ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 745-756.

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

道德伪善的心理学研究述评

沈汪兵;刘昌   

  1. (南京师范大学心理学系暨认知神经科学实验室, 南京, 210097)
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-05-15 发布日期:2012-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘昌

Critical Review on Psychological Studies on Moral Hypocrisy

SHEN Wang-Bing;LIU Chang   

  1. (Lab of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210097, China)
  • Received:2011-06-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-05-15 Published:2012-05-15
  • Contact: LIU Chang

摘要: 道德伪善(moral hypocrisy)是对道德知行脱离进行反思的产物, 反映了道德心理学和社会认知领域的最新进展。从社会学习理论、认知失调理论、社会影响理论和双加工理论四个理论来对道德伪善产生缘由进行了探讨, 并在此基础上对其产生机制进行了阐述。为了避免道德伪善的消极效应与不良后果, 进一步从个体和群体两个层面来探讨了道德伪善的影响因素。考虑到现实生活中过分强调道德伪善的负面价值, 研究积极地审视了道德伪善在诱导认知失调、塑造和培养亲社会行为以及促进组织发展等领域的应用。未来研究需在现有研究基础上, 进一步借鉴反应时和内隐测量技术来对道德伪善进行本土化和跨文化研究, 并对其应用性开展更深入和系统的探讨。

关键词: 道德伪善, 认知失调理论, 道德判断, 双加工

Abstract: Moral hypocrisy reflects the current direction on disengagement between moral cognition and moral behaviors. Prior studies indicated that some theories, including social learning theory, cognitive dissonance theory, social influence theory and the newly emerging dual-processing theory could be employed to interpret its generating mechanism in some sense. Other existing studies focused on its generality effect, self-deception strategies and influence factors. Furthermore, many researchers found that it shared a close relation with cognitive dissonance, and it may enhance people’s pro-social behaviors and organizations’ development. Studies in future seem to reexamine its effect in indigenous and cross cultures by reaction time and implicit measurement technologies.

Key words: moral hypocrisy, cognitive dissonance theory, moral judgment, dual processing