Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (10): 1071-1081.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01071
• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Fang, LI Xin, ZHANG Manman, BAI Xuejun()
Received:
2020-08-27
Published:
2021-10-25
Online:
2021-08-23
Contact:
BAI Xuejun
E-mail:bxuejun@126.com
Supported by:
LI Fang, LI Xin, ZHANG Manman, BAI Xuejun. (2021). Effects of sentence structure and type of control verb on thematic role assignment: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(10), 1071-1081.
Conditions | Sentences | |
---|---|---|
Centered structure | Subject control verb | 老徐对老齐懊悔说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Object control verb | 老徐对老齐提醒说应该及早采取防护措施。 | |
Preposed structure | Subject control verb | 对老齐老徐懊悔说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Object control verb | 对老齐老徐提醒说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Table 1 Examples of sentences under the four experimental conditions
Conditions | Sentences | |
---|---|---|
Centered structure | Subject control verb | 老徐对老齐懊悔说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Object control verb | 老徐对老齐提醒说应该及早采取防护措施。 | |
Preposed structure | Subject control verb | 对老齐老徐懊悔说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Object control verb | 对老齐老徐提醒说应该及早采取防护措施。 |
Material properties | Centered structure | Preposed structure | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Subject control verb | Object control verb | Subject control verb | Object control verb | |
Verb-verification index | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.03 |
Semantic orientation fitness | 0.92 ± 0.14 | 0.94 ± 0.12 | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.16 |
Sentence naturalness | 5.11 ± 0.78 | 5.15 ± 0.69 | 4.49 ± 0.67 | 4.49 ± 0.71 |
Table 2 Material properties of different experimental conditions (M ± SD)
Material properties | Centered structure | Preposed structure | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Subject control verb | Object control verb | Subject control verb | Object control verb | |
Verb-verification index | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 0.99 ± 0.03 | 0.99 ± 0.03 |
Semantic orientation fitness | 0.92 ± 0.14 | 0.94 ± 0.12 | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.16 |
Sentence naturalness | 5.11 ± 0.78 | 5.15 ± 0.69 | 4.49 ± 0.67 | 4.49 ± 0.71 |
Experimental conditions | 1 | 2 (Interest area 1) | 3 | 4 (Interest area 2) | 5 (Interest area 3) | 6 (Interest area 4) | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||||
Subject control verb | 老徐 | 对 | 老齐 | 懊悔 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Object control verb | 老徐 | 对 | 老齐 | 提醒 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Preposed structure | |||||||
Subject control verb | 对 | 老齐 | 老徐 | 懊悔 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Object control verb | 对 | 老齐 | 老徐 | 提醒 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 |
Table 3 An example of interest areas in experimental sentences
Experimental conditions | 1 | 2 (Interest area 1) | 3 | 4 (Interest area 2) | 5 (Interest area 3) | 6 (Interest area 4) | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||||
Subject control verb | 老徐 | 对 | 老齐 | 懊悔 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Object control verb | 老徐 | 对 | 老齐 | 提醒 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Preposed structure | |||||||
Subject control verb | 对 | 老齐 | 老徐 | 懊悔 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 | |
Object control verb | 对 | 老齐 | 老徐 | 提醒 | 说应该 | 及早采取防护措施 |
Experimental conditions | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) |
---|---|---|
Centered structure | ||
Subject control verb | 839 ± 302 | 3.01 ± 1.02 |
Object control verb | 924 ± 330 | 3.32 ± 1.21 |
Preposed structure | ||
Subject control verb | 978 ± 388 | 3.71 ± 1.31 |
Object control verb | 1083 ± 374 | 3.93 ± 1.50 |
Table 4 The results of each eye movement measure under different experimental conditions in interest area 1 (M ± SD)
Experimental conditions | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) |
---|---|---|
Centered structure | ||
Subject control verb | 839 ± 302 | 3.01 ± 1.02 |
Object control verb | 924 ± 330 | 3.32 ± 1.21 |
Preposed structure | ||
Subject control verb | 978 ± 388 | 3.71 ± 1.31 |
Object control verb | 1083 ± 374 | 3.93 ± 1.50 |
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 340 ± 76 | 520 ± 140 | 775 ± 348 | 2.85 ± 1.18 | 1.54 ± 0.44 |
Object control verb | 329 ± 77 | 486 ± 151 | 1070 ± 456 | 3.76 ± 1.64 | 1.65 ± 0.56 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 379 ± 77 | 672 ± 210 | 1080 ± 446 | 3.83 ± 1.46 | 1.74 ± 0.59 |
Object control verb | 383 ± 90 | 722 ± 233 | 1022 ± 393 | 3.67 ± 1.20 | 1.74 ± 0.52 |
Table 5 The results of each eye movement measure under different experimental conditions in interest area 2 (M ± SD)
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 340 ± 76 | 520 ± 140 | 775 ± 348 | 2.85 ± 1.18 | 1.54 ± 0.44 |
Object control verb | 329 ± 77 | 486 ± 151 | 1070 ± 456 | 3.76 ± 1.64 | 1.65 ± 0.56 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 379 ± 77 | 672 ± 210 | 1080 ± 446 | 3.83 ± 1.46 | 1.74 ± 0.59 |
Object control verb | 383 ± 90 | 722 ± 233 | 1022 ± 393 | 3.67 ± 1.20 | 1.74 ± 0.52 |
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 355 ± 75 | 447 ± 124 | 669 ± 287 | 2.41 ± 0.95 | 1.41 ± 0.37 |
Object control verb | 402 ± 88 | 506 ± 153 | 859 ± 352 | 3.06 ± 1.28 | 1.59 ± 0.46 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 345 ± 89 | 523 ± 165 | 698 ± 243 | 2.42 ± 0.81 | 1.51 ± 0.39 |
Object control verb | 366 ± 73 | 611 ± 257 | 768 ± 327 | 2.71 ± 1.03 | 1.53 ± 0.45 |
Table 6 The results of each eye movement measure under different experimental conditions in interest area 3 (M ± SD)
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 355 ± 75 | 447 ± 124 | 669 ± 287 | 2.41 ± 0.95 | 1.41 ± 0.37 |
Object control verb | 402 ± 88 | 506 ± 153 | 859 ± 352 | 3.06 ± 1.28 | 1.59 ± 0.46 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 345 ± 89 | 523 ± 165 | 698 ± 243 | 2.42 ± 0.81 | 1.51 ± 0.39 |
Object control verb | 366 ± 73 | 611 ± 257 | 768 ± 327 | 2.71 ± 1.03 | 1.53 ± 0.45 |
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 418 ± 108 | 646 ± 250 | 566 ± 212 | 2.22 ± 0.69 | 1.34 ± 0.34 |
Object control verb | 392 ± 107 | 674 ± 274 | 724 ± 300 | 2.78 ± 1.08 | 1.61 ± 0.50 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 375 ± 80 | 592 ± 296 | 523 ± 197 | 2.19 ± 0.70 | 1.35 ± 0.33 |
Object control verb | 423 ± 105 | 713 ± 309 | 652 ± 288 | 2.52 ± 0.95 | 1.56 ± 0.47 |
Table 7 The results of each eye movement measure under different experimental conditions in interest area 4 (M ± SD)
Experimental conditions | First-pass reading time (ms) | Regression path duration (ms) | Second-pass reading time (ms) | Total incoming regressions (times) | Total outgoing regressions (times) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Centered structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 418 ± 108 | 646 ± 250 | 566 ± 212 | 2.22 ± 0.69 | 1.34 ± 0.34 |
Object control verb | 392 ± 107 | 674 ± 274 | 724 ± 300 | 2.78 ± 1.08 | 1.61 ± 0.50 |
Preposed structure | |||||
Subject control verb | 375 ± 80 | 592 ± 296 | 523 ± 197 | 2.19 ± 0.70 | 1.35 ± 0.33 |
Object control verb | 423 ± 105 | 713 ± 309 | 652 ± 288 | 2.52 ± 0.95 | 1.56 ± 0.47 |
[1] | Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. |
[2] | Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates. |
[3] | Bates, E. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The cross linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[4] |
Betancort, M., Carreiras, M., & Acuña-Fariña, C. (2006). Processing controlled PROs in Spanish. Cognition, 100(2), 217-282.
pmid: 16310761 |
[5] |
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(4), 413-432.
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90064-7 URL |
[6] |
Bornkessel, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review, 113(4), 787-821.
pmid: 17014303 |
[7] |
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003 pmid: 18617270 |
[8] | Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2016). The argument dependency model. In G. Hickok & S. L. Small (Eds.), Neurobiology of Language (pp. 357-369). Academic Press. |
[9] | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. |
[10] |
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619.
doi: 10.1353/lan.1991.0021 URL |
[11] |
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. -G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 URL |
[12] |
Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 13(2), 187-222.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90022-7 URL |
[13] |
Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Neuroreport, 12(15), 3391-3394.
pmid: 11711892 |
[14] |
Gattei, C. A., Dickey, M. W., Wainselboim, A. J., & París, L. (2015). The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(10), 1981-2007.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.1000345 URL |
[15] |
Gattei, C. A., Tabullo, Á., París, L., & Wainselboim, A. J. (2015). The role of prominence in Spanish sentence comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 150, 22-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.001 URL |
[16] | Gattei, C. A., Sevilla, Y., Tabullo, Á. J., Wainselboim, A. J., París, L. A., & Shalom, D. E. (2017). Prominence in Spanish sentence comprehension: An eye-tracking study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(5), 587-607. |
[17] |
Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(4), 351-377.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716400000370 URL |
[18] | Li, X. Q., Zhao, H. Y., Zheng, Y. Y., & Yang, Y. F. (2015). Two-stage interaction between word order and noun animacy during online thematic processing of sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5), 555-573. |
[19] | MacWhinney, B. (1984). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69-90). Cambridge University Press. |
[20] |
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 127-150.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90093-8 URL |
[21] | Manouilidou, C., & de Almeida, R. G. (2013). Processing correlates of verb typologies: Investigating internal structure and argument realization. Linguistics, 51(4), 767-792. |
[22] |
McDonald, J. L., & Heilenman, L. K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12(3), 313-348.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716400009255 URL |
[23] |
Meltzer-Asscher, A., Mack, J. E., Barbieri, E., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). How the brain processes different dimensions of argument structure complexity: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, 142, 65-75.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.12.005 pmid: 25658635 |
[24] | Meng, X. Q., & Jia, X. Y. (2009). Comparison of “dui construction” in Chinese and French. Linguistic Research, 3, 22-26. |
[25] |
Morett, L. M., & MacWhinney, B. (2013). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 132-151.
doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000107 URL |
[26] |
Özge, D., Küntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152-180.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026 URL |
[27] | Pléh, C., Fekete, I., & Varga, D. (2017). The possible role of entropy in processing argument dependencies in Hungarian. In F. Kiefer, J. Blevins, & H. Bartos (Eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization (pp. 200-211). Brill. |
[28] | Qiao, Y. (1987). Comparative analysis of case marking and lexicase in Chinese. Academic Journal Graduate School Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 6, 75-78. |
[29] |
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
pmid: 9849112 |
[30] | RStudio, . (2019). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 1.2.5033) [Computer software]. Boston, MA, Author. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.org/ |
[31] | Song, J. Q., & Jang, H. H. (2011). Contrastive analysis of Chinese-English case marking and its translation strategies. Journal of Nantong Vocational and Technical Shipping College, 10(1), 5-8. |
[32] | Starosta., S. (1985). Mandarin case marking: A localistic lexicase analysis. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13(2), 216-266. |
[33] |
Strotseva-Feinschmidt, A., Schipke, C. S., Gunter, T. C., Brauer, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2019). Young children’s sentence comprehension: Neural correlates of syntax-semantic competition. Brain and Cognition, 134, 110-121.
doi: S0278-2626(18)30030-7 pmid: 30442450 |
[34] |
Su, I. R. (2001). Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 83-112.
doi: 10.1017/S0142716401001059 URL |
[35] | Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3-4), SI211-SI234. |
[36] | Team, R. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ |
[37] |
Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., & Fix, S. F. (2010). Neural mechanisms of verb argument structure processing in agrammatic aphasic and healthy age-matched listeners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(9), 1993-2011.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21334 pmid: 19702460 |
[38] |
Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Mesulam, M. M. (2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1753-1767.
pmid: 17958479 |
[39] |
Thompson, C. K., Riley, E. A., den Ouden, D. B., MeltzerAsscher, A., & Lukic, S. (2013). Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: Behavioral and neural recovery patterns. Cortex, 49(9), 2358-2376.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.003 pmid: 23514929 |
[40] |
Wang, L., Schlesewsky, M., Bickel, B., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, L. (2009). Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7-8), 1180-1226.
doi: 10.1080/01690960802159937 URL |
[41] | Wang, X. (2013). A treatment of the ba-sentence and the bei-sentence by type-logical grammar. Journal of Yantai University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 26(3), 113-117. |
[42] |
Wang, X., Hang, M. L., & Liang, D. D. (2020). The cognitive neural mechanisms of verb argument structure complexity processing. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(1), 62-74.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00062 URL |
[43] |
Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 559-570.
pmid: 10442024 |
[44] | Wu, H. (2019). The research of “Dui”-sentence in modern Chinese from the cognitive-function perspective (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Jilin University, Changchun. |
[45] | Xu, X. D., Chen, L. J., & Ni, C. B. (2017). How is pronoun resolution modulated by topic structures and verb-based implicit causality in Mandarian Chinese? An ERP investigation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 49(3), 323-334. |
[46] | Xu, X. D., Ni, C. B., & Chen, L. J. (2017). The influence of topic structure and verb-based implicit causality on pronoun resolution in Mandarian Chinese: Evidence from sentence production and comprehension. Modern Foreign Languages, 36(4), 331-339. |
[47] |
Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), 163-188.
doi: 10.1023/A:1025009615473 URL |
[48] |
Zhai, Y. (2011). The processing of Dui-construction in Chinese. Psychology, 2(6), 560-567.
doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.26086 URL |
[49] |
Zhang, M., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X., Yan, G., & Zang, C. (2019). The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(6), 812-825.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000644 URL |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||