Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
信息量和明显度对规则可获得性的影响
刘志雅;郑琛
(华南师范大学心理应用研究中心/心理学院, 广州 510631)
Information Amount and Obviousness Influence Hypothesis Generation
LIU Zhiya; ZHENG Chen
(Center for Studies of Psychological Application/School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
全文: PDF(508 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

该研究探索了规则的信息量与明显度对规则可获得性的影响。采用改编后的2-4-6任务, 70名大学生参加了两个实验。实验1发现, 规则可获得性除了受到信息量的影响外, 还受到明显度的显著影响; 实验2增加了规则的探测, 发现信息量大、明显度高的规则更容易用语言陈述出来, 而信息量小、明显度低的规则更不容易陈述出来。实验结果启示:信息量大、明显度高的规则可能是一种外显规则, 而信息量小、明显度低的规则可能是一种内隐规则。初步提出了“计算和感知的双加工”模型。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘志雅
郑琛
关键词 学习规则形成推理内隐学习    
Abstract

 This study focuses on the availability of rule learning. Cherubini, Castelvecchio & Cherubini (2005); Cherubini, Rusconi, Russo, Di Bari, & Sacchi (2010) confirmed that the availability of rule learning was influenced by the information amount of the rule. Information amount was explained by how many examples could be covered by a rule. For a rule, the more number of examples could be converted, the less information amount would have. For example, in 2-4-6 task, the information amount in the rule of “even number increase” is 1/n and in the rule of “the third number is the sum of other two” is 1/n2. The information amount theory suggests that a rule with higher information amount is generated more easily than a lower one. However, Some researches (Barsalou,1982; Rips,1989; Medin, Lynch, Coley, & Atran,1997; Shafto, Coley, & Baldwin,2007; Guhe, Pease, & Smail,2011) showed that rule learning would be impacted by the information background of participants.

In this paper, information background was defined as the obviousness of the rule. Inspired by dual process model of deductive reasoning (Evans, 2003, 2010; Sloman, 1996; Barrouillet, 2011), This study assumed that the cognitive process of rule learning might be impacted by the information amount and obviousness both. Dual process model suggested that there were two independent cognitive systems, system 1 was usually described as unconscious and automatic; the system 2 was inherently conscious and controlled. This paper assumed that there might be two independent cognitive systems that manipulating rule learning process. This hypothesis was tested by experiment 1. Additionally, Ashby (1998) also suggested that there were two kinds of category learning. One was the rule-base category learning, the other was information integration. In the case of rule-based learning, participants could abstract a linguistic and explicit rule from materials, while they cannot discover an explicit rule but still can classify materials when doing information integration tasks, which seems to be implicit. This article assume that rule learning process may also conducted by both explicit and implicit systems and which system would be adopted may related to the information amount and obviousness of rules. Experiment 2 was designed to test this hypothesis. With 70 college students' participated, a revised 2-4-6 task was used to examine our hypothesis. Both experiments were presented by Psychtoolbox 3.0 on MATLAB.

Experiment 1 found that there were two independent factors, the information amount and the obviousness of the rule, significantly influence availability of rule learning. Experiment 2 is the same as experiment 1 except a rule description between every block of learning. The result of experiment 2 indicated that rules with high information amount and obviousness are more easier to be learned and expressed, while rules of low information amount combine with less obvious could be learned either but hardly be expressed clearly. These results consist with the dual process model in deductive reasoning and reveal that the rules with high amount information and obviousness are processing by an explicit rule system, and with lower amount information and less obviousness are processing by an implicit rule system.

Key wordslearning    hypothesis generation    reasoning    implicit learning
收稿日期: 2014-10-16      出版日期: 2015-12-25
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(31371050)资助。

通讯作者: 刘志雅, E-mail: zhiyaliu@scnu.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
刘志雅;郑琛. 信息量和明显度对规则可获得性的影响[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01445.
LIU Zhiya; ZHENG Chen. Information Amount and Obviousness Influence Hypothesis Generation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(12): 1445-1453.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01445      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2015/V47/I12/1445
[1] 龚少英, 上官晨雨, 翟奎虎, 郭雅薇.  情绪设计对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.
[2] 江荣焕, 李晓东.  比例推理的过度使用及其认知机制: 一项发展性的负启动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(6): 745-758.
[3] 冯彪;徐亮;张蔚欣;陈婷;王文清;郑希付. 积极情绪对条件性恐惧泛化的抑制作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 317-328.
[4] 张恒超. 共享因素对参照性交流双方学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 197-205.
[5] 张丽锦; 毕远; 梁熠; 刘敏红;. 小学一年级数感不良儿童的筛查与动态干预[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 804-817.
[6] 陈帅; 王端旭;. 道不同不相为谋?信息相关断裂带对团队学习的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 867-879.
[7] 谢和平;王福兴;周宗奎;吴鹏. 多媒体学习中线索效应的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 540-555.
[8] 王琼;王玮文;李曼;杜伟;邵枫. 阻断内侧前额叶皮质TrkB受体对大鼠认知和海马BDNF表达的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 509-517.
[9] 杨海波;刘电芝. 片段再认任务在内隐序列学习研究中的有效性检验[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 230-237.
[10] 贾永萍;周楚;李林;郭秀艳. 汉字的无线索回忆再认效应:重复学习和重复测验的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 111-120.
[11] 李利;张扬;李璇;郭红婷;伍丽梅;王瑞明. 三语者语义通达中的跨语言重复启动效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1401-1409.
[12] 杜雪娇;张奇. 样例设计及呈现方式对学习代数运算规则的促进[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1445-1454.
[13] 李婧; 陈安涛;陈杰;龙长权. 词语型类别属性归纳中分类与属性推理过程的时间特征[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1410-1422.
[14] 姜英杰; 王志伟; 郑明玲; 金雪莲. 基于价值的议程对学习时间分配影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1229-1238.
[15] 周爱保;杨天成;程晨;马小凤;赵静. 多篇章学习中提取练习策略对高阶技能的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 928-938.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn