惯用语比喻意义理解的时间进程

心理学报 ›› 2000, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (增刊): 73-76.

惯用语比喻意义理解的时间进程

佘贤君¹, 张必隐²

1.中央电视台,北京 100859;
2.北京师范大学心理系,北京 100875

发布日期:2021-06-21 出版日期:2000-12-30

THE TIME OF THE FIGURATIVE MEANING COMPREHENSION OF THE IDIOM

Xianjun She¹, Biyin Zhang²

1. China Central Television, Beijing 100859;
2. Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Online:2021-06-21 Published:2000-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过两个跨通道启动实验,探讨了惯用语比喻意义理解的时间进程。实验一发现,在惯用语的第二个字后面,高预测性惯用语的比喻意义被激活,低预测性惯用语的比喻意义未被激活。实验二发现,在惯用语的第二个字后面,高预测性惯用语的字面意义未被激活,而低预测性惯用语的字面意义却被激活。研究结果证明了惯用语在心理词典中是分解储存的,惯用语的理解是一个构造过程。

关键词: 惯用语, 预测性, 比喻意义, 字面意义

Abstract: Idiom is a kind of figurative language. The comprehension process of idiom's figurative meaning is an important topic in Cognitive Psychology. Two cross-modal experiments were designed to investigate the time course of the three character idiom's comprehension. The idiom was present by hearing. The figurative or literal meaning of the idiom was present by vision, which was behind the second character of the idiom, ISI=0 ms. Experiment one found that the figurative meaning of high predictable idiom was activation behind the second character, but the figurative meaning of low predictable idiom wasn't activation behind the second character . Experiment two found that the literal meaning of low predictable idiom was activation behind the second character, but the literal meaning of high predictable idiom wasn't activation behind the second character . It was proved that the idiom's components were distributed in mental lexical, the comprehension of idiom was a compositional process.

Key words: Idiom, Predictability, Figurative Meaning, Literal Meaning

佘贤君, 张必隐. (2000). 惯用语比喻意义理解的时间进程. 心理学报, 32(增刊), 73-76.

Xianjun She, Biyin Zhang. (2000). THE TIME OF THE FIGURATIVE MEANING COMPREHENSION OF THE IDIOM. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32(增刊), 73-76.

[1]	黄昕杰, 张弛, 万华根, 张灵聪. 情绪效价可预测性对时间捆绑效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 36-44.
[2]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 张志超, 李鑫, 汪强, 白学军, 臧传丽. 预测性对快速读者和慢速读者词汇加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(1): 79-93.
[3]	布宇博, 李力红, 吕香玲, 国宏远, 安灿翎, 王凌云. 动作自主性与结果性质对不同预测性条件下施动感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 789-798.
[4]	刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 赵亚军. 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响：眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1031-1047.
[5]	罗一君, 牛更枫, 陈红. 生命早期环境不可预测性对过度进食的影响:基于生命史理论[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1224-1236.
[6]	徐迩嘉, 隋雪. 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响 ^*[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(6): 606-621.
[7]	苏衡;刘志方;曹立人. 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示：基于眼动的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 625-636.
[8]	马利军;张积家. 汉语动宾结构惯用语加工的基本单元：来自词切分的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(6): 754-764.
[9]	马利军;张积家;杜凯. 语义分解性在惯用语理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 391-405.
[10]	张积家,石艳彩. 汉语惯用语的产生机制[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(08): 659-675.
[11]	肖利军,苗丹民,肖玮,武圣君,李红政. 应征公民心理选拔的人格评估[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(2): 362-370.
[12]	苗丹民,罗正学,刘旭峰,李云波,王京生,苏景宽. 初级军官心理选拔的预测性[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(02): 308-316.
[13]	佘贤君,宋歌,张必隐. 预测性、语义倾向性对惯用语理解的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2000, 32(2): 203-209.