Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2020, Vol. 28 Issue (5) : 746-751     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00746
Research Reports |
The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking
LI Qinggong(),WANG Zhenyan,SUN Jieyuan,SHI Yan
Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
Download: PDF(830 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The present study (N = 58) investigated the influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment as well as the moderating effect of intuitive thinking by setting up the scene of car-hailing. The results showed that reputation and face trustworthiness could influence women’s trust judgment of car-hailing choices. In other words, they were more likely to trust drivers with good reputation and trustworthy face. Reputation had less influence on women’s trust judgment in high intuitive thinking group as compared to low intuitive thinking group, while face trustworthiness had more influence on trust judgment of women with high intuitive thinking.

Keywords trust decision      reputation      face      intuitive thinking      car-hailing     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Corresponding Authors: Qinggong LI     E-mail: liqinggong@zjnu.cn
Issue Date: 27 March 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Qinggong LI
Zhenyan WANG
Jieyuan SUN
Yan SHI
Cite this article:   
Qinggong LI,Zhenyan WANG,Jieyuan SUN, et al. The influence of reputation and face trustworthiness on women’s trust judgment in car-hailing scene and the moderating effect of intuitive thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 746-751.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00746     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2020/V28/I5/746
  
直觉性思维 低面孔可信度 高面孔可信度
低声誉 中声誉 高声誉 低声誉 中声誉 高声誉
0.52 ± 1.06 3.59 ± 1.62 4.55 ± 0.78 0.93 ± 1.28 3.97 ± 1.50 4.90 ± 0.31
0.83 ± 1.31 2.93 ± 1.67 3.97 ± 1.43 1.76 ± 1.88 4.00 ± 1.13 4.59 ± 0.98
总计 0.67 ± 1.19 3.26 ± 1.66 4.26 ± 1.18 1.34 ± 1.65 3.98 ± 1.31 4.74 ± 0.74
  
  
  
1 陈欣, 叶浩生 . ( 2009). 行为博弈视野下信任研究的回顾. 心理科学, 32( 3), 636-639.
2 洪名勇, 钱龙 . ( 2014). 信任、声誉及其内在逻辑. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 32( 1), 34-39.
3 李彬, 徐富明, 王伟, 张慧, 罗寒冰 . ( 2015). 决策的加工过程及个体差异: 模糊痕迹理论视角. 心理科学进展, 23( 2), 316-324.
4 李延喜, 吴笛, 肖峰雷, 姚宏 . ( 2010). 声誉理论研究述评. 管理评论, 22( 10), 3-11.
5 李易尚, 朱双洋 . ( 2018). 守住网约车的安全底线. 人民法治, ( 15), 94-95.
6 刘国芳, 辛自强 . ( 2011). 间接互惠中的声誉机制: 印象、名声、标签及其传递. 心理科学进展, 19( 2), 233-242.
7 施丽芳, 廖飞, 丁德明 . ( 2012). 个人声誉关注作为心理不确定的缓解器: 程序公平/合作关系下的实证研究. 管理世界, ( 12), 97-114.
8 文跃兰 . ( 2012). 大学生理性—经验思维方式的个体差异及其与社会问题解决的关系(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
9 于会会, 徐富明, 黄宝珍, 文桂婵, 王岚 . ( 2012). 框架效应中的个体差异. 心理科学进展, 20( 6), 894-901.
url: http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/article1493.shtml
10 武洁, 杨建春 . ( 2014). 张、王、李、赵谁最多: 2010年人口普查姓氏结构和分布特点. 中国统计, ( 6), 21-22.
11 Bailey P. E., Szczap P., Mclennan S. N., Slessor G., Ruffman T., & Rendell P. G . ( 2015). Age-related similarities and differences in first impressions of trustworthiness. Cognition and Emotion, 30( 5), 1017-1026.
12 Boero R., Bravo G., Castellani M., & Squazzoni F . ( 2009). Reputational cues in repeated trust games. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38( 6), 871-877.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.004
13 Cox J.C . ( 2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46( 2), 260-281.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=14614225
14 Delgado M. R., Frank R. H., & Phelps E. A . ( 2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8( 11), 1611-1618.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1575
15 Denes-Raj V. &Epstein S. , ( 1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66( 5), 819-829.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.819
16 DeSteno D . ( 2014).The truth about trust: How it determines success in life, love, learning, and more . New York: Hudson Street Press.
17 Heyman G.D . ( 2008). Children's critical thinking when learning from others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17( 5), 344-347.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00603.x
18 Kreps D. M., Milgrom P., Roberts J., & Wilson R . ( 1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27( 2), 245-252.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1
19 Li Q., Heyman G. D., Mei J., & Lee K . ( 2019). Judging a book by its cover: Children’s facial trustworthiness as judged by strangers predicts their real-world trustworthiness and peer relationships. Child Development, 90( 2), 562-575.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12907
20 Li T., Liu X., Pan J., & Zhou G . ( 2017). The interactive effect of facial appearance and behavior statement on trust belief and trust behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 117( 1), 60-65.
21 Mahoney K. T., Buboltz W., Levin I. P., Doverspike D., & Svyantek D. J . ( 2011). Individual differences in a within-subjects risky-choice framing study. Personality and Individual Differences, 51( 3), 248-257.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=15277330
22 Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., & Schoorman F. D . ( 1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20( 3), 709-734.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
23 Pacini R. &Epstein S. , ( 1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 6), 972-987.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
24 Slepian M. L., &Ames D. R . ( 2015). Internalized Impressions: The link between apparent facial trustworthiness and deceptive behavior is mediated by targets’ expectations of how they will be judged. Psychological Science, 27( 2), 282-288.
25 Stirrat M. &Perrett D. I . ( 2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 349-354.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647
26 Uleman J. S., Newman L. S., & Moskowitz G. B . ( 1996). People as flexible interpreters: evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28( 8), 211-279.
27 van't Wout, M., &Sanfey A. G . ( 2008). Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108( 3), 796-803.
28 Willis J. &Todorov A. , ( 2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17( 7), 592-598.
url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
[1] FAN Xiaozhuang, BI Xiaobin, XIE Yu, HE Huizhong. Attention bias toward threatening emotional faces in individuals with high-functioning autism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1172-1186.
[2] WEN Fangfang, ZUO Bin, MA Shuhan, XIE Zhijie. Own-group bias in face recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1164-1171.
[3] Tuwei SUN,Nanfeng LUO,Wei SHI,Hongyang LI. Psychological mechanisms underlying the negative effects of corporations’ high reputation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 497-509.
[4] CHENG Gang,JIA Yuncheng,DING Fangyuan,ZHANG Dajun,CHEN Jia,LONG Nü. Moderating effects of facial expression on the babyface schema and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 761-772.
[5] HOU Chun-Na,LIU Zhi-Jun. Visualization of mental representation: Noise-based reverse correlation image classification technology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 465-474.
[6] ZHANG Kaili, ZHOU Pei, WANG Pei. The affects of facial expression and gaze direction on face processing: Based on perceptual load theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 984-993.
[7] WANG Haiwen, ZHANG Shuhua.  The relationship between emotional labor and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 599-613.
[8] JING Wei, LIU Ziqin.  The diminished attention to eye in the face processing of individuals with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 476-487.
[9] YU Mingyang, LI Fuhong, CAO Bihua.  The advantage in recognition of happy faces and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 254-261.
[10] Hao WANG,Zhigang YANG. Face pareidolia and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 1952-1960.
[11] Kai ZhiZhong.  Face Shapes on Chinese Traditional Physiognomy and Relevant Personality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 40-40.
[12] LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
[13] ZHANG Xuejiao; LIU Conghui. The watching eyes effect on prosociality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 475-485.
[14] QIAN Haoyue; ZHU Min; GAO Xiangping. Configural processing of faces in old adulthood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 230-236.
[15] Li Tian; Lin Qi; JunYu Dong. Bumpy or Glossy? A Psychophysical Study of the Illusory Gloss on Lambertian Surfaces[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 21-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech