[1] Adler N. E., Epel E. S., Castellazzo G., & Ickovics J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592. [2] Aknin, L. B., & Human, L. J. (2015). Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 8-16. [3] Baskin E., Wakslak C. J., Trope Y., & Novemsky N. (2014). Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers that to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169-182. [4] Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339-363. [5] Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393-417. [6] Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1-14. [7] Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204-232. [8] Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199-215. [9] Cavanaugh L. A., Gino F., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2015). When doing good is bad in gift giving: Mis-predicting appreciation of socially responsible gifts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 178-189. [10] Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2017). Experiential gifts foster stronger social relationships than material gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 913-931. [11] Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Why is age so important in human mating? Evolved age preferences and their influences on multiple mating behaviors. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 127-157. [12] Epley, N., & Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980-1999. [13] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A. G., & Buchner A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. [14] Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. S. (2009). Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404-409. [15] Förster J., Epstude K., & Özelsel A. (2009). Why love has wings and sex has not: How reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1479-1491. [16] Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573-587. [17] Givi J., Birg L., Lowrey T. M., & Galak J. (2023). An integrative review of gift-giving research in consumer behavior and marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(3), 529-545. [18] Gonzaga G. C., Keltner D., Londahl E. A., & Smith M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 247-262. [19] Goodman J. K., Malkoc S. A., & Rosenboim M. (2019). The material-experiential asymmetry in discounting: When experiential purchases lead to more impatience. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 671-688. [20] Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications. [21] Howard, D. J., & Gengler, C. (2001). Emotional contagion effects on product attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 189-201. [22] Huang, M. H., & Yu, S. (2000). Gifts in a romantic relationship: A survival analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(3), 179-188. [23] iiMedia Research. (2021). Research on China's gift economy industry and analysis of users' consumption behavior from 2021 to 2022. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1718117 143899303691&wfr=spider&for=pc [艾媒咨询. (2021). 2021-2022年中国礼物经济产业研究与用户消费行为分析报告. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/ s?id=1718117143899303691&wfr=spider&for= pc] [24] iiMedia Research. (2023). Research on China's gift economy industry and analysis of users' consumption behavior from 2023 to 2024. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=176685029 9591314666&wfr=spider&for=pc [艾媒咨询. (2023). 2023-2024年中国礼物经济产业研究与用户消费行为分析报告. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1766850299591314666&wfr=spider&for=pc] [25] Joshi P. D., Wakslak C. J., Raj M., & Trope Y. (2016). Communicating with distant others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 37-44. [26] Kalkstein D. A., Kleiman T., Wakslak C. J., Liberman N., & Trope Y. (2016). Social learning across psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 1-19. [27] Ko, A., & Suh, E. M. (2019). Does physical attractiveness buy happiness? Women’s mating motivation and happiness. Motivation and Emotion, 43(1), 1-11. [28] Li N. P., Bailey J. M., Kenrick D. T., & Linsenmeier J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947-955. [29] Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18. [30] Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201-1205. [31] Liu P.,& Kwon, T. (2022). Shared consumption. In C. Lamberton, D. D. Rucker, & S. A. Spiller (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consumer psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [32] Liu P. J., Dallas S. K., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2019). A framework for understanding consumer choices for others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 407-434. [33] Liu Y. F., Su L. N., & Wang H. Y. (2011). Women’s cue preferences and information processing mode in mate choice. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(1), 21-29. [刘永芳, 苏丽娜, 王怀勇. (2011). 女性择偶决策的线索偏好及信息加工方式. 心理学报, 43(1), 21-29.] [34] Lu J., Xie X., & Xu J. (2013). Desirability or feasibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 144-155. [35] Luan, M., & Li, H. (2017). Good enough—compromise between desirability and feasibility: An alternative perspective on satisficing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 110-116. [36] Luan, M., & Li, H. (2020). How do people construe objects when being observed? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 808-823. [37] Luan M., Wu S., & Li H. (2020). The relationship between anticipated communication and creativity: Moderating role of construal level. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(10), 1178-1188. [栾墨, 吴霜, 李虹. (2020). 预期交流与创造力的关系: 解释水平的调节作用. 心理学报, 52(10), 1178-1188.] [38] Luo B., Fang W., Shen J., & Cong X. F. (2019). Gift-image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence. Journal of Business Research, 103, 142-152. [39] Miller, G. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books. [40] Otnes C., Ruth J. A., & Milbourne C. C. (1994). The pleasure and pain of being close: Men's mixed feelings about participation in Valentine's Day gift exchange. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 159-164. [41] Rim S., Min K. E., Liu P. J., Chartrand T. L., & Trope Y. (2018). The gift of psychological closeness: How feasible versus desirable gifts reduce psychological distance to the giver. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 360-371. [42] Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift giving among young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 765-784. [43] Simpson J. A., Griskevicius V., & Rothman A. J. (2012). Consumer decisions in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 304-314. [44] Tidwell N. D., Eastwick P. W., & Finkel E. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed‐dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20(2), 199-215. [45] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889. [46] Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. [47] Van Boven, L. (2005). Experientialism, materialism, and the pursuit of happiness. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 132-142. [48] Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193-1202. [49] Vandenbroele J., Van Kerckhove A., & Geuens M. (2020). If you work it, flaunt it: Conspicuous displays of exercise efforts increase mate value. Journal of Business Research, 120, 586-598. [50] Van Lange P. A., Rusbult C. E., Drigotas S. M., Arriaga X. B., Witcher B. S., & Cox C. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1373-1395. [51] Wang Y., Hou B., Li X., Li X., & Jiao L. (2017). The influence of different sex ratios and resource-gaining capability on male’s mating selection. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(9), 1195-1205. [王燕, 侯博文, 李歆瑶, 李晓煦, 焦璐. (2017). 不同性别比和资源获取能力对未婚男性择偶标准的影响. 心理学报, 49(9), 1195-1205.] [52] Wang Y., Yao P., & Zhou G. (2015). The influence of facial attractiveness and personality labels on men and women’s mate preference. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(1), 108-118. [王雨晴, 姚鹏飞, 周国梅. (2015). 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47(1), 108-118.] [53] Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2016). Ask and you shall (not) receive: Close friends prioritize relational signaling over recipient preferences in their gift choices. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(6), 1001-1018. [54] Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 635-653. [55] Wight K. G., Liu P. J., Bettman J. R., & Fitzsimons G. J. (2022). Social relationships and consumer behavior. In L. R. Kahle, T. M. Lowrey, & J. Huber (Eds.), APA handbook of consumer psychology. American Psychological Association. [56] Yang, A. X., & Urminsky, O. (2015). The foresight effect: Local optimism motivates consistency and local pessimism motivates variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 361-377. [57] Zhang, Y., & Epley, N. (2012). Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: When “it's the thought that counts” in gift exchanges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 667-681. |