Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (2) : 253-264     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00253
Regular Articles |
Common factors vs. specific ingredients in psychotherapy: Controversy and integration
YANG Wendeng1,2; ZHANG Xiaoyuan2
(1The Center for the Psychology and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China) (2 Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China)
Download: PDF(459 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Common factors theory and specific ingredients theory are two contradictory theories on the contributing factors of therapeutic change in psychotherapy. This article reviews the definition of common factors theory and its two developmental pathways; explores the concepts and research advances of the specific ingredients theory through examples of empirically supported treatment; and discusses respectively the issues and debates within each of the theories. We concluded that the concepts of "common factors" and "specific ingredients" represent a temporary categorization of the contributing facts of therapeutic change, mainly through the eyes of researchers. These two concepts are largely interdependent and interchangeable; however, even a combination of them may still not be able to accommodate all factors of therapeutic change. In the future, there is a need to further understand the process and mechanism of therapeutic change; to equip our next-generation clinical psychologists with skills for both "common factors" and "specific ingredients"; and to gradually integrate these two camps into one through the promotion of evidence-based psychotherapies.

Keywords common factor      specific ingredient      therapeutic change      empirically supported treatment      evidence-based psychotherapy      integration     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Xiaoyuan, E-mail: zhxy@fimmu.com   
Issue Date: 15 February 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YANG Wendeng
ZHANG Xiaoyuan
Cite this article:   
YANG Wendeng,ZHANG Xiaoyuan. Common factors vs. specific ingredients in psychotherapy: Controversy and integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 253-264.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/ 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00253     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2017/V25/I2/253
[1] YU Xide, ZHANG Xiaojuan, LU Cheng, ZHU Yiyi, GAO Dingguo.  Sound influence eating or drinking behavior: Empirical progress and theoretical ideas[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 955-969.
[2] XIN Xin; REN Gui-Qin; LI Jin-Cai; TANG Xiao-Yu. The characteristics and mechanisms of audiovisual integration: Evidence from mismatch negativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 757-768.
[3] SUN Hailong; XING Qiang; LI Aimei. The influence of working memory on perceptual category learning: Problem and conception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 424-430.
[4] Cong Zhang; Lin Yang; Mingsha Zhang. Dynamic change of visual receptive field during visually-guided delay saccades in macaque posterior parietal cortex[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 16-.
[5] XU Sheng; SONG Xiaolei. Joint Simon effect: Current research, influencing factors and theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 367-378.
[6] LI Songqing; ZHAO Qingbai; ZHOU Zhijin; ZHANG Yi. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Text and Picture Processing in Multimedia Learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1361-1370.
[7] WANG Ping; PAN Zhihui; ZHANG Lijie; CHEN Xuhai. The Integration of Dynamic Facial and Vocal Emotion and Its Neurophysiological Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1109-1117.
[8] ZHOU Aibao; ZHANG Yanchi; LIU Peiru; YIN Yulong; ZHANG Fen. Who am I ? ——Enfacement Illusion Based on Interpersonal Multisensory Stimulation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 159-167.
[9] PAN Lu; QIAN Xiuying. Rhythm Perception and Interactions between Different Sensory Channels[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 1910-1919.
[10] LI Dan; YANG Zhongning. Spatial Navigation: The Relationship between Landmark Learning and Path Integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1755-1762.
[11] ZHOU Lihua;CHEN Jian;LU Dali;LIU Xiaoqun;SU Linyan. Hopelessness and Hopefulness: Risk and Resilience to Hopelessness Depression from the Perspective of Cognitive Style[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 977-986.
[12] FU Mei;WANG Qiang. The Neural Basis of Intertemporal Choice: Evidences from Voxel-Based Morphometry and Diffusion Tensor Imaging[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 659-667.
[13] LIU Chenghao; XU Fuming; SHI Yanwei; LI Yan; ZHANG Hui. The Base Rate Neglect in Judgment and Decision-making LIU Chenghao; XU Fuming; SHI Yanwei; LI Yan; ZHANG Hui[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1637-1646.
[14] SUN Hailong;XING Qiang. The Influences of Feedback on Perceptual Category Learning and Its’ Cognitive and Neurophysiological Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 67-74.
[15] LU Xinxin;TU Yidong. Contextualization and Generalizability of Organization-Based Self-Esteem[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 130-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech