Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (3) : 429-436     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00429
Regular Articles |
Embodied Views of Abstract Concepts Representation
ZHANG Entao;FANG Jie;LIN Wenyi;LUO Junlong
(1School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China) (2College of Humanities and Communication, Guangdong University of Business Studies, Guangzhou 510320, China) (3Education College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China)
Download: PDF(143 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Whether people are able to represent abstract concepts through experience of sensory and motor systems? This is a challenge for embodied cognition. From the perspective of the relations between sensorimotor information and representation of abstract concepts, Present paper reviewed some influential theories in embodied cognition and the corresponding important evidences. Reviewing the theories indicates that abstract concepts is grounded in perceptual information, however, how abstract concepts are grounded in perceptual information remains debated. Within Embodied Cognition (EC) approach, some authors emphasize the importance of action or situation for conceptual representation, this supports strong version of EC. Others highlight the role of concrete experience or common structure for cognition, this supports weaker version of EC. Furthermore, we should view conceptual representations as flexible entities, and integrate different views into more mature frame of embodied cognition. Additionally, future work should focus on the relationship between abstract concepts and language, and the difference in abstract concepts representation between normal and special children.
Keywords abstract concepts      sensorimotor information      language      embodied cognition     
Corresponding Authors: FANG Jie   
Issue Date: 15 March 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Entao
FANG Jie
LIN Wenyi
LUO Junlong
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Entao,FANG Jie,LIN Wenyi, et al. Embodied Views of Abstract Concepts Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 429-436.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00429     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I3/429
[1] LI Lin, LIU Wen, SUI Xue.  Prediction effect during syntactic processing and experimental evidence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1122-1131.
[2] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[3] CHANG Xin; LIU Yuting; WANG Pei; ZHANG Jiawei. The effects of music interventions onverbal expression in children with autism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1391-1397.
[4] WU Xuanna. Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1147-1158.
[5] LI Yan; YANG Baiyin. Idea implementation: The trend of innovation research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 643-653.
[6] ZHANG Quan; CHEN Zheng; WANG Weiwen; DENG Huihua. Temporal characteristics of change in HPA activity among PTSD patients[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 536-546.
[7] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[8] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[9] ZHANG Xiuping; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Neural Mechanism and Influential Factors of Semantic Unification in Discourse Comprehension[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141.
[10] WANG Hang; JIANG Jun; JIANG Cunmei. The Effects of Music Training on Cognitive Abilities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 419-429.
[11] CHANG Xin; WANG Pei. The Moderating Factors and Their Effect in Late Second Language Learners’ Syntactic Processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 225-233.
[12] JIANG Yan-Ling; YANG Hong-Sheng. Intentions Behind Language: The Linguistic Inter-group Bias[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2142-2152.
[13] LEE Hui-Min I.; WANG Ruo-Meng; WANG Quan-Hong; QIU Jiang. Handwriting Psychology in the Age of Computers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[14] Li Jinxing; Wang Zhenhong. Spatial-temporal Association of Response Codes Effect: Manifestation, Influencing Factors and Its Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 30-40.
[15] ZHOU Jing;YU Fang;GUO Liping. Language Ability and False-belief: A Meta-analysis on Children Aged 3~6 in China[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 911-917.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech