Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 646-664.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00646
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Xiaoming1, YU Yu2(), LIU Xin3
Received:
2019-05-31
Published:
2022-06-25
Online:
2022-06-30
Contact:
YU Yu
E-mail:yuyu@swufe.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZHENG Xiaoming, YU Yu, LIU Xin. (2022). The effect of spouse emotional intelligence on employee work engagement: The mediating role of employee life well-being and the moderating role of gender. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(6), 646-664.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://journal.psych.ac.cn/acps/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00646
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Spouse age | 30.10 | 3.03 | |||||||||||
2 Spouse education | 2.75 | 0.58 | -0.05(0.574) | ||||||||||
3 Spouse tenure | 5.85 | 3.38 | 0.66***(0.000) | -0.01(0.900) | |||||||||
4 Employee age | 28.94 | 2.96 | 0.79***(0.000) | -0.16(0.074) | 0.64***(0.000) | ||||||||
5 Employee education | 2.92 | 0.37 | -0.05(0.578) | 0.17(0.061) | -0.00(0.970) | -0.09(0.345) | |||||||
6 Employee tenure | 6.29 | 3.45 | 0.73***(0.000) | -0.22*(0.016) | 0.72***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | -0.11(0.207) | ||||||
7 Employee emotional intelligence | 5.16 | 0.69 | -0.04(0.666) | 0.07(0.449) | 0.01(0.945) | -0.03(0.708) | 0.02(0.823) | -0.01(0.940) | 0.86 | ||||
8 Employee gender | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.11(0.241) | -0.03(0.785) | -0.02(0.824) | 0.08(0.397) | -0.03(0.709) | -0.00(0.980) | 0.05(0.567) | ||||
9 Spouse emotional intelligence | 5.62 | 0.56 | 0.14(0.132) | -0.03(0.744) | 0.24**(0.008) | 0.15(0.094) | -0.07(0.457) | 0.21*(0.019) | 0.07(0.444) | -0.08(0.365) | 0.78 | ||
10 Employee life well-being | 4.97 | 1.06 | 0.14(0.114) | 0.04(0.689) | 0.04(0.678) | 0.07(0.448) | -0.03(0.741) | 0.12(0.176) | 0.12(0.175) | -0.04(0.646) | 0.27**(0.002) | 0.91 | |
11 Employee work engagement | 4.83 | 1.04 | 0.09(0.326) | -0.07(0.411) | 0.08(0.371) | 0.08(0.390) | 0.02(0.850) | 0.13(0.148) | 0.20*(0.024) | 0.16(0.071) | 0.08(0.357) | 0.46***(0.000) | 0.89 |
Table 1 Means, standard deviations, and correlations (Study 1)
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Spouse age | 30.10 | 3.03 | |||||||||||
2 Spouse education | 2.75 | 0.58 | -0.05(0.574) | ||||||||||
3 Spouse tenure | 5.85 | 3.38 | 0.66***(0.000) | -0.01(0.900) | |||||||||
4 Employee age | 28.94 | 2.96 | 0.79***(0.000) | -0.16(0.074) | 0.64***(0.000) | ||||||||
5 Employee education | 2.92 | 0.37 | -0.05(0.578) | 0.17(0.061) | -0.00(0.970) | -0.09(0.345) | |||||||
6 Employee tenure | 6.29 | 3.45 | 0.73***(0.000) | -0.22*(0.016) | 0.72***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | -0.11(0.207) | ||||||
7 Employee emotional intelligence | 5.16 | 0.69 | -0.04(0.666) | 0.07(0.449) | 0.01(0.945) | -0.03(0.708) | 0.02(0.823) | -0.01(0.940) | 0.86 | ||||
8 Employee gender | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.11(0.241) | -0.03(0.785) | -0.02(0.824) | 0.08(0.397) | -0.03(0.709) | -0.00(0.980) | 0.05(0.567) | ||||
9 Spouse emotional intelligence | 5.62 | 0.56 | 0.14(0.132) | -0.03(0.744) | 0.24**(0.008) | 0.15(0.094) | -0.07(0.457) | 0.21*(0.019) | 0.07(0.444) | -0.08(0.365) | 0.78 | ||
10 Employee life well-being | 4.97 | 1.06 | 0.14(0.114) | 0.04(0.689) | 0.04(0.678) | 0.07(0.448) | -0.03(0.741) | 0.12(0.176) | 0.12(0.175) | -0.04(0.646) | 0.27**(0.002) | 0.91 | |
11 Employee work engagement | 4.83 | 1.04 | 0.09(0.326) | -0.07(0.411) | 0.08(0.371) | 0.08(0.390) | 0.02(0.850) | 0.13(0.148) | 0.20*(0.024) | 0.16(0.071) | 0.08(0.357) | 0.46***(0.000) | 0.89 |
Variable | Employee life well-being | Employee work engagement | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | ||||||||
B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | |
Intercept | 3.13(1.91) | 0.104 | 0.11(2.12) | 0.958 | 1.57(2.19) | 0.476 | 3.29(1.86) | 0.080 | 2.54(2.11) | 0.229 | 1.93(1.69) | 0.257 | 2.49(1.88) | 0.188 |
Spouse age | 0.08(0.06) | 0.138 | 0.09(0.06) | 0.104 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.124 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.710 | 0.05(0.06) | 0.378 | -0.02(0.05) | 0.747 | 0.01(0.05) | 0.879 |
