Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (10) : 1851-1864     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01851
Regular Articles |
Processing Efficiency Theory to Attentional Control Theory: New Perspective for Anxiety-performance Relationship in Sport Psychology
SUN Guoxiao;ZHANG Liwei
(Sport Psychology Section, Dept. of Sports Kinetics, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(264 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Sport psychology literature extensively reveals that competitive anxiety affects athletic performance (Sarason, 1984). However, the specific mechanisms of such negative relationship occurred between anxiety and performance still need to be further examined. Recently, processing efficiency theory and attentional control theory are further studied for attempting to explain the anxiety-performance relationship specifically in the areas of working memory and executive functions. Based on the research findings (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992), there are two theoretical assumptions for the processing efficiency theory: (1) anxiety impairs processing efficiency more than performance effectiveness, and (2) anxiety impairs the central executive system of working memory. Whereas, attentional control theory is a major development of processing efficiency theory (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007). Accordingly, there are also two theoretical assumptions for attentional control theory: (1) anxiety impairs goal-directed attentional system, (2) anxiety impairs efficiency of inhibition and shifting functions. Evidently, processing efficiency theory and attentional control theory both provide the useful frameworks to explain the specific mechanisms of anxiety-performance relationship, which is an imperative topic in sport psychology. Thus, the main purpose of this presentation is twofold: (1) to review the empirical research studies based on these two theories and (2) to recommend the implications for future research. Hopefully, our presentation would promote to further examine other anxiety-performance theories, improve the consistency of research protocol, take the cognitive perspectives into consideration of our research endeavor, and pay more attention to the effect of state anxiety for the purpose of enriching applied research literature.
Keywords anxiety      processing efficiency      attentional control      inhibition      shifting     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Liwei   
Issue Date: 15 October 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Guoxiao
ZHANG Liwei
Cite this article:   
SUN Guoxiao,ZHANG Liwei. Processing Efficiency Theory to Attentional Control Theory: New Perspective for Anxiety-performance Relationship in Sport Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1851-1864.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01851     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I10/1851
[1] LEI Ming, LI Pengbo. Neural mechanism underlying the attentional modulation of auditory sensory gating[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1232-1245.
[2] YOU Yuan,WANG Li. Cognitive neurological process associated with behavioral inhibition and psychopathology in children[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 612-625.
[3] ZHANG Yali,LI Sen,YU Guoliang. The relationship between self-esteem and social anxiety: A meta-analysis with Chinese students[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1005-1018.
[4] LU Kexin,WANG Xu,LI Hong. The relationship of death anxiety defense mechanisms in terror management theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 344-356.
[5] WEI Hua,ZHOU Renlai. The current status and controversy of inhibitory control deficits in anxiety: A perspective from attentional control theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1853-1862.
[6] SU Bobo,ZHENG Meihong. Effects of substance-related cues on response inhibition in addicts[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1863-1874.
[7] JIANG Jingqi,WANG Haoyu,QIAN Mingyi. Dynamic attention bias in social anxiety[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1887-1895.
[8] WANG Ziyu,KONG Ziye,ZHU Rongjuan,YOU Xuqun. Task-switching training and plasticity of executive function[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1667-1676.
[9] LIU Chunyan,CHEN Gongxiang. Anxiety in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Mechanism, assessment and treatment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1713-1725.
[10] LI Zhenghan, YANG Guochun, NAN Weizhi, LI Qi, LIU Xun. Attentional regulation mechanisms of cognitive control in conflict resolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 966-974.
[11] LIU Bingqian, LI Xuebing.  Cognitive bias modification of interpretation for social anxiety: A “bottom-up” intervention?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 859-871.
[12] TENG Jing, SHEN Wangbing, HAO Ning.  The role of cognitive control in divergent thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 411-422.
[13] Jing ZHOU,Bin XUAN. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the frontal lobe region on inhibitory control[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1976-1991.
[14] YAN Ding; WANG Ting; WANG Chengyao; JIAO Can. The influence of drinking on response inhibition and its neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 586-598.
[15] ZHU Ye, CAO Chengqi, WANG Li.  Endocannabinoid and post-traumatic stress disorder: Possible mechanisms and clinical application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(12): 2043-2056.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech