behavior for the benefit of the company: A two-study investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120( 1), 81-93. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1644-z URL
[17]	Emerson, R. M . ( 1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 URL
[18]	Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M . ( 1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58( 2), 203-210. doi: 10.1037/h0033627 URL pmid: 13640824
[19]	Graham K. A., Ziegert J. C., & Capitano J . ( 2015). The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 126( 3), 423-436. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1952-3 URL
[20]	Greenberg, J. (1997). The STEAL motive: Managing the social determinants of employee theft. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations(pp. 85-108). California: SAGE Publications.
[21]	Kalshoven K., van Dijk H., & Boon C . ( 2016). Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31( 2), 500-515. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2013.13515abstract URL
[22]	Kish-Gephart J., Detert J., Treviño L. K., Baker V., & Martin S . ( 2014). Situational moral disengagement: Can the effects of self-interest be mitigated? Journal of Business Ethics, 125( 2), 267-285. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1909-6 URL
[23]	Kong, D. T . ( 2016). The pathway to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.035 URL
[24]	Krebs, D. L . ( 2005). An evolutionary reconceptualization of Kohlberg’s model of moral development. In R. L. Burgess & K. MacDonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development ( 2nd ed., pp. 243-274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781452233574.n9 URL
[25]	Matherne, C. F., & Litchfield, S. R . ( 2012). Investigating the relationship between affective commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The role of moral identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9( 5), 35-46.
[26]	Miao Q., Newman A., Yu J., & Xu L . ( 2013). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects. Journal of Business Ethics, 116( 3), 641-653. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1504-2 URL
[27]	Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30( 2), 245-268. doi: 10.2307/20159118 URL
[28]	Moore C., Detert J. R., Treviño L. K., Baker V. L., & Mayer D. M . ( 2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65( 1), 1-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.x URL
[29]	Peterson, D. (2004). Perceived leader integrity and ethical intentions of subordinates. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25( 1), 7-23. doi: 10.1108/01437730410512741 URL
[30]	Rest, J. R . ( 1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
[31]	Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L . ( 2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55( 1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 URL
[32]	Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C . ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations( 2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
[33]	Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D . ( 2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88( 3), 500-517. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500 URL pmid: 12814298
[34]	Thau S., Derfler-Rozin R., Pitesa M., Mitchell M. S., & Pillutla M. M . ( 2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: Risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100( 1), 98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0036708 URL pmid: 24773402
[35]	Tian, Q., & Peterson, D. K . ( 2016). The effects of ethical pressure and power distance orientation on unethical pro-organizational behavior: The case of earnings management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25( 2), 159-171. doi: 10.1111/beer.12109 URL
[36]	Treviño L. K., Weaver G. R., & Reynolds S. J . ( 2006). Behavioral ethical in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32( 6), 951-990.
[37]	Umphress E. E., Bingham J. B., & Mitchell M. S . ( 2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95( 4), 769-780. doi: 10.1037/a0019214 URL pmid: 20604596
[38]	Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B . ( 2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22( 3), 621-640. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0559 URL
[39]	Vadera, A. K., & Pratt, M. G . ( 2013). Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science, 24( 1), 172-188. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0714 URL
[40]	Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in organizations: Theory, research, and management. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[41]	Warren, D. E . ( 2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 28( 4), 622-632. doi: 10.2307/30040751 URL

相关概念	区别	联系	相关研究
“必须的恶行”	“必须的恶行”可能对社会有利, 可能属于道德行为; UPB只属于不道德行为。	UPB旨在对组织有利, “必须的恶行”在某种层面上也对组织有利。	Molinsky & Margolis (2005)
偏差行为	偏差行为包含道德行为与不道德行为, 但不关注行为背后的动机; UPB不仅是一种不道德行为, 还关注行为的隐含动机。	UPB是对偏差行为的补充。	Warren (2003)
组织不当行为	组织不当行为包括道德行为与不道德行为, 但并不基于社会交换理论; UPB只包括不道德行为, 以社会交换为理论基础, 关注不道德行为对实体的潜在影响。	组织不当行为中包含的“帮助组织的行为”的概念与UPB不谋而合。	Vardi & Weitz (2004)

相关概念	区别	联系	相关研究
“必须的恶行”	“必须的恶行”可能对社会有利, 可能属于道德行为; UPB只属于不道德行为。	UPB旨在对组织有利, “必须的恶行”在某种层面上也对组织有利。	Molinsky & Margolis (2005)
偏差行为	偏差行为包含道德行为与不道德行为, 但不关注行为背后的动机; UPB不仅是一种不道德行为, 还关注行为的隐含动机。	UPB是对偏差行为的补充。	Warren (2003)
组织不当行为	组织不当行为包括道德行为与不道德行为, 但并不基于社会交换理论; UPB只包括不道德行为, 以社会交换为理论基础, 关注不道德行为对实体的潜在影响。	组织不当行为中包含的“帮助组织的行为”的概念与UPB不谋而合。	Vardi & Weitz (2004)