Spouse education | 0.11(0.18) | 0.526 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.511 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.527 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.460 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.442 | -0.18(0.16) | 0.257 | -0.18(0.15) | 0.234 |
Spouse tenure | -0.05(0.04) | 0.237 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.105 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.085 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.875 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.775 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.680 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.614 |
Employee age | -0.07(0.06) | 0.300 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.317 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.329 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.604 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.330 | 0.00(0.06) | 0.952 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.563 |
Employee education | -0.06(0.26) | 0.818 | -0.01(0.26) | 0.956 | -0.04(0.25) | 0.858 | 0.11(0.25) | 0.670 | 0.13(0.25) | 0.597 | 0.13(0.23) | 0.557 | 0.14(0.23) | 0.536 |
Employee tenure | 0.07(0.06) | 0.206 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.276 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.247 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.349 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.329 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.683 | 0.03(0.05) | 0.593 |
Employee emotional intelligence | 0.19(0.14) | 0.172 | 0.16(0.14) | 0.233 | 0.15(0.13) | 0.261 | 0.31*(0.14) | 0.024 | 0.29*(0.14) | 0.033 | 0.23(0.12) | 0.067 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.077 |
Employee gender | 0.03(0.23) | 0.884 | 0.07(0.23) | 0.746 | 0.45*(0.23) | 0.049 | 0.44*(0.20) | 0.033 | ||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence | 0.51**(0.17) | 0.004 | 0.30(0.20) | 0.121 | 0.12(0.17) | 0.476 | -0.11(0.16) | 0.500 | ||||||
Employee life well-being | 0.44***(0.08) | 0.000 | 0.45***(0.08) | 0.000 | ||||||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence × Employee gender | 0.47*(0.21) | 0.031 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.29 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.07* | 0.03* | 0.03 | 0.18***a | 0.19***b |
Table 2 Regression results (Study 1)
Variable | Employee life well-being | Employee work engagement | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | ||||||||
B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | |
Intercept | 3.13(1.91) | 0.104 | 0.11(2.12) | 0.958 | 1.57(2.19) | 0.476 | 3.29(1.86) | 0.080 | 2.54(2.11) | 0.229 | 1.93(1.69) | 0.257 | 2.49(1.88) | 0.188 |
Spouse age | 0.08(0.06) | 0.138 | 0.09(0.06) | 0.104 | 0.08(0.06) | 0.124 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.710 | 0.05(0.06) | 0.378 | -0.02(0.05) | 0.747 | 0.01(0.05) | 0.879 |
Spouse education | 0.11(0.18) | 0.526 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.511 | 0.11(0.17) | 0.527 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.460 | -0.13(0.17) | 0.442 | -0.18(0.16) | 0.257 | -0.18(0.15) | 0.234 |
Spouse tenure | -0.05(0.04) | 0.237 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.105 | -0.07(0.04) | 0.085 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.875 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.775 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.680 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.614 |
Employee age | -0.07(0.06) | 0.300 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.317 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.329 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.604 | -0.06(0.06) | 0.330 | 0.00(0.06) | 0.952 | -0.03(0.06) | 0.563 |
Employee education | -0.06(0.26) | 0.818 | -0.01(0.26) | 0.956 | -0.04(0.25) | 0.858 | 0.11(0.25) | 0.670 | 0.13(0.25) | 0.597 | 0.13(0.23) | 0.557 | 0.14(0.23) | 0.536 |
Employee tenure | 0.07(0.06) | 0.206 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.276 | 0.06(0.05) | 0.247 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.349 | 0.05(0.05) | 0.329 | 0.02(0.05) | 0.683 | 0.03(0.05) | 0.593 |
Employee emotional intelligence | 0.19(0.14) | 0.172 | 0.16(0.14) | 0.233 | 0.15(0.13) | 0.261 | 0.31*(0.14) | 0.024 | 0.29*(0.14) | 0.033 | 0.23(0.12) | 0.067 | 0.22(0.12) | 0.077 |
Employee gender | 0.03(0.23) | 0.884 | 0.07(0.23) | 0.746 | 0.45*(0.23) | 0.049 | 0.44*(0.20) | 0.033 | ||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence | 0.51**(0.17) | 0.004 | 0.30(0.20) | 0.121 | 0.12(0.17) | 0.476 | -0.11(0.16) | 0.500 | ||||||
Employee life well-being | 0.44***(0.08) | 0.000 | 0.45***(0.08) | 0.000 | ||||||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence × Employee gender | 0.47*(0.21) | 0.031 | ||||||||||||
R2 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.29 | |||||||
ΔR2 | 0.07* | 0.03* | 0.03 | 0.18***a | 0.19***b |
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Spouse age | 32.73 | 6.07 | |||||||||||||||
2 Spouse education | 3.00 | 1.07 | 0.05(0.652) | ||||||||||||||
3 Spouse tenure | 6.51 | 5.15 | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.22(0.068) | |||||||||||||
4 Employee age | 33.26 | 5.43 | 0.86***(0.000) | -0.07(0.559) | 0.50***(0.000) | ||||||||||||
5 Employee education | 3.01 | 0.94 | 0.21(0.080) | 0.54***(0.000) | 0.13(0.290) | 0.14(0.252) | |||||||||||
6 Employee tenure | 2.24 | 1.33 | 0.38**(0.001) | 0.22(0.066) | 0.12(0.294) | 0.33**(0.005) | 0.38**(0.001) | ||||||||||
7 Employee job demands | 4.64 | 1.01 | -0.12(0.331) | 0.10(0.396) | 0.06(0.589) | -0.03(0.796) | 0.15(0.206) | 0.04(0.740) | 0.83 | ||||||||
8 Employee job Control | 4.78 | 1.33 | -0.04(0.740) | 0.13(0.282) | -0.04(0.723) | -0.11(0.342) | 0.00(0.971) | -0.08(0.510) | -0.07(0.569) | 0.94 | |||||||
9 Leader emotional intelligence | 5.51 | 0.94 | 0.01(0.935) | -0.00(0.977) | 0.10(0.414) | -0.05(0.657) | -0.02(0.888) | -0.12(0.326) | 0.04(0.770) | 0.47***(0.000) | 0.98 | ||||||
10 Peers’ emotional intelligence | 5.37 | 0.87 | -0.09(0.446) | -0.05(0.672) | -0.07(0.554) | -0.13(0.293) | 0.04(0.760) | -0.09(0.456) | -0.02(0.888) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | 0.98 | |||||
11 Employee emotional intelligence | 5.68 | 0.67 | 0.02(0.861) | 0.00(0.976) | -0.17(0.157) | -0.00(0.983) | -0.02(0.891) | 0.02(0.876) | -0.11(0.349) | 0.27*(0.021) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.58***(0.000) | 0.92 | ||||
12 Employee gender | 0.73 | 0.45 | -0.12(0.335) | -0.15(0.221) | 0.02(0.874) | 0.17(0.146) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.05(0.650) | 0.12(0.330) | -0.10(0.389) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.14(0.230) | 0.12(0.330) | ||||
13 Spouse emotional intelligence | 5.59 | 0.72 | 0.08(0.530) | -0.05(0.648) | -0.13(0.270) | 0.03(0.835) | -0.10(0.425) | -0.12(0.320) | -0.10(0.418) | 0.12(0.315) | 0.16(0.166) | 0.18(0.125) | 0.11(0.348) | -0.07(0.541) | 0.94 | ||
14 Employee life well-being | 4.73 | 1.04 | -0.05(0.706) | -0.09(0.473) | -0.13(0.265) | -0.13(0.264) | -0.06(0.641) | -0.09(0.450) | 0.06(0.606) | 0.24*(0.039) | 0.32**(0.005) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.21(0.069) | -0.04(0.770) | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.92 | |
15 Employee work engagement | 5.42 | 0.92 | 0.18(0.127) | 0.18(0.124) | 0.06(0.603) | 0.18(0.130) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.18(0.123) | 0.10(0.382) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.41***(0.000) | 0.23(0.055) | 0.09(0.430) | 0.35**(0.002) | 0.96 |
Table 3 Mean, standard deviations, and correlations (Study 2)
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Spouse age | 32.73 | 6.07 | |||||||||||||||
2 Spouse education | 3.00 | 1.07 | 0.05(0.652) | ||||||||||||||
3 Spouse tenure | 6.51 | 5.15 | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.22(0.068) | |||||||||||||
4 Employee age | 33.26 | 5.43 | 0.86***(0.000) | -0.07(0.559) | 0.50***(0.000) | ||||||||||||
5 Employee education | 3.01 | 0.94 | 0.21(0.080) | 0.54***(0.000) | 0.13(0.290) | 0.14(0.252) | |||||||||||
6 Employee tenure | 2.24 | 1.33 | 0.38**(0.001) | 0.22(0.066) | 0.12(0.294) | 0.33**(0.005) | 0.38**(0.001) | ||||||||||
7 Employee job demands | 4.64 | 1.01 | -0.12(0.331) | 0.10(0.396) | 0.06(0.589) | -0.03(0.796) | 0.15(0.206) | 0.04(0.740) | 0.83 | ||||||||
8 Employee job Control | 4.78 | 1.33 | -0.04(0.740) | 0.13(0.282) | -0.04(0.723) | -0.11(0.342) | 0.00(0.971) | -0.08(0.510) | -0.07(0.569) | 0.94 | |||||||
9 Leader emotional intelligence | 5.51 | 0.94 | 0.01(0.935) | -0.00(0.977) | 0.10(0.414) | -0.05(0.657) | -0.02(0.888) | -0.12(0.326) | 0.04(0.770) | 0.47***(0.000) | 0.98 | ||||||
10 Peers’ emotional intelligence | 5.37 | 0.87 | -0.09(0.446) | -0.05(0.672) | -0.07(0.554) | -0.13(0.293) | 0.04(0.760) | -0.09(0.456) | -0.02(0.888) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.81***(0.000) | 0.98 | |||||
11 Employee emotional intelligence | 5.68 | 0.67 | 0.02(0.861) | 0.00(0.976) | -0.17(0.157) | -0.00(0.983) | -0.02(0.891) | 0.02(0.876) | -0.11(0.349) | 0.27*(0.021) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.58***(0.000) | 0.92 | ||||
12 Employee gender | 0.73 | 0.45 | -0.12(0.335) | -0.15(0.221) | 0.02(0.874) | 0.17(0.146) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.05(0.650) | 0.12(0.330) | -0.10(0.389) | -0.12(0.299) | -0.14(0.230) | 0.12(0.330) | ||||
13 Spouse emotional intelligence | 5.59 | 0.72 | 0.08(0.530) | -0.05(0.648) | -0.13(0.270) | 0.03(0.835) | -0.10(0.425) | -0.12(0.320) | -0.10(0.418) | 0.12(0.315) | 0.16(0.166) | 0.18(0.125) | 0.11(0.348) | -0.07(0.541) | 0.94 | ||
14 Employee life well-being | 4.73 | 1.04 | -0.05(0.706) | -0.09(0.473) | -0.13(0.265) | -0.13(0.264) | -0.06(0.641) | -0.09(0.450) | 0.06(0.606) | 0.24*(0.039) | 0.32**(0.005) | 0.43***(0.000) | 0.21(0.069) | -0.04(0.770) | 0.44***(0.000) | 0.92 | |
15 Employee work engagement | 5.42 | 0.92 | 0.18(0.127) | 0.18(0.124) | 0.06(0.603) | 0.18(0.130) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.18(0.123) | 0.10(0.382) | 0.27*(0.019) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.42***(0.000) | 0.41***(0.000) | 0.23(0.055) | 0.09(0.430) | 0.35**(0.002) | 0.96 |
Variable | Employee life well-being | Employee work engagement | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |||||||||
B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | ||
Intercept | 2.36(1.50) | 0.120 | -0.06(1.55) | 0.968 | 4.93(2.63) | 0.065 | -0.81(1.19) | 0.502 | -0.97(1.28) | 0.452 | -1.38(1.17) | 0.244 | -0.95(1.24) | 0.445 | |
Spouse age | 0.06(0.04) | 0.136 | 0.07(0.04) | 0.091 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.138 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.684 | 0.04(0.04) | 0.307 | -0.03(0.03) | 0.379 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.578 | |
Spouse education | -0.06(0.15) | 0.669 | -0.09(0.13) | 0.499 | -0.12(0.13) | 0.373 | 0.08(0.12) | 0.487 | 0.09(0.11) | 0.433 | 0.10(0.11) | 0.392 | 0.11(0.11) | 0.320 | |
Spouse tenure | -0.01(0.03) | 0.645 | 0.01(0.03) | 0.843 | 0.00(0.03) | 0.982 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.586 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.676 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.674 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.626 | |
Employee age | -0.06(0.05) | 0.205 | -0.10(0.05) | 0.062 | -0.09(0.05) | 0.060 | 0.05(0.04) | 0.207 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.797 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.093 | 0.01(0.04) | 0.790 | |
Employee education | -0.08(0.16) | 0.637 | -0.03(0.15) | 0.861 | 0.02(0.15) | 0.884 | 0.17(0.13) | 0.205 | 0.18(0.13) | 0.159 | 0.19(0.13) | 0.144 | 0.18(0.12) | 0.134 | |
Employee tenure | -0.03(0.10) | 0.764 | 0.01(0.09) | 0.891 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.646 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.505 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.414 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.431 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.422 | |
Employee job demands | 0.13(0.12) | 0.277 | 0.14(0.11) | 0.218 | 0.12(0.11) | 0.268 | 0.09(0.10) | 0.379 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.477 | 0.05(0.09) | 0.570 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.706 | |
Employee job control | 0.07(0.10) | 0.486 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.485 | 0.06(0.09) | 0.488 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.447 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.435 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.569 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.545 | |
Leader emotional intelligence | -0.16(0.23) | 0.503 | -0.19(0.21) | 0.365 | -0.17(0.21) | 0.411 | 0.23(0.19) | 0.226 | 0.19(0.18) | 0.289 | 0.26(0.18) | 0.144 | 0.23(0.17) | 0.181 | |
Peers’ emotional intelligence | 0.62*(0.27) | 0.023 | 0.62*(0.25) | 0.017 | 0.55*(0.25) | 0.030 | 0.09(0.21) | 0.672 | 0.22(0.21) | 0.293 | -0.06(0.21) | 0.779 | 0.08(0.21) | 0.706 | |
Employee emotional intelligence | -0.09(0.22) | 0.703 | -0.13(0.22) | 0.554 | -0.13(0.21) | 0.544 | 0.33(0.18) | 0.073 | 0.18(0.18) | 0.317 | 0.35*(0.17) | 0.048 | 0.21(0.17) | 0.233 | |
Employee Gender | 0.38(0.30) | 0.207 | 0.30(0.29) | 0.310 | 0.71**(0.25) | 0.006 | 0.63*(0.24) | 0.013 | |||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence | 0.55**(0.16) | 0.001 | -0.24(0.37) | 0.522 | 0.05(0.13) | 0.687 | -0.07(0.14) | 0.603 | |||||||
Employee life well-being | 0.24*(0.10) | 0.017 | 0.23*(0.10) | 0.033 | |||||||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence × employee gender | 0.96*(0.42) | 0.024 | |||||||||||||
R2 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.49 | ||||||||
ΔR2 | 0.14** | 0.06* | 0.07* | 0.05*a | 0.04*b |
Table 4 Regression Results (Study 2)
Variable | Employee life well-being | Employee work engagement | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | |||||||||
B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | B (SE) | p | ||
Intercept | 2.36(1.50) | 0.120 | -0.06(1.55) | 0.968 | 4.93(2.63) | 0.065 | -0.81(1.19) | 0.502 | -0.97(1.28) | 0.452 | -1.38(1.17) | 0.244 | -0.95(1.24) | 0.445 | |
Spouse age | 0.06(0.04) | 0.136 | 0.07(0.04) | 0.091 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.138 | -0.01(0.03) | 0.684 | 0.04(0.04) | 0.307 | -0.03(0.03) | 0.379 | 0.02(0.04) | 0.578 | |
Spouse education | -0.06(0.15) | 0.669 | -0.09(0.13) | 0.499 | -0.12(0.13) | 0.373 | 0.08(0.12) | 0.487 | 0.09(0.11) | 0.433 | 0.10(0.11) | 0.392 | 0.11(0.11) | 0.320 | |
Spouse tenure | -0.01(0.03) | 0.645 | 0.01(0.03) | 0.843 | 0.00(0.03) | 0.982 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.586 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.676 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.674 | -0.01(0.02) | 0.626 | |
Employee age | -0.06(0.05) | 0.205 | -0.10(0.05) | 0.062 | -0.09(0.05) | 0.060 | 0.05(0.04) | 0.207 | -0.01(0.04) | 0.797 | 0.06(0.04) | 0.093 | 0.01(0.04) | 0.790 | |
Employee education | -0.08(0.16) | 0.637 | -0.03(0.15) | 0.861 | 0.02(0.15) | 0.884 | 0.17(0.13) | 0.205 | 0.18(0.13) | 0.159 | 0.19(0.13) | 0.144 | 0.18(0.12) | 0.134 | |
Employee tenure | -0.03(0.10) | 0.764 | 0.01(0.09) | 0.891 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.646 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.505 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.414 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.431 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.422 | |
Employee job demands | 0.13(0.12) | 0.277 | 0.14(0.11) | 0.218 | 0.12(0.11) | 0.268 | 0.09(0.10) | 0.379 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.477 | 0.05(0.09) | 0.570 | 0.04(0.09) | 0.706 | |
Employee job control | 0.07(0.10) | 0.486 | 0.07(0.09) | 0.485 | 0.06(0.09) | 0.488 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.447 | 0.06(0.08) | 0.435 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.569 | 0.05(0.08) | 0.545 | |
Leader emotional intelligence | -0.16(0.23) | 0.503 | -0.19(0.21) | 0.365 | -0.17(0.21) | 0.411 | 0.23(0.19) | 0.226 | 0.19(0.18) | 0.289 | 0.26(0.18) | 0.144 | 0.23(0.17) | 0.181 | |
Peers’ emotional intelligence | 0.62*(0.27) | 0.023 | 0.62*(0.25) | 0.017 | 0.55*(0.25) | 0.030 | 0.09(0.21) | 0.672 | 0.22(0.21) | 0.293 | -0.06(0.21) | 0.779 | 0.08(0.21) | 0.706 | |
Employee emotional intelligence | -0.09(0.22) | 0.703 | -0.13(0.22) | 0.554 | -0.13(0.21) | 0.544 | 0.33(0.18) | 0.073 | 0.18(0.18) | 0.317 | 0.35*(0.17) | 0.048 | 0.21(0.17) | 0.233 | |
Employee Gender | 0.38(0.30) | 0.207 | 0.30(0.29) | 0.310 | 0.71**(0.25) | 0.006 | 0.63*(0.24) | 0.013 | |||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence | 0.55**(0.16) | 0.001 | -0.24(0.37) | 0.522 | 0.05(0.13) | 0.687 | -0.07(0.14) | 0.603 | |||||||
Employee life well-being | 0.24*(0.10) | 0.017 | 0.23*(0.10) | 0.033 | |||||||||||
Spouse emotional intelligence × employee gender | 0.96*(0.42) | 0.024 | |||||||||||||
R2 | 0.24 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.49 | ||||||||
ΔR2 | 0.14** | 0.06* | 0.07* | 0.05*a | 0.04*b |
[1] | Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[2] | Arthur, A. R. (2000). Employee assistance programmes: The emperor’s new clothes of stress management?. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 28(4), 549-559. |
[3] |
Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11.
