Please wait a minute...
心理学报
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国当代大学生情感素质的现状及其影响因素
卢家楣; 刘 伟; 贺 雯; 王俊山; 陈念劬 ;解登峰
(上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234)
The status quo of China's contemporary college students’ affective diathesis and its influencing factors
LU Jiamei; LIU Wei; HE Wen; WANG Junshan; CHEN Nianqu; XIE Dengfeng
(Educational College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234,China)
全文: PDF(625 KB)   评审附件 (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

在情感素质理论与实践探索相结合的基础上编制了《中国大学生情感素质问卷》(内含6个分问卷), 并对全国3类地区14座城市100所大学的11982名大学生进行首次大规模情感素质调查。结果发现:该问卷具有较好的信效度, 是适合研究大学生情感素质的原创性的有效测评工具; 大学生情感素质具有2层面6大类33种情感的结构, 呈现丰富情感, 且总体发展水平尚好, 其中道德、生活情感发展水平较高, 人际、审美、理智情感和情绪智力等相对较低; 男女大学生之间和本专科大学生之间存在情感素质的结构性差异; 有获奖经历、学业自评高及无负性生活事件的大学生情感素质水平较高; 良好的人际关系、对舆论的关注、对核心价值观的认同、自我高要求、民主的家庭教养方式等因素对大学生情感素质的发展具有促进作用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
卢家楣
刘伟
贺雯
王俊山
陈念劬
解登峰
关键词 情感素质 情感 问卷调查 大学生 影响因素    
Abstract

A large-scale research on the affective diathesis of college students in China is a significant though challenging endeavor. Based upon the theory of affective diathesis and thoughts of developmental affection with classified thoughts, current study developed an original investigative tool with solid reliability and validity—“Questionnaire on College Students’ Affective Diathesis”. This instrument dealt with the complexities in affect measurement and is of great theoretical and practical significance. The questionnaire was used to investigate college students’ affect development on thirty-three different kinds of affects, including patriotism, responsibility, integrity, credibility, dedication, fairness, public benefit; curiosity, exploration, self-confidence, achievements, learning happiness, major interest; intimacy, cooperation, forgiveness, emotionally appealing, gratefulness, care; self-improvement, self-reliance, self-esteem, cherish, happiness, optimism; aesthetic for nature, aesthetic for humanity, aesthetic for science, aesthetic for deportment; emotional understanding ability, emotional expression ability, emotional control of oneself, emotional control of others. They belong to six categories (moral affection, rational affection, interpersonal affection, life affection, aesthetic affection and emotional intelligence) evolving from the identity layer of affection and the operational layer of affection. The questionnaire was administered to 11982 college students, including vocational college students and university students. The geological regions encompassed well-developed, developing and less-developed regions in China involving 100 colleges and universities of 14 major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Nanjing, Changchun, Zhengzhou, Xi'an, Wuhan, Xining, Lanzhou, Guiyang, Nanning, Haikou, and Kunming). The results showed: (1) The questionnaire meets the criteria of an effective measurement tool and serves as an original investigative tool for affective diathesis of college students. (2) The college students’ affective diathesis has a multilevel structure. On the whole, the affective diathesis of college students in China is positive. The developmental level of moral affection and life affection is relatively higher, and the developmental level of interpersonal affection, aesthetic affection, rational affection and emotional intelligence were relatively lower. Affections of integrity, public benefit, dedication, exploration, learning happiness, self-confidence, forgiveness, intimacy, emotionally appealing, aesthetic for humanity, aesthetic for science and ability of emotional expression were still in urgent need of improvement. (3) A structural difference mainly existed between males and females. Females scored higher in intimacy, emotionally appealing and self-esteem, but males performed better on integrity, curiosity, exploration, self-confidence, aesthetic for science and emotional expression. (4) Those who received awards, reported achieving higher academic performance, or experienced no negative life events showed higher level of affective diathesis, especially reflected in self-confidence, achievements, learning happiness, self-improvement, happiness etc. (5) The factors affecting the affective diathesis development of the college students mainly derived from four aspects: individuals, families, schools and society. Strong interpersonal relationship, more public awareness, sound moral values, high self-expectations, democratic family education style et al. all had positive effects on college students’ affective diathesis. This investigation equips educators with abundant first-hand information on how to improve the affective diathesis of college students as well as for academics on the theoretical implications for affective diathesis research.

Key wordsaffective diathesis    affects    questionnaire    college students    affecting factors.
收稿日期: 2016-07-27      出版日期: 2017-01-25
基金资助:

教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(13JZD048)的研究成果。

通讯作者: 卢家楣, E-mail: lujiamei@vip.163.com   
引用本文:   
卢家楣;刘伟;贺雯;王俊山;陈念劬;解登峰. 中国当代大学生情感素质的现状及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00001.
LU Jiamei; LIU Wei; HE Wen; WANG Junshan; CHEN Nianqu; XIE Dengfeng. The status quo of China's contemporary college students’ affective diathesis and its influencing factors. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 1-16.
链接本文:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00001      或      http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/Y2017/V49/I1/1
[1] 莫申江;施俊琦. 情绪劳动策略对主动破坏行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(3): 349-358.
[2] 任志洪; 李献云; 赵陵波; 余香莲; 李政汉; 赖丽足; 阮怡君; 江光荣. 抑郁症网络化自助干预的效果及作用机制 ——以汉化MoodGYM为例[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(7): 818-832.
[3] 黄四林; 韩明跃; 宁彩芳; 林崇德. 大学生学校认同对责任感的影响:自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 684-692.
[4] 黄四林;韩明跃;张梅;. 人际关系对社会责任感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 578-587.
[5] 叶勇豪;许燕;朱一杰;梁炯潜;兰天;于淼. 网民对“人祸”事件的道德情绪特点——基于微博大数据研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 290-304.
[6] 应梦婷;江光荣;于丽霞;鲁婷. 大学生自伤行为的强化敏感性基础[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(3): 258-270.
[7] 涂乙冬;陆欣欣;郭玮;王震. 道德型领导者得到了什么?道德型领导、团队平均领导?部属交换及领导者收益[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[8] 张剑心;武燕;陈心韵;刘电芝. 高低情感开放性者概率内隐序列学习进程差异[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1793-1804 .
[9] 周璠;石岩. 女大学生体重知觉偏差及探因[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(1): 101-112 .
[10] 常亚平;肖万福;覃伍;阎俊. 网络环境下第三方评论对冲动购买意愿的影响机制:以产品类别和评论员级别为调节变量[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(9): 1244-1264.
[11] 望海军. 品牌信任和品牌情感:究竟谁导致了品牌忠诚?—— 一个动态研究[J]. , 2012, 44(6): 830-840 .
[12] 辛自强,张梅,何琳. 大学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究[J]. , 2012, 44(5): 664-679.
[13] 王宇清;龙立荣;周浩. 消极情绪在程序和互动不公正感与员工偏离行为间的中介作用:传统性的调节机制[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(12): 1663-1676.
[14] 陈雪军,黄月胜,党晓姣,郑希付. 创伤青少年自传体记忆具体性减少:情感调节还是执行控制受损[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 112-120.
[15] 王娟,沈树华,张积家. 大学生的气味词分类—— 基于语义相似性和知觉相似性的探讨[J]. , 2011, 43(10): 1124-1137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《心理学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn