ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B

Acta Psychologica Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 1313-1326.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01313

• Reports of Empirical Studies • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health of migrant children: A meta-analysis of Chinese students

HAN Yichu1(), WEN Hengfu1(), CHENG Shuhua2, ZHANG Chungan2, LI Xin3   

  1. 1. College of Educational Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China
    2. College of Teachers Education, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China
    3. Education Center for Mental Health, Harbin Cambridge College, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2020-03-23 Published:2020-11-25 Online:2020-10-10
  • Contact: HAN Yichu,WEN Hengfu E-mail:hanyichu@126.com

Abstract:

Migrant children are children aged 6~15 years (compulsory education stage) who leave their home country with their parents to study, live in the destination for more than half a year, and have no registered permanent residence. Being discriminated against and viewing oneself as a target of discrimination poses a threat to the mental health of migrant children. This meta-analysis was intended to estimate the association between perceived discrimination and various mental health conditions (positive and negative).
Numerous studies explored the relationship between perceived discrimination and mental health among Chinese migrant students. However, these results were far from consistent and mental health indicators need to be studied further. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to explore the relation between perceived discrimination and positive and negative mental health indicators, and investigate the moderating effects of perceived discrimination, type of participants, and gender. Through literature retrieval, 49 independent effect sizes were selected together with 40, 351 participants, which met the inclusion criteria of meta-analysis. After coding the data, we analyzed independent effect sizes using the CMA 2.0 program. Heterogeneity test indicated that random effects model was suitable for the meta-analysis.
The results of funnel plot and Egger’s intercept showed no publication bias. Main-effect test indicated a significant negative correlation between perceived discrimination and positive mental health indicators (r = –0.323, 95% CI = [–0.378, –0.266]), and a significant positive correlation between perceived discrimination and negative mental health indicators (r = 0.41, 95% CI = [0.36, 0.458]). Moderation analyses and meta-regression analysis revealed that the association between perceived discrimination and positive mental health indicators was moderated by tools of perceived discrimination and type of participants but not by the gender. Furthermore, the association between perceived discrimination and negative mental health indicators was moderated by tools of perceived discrimination, type of participants, and gender.
According to the meta-analysis, the perception of discrimination and mental health of immigrant children were closely related. Identifying the mechanism of perceived discrimination and mental health is necessary, which could help migrant children to recover from their psychological predicament and actively address the negative effects of perceived discrimination. Particular attention should be given to the relationship between perception of discrimination and positive mental health, and further protection should be ensured for migrant children at the junior secondary level.

Key words: migrant children, perceived discrimination, mental health, meta-analysis