doi: 10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207 URL |
[4] |
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389-411.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 URL |
[5] |
Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274 URL |
[6] |
Bastian, V. A., Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2005). Emotional intelligence predicts life skills, but not as well as personality and cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1135-1145.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.006 URL |
[7] | Batista, E. D. (2016). How to not fight with your spouse when you get home from work. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version). Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://news.caijingmobile.com/article/detail/263892. |
[8] |
Bechtoldt, M. N., & Schneider, V. K. (2016). Predicting stress from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings: Emotional intelligence and testosterone jointly predict cortisol reactivity. Emotion, 16(6), 815-825.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000134 pmid: 27064289 |
[9] |
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 780-795.
pmid: 17014299 |
[10] |
Brackett, M. A., Warner, R. M., & Bosco, J. S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 197-212.
doi: 10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00111.x URL |
[11] |
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
doi: 10.1177/135910457000100301 URL |
[12] |
Byrne, Z. S., Peters, J. M., & Weston, J. W. (2016). The struggle with employee engagement: Measures and construct clarification using five samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1201-1227.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000124 URL |
[13] | Campbell, M., & Gavett, G. (2021). What Covid-19 has done to our well-being, in 12 charts. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version), 4, 60-73. |
[14] |
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x URL |
[15] | Coleman, J., & Coleman, J. (2017). Don’t take work stress home with you. Harvard Business Review (Chinese version). Retrieved January 3, 2022, from https://www.hbrchina.org/2017-02-14/4986.html. |
[16] |
Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2015). Direct and contextual influence of team conflict on team resources, team work engagement, and team performance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(4), 211-227.
doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12061 URL |
[17] | Côté, S. (2014). Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 4593-488. |
[18] |
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69-106.
doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x pmid: 26158995 |
[19] | Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum. |
[20] | Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities:A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp.123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[21] |
Elfenbein, H. A. (2006). Learning in emotion judgments: Training and the cross-cultural understanding of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 21-36.
doi: 10.1007/s10919-005-0002-y URL |
[22] | Fang, W. (2008). The job demands-resources model and job burnout: Psychological capital as a moderator (Unpublished master’s thesis). Renmin University of China. |
[23] | Ghiselli, R. F., La Lopa, J. M., & Bai, B. (2001). Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent: Among food-service managers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 28-37. |
[24] |
Gohm, C. L., Corser, G. C., & Dalsky, D. J. (2005). Emotional intelligence under stress: Useful, unnecessary, or irrelevant?. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1017-1028.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.018 URL |
[25] | Goleman, D. (2016). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ (Chinese version). Beijing: China CITIC Press. |
[26] | Grandey, A. A., & Krannitz, M. A. (2016). Emotion regulation at work and at home. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The oxford handbook of work and family (pp.81-94). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. |
[27] |
Grijalva, E., Newman, D. A., Tay, L., Donnellan, M. B., Harms, P. D., Robins, R. W., & Yan, T. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 261-310.
doi: 10.1037/a0038231 pmid: 25546498 |
[28] |
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237.
pmid: 9457784 |
[29] | Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation:Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp.3-26). New York, NJ: Guilford Press. |
[30] |
Guilford, J. P. (1929). An experiment in learning to read facial expression. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24(2), 191-202.
doi: 10.1037/h0069973 URL |
[31] |
Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334-1364.
doi: 10.1177/0149206314527130 URL |
[32] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NJ: Guilford. |
[33] |
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81-92.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 URL |
[34] |
Huang, Q., Xing, Y., & Gamble, J. (2019). Job demands-resources: A gender perspective on employee well-being and resilience in retail stores in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(8), 1323-1341.
doi: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1226191 URL |
[35] |
Hunter, E. M., & Wu, C. (2016). Give me a better break: Choosing workday break activities to maximize resource recovery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 302-311.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000045 pmid: 26375961 |
[36] |
Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 453-467.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.453 URL |
[37] |
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J. G., Shanine, K. K., & Kacmar, K. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309-341.
doi: 10.5465/annals.2014.0053 URL |
[38] | Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a better predictor of job performance: Job satisfaction or life satisfaction?. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 8(1), 20-42. |
[39] | Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Ascough, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence in organizational behavior and industrial-organizational psychology. In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, M., & Rd Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence (pp.356-375). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. |
[40] |
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 54-78.
doi: 10.1037/a0017286 pmid: 20085406 |
[41] | Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. |
[42] |
Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosogical job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355.
pmid: 9805280 |
[43] | Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York: Freeman. |
[44] |
Kotsou, I., Nelis, D., Grégoire, J., & Mikolajczak, M. (2011). Emotional plasticity: Conditions and effects of improving emotional competence in adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 827-839.
doi: 10.1037/a0023047 pmid: 21443316 |
[45] |
Koubova, V., & Buchko, A. A. (2013). Life-work balance: Emotional intelligence as a crucial component of achieving both personal life and work performance. Management Research Review, 36(7), 700-719.
doi: 10.1108/MRR-05-2012-0115 URL |
[46] |
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., Jiang, S., Elechi, O. O., Benjamin, B., Morris, A., ... Dupuy, P. (2010). The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 7-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.002 URL |
[47] |
Leung, A. S. (2003). Feminism in transition: Chinese culture, ideology and the development of the women’s movement in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 359-374.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024049516797 URL |
[48] |
Li, W.-D., Fay, D., Frese, M., Harms, P. D., & Gao, X. Y. (2014). Reciprocal relationship between proactive personality and work characteristics: A latent change score approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 948-965.
doi: 10.1037/a0036169 URL |
[49] |
Li, W.-D., Li, S., Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2019). Reciprocal relationships between dispositional optimism and work experiences: A five-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1471-1486.
doi: 10.1037/apl0000417 URL |
[50] |
Liu, Y., Prati, L. M., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2008). The relationship between emotional resources and emotional labor: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2410-2439.
doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00398.x URL |
[51] | Lively, K. J. (2013). Social and cultural influencers:Gender effects on emotional labor at work and at home. In A. Grandey, J. Diefendorff, & D.E. Rupp (Eds.), Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work (pp.223-250). New York, NJ: Routledge. |
[52] |
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597 URL |
[53] |
Mandell, B., & Pherwani, S. (2003). Relationship between emotional intelligence and transformational leadership style: A gender comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 387-404.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022816409059 URL |
[54] | Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?. Educational Researcher, 1988, 17(2), 13-17. |
[55] |
Matthews, G., Emo, A. K., Funke, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., Costa Jr, P. T., & Schulze, R. (2006). Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 96-107.
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.2.96 URL |
[56] | Mayer, J. D. (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test (MSCEIT): User’s manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Syst. |
[57] |
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507-536.
pmid: 17937602 |
[58] | Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is Emotional Intelligence? In P. Salovey, & D. Sluyter (Eds), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp.3-31). New York, NJ: Basic Books. |
[59] | Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology: Work psychology (pp.5-33). Hove, England: Psychology Press. |
[60] |
Niven, K., Holman, D., & Totterdell, P. (2012). How to win friendship and trust by influencing people’s feelings: An investigation of interpersonal affect regulation and the quality of relationships. Human Relations, 65(6), 777-805.
doi: 10.1177/0018726712439909 URL |
[61] |
Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Greene-Shortridge, T. M. (2012). Organizational work-family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: The process of work-family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 28-40.
doi: 10.1037/a0026428 pmid: 22149204 |
[62] |
Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Burnout and daily recovery: A day reconstruction study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 303-14.
doi: 10.1037/a0036904 pmid: 24885683 |
[63] |
Orth, M., & Volmer, J. (2017). Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 601-612.
doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2017.1332042 URL |
[64] |
Paik, Y., Seo, M.-G., & Jin, S. (2019). Affective information processing in self-managing teams: The role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(2), 235-267.
doi: 10.1177/0021886319832013 URL |
[65] | Peng, Z., Lin, X., Zhang, J., & Che, H. (2004). The ability model of emotional intelligence. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 817-823. |
[66] | Pierce, J. L. (1996). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. |
[67] |
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 pmid: 14516251 |
[68] |
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 URL |
[69] |
Purvanova, R. K., & Muros, J. P. (2010). Gender differences in burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 168-185.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.006 URL |
[70] |
Rong, Y., Sui, Y., & Yang, B. (2015). The effect of leader emotional intelligence on group performance and employee attitude: Mediating effect of justice climate and moderating effect of group power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(9), 1152-1161.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01152 URL |
[71] |
Rothbard, N. P., & Wilk, S. L. (2011). Waking up on the right or wrong side of the bed: Start-of-workday mood, work events, employee affect, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 959-980.
doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.0056 URL |
[72] | Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 369-386. |
[73] |
Salguero, J. M., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2012). Emotional intelligence and depression: The moderator role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 29-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.006 URL |
[74] | Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211. |
[75] |
Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2012). The daily spillover and crossover of emotional labor: Faking emotions at work and at home. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 209-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.07.003 URL |
[76] |
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
doi: 10.1002/job.248 URL |
[77] | Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement:Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp.10-24). New York, NJ: Psychology Press. |
[78] |
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471 URL |
[79] | Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20( 2), 177-196. |
[80] |
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326 URL |
[81] |
Schneider, B., Yost, A. B., Kropp, A., Kind, C., & Lam, H. (2018). Workforce engagement: What it is, what drives it, and why it matters for organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 462-480.
doi: 10.1002/job.2244 URL |
[82] |
Seo, M.-G., Bartunek, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2010). The role of affective experience in work motivation: Test of a conceptual model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 951-968.
doi: 10.1002/job.655 URL |
[83] |
Seo, M.-G., & Ilies, R. (2009). The role of self-efficacy, goal, and affect in dynamic motivational self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 120-133.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.001 URL |
[84] |
Sheldon, O. J., Dunning, D., & Ames, D. R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 125-137.
doi: 10.1037/a0034138 pmid: 23957689 |
[85] |
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). The long reach of one’s spouse: Spouses’ personality influences occupational success. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2189-2198.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614551370 URL |
[86] |
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518-528.
doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 pmid: 12814299 |
[87] |
Sun, J., Tian, X., & Li, R. (2019). Negative effects and mechanisms of emotional intelligence. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(8), 1451-1459.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01451 URL |
[88] |
Sy, T., Tram, S., & O’Hara, L. A. (2006). Relation of employee and manager emotional intelligence to job satisfaction and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 461-473.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.003 URL |
[89] | Tang, C., & Pan, Y. (2010). The impact of emotional intelligence and organizational identification on organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis. Nankai Business Review, 13(4), 115-124. |
[90] |
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 445-455.
doi: 10.1037/a0029213 pmid: 22799771 |
[91] |
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Trougakos, J. P. (2014). The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 177-199.
doi: 10.1111/joop.12050 URL |
[92] |
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H. D., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22(3), 277-294.
doi: 10.1080/02678370802393672 URL |
[93] |
Van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184-188.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x URL |
[94] |
Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., & Stevens, J. (2006). The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 445-461.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.07.002 URL |
[95] | Westman, M., Hobfoll, S. E., Chen, S., Davidson, O. B., & Laski, S. (2005). Organizational stress through the lens of conservation of resources (COR) theory. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (pp.167-220). Oxford, England: JAI Press/Elsevier Science. |
[96] |
Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543-604.
doi: 10.5465/19416520903065683 URL |
[97] |
Winkel, D. E., Wyland, R. L., Shaffer, M. A., & Clason, P. (2011). A new perspective on psychological resources: Unanticipated consequences of impulsivity and emotional intelligence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 78-94.
doi: 10.1348/2044-8325.002001 URL |
[98] |
Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243-274.
doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1 URL |
[99] |
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235-244.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003 URL |
[100] |
Yu, Q., & Yuan, D. (2008). The impact of the emotional intelligence of employees and their manager on the job performance of employees. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(1), 74-83.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2008.00074 URL |
[101] |
Zeidner, M., Kloda, I., & Matthews, G. (2013). Does dyadic coping mediate the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and marital quality?. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 795-805.
doi: 10.1037/a0034009 pmid: 24098964 |
[102] | Zhang, H., & Huang, T. (2015). The transmitting mechanisms of emotional intelligence on performance: Sequentially mediated by intra-group trust perception and friendship network centrality. Nankai Business Review, 18, 141-150. |
[103] | Zhang, H., & Ling, W. (2008). An empirical research on manager’s behavior emotional intelligence model and its validity. Nankai Business Review, 11, 50-60. |
[104] |
Zhang, H., & Wang, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the relationship between individual emotional intelligence and workplace performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(2), 188-202.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.00188 URL |
[105] |
Zheng, X., & Liu, X. (2016). The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6), 693-709.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00693 URL |
[106] |
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2015). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621-644.
doi: 10.1002/job.1990 URL |
[107] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method Biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12, 942-950. |
[108] |
Zhu, Z., Kuykendall, L., & Zhang, X. (2019). The impact of within-day work breaks on daily recovery processes: An event-based pre-/post-experience sampling study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 191-211.
doi: 10.1111/joop.12246 |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||