汉语词汇阅读中的语音与语义激活：一个重复实验研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 语音信息在汉语词汇阅读中的作用是一个颇有争议的问题,研究者为此提出了许多看法和研究范式。一种研究范式是比较语音和语义激活的相对时间进程。使用同样的实验材料和过程,在两个实验中试图重复Perfetti和Tan（1998）和Tan,Hoosain和Siok（1996）。第一个实验采用了启动命名方法,第二个实验采用了后向掩蔽启动范式。虽然原先研究的数据似乎表明,汉字加工中语音信息的激活要遭遇语义信息,但重复实验的结果表明,心理词典中语义信息的激活至少与语音信息一样迅速、一样强烈。文章强调了在汉语认知研究中报告可重复、可靠数据的重要性。

关键词: 汉语阅读, 汉字加工, 语音激活, 语义激活, 时间进程

Abstract: The role of phonology in lexical access and semantic activation in reading Chinese is a controversial issue, and many arguments and experimental paradigms have been proposed to address the issue. One particular paradigm is to compare the relative time course of phonological and semantic activation. Two experiments were conducted to replicate Perfetti and Tan (1998) and Tan, Hoosain and Siok (1996) respectively with the same stimuli and experimental procedures. The first experiment used a primed naming task while the second experiment used a backward masking technique. These two experiments did not replicate the original studies which reported data showing earlier phonological activation than semantic activation in reading Chinese. Instead the present experiments, consistent with other studies, produced data suggesting that semantic information in the lexicon is activated at least as early and as strongly as phonological information. The importance of reporting replicable and reliable data in the study of cognitive processing of the Chinese language was discussed.

Key words: reading Chinese, Chinese characters, phonological activation, semantic activation, time course

中图分类号:

B842.1

谢丹柯, 周晓林. (2003). 汉语词汇阅读中的语音与语义激活：一个重复实验研究. 心理学报, 35(增刊), 14-22.

Xie Danke, Zhou Xiaolin. (2003). Earlier Phonological Activation than Semantic Activation in Reading Chinese? A Replication Study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(增刊), 14-22.

参考文献

1 Perfetti C A, Zhang S.Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21: 24~33
2 Perfetti C A, Tan L H.The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998, 24:101~118
3 Tan L H, Hoosain R, Peng D-L.Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21:43~54
4 Tan L H, Hoosain R, Siok W W.Activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1996, 22:865~882
5 Perfetti C A, Tan L H, Zhang S, Georgi M C.Why semantics lags behind phonology in word identification. In J D Moore and J F Lehman Eds. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995, 683~687
6 Weekes B S, Chen M J, Lin Y B.Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1998, 10:201~222
7 Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W.The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26:1245~1265
8 Zhou X, Wu N, Shu H.The Relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese: Evidence from child development. Psychological Sciences, 1998, 21:498~501
9 Chen H-C, Shu, H.Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8:511~518
10 Wu N, Zhou X, Shu H.The nature and development of sublexical processing in reading Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1999, 14:503~524
11 Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W.Spread of activation in the mental lexicon. In M G Shafto, P Langley eds. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997, 838~843
12 Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W.Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 1999, 41:579~606
13 Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson, W. The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1999, 25: 819~837
14 Zhou X, Shu H, Bi Y, Shi D.Is there phonologically mediated access to lexical semantics in reading Chinese? In J Wang, A Inhoff, H-C Chen Eds. Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, 135~171
15 Li D.A study of Chinese characters. Beijng: Peking University Press, 1993
16 Yin B, Rohsenow J S.Modern Chinese characters. Beijing: Sinolingua, 1994
17 Seidenberg M S.The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 1985, 19: 1~30
18 Stone G O, Vanhoy M D, van Orden G C. Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 36: 337~359
19 Ziegler J C, Montant M, Jacobs A M.The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 37:533~554
20 Azuma T, van Orden G C. Why SAFE is better than FAST: The relatedness of a word's meanings affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory and Language, 1997, 36:484-505
21 Cho J-R, Chen H-C.Orthographic and phonological activation in the semantic processing of Korean Hanja and Hangul. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1999, 14: 481~502
22 Perfetti C A, Zhang S.Phonological processes in reading Chinese words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1991, 17:633~643

[1]	丁锦红, 汪亚珉, 姜扬. 注意促进运动知觉判断的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 337-348.
[2]	王永胜, 赵冰洁, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(12): 1336-1345.
[3]	王慧媛, 隋洁, 张明. 语义关联的注意捕获——来自线索化范式的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(10): 1071-1082.
[4]	白学军;王永胜;郭志英;高晓雷;闫国利. 汉语阅读中词N+2的预视对高频词N+1 加工影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 143-156.
[5]	马利军;张积家;杜凯. 语义分解性在惯用语理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(4): 391-405.
[6]	任桂琴,韩玉昌,于泽. 句子语境中汉语词汇形、音作用的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(4): 427-434.
[7]	张智君,刘志方,赵亚军,季靖. 汉语阅读过程中词切分的位置：一项基于眼动随动显示技术的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(1): 51-62.
[8]	刘志方,张智君,赵亚军. 汉语阅读中眼跳目标选择单元以及词汇加工方式：来自消失文本的实验证据[J]. 心理学报, 2011, 43(06): 608-618.
[9]	陈煦海,黄希庭 . 汉语双字合成词口语产生的词素信息编码[J]. 心理学报, 2010, 42(03): 377-386.
[10]	曹晓华,曹立人. 图形识别中学习和再认取样的时间进程及其策略 [J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(03): 242-248.
[11]	丁锦红,王丽燕. 语音回路与阅读理解关系的眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2006, 38(05): 694-701.
[12]	张积家,陈栩茜. 句子背景下缺失音素的中文听觉词理解的音、义激活进程（Ⅱ）[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(05): 582-589.
[13]	陈栩茜,张积家. 句子背景下缺失音素的中文听觉词理解的音、义激活进程（Ⅰ）[J]. 心理学报, 2005, 37(05): 575-581.
[14]	周晓林,曲延轩,舒华,Gareth Gaskell,William Marslen-Wilson. 汉语听觉词汇加工中声调信息对语义激活的制约作用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(04): 379-392.
[15]	张亚旭, 周晓林, 舒华, 曹凡. 不同阅读能力儿童汉语形声字的词汇和亚词汇语音加工[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(增刊): 6-13.