Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (2) : 253-264     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00253
Regular Articles |
Common factors vs. specific ingredients in psychotherapy: Controversy and integration
YANG Wendeng1,2; ZHANG Xiaoyuan2
(1The Center for the Psychology and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China) (2 Department of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China)
Download: PDF(459 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Common factors theory and specific ingredients theory are two contradictory theories on the contributing factors of therapeutic change in psychotherapy. This article reviews the definition of common factors theory and its two developmental pathways; explores the concepts and research advances of the specific ingredients theory through examples of empirically supported treatment; and discusses respectively the issues and debates within each of the theories. We concluded that the concepts of "common factors" and "specific ingredients" represent a temporary categorization of the contributing facts of therapeutic change, mainly through the eyes of researchers. These two concepts are largely interdependent and interchangeable; however, even a combination of them may still not be able to accommodate all factors of therapeutic change. In the future, there is a need to further understand the process and mechanism of therapeutic change; to equip our next-generation clinical psychologists with skills for both "common factors" and "specific ingredients"; and to gradually integrate these two camps into one through the promotion of evidence-based psychotherapies.

Keywords common factor      specific ingredient      therapeutic change      empirically supported treatment      evidence-based psychotherapy      integration     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Xiaoyuan, E-mail: zhxy@fimmu.com   
Issue Date: 15 February 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YANG Wendeng
ZHANG Xiaoyuan
Cite this article:   
YANG Wendeng,ZHANG Xiaoyuan. Common factors vs. specific ingredients in psychotherapy: Controversy and integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 253-264.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/ 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00253     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2017/V25/I2/253
[1] YANG Weiping,LI Shengnan,LI Zimo,GUO Ao,REN Yanna. The influential factors and neural mechanisms of audiovisual integration in older adults[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 790-799.
[2] XIE Julan,LIU Xiaomei,LI Jian,CHEN Chunyan,GONG Yanping. Social-to-consumption transition mechanism in social commerce[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 405-415.
[3] ZHANG Jing,CHEN Wei. Sense of body ownership and its plasticity: Based on the perspectives from the studies of interoception and exteroception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 305-315.
[4] LI Ping,ZHANG Mingming,LI Shuaixia,ZHANG Huoyin,LUO Wenbo. The integration of facial expression and vocal emotion and its brain mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(7): 1205-1214.
[5] ZHANG Aizhen,WANG Yao,LI Jing. The cognitive aging effect of route knowledge acquisition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 242-250.
[6] ZHANG Jingjing,YANG Yufang. Processing of hierarchical structures in language and music[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2043-2051.
[7] ZHAO Peiqiong,CHEN Wei,ZHANG Jing,PING Xianjie. The rubber hand illusion (RHI): The experimental paradigm of sense of ownership and its application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 37-50.
[8] LI Taotao, HU Jinsheng, WANG Qi, LI Chengshi, LI Songze, HE Jianqing, LI Chenyang, LIU Shuqing. Audiovisual temporal integration in autism spectrum disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1031-1040.
[9] Xing PENG,Ruosong CHANG,Guiqin REN,Aijun WANG,Xiaoyu TANG. The interaction between exogenous attention and multisensory integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2129-2140.
[10] Xiaoxiao LUO,Guanlan KANG,Xiaolin ZHOU. The influential factors and neural mechanisms of McGurk effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.
[11] FU Yue.  Research on the impact mechanism of TMT cognition on organizational ambidexterity: From organizational character perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 14-25.
[12] YU Xide, ZHANG Xiaojuan, LU Cheng, ZHU Yiyi, GAO Dingguo.  Sound influence eating or drinking behavior: Empirical progress and theoretical ideas[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 955-969.
[13] XIN Xin; REN Gui-Qin; LI Jin-Cai; TANG Xiao-Yu. The characteristics and mechanisms of audiovisual integration: Evidence from mismatch negativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 757-768.
[14] SUN Hailong; XING Qiang; LI Aimei. The influence of working memory on perceptual category learning: Problem and conception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 424-430.
[15] Cong Zhang; Lin Yang; Mingsha Zhang. Dynamic change of visual receptive field during visually-guided delay saccades in macaque posterior parietal cortex[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 16-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech