ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 765-773.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00765

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会创造性的脑机制:状态与特质的EEG α波活动特点

谷传华1,2;王亚丽1,2;吴财付1,2;谢祥龙1,2;崔承珠1,2;王亚娴1,2;王婉贞1,2;胡碧颖3;周宗奎1,2   

  1. (1青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验(华中师范大学), 武汉 430079) (2人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室, 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079) (3澳门大学教育学院, 澳门 999078)
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-17 出版日期:2015-06-25 发布日期:2015-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 周宗奎, E-mail: zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    全国教育科学“十二五”规划国家青年基金课题(CDA110106)资助。

Brain Correlates underlying Social Creative Thinking: EEG Alpha Activity in Trait vs. State Creativity

GU Chuanhua1,2; WANG Yali1,2; WU Caifu1,2; XIE Xianglong1,2; CUI Chengzhu1,2; WANG Yaxian1,2; WANG Wanzhen1,2; HU Biying3; ZHOU Zongkui1,2   

  1. (1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) (3 Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macao 999078, China)
  • Received:2014-07-17 Published:2015-06-25 Online:2015-06-25
  • Contact: ZHOU Zongkui, E-mail: zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

摘要:

采用社会问题情境, 通过记录38名高、低特质社会创造性被试在社会问题解决过程中的脑电活动, 考查不同特质社会创造性的被试在表现不同状态社会创造性时的脑电激活模式。结果表明:无论高频还是低频α波同步化都存在状态创造性的主效应。同时, 高、低频段的α波同步化还存在特质创造性与状态创造性之间显著的交互作用, 在表现高状态社会创造性时, 高特质的被试比低特质的被试出现更高的α波同步化水平。此外, 对于高频α波同步化, 状态创造性、特质创造性以及大脑半球的三重交互作用达到显著性水平, 低特质社会创造性的被试在表现高状态社会创造性时, 右脑半球比左脑半球出现更强烈的α波同步化, 在其他情况下均无显著差异。未来的研究可以采用时间进程分析、纵向研究设计、脑功能成像技术探查社会创造性的脑机制。

关键词: 状态社会创造性, 特质社会创造性, α波同步化, EEG

Abstract:

Creativity is commonly defined as the ability to simultaneously produce novel (original, unique) and useful work within a social context. Social creativity, as a new domain of creativity, is observed when one proposes and solves social problem in the original, appropriate and effective ways. Creativity can be studied from the perspective of state and trait, as many psychologists have studied the psychological variables such as anxiety and self-esteem. With the fast development of neuroscience, research on the brain mechanism of creativity has recently attracted great attention in psychology. Most EEG studies about creativity focused on the alpha activity in the process of creative idea generation. In current study we examined brain mechanisms of social creativity from the perspective of state and trait by recording the EEG of 38 college participants in the social problem scene. We measured participants’ state social creativity using the Questionnaire of Social Creativity for College Students and their trait social creativity using open-ended questionnaire of social problems. The repeated measures ANOVA design in the lower and upper alpha frequency band was used, with state social creativity (high vs. low), hemisphere (left vs. right), and area (prefrontal, frontal, central, parietal, temporal, occipital) as the within-subject factors, and with trait social creativity (high vs. low) as between-subject factor. We found the alpha synchronization in the process of creative social problem solving. A significant main effect of state social creativity was observed on the upper alpha band and the lower alpha band, suggesting that high state social creativity showed a lower alpha synchronization as compared with the low state social creativity. The main effect of hemisphere, area, and the level of trait social creativity failed to reach statistical significance. Moreover, there was the interaction of trait creativity with state creativity, and when presenting high state social creativity, individuals of high trait social creativity showed higher alpha synchronization than their counterparts. However, when they presented low state social creativity, no significant difference was found in alpha synchronization between individuals of high trait social creativity and their counterparts. Furthermore, the interaction between state social creativity and trait social creativity was moderated by the hemisphere. For individuals of low trait social creativity, when manifesting high state social creativity, the alpha synchronization on the right hemisphere was stronger than that on the left hemisphere. However, when manifesting low state social creativity, no significant difference was found between right hemisphere and left hemisphere. For those with high trait social creativity, whenever they presented high or low state social creativity, no significant difference in upper frequency band alpha synchronization was found between left hemisphere and right hemisphere. Similarly, with regard to the lower alpha band, the main effects of state social creativity and the interaction between the state social and trait social creativity were observed, while main effects of other factors failed to reach statistical significance. The simple effect analysis of the interaction indicated the same result as the upper band alpha. Besides, we failed to find the main effect of the brain areas or their interactions with other variables. For future studies, we recommend applying time-course analysis (Schwab, Benedek, Papousek, Weiss, & Fink, 2014) for classifying the cognitive phrases during participants’ creative social problem solving while investigating their EEG. Moreover, we recommend applying longitudinal designs and neuroimaging techniques, such as fMRI and NIR, to explore the brain mechanisms of social creativity from the perspective of trait and state.

Key words: state social creativity, trait social creativity, &alpha, synchronization, EEG