Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (4) : 691-700     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00691
Regular Articles |
Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective
XIANG Peng1; GENG Liuna1; ZHOU Kexin2; CHENG Xiao1
(1 School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China) (2 Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, MEP, Nanjing 210042, China)
Download: PDF(438 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

In this paper, we reviewed existing scientific literature on adverse effects of air pollution, particularly psychological and behavioral effects, and how these effects are developed under different theoretical frameworks. Collective evidence indicated that air pollution exerts negative effects on human physical health, but also cognitive functions, emotions and behaviors. As for now, two theoretical frameworks have been developed to interpret how air pollution causes a series of adverse effects, framework of environmental stressors and framework of social-environmental interaction. These frameworks arguably stated that adverse effect of air pollution is not only subject to the direct exposure of air pollution, but also individual’s psychosomatic status and he or she how to evaluate air pollution. We also discussed future directions for this line of research for environmental psychologists. Future research is expected to improve research approach, and conduct psychological studies under the framework of environmental stress and risk perception.

Keywords air pollution      risk perception      environmental stressor      adverse effect      environmental psychology     
Corresponding Authors: GENG Liuna, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 April 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
GENG Liuna
ZHOU Kexin
Cite this article:   
XIANG Peng,GENG Liuna,ZHOU Kexin, et al. Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 691-700.
URL:     OR
[1] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[2] LI Kai; GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong. Public risk perception of terror attacks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 358-369.
[3] LV Xiaokang; WANG Cong. Exposure to Air pollution impairs cognitive function and psychological well-being[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 111-120.
[4] LI Aimei; TAN Lei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; Pan Jiyang. The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 804-814.
[5] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[6] ZHANG Hui;XU Fuming;LI Bin;LUO Hanbing;ZHENG Qiuqiang. Risk Perception Based on Climate Change[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1677-1685.
[7] Chen Yi-Wen;Ma Ji-Wei. E-commerce Consumers Purchase Decision and Its Influencing Factors[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 27-34.
[8] ZHUANG Chun-Ping;ZHANG Jian-Xin. Place Identity: Analysis from Environmental Psychology Perspective[J]. , 2011, 19(9): 1387-1396.
[9] Zhang Shuoyang,Chen Yiwen,Wang Erping. RISK PERCEPTION IN CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY[J]. , 2004, 12(02): 256-263.
[10] Wu Lin, Guo Jinshan (Department of Social Psychology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012 ). NEW DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY ABROAD[J]. , 2002, 10(04): 466-471.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech