语义网络结构与创造性的关联：来自行为与静息态fMRI的证据

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2026.1795

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创造性是知识结构与认知能力共同作用的结果。本研究采用递进式设计, 系统探究语义网络结构与创造性之间的关系及其可能的神经关联。研究1通过组水平分析发现, 高创造性个体的任务态语义网络表现出更强的小世界属性和更低的模块化, 支持其高效的发散性思维能力。研究2在个体水平上进一步验证, 静态语义网络的结构特征(如低模块化)与个体的创造性人格倾向显著相关, 揭示了知识结构与人格特质之间的深层联系。研究3结合静息态fMRI数据发现, 大脑语义加工网络的基线活动水平调节了语义网络模块化与创造性倾向之间的关系：在基线活动较高的个体中, 高模块化对创造性的负向关联较弱, 提示较高的认知调控潜力可能补偿语义网络结构上的限制。总之, 高创造性者的语义网络以高效的信息整合与传递为特征, 而其创造性潜能不仅与语义网络的组织方式相关, 也受到大脑语义相关区域自发活动的调节。

关键词: 创造性, 语义网络, fMRI

Abstract: Creativity arises from the interplay between knowledge structure and cognitive control. This study aims to systematically investigate the role of semantic network organization in creative thinking across multiple psychological levels. Specifically, it examines how the topological properties of semantic networks relate to both creative ability and creative personality, and its potential neural correlates. By adopting a three-part design, this work seeks to bridge cognitive, trait, and neurobiological perspectives to provide a more comprehensive understanding of how knowledge organization supports creative thinking across different psychological levels.

霍腾宾, 庄恺祥, 邱江. (2026). 语义网络结构与创造性的关联：来自行为与静息态fMRI的证据. 心理学报, 58(9), 1795-1812.

HUO Tengbin, ZHUANG Kaixiang, QIU Jiang. (2026). The association between semantic network structure and creativity: Evidence from behavioral and resting-state fMRI data. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 58(9), 1795-1812.

参考文献

[1] Abraham, A. (2014). Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. Cognitive control brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00095
[2] Amabile, T. (2013). Componential theory of creativity. In Encyclopedia of management theory(Vol. 2, pp. 135-139). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/97814522 76090.n50
[3] Bai J., Zhao K., Li L., Zeng D., Li Q., Yang F.,& Zu, Q.(2024). Graph representation learning based on cognitive spreading activations. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 362024.3437781
[4] Beaty R. E., Christensen A. P., Benedek M., Silvia P. J.,& Schacter, D. L.(2017). Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production. NeuroImage, 148, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012
[5] Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021). Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 757-780. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w
[6] Beaty R. E.,& Kenett, Y. N.(2023). Associative thinking at the core of creativity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 272023.04.004
[7] Beaty R. E., Kenett Y. N., Hass R. W.,& Schacter, D. L.(2023). Semantic memory and creativity: The costs and benefits of semantic memory structure in generating original ideas. Thinking & Reasoning, 292022.2076742
[8] Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171
[9] Beaty R. E., Silvia P. J., Nusbaum E. C., Jauk E., & Benedek M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1186-1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
[10] Beaty R. E., Zeitlen D. C., Baker B. S.,& Kenett, Y. N.(2021). Forward flow and creative thought: Assessing associative cognition and its role in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100859
[11] Benedek M.,& Fink, A.(2019). Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: The role of memory, attention, and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.002
[12] Benedek M., Jurisch J., Koschutnig K., Fink A.,& Beaty, R. E.(2020). Elements of creative thought: Investigating the cognitive and neural correlates of association and bi-association processes. NeuroImage, 210, 116586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116586
[13] Benedek M., Kenett Y. N., Umdasch K., Anaki D., Faust M.,& Neubauer, A.(2017). How semantic memory structure and intelligence contribute to creative thought: A network science approach. Thinking & Reasoning, 232016.1278034
[14] Benedek M.,& Lebuda, I.(2024). Managing your muse: Exploring three levels of metacognitive control in creative ideation. Creativity Research Journal, 372024.2347770
[15] Binder J. R., Desai R. H., Graves W. W., & Conant L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055
[16] Broday-Dvir, R., & Malach, R. (2021). Resting-state fluctuations underlie free and creative verbal behaviors in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 31(1), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa221
[17] Cabana Á., Zugarramurdi C., Valle-Lisboa J. C., & De Deyne S. (2024). The “small world of words” free association norms for rioplatense spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 56(2), 968-985. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02070-z
[18] Chen Q., Beaty R. E., Wei D., Yang J., Sun J., Liu W., Qiu J. (2018). Longitudinal alterations of frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks predict future creative cognitive ability. Cerebral Cortex, 28(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw353
[19] Christensen, A. P., & Kenett, Y. (2019). Semantic Network Analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/eht87
[20] Christensen, A. P., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 860-879. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000463
[21] Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
[22] Conti R., Coon H. M., & Amabile T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 385-389. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ0904_9
[23] De Deyne S., Navarro D. J., Perfors A., Brysbaert M., & Storms G. (2019). The “small world of words” English word association norms for over 12, 000 cue words. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3), 987-1006. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1115-7
[24] De Deyne S., Navarro D. J., & Storms G. (2013). Better explanations of lexical and semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single-word associations. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 480-498. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0260-7
[25] Feist G. J.,Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C.(Eds.). (2017). Process and structure of the creative personality. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 7-164). Cambridge University Press. https://www. cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-creativity-and-personality-research/process-and-structure-of-the-creative-personality/A63E06B9D05210CDFFEA8715FDE10EB2
[26] Frith E., Kane M. J., Welhaf M. S., Christensen A. P., Silvia P. J.,& Beaty, R. E.(2021). Keeping creativity under control: Contributions of attention control and fluid intelligence to divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 33 2020.1855906
[27] Gray K., Anderson S., Chen E. E., Kelly J. M., Christian M. S., Patrick J., Lewis K. (2019). “Forward flow”: A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity. American Psychologist, 74(5), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000391
[28] Hao X., Geng F., Wang T., Hu Y.,& Huang, K.(2021). Relations of creativity to the interplay between high-order cognitive functions: Behavioral and neural evidence. Neuroscience, 473, 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.015
[29] He L., Kenett Y. N., Zhuang K., Sun J., Chen Q., & Qiu J. (2025). Connector hubs in semantic network contribute to creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 154(2), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001675
[30] Herault C., Ovando-Tellez M., Lebuda I., Kenett Y. N., Beranger B., Benedek M., & Volle E. (2024). Creative connections: The neural correlates of semantic relatedness are associated with creativity. Communications Biology, 7, 810. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06493-y
[31] Karwowski M., Czerwonka M., Wiśniewska E., & Forthmann B. (2021). How is intelligence test performance associated with creative achievement? A meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020028
[32] Kenett Y. N.(2018). Investigating creativity from a semantic network perspective. In Z. Kapoula, E. Volle, J. Renoult, & M. Andreatta (Eds.), Exploring transdisciplinarity in art and sciences (pp. 49-75). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_3
[33] Kenett Y. N.(2025). The role of knowledge in creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 37(2), 242-249. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10400419.2024.2322858
[34] Kenett Y. N., Anaki D.,& Faust, M.(2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407
[35] Kenett Y. N., Beaty R. E., Silvia P. J., Anaki D., & Faust M. (2016). Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000056
[36] Kenett Y. N.,& Faust, M.(2019). A semantic network cartography of the creative mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23 2019.01.007
[37] Kenett Y. N., Humphries S.,& Chatterjee, A.(2023). A thirst for knowledge: Grounding curiosity, creativity, and aesthetics in memory and reward neural systems. Creativity Research Journal, 352023.2165748
[38] Kenett Y. N., Kenett D. Y., Ben-Jacob E., & Faust M. (2011). Global and local features of semantic networks: Evidence from the Hebrew mental lexicon. PLoS ONE, 3.24, 6(8), e23912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023912
[39] Kenett Y. N., Levi E., Anaki D., & Faust M. (2017). The semantic distance task: Quantifying semantic distance with semantic network path length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(9), 1470-1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000391
[40] Kenett Y. N., Levy O., Kenett D. Y., Stanley H. E., Faust M., & Havlin S. (2018). Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(5), 867-872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717362115
[41] Kenett Y. N., Medaglia J. D., Beaty R. E., Chen Q., Betzel R. F.,Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Qiu, J.(2018). Driving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis. Neuropsychologia, 1182018.01.001
[42] Kenett Y. N., Ungar L.,& Chatterjee, A.(2021). Beauty and wellness in the semantic memory of the beholder. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 696507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2021.696507
[43] Krieger-Redwood K., Steward A., Gao Z., Wang X., Halai A., Smallwood J., & Jefferies E. (2022). Creativity in verbal associations is linked to semantic control. Cerebral Cortex, 33(9), 5135-5147. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac405
[44] Lai C. K., Haim E., Aschauer W., Haim K.,& Beaty, R. E.(2024). Fostering creativity in science education reshapes semantic memory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101593
[45] Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification.Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267.
[46] Lebuda, I. (2025). Broadening perspective on creative personality: Surface and core characteristics as predictors of creative achievements. Creativity Research Journal, 37(2), 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2300198
[47] Lebuda I., Zielińska A.,& Karwowski, M.(2021). On surface and core predictors of real-life creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100973
[48] Li Y., Kenett Y. N., Hu W.,& Beaty, R. E.(2021). Flexible semantic network structure supports the production of creative metaphor. Creativity Research Journal, 332021.1879508
[49] Li Y., Seger C. A., Chen Q., & Mo L. (2020). Left inferior frontal gyrus integrates multisensory information in category learning. Cerebral Cortex. 30(8), 4410-4423. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa029
[50] Liu C., Ren Z., Zhuang K., He L., Yan T., Zeng R.,& Qiu, J.(2021). Semantic association ability mediates the relationship between brain structure and human creativity. Neuropsychologia, 151, 107722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107722
[51] Liu C. Y., Qin L., Tao R., Deng W., Jiang T., Wang N., Matthews S.,& Siok, W. T.(2024). Delineating region-specific contributions and connectivity patterns for semantic association and categorization through ROI and granger causality analysis. Brain and Language, 258, 105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105476
[52] Liu Y., Nour M., Schuck N. W., Behrens T., & Dolan R. (2022). Decoding cognition from spontaneous neural activity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23, 204-214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00570-z
[53] Long, H. (2014). More than appropriateness and novelty: Judges’ criteria of assessing creative products in science tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.05.002
[54] Long, J. (2019). Interactions: Comprehensive, user-friendly toolkit for probing interactions (R package version 1.1. 0) [computer software]. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=interactions
[55] Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
[56] Merseal H. M., Luchini S., Kenett Y. N., Knudsen K., Bilder R. M., & Beaty R. E. (2025). Free association ability distinguishes highly creative artists from scientists: Findings from the big-C project. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(3), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000545
[57] Ovando-Tellez M., Benedek M., Kenett Y. N., Hills T., Bouanane S., Bernard M., Volle E. (2022). An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability. Communications Biology, 5(1), 604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03547-x
[58] Ovando-Tellez M., Kenett Y. N., Benedek M., Bernard M., Belo J., Beranger B., Bieth T., & Volle E. (2022). Brain connectivity-based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure. Science Advances, 8(5), eabl4294. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl4294
[59] Power J. D., Cohen A. L., Nelson S. M., Wig G. S., Barnes K. A., Church J. A., Petersen S. (2011). Functional network organization of the human brain.Neuron, 72(4), 665-678.
[60] Puccio G. J.(2020). Polarities in creativity: Revisiting amabile’s componential model. In: Reiter-Palmon, R., Fisher, C. M., Mueller, J. S. (Eds.), Creativity at work. Palgrave studies in creativity and innovation in organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_14
[61] Quillian, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the ACM, 12(8), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1145/363196.363214
[62] Rabini G., Ubaldi S., & Fairhall S. L. (2023). Task-based activation and resting-state connectivity predict individual differences in semantic capacity for complex semantic knowledge. Communications Biology, 6, 1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05400-1
[63] Roelke A.,& Hofmann, M. J.(2020). Functional connectivity of the left inferior frontal gyrus during semantic priming. Neuroscience Letters, 735, 135236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135236
[64] Sadrhaghighi H., Zarghami A., Irani M., Eskandarinezhad M., Sadrhaghighi S., & Parvaresh M. (2024). Student evaluation of teaching (SET) in dental faculty: Is it influenced by grouping the students according to their averages? Oral and Implantology: A Journal of Innovations and Advanced Techniques for Oral Health, 16(3), 156-161. https://doi.org/10.11138/oi163156-161
[65] Shofty B., Gonen T., Bergmann E., Mayseless N., Korn A., Shamay-Tsoory S., Ram Z. (2022). The default network is causally linked to creative thinking. Molecular Psychiatry, 27(3), 1848-1854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01403-8
[66] Silvia P. J.(2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.06.001
[67] Skurnik A., Ackerman R., & Kenett Y. N. (2025). Semantic memory and creative evaluation. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 824. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x
[68] Sripada C., Rutherford S., Angstadt M., Thompson W. K., Luciana M., Weigard A., Hyde L. H., & Heitzeg M. (2020). Prediction of neurocognition in youth from resting state fMRI. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(12), 3413-3421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0481-6
[69] Sternberg R. J.,& Lubart, T. I. (1998). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms In R J Sternberg (Ed), Handbook of creativity (pp 3-15) Cambridge University Press https://doiorg/10 Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.003
[70] Sun J., Liu Z., Rolls E. T., Chen Q., Yao Y., Yang W., Qiu J. (2019). Verbal creativity correlates with the temporal variability of brain networks during the resting state. Cerebral Cortex, 29(3), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy010
[71] Takeuchi H., Taki Y., Sassa Y., Hashizume H., Sekiguchi A., Fukushima A.,& Kawashima, R.(2010). White matter structures associated with creativity: Evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage, 512010.02.035
[72] Thomas S. A., Ryan S. K.,& Gilman, J.(2023). Resting state network connectivity is associated with cognitive flexibility performance in youth in the adolescent brain cognitive development study. Neuropsychologia, 191, 108708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108708
[73] Van Den Heuvel,M. P., De Lange, S. C., Zalesky, A., Seguin, C., Yeo, B. T. T., & Schmidt, R.(2017). Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: Issues and recommendations. NeuroImage, 152, 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.005
[74] Vatansever D., Smallwood J., & Jefferies E. (2021). Varying demands for cognitive control reveals shared neural processes supporting semantic and episodic memory retrieval. Nature Communications, 12(1), 2134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22443-2
[75] Vigneau M., Beaucousin V., Hervé P. Y., Duffau H., Crivello F., Houdé O., Mazoyer B.,& Tzourio-Mazoyer, N.(2006). Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. NeuroImage, 302005.11.002
[76] Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. NY. USA: Harcourt Brace.
[77] Wang X., Chen Q., Zhuang K., Zhang J., Cortes R. A., Holzman D. D., Qiu J. (2024). Semantic associative abilities and executive control functions predict novelty and appropriateness of idea generation. Communications Biology, 7(1), 703. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06405-0
[78] Wei D., Yang J., Li W., Wang K., Zhang Q.,& Qiu, J.(2014). Increased resting functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex in creativity by means of cognitive stimulation. Cortex, 51, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.004
[79] Wu J., Wang J., Georgiadis J. R., Cera N., Liang J., Shi G., Chen C., & Dong M. (2024). Expertise, brain plasticity, and resting state. Psychoradiology, 4, kkae020. https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkae020
[80] Yan T., Zhuang K., He L., Liu C., Zeng R., & Qiu J. (2021). Left temporal pole contributes to creative thinking via an individual semantic network.Psychophysiology, 58(8), e13841.
[81] Zhang J., Zhuang K., Sun J., Liu C., Fan L., Wang X., Gu J., & Qiu J. (2023). Retrieval flexibility links to creativity: Evidence from computational linguistic measure. Cerebral Cortex, 33(8), 4964-4976. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac392
[82] Zhang W., Xiang M., & Wang S. (2022). The role of left angular gyrus in the representation of linguistic composition relations.Human Brain Mapping, 43(7), 2204-2217.
[83] Zhong J., Kang K., Huang W., Zhao Z., & Zhang H. (2025). A standardized semantic feature norm for 954 cantonese concepts. Scientific Data, 12(1), 1936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06210-2