Please wait a minute...
  2005, Vol. 37 Issue (01): 92-99    DOI:
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社会支持与人格对大学生压力的影响
刘玉新,张建卫,金盛华
对外经济贸易大学国际工商管理学院,北京 100029,北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081,北京师范大学心理学院,北京 100875
THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND PERSONALITY ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ STRESS
Liu Yuxin, Zhang Jianwei, Jin Shenghua
School of International Business Management, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
全文: PDF(1438 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 将横断与纵向研究相结合,对660名大学生进行了问卷调查。结果发现,社会支持对同期压力的主效应非常显著,对后期压力的主效应则不显著。社会支持的变化类型对后期压力也具有显著的主效应。“开朗—果断”与“拘谨—温和”两类人格对同期压力的主效应非常显著,前者同期的各类压力均显著低于后者的同类压力;前期人格类型对两年后压力的主效应依然显著。社会支持与人格的独立主效应和交互作用均显著;社会支持的变化与人格的独立主效应和交互作用均显著
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘玉新
张建卫
金盛华
关键词 压力社会支持人格大学生     
Abstract:This study administered both cross-sectional and longitudinal questionnaire surveys on 660 university students. Results of the study indicated the following: Social support had significant main effect on concurrent stress; those having relatively higher level of social support experienced significantly less concurrent stress than those having lower level of social support. After controlling for earlier stress, earlier social support no longer had significant main effect on later stress. Change of types of social support (four types all together: those continuously having high level support; those continuously having low level support; those having high level support at the beginning but change to low level support two years later; those having low level support at the beginning but changed to high level support two years later) also had significant main effect on later stress. Two types of personality, “open-assertive” and “reserved-gentle”, had significant main effect on concurrent stress, with the “open-assertive” experiencing significantly less stress than the “reserved-gentle” on every corresponding stress types. Earlier personality types still had significant main effect on stress level two-years-later. Social support and personality had significant both main effects and interaction effect on stress; change of types of social support and personality had significant both main effects and interaction effect on stress
Key wordsstress    social support    personality    university students
收稿日期: 2003-02-01      出版日期: 2005-01-30
ZTFLH:  R395  
通讯作者: 刘玉新   
引用本文:   
刘玉新,张建卫,金盛华. 社会支持与人格对大学生压力的影响[J]. , 2005, 37(01): 92-99.
Liu Yuxin, Zhang Jianwei, Jin Shenghua. THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND PERSONALITY ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ STRESS. , 2005, 37(01): 92-99.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2005/V37/I01/92
[1] 卢家楣;刘伟;贺雯;王俊山;陈念劬;解登峰. 中国当代大学生情感素质的现状及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 1-16.
[2] 周宵;伍新春;曾旻;田雨馨. 青少年的情绪调节策略对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 969-980.
[3] 任志洪; 李献云; 赵陵波; 余香莲; 李政汉; 赖丽足; 阮怡君; 江光荣. 抑郁症网络化自助干预的效果及作用机制 ——以汉化MoodGYM为例[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 818-832.
[4] 汪佳瑛; 陈斌斌. 童年压力及死亡威胁启动对择偶要求的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 857-866.
[5] 陈乐妮; 王桢; 骆南峰;罗正学. 领导−下属外向性人格匹配性与下属工作投入的关系:基于支配补偿理论[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 710-721.
[6] 黄四林; 韩明跃; 宁彩芳; 林崇德. 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响:自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 684-692.
[7] 黄四林;韩明跃;张梅;. 人际关系对社会责任感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 578-587.
[8] 应梦婷;江光荣;于丽霞;鲁婷. 大学生自伤行为的强化敏感性基础[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 258-270.
[9] 崔诣晨;王沛;谈晨皓. 内隐人格理论对他人印象加工策略的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1538-1550.
[10] 谢俊;严鸣. 积极应对还是逃避?主动性人格对职场排斥与组织公民行为的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1314-1325.
[11] 曹丛;王美萍;纪林芹;魏星;曹衍淼;张文新. MAOA基因rs6323多态性与母亲支持性教养对青少年抑郁的交互作用:素质–压力假说与不同易感性假说的检验[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(1): 22-35.
[12] 潘颖秋. 初中青少年自尊发展趋势及影响因素的追踪分析[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 787-796.
[13] 徐建平;陈基越;张伟;李文雅;盛毓. 应聘者在人格测验中作假的反应过程:基于工作赞许性的眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(11): 1395-1404.
[14] 王雨晴;姚鹏飞;周国梅. 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 108-118.
[15] 毛晓飞;彭华茂. 视知觉压力在基本心理能力老化中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 29-38.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn