心理学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 614-630.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2025.0614 cstr: 32110.14.2025.0614
韩宪国1, 金国敏2, 李丹1(), 刘世宏1, 吴琴1, 刘俊升2, 陈欣银3
收稿日期:
2023-09-24
发布日期:
2025-02-06
出版日期:
2025-04-25
通讯作者:
李丹, E-mail: lidan501@126.com作者简介:
韩宪国和金国敏为共同第一作者。
基金资助:
HAN Xianguo1, JIN Guomin2, LI Dan1(), LIU Shihong1, WU Qin1, LIU Junsheng2, CHEN Xinyin3
Received:
2023-09-24
Online:
2025-02-06
Published:
2025-04-25
摘要:
本研究采用自我报告法和教师评价法对1033名四年级学生(49.5%女生, M年龄 = 10.28岁, SD = 0.69岁)进行为期3年的3次追踪调查, 旨在探讨父母温暖与儿童晚期亲社会行为的关系以及儿童集体取向在其中的作用。结果发现:(1)父母温暖与儿童亲社会行为直接预测关系因父母角色而异, 前测母亲温暖正向预测后测儿童亲社会行为, 前测儿童亲社会行为正向预测后测父亲温暖; (2)纳入儿童集体取向后, 前测父亲温暖和母亲温暖均正向预测后测儿童集体取向, 儿童集体取向与亲社会行为相互正向预测; (3)中介效应检验表明, T1的父亲温暖和母亲温暖均能够通过T2的儿童集体取向预测T3的儿童亲社会行为。研究结果为理解文化价值观在父母教养与儿童亲社会行为的作用提供实证依据, 并为儿童价值观教育和亲社会行为干预带来一定启示。
中图分类号:
韩宪国, 金国敏, 李丹, 刘世宏, 吴琴, 刘俊升, 陈欣银. (2025). 父母温暖与儿童晚期亲社会行为的关系: 集体取向的作用. 心理学报, 57(4), 614-630.
HAN Xianguo, JIN Guomin, LI Dan, LIU Shihong, WU Qin, LIU Junsheng, CHEN Xinyin. (2025). Parental warmth and children’s prosocial behavior: The role of group orientation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 57(4), 614-630.
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 性别a | — | ||||||||||||||
2 母亲受教育水平 | −0.04 | — | |||||||||||||
3 父亲受教育水平 | −0.04 | 0.53*** | — | ||||||||||||
4 母亲温暖T1 | 0.10** | 0.05 | 0.03 | — | |||||||||||
5 母亲温暖T2 | −0.01 | 0.08* | 0.02 | 0.46*** | — | ||||||||||
6 母亲温暖T3 | −0.05 | 0.09** | 0.07 | 0.35*** | 0.48*** | — | |||||||||
7 父亲温暖T1 | 0.10** | 0.07* | 0.04 | 0.50*** | 0.30*** | 0.24*** | — | ||||||||
8 父亲温暖T2 | 0.09** | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.26*** | 0.56*** | 0.30*** | 0.41*** | — | |||||||
9 父亲温暖T3 | −0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.24*** | 0.34*** | 0.60*** | 0.36*** | 0.45*** | — | ||||||
10 集体取向T1 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08* | 0.37*** | 0.20*** | 0.13*** | 0.32*** | 0.17*** | 0.14*** | — | |||||
11 集体取向T2 | 0.09** | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.32*** | 0.33*** | 0.21*** | 0.22*** | 0.34*** | 0.18*** | 0.35*** | — | ||||
12 集体取向T3 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.21*** | 0.25*** | 0.35*** | 0.17*** | 0.29*** | 0.39*** | 0.31*** | 0.47*** | — | |||
13 亲社会行为T1 | 0.28*** | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.13*** | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.15*** | 0.10** | 0.07 | 0.16*** | 0.15*** | 0.11*** | — | ||
14 亲社会行为T2 | 0.26*** | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.11** | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08* | 0.03 | 0.08* | 0.13*** | 0.11*** | 0.12*** | 0.22*** | — | |
15 亲社会行为T3 | 0.25*** | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.09* | 0.05 | 0.07* | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.10** | 0.10** | 0.12** | 0.26*** | 0.20*** | — |
M | 0.49 | 3.55 | 3.93 | 3.64 | 3.68 | 3.69 | 3.52 | 3.54 | 3.60 | 3.55 | 3.62 | 3.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
SD | 0.50 | 1.06 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
表1 各变量的描述统计与相关分析
变量 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 性别a | — | ||||||||||||||
2 母亲受教育水平 | −0.04 | — | |||||||||||||
3 父亲受教育水平 | −0.04 | 0.53*** | — | ||||||||||||
4 母亲温暖T1 | 0.10** | 0.05 | 0.03 | — | |||||||||||
5 母亲温暖T2 | −0.01 | 0.08* | 0.02 | 0.46*** | — | ||||||||||
6 母亲温暖T3 | −0.05 | 0.09** | 0.07 | 0.35*** | 0.48*** | — | |||||||||
7 父亲温暖T1 | 0.10** | 0.07* | 0.04 | 0.50*** | 0.30*** | 0.24*** | — | ||||||||
8 父亲温暖T2 | 0.09** | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.26*** | 0.56*** | 0.30*** | 0.41*** | — | |||||||
9 父亲温暖T3 | −0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.24*** | 0.34*** | 0.60*** | 0.36*** | 0.45*** | — | ||||||
10 集体取向T1 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08* | 0.37*** | 0.20*** | 0.13*** | 0.32*** | 0.17*** | 0.14*** | — | |||||
11 集体取向T2 | 0.09** | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.32*** | 0.33*** | 0.21*** | 0.22*** | 0.34*** | 0.18*** | 0.35*** | — | ||||
12 集体取向T3 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.21*** | 0.25*** | 0.35*** | 0.17*** | 0.29*** | 0.39*** | 0.31*** | 0.47*** | — | |||
13 亲社会行为T1 | 0.28*** | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.13*** | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.15*** | 0.10** | 0.07 | 0.16*** | 0.15*** | 0.11*** | — | ||
14 亲社会行为T2 | 0.26*** | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.11** | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08* | 0.03 | 0.08* | 0.13*** | 0.11*** | 0.12*** | 0.22*** | — | |
15 亲社会行为T3 | 0.25*** | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.09* | 0.05 | 0.07* | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.10** | 0.10** | 0.12** | 0.26*** | 0.20*** | — |
M | 0.49 | 3.55 | 3.93 | 3.64 | 3.68 | 3.69 | 3.52 | 3.54 | 3.60 | 3.55 | 3.62 | 3.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
SD | 0.50 | 1.06 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 1.08 | 1.01 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 |
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 69.419 (39) | 0.990 | 0.983 | 0.028 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 73.227 (45) | 0.991 | 0.986 | 0.025 | M2-M1 | 3.341 (6) | 0.765 | 0.001 | −0.003 |
M3: 强等值 | 90.467 (53) | 0.988 | 0.985 | 0.026 | M3-M2 | 17.886 (8) | 0.022 | −0.003 | 0.001 |
父亲温暖 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 70.548 (39) | 0.990 | 0.983 | 0.028 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 76.021 (45) | 0.990 | 0.986 | 0.026 | M2-M1 | 5.110 (6) | 0.530 | 0.000 | −0.002 |
M3: 强等值 | 89.000 (53) | 0.989 | 0.986 | 0.026 | M3-M2 | 12.914 (8) | 0.115 | −0.001 | 0.000 |
集体取向 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 703.039 (372) | 0.938 | 0.928 | 0.029 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 717.681 (390) | 0.939 | 0.932 | 0.029 | M2-M1 | 12.801 (18) | 0.803 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
M3: 强等值 | 807.431 (410) | 0.926 | 0.921 | 0.031 | M3-M2 | 96.981 (20) | < 0.001 | −0.013 | 0.002 |
M3.1: 部分强等值 | 768.248 (408) | 0.933 | 0.928 | 0.029 | M3.1-M2 | 53.034 (18) | < 0.001 | −0.006 | 0.000 |
亲社会行为 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 127.000 (72) | 0.986 | 0.980 | 0.027 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 132.470 (80) | 0.987 | 0.982 | 0.025 | M2-M1 | 5.409 (8) | 0.713 | 0.001 | −0.002 |
M3: 强等值 | 135.461 (90) | 0.988 | 0.987 | 0.022 | M3-M2 | 1.176 (10) | 1.000 | 0.001 | −0.003 |
表2 各量表在3个时间点的纵向等值性检验
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 69.419 (39) | 0.990 | 0.983 | 0.028 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 73.227 (45) | 0.991 | 0.986 | 0.025 | M2-M1 | 3.341 (6) | 0.765 | 0.001 | −0.003 |
M3: 强等值 | 90.467 (53) | 0.988 | 0.985 | 0.026 | M3-M2 | 17.886 (8) | 0.022 | −0.003 | 0.001 |
父亲温暖 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 70.548 (39) | 0.990 | 0.983 | 0.028 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 76.021 (45) | 0.990 | 0.986 | 0.026 | M2-M1 | 5.110 (6) | 0.530 | 0.000 | −0.002 |
M3: 强等值 | 89.000 (53) | 0.989 | 0.986 | 0.026 | M3-M2 | 12.914 (8) | 0.115 | −0.001 | 0.000 |
集体取向 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 703.039 (372) | 0.938 | 0.928 | 0.029 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 717.681 (390) | 0.939 | 0.932 | 0.029 | M2-M1 | 12.801 (18) | 0.803 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
M3: 强等值 | 807.431 (410) | 0.926 | 0.921 | 0.031 | M3-M2 | 96.981 (20) | < 0.001 | −0.013 | 0.002 |
M3.1: 部分强等值 | 768.248 (408) | 0.933 | 0.928 | 0.029 | M3.1-M2 | 53.034 (18) | < 0.001 | −0.006 | 0.000 |
亲社会行为 | |||||||||
M1: 形态等值 | 127.000 (72) | 0.986 | 0.980 | 0.027 | |||||
M2: 弱等值 | 132.470 (80) | 0.987 | 0.982 | 0.025 | M2-M1 | 5.409 (8) | 0.713 | 0.001 | −0.002 |
M3: 强等值 | 135.461 (90) | 0.988 | 0.987 | 0.022 | M3-M2 | 1.176 (10) | 1.000 | 0.001 | −0.003 |
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M1.1: 自由估计 | 620.660 (395) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | |||||
M1.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 621.047 (397) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.023 | M1.2-M1.1 | 0.438 (2) | 0.804 | 0.000 | −0.001 |
M1.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 623.860 (397) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M1.3-M1.1 | 3.205 (2) | 0.201 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M1.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 624.054 (399) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.023 | M1.4-M1.1 | 3.311 (4) | 0.507 | 0.000 | −0.001 |
父亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M2.1: 自由估计 | 629.480 (395) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | |||||
M2.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 629.931 (397) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.2-M2.1 | 0.398 (2) | 0.819 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M2.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 630.438 (397) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.3-M2.1 | 0.999 (2) | 0.607 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M2.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 630.745 (399) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.4-M2.1 | 1.265 (4) | 0.867 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
母亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M3.1: 自由估计 | 2466.802 (1688) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | |||||
M3.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 2469.313 (1691) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.2-M3.1 | 2.605 (3) | 0.457 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M3.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 2474.801 (1694) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.3-M3.1 | 8.019 (6) | 0.237 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M3.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 2475.041 (1697) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.4-M3.1 | 8.405 (9) | 0.494 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M4.1: 自由估计 | 2512.261 (1688) | 0.945 | 0.942 | 0.022 | |||||
M4.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 2512.611 (1691) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.2-M4.1 | 0.350 (3) | 0.950 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M4.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 2514.487 (1694) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.3-M4.1 | 2.399 (6) | 0.880 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M4.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 2515.136 (1697) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.4-M4.1 | 3.233 (9) | 0.954 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表3 交叉滞后模型的拟合指数与模型比较
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M1.1: 自由估计 | 620.660 (395) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | |||||
M1.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 621.047 (397) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.023 | M1.2-M1.1 | 0.438 (2) | 0.804 | 0.000 | −0.001 |
M1.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 623.860 (397) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M1.3-M1.1 | 3.205 (2) | 0.201 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M1.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 624.054 (399) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.023 | M1.4-M1.1 | 3.311 (4) | 0.507 | 0.000 | −0.001 |
父亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M2.1: 自由估计 | 629.480 (395) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | |||||
M2.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 629.931 (397) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.2-M2.1 | 0.398 (2) | 0.819 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M2.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 630.438 (397) | 0.973 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.3-M2.1 | 0.999 (2) | 0.607 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M2.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 630.745 (399) | 0.974 | 0.971 | 0.024 | M2.4-M2.1 | 1.265 (4) | 0.867 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
母亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M3.1: 自由估计 | 2466.802 (1688) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | |||||
M3.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 2469.313 (1691) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.2-M3.1 | 2.605 (3) | 0.457 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M3.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 2474.801 (1694) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.3-M3.1 | 8.019 (6) | 0.237 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M3.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 2475.041 (1697) | 0.947 | 0.945 | 0.021 | M3.4-M3.1 | 8.405 (9) | 0.494 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M4.1: 自由估计 | 2512.261 (1688) | 0.945 | 0.942 | 0.022 | |||||
M4.2: 限定各时间点间自回归路径相等 | 2512.611 (1691) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.2-M4.1 | 0.350 (3) | 0.950 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M4.3: 限定各时间点间交叉滞后路径相等 | 2514.487 (1694) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.3-M4.1 | 2.399 (6) | 0.880 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
M4.4: 限定各时间点间自回归和交叉滞后路径相等 | 2515.136 (1697) | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.022 | M4.4-M4.1 | 3.233 (9) | 0.954 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖 | 0.52 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.55 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.20 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.012 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.012 |
亲社会行为→母亲温暖 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 0.560 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.559 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
母亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | -0.01 | 0.04 | 0.818 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.134 |
表4 母亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后分析结果
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖 | 0.52 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.55 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.20 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.012 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.012 |
亲社会行为→母亲温暖 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 0.560 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.559 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
母亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | -0.01 | 0.04 | 0.818 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.134 |
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖 | 0.49 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.52 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.21 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.141 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.144 |
亲社会行为→父亲温暖 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.036 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.039 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
父亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.762 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.516 |
表5 父亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后分析结果
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖 | 0.49 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.52 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.21 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.19 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.141 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.144 |
亲社会行为→父亲温暖 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.036 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.039 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
父亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.762 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.516 |
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖 | 0.50 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.53 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
集体取向 | 0.39 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.45 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.19 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖→集体取向 | 0.14 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.16 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
母亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.201 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.202 |
集体取向→母亲温暖 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.189 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.192 |
集体取向→亲社会行为 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.018 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.017 |
亲社会行为→母亲温暖 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.451 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.450 |
亲社会行为→集体取向 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.003 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
母亲温暖T1↔集体取向T1 | 0.47 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
集体取向T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.18 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔集体取向T2 | 0.26 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.02 | 0.04 | 0.692 | |||
集体取向T2↔亲社会行为T2 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.235 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔集体取向T3 | 0.34 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.146 | |||
集体取向T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.054 |
表6 母亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后分析结果
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖 | 0.50 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.53 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
集体取向 | 0.39 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.45 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.19 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
母亲温暖→集体取向 | 0.14 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.16 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
母亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.201 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.202 |
集体取向→母亲温暖 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.189 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.192 |
集体取向→亲社会行为 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.018 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.017 |
亲社会行为→母亲温暖 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.451 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.450 |
亲社会行为→集体取向 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.003 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
母亲温暖T1↔集体取向T1 | 0.47 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
集体取向T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.18 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔集体取向T2 | 0.26 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.02 | 0.04 | 0.692 | |||
集体取向T2↔亲社会行为T2 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.235 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔集体取向T3 | 0.34 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
母亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.146 | |||
集体取向T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.054 |
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖 | 0.49 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.52 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
集体取向 | 0.40 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.46 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.19 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖→集体取向 | 0.13 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.14 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
父亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.884 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.884 |
集体取向→父亲温暖 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.771 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.771 |
集体取向→亲社会行为 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.005 |
亲社会行为→父亲温暖 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.039 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.042 |
亲社会行为→集体取向 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.002 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
父亲温暖T1↔集体取向T1 | 0.41 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
集体取向T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.19 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔集体取向T2 | 0.32 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.02 | 0.05 | 0.732 | |||
集体取向T2↔亲社会行为T2 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.153 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔集体取向T3 | 0.37 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.548 | |||
集体取向T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.057 |
表7 父亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后分析结果
路径 | T1→T2 | T2→T3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | p | β | SE | p | |
自回归路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖 | 0.49 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.52 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
集体取向 | 0.40 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.46 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
亲社会行为 | 0.19 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | 0.18 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
交叉滞后路径 | ||||||
父亲温暖→集体取向 | 0.13 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 0.14 | 0.03 | < 0.001 |
父亲温暖→亲社会行为 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.884 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.884 |
集体取向→父亲温暖 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.771 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.771 |
集体取向→亲社会行为 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.005 |
亲社会行为→父亲温暖 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.039 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.042 |
亲社会行为→集体取向 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.002 |
同一时间点各变量间的相关 | ||||||
父亲温暖T1↔集体取向T1 | 0.41 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
集体取向T1↔亲社会行为T1 | 0.19 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔集体取向T2 | 0.32 | 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T2↔亲社会行为T2 | −0.02 | 0.05 | 0.732 | |||
集体取向T2↔亲社会行为T2 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.153 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔集体取向T3 | 0.37 | 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
父亲温暖T3↔亲社会行为T3 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.548 | |||
集体取向T3↔亲社会行为T3 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.057 |
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M1.1: 自由估计 | 996.754 (760) | 0.970 | 0.968 | 0.025 | |||||
M1.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 1002.269 (762) | 0.970 | 0.968 | 0.025 | M1.2-M1.1 | 5.624 (2) | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M2.1: 自由估计 | 1027.748 (762) | 0.968 | 0.966 | 0.026 | |||||
M2.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 1028.785 (764) | 0.968 | 0.966 | 0.026 | M2.2-M2.1 | 0.905 (2) | 0.636 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
母亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M3.1: 自由估计 | 4465.092 (3315) | 0.921 | 0.919 | 0.026 | |||||
M3.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 4483.641 (3321) | 0.921 | 0.918 | 0.026 | M3.2-M3.1 | 18.026 (6) | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M4.1: 自由估计 | 4552.834 (3317) | 0.917 | 0.914 | 0.027 | |||||
M4.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 4557.380 (3323) | 0.917 | 0.914 | 0.027 | M4.2-M4.1 | 4.546 (6) | 0.603 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
表8 交叉滞后路径的性别差异检验
模型 | χ² (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | 模型比较 | Δχ2SB (Δdf) | p | ΔCFI | ΔRMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
母亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M1.1: 自由估计 | 996.754 (760) | 0.970 | 0.968 | 0.025 | |||||
M1.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 1002.269 (762) | 0.970 | 0.968 | 0.025 | M1.2-M1.1 | 5.624 (2) | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖与儿童亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M2.1: 自由估计 | 1027.748 (762) | 0.968 | 0.966 | 0.026 | |||||
M2.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 1028.785 (764) | 0.968 | 0.966 | 0.026 | M2.2-M2.1 | 0.905 (2) | 0.636 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
母亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M3.1: 自由估计 | 4465.092 (3315) | 0.921 | 0.919 | 0.026 | |||||
M3.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 4483.641 (3321) | 0.921 | 0.918 | 0.026 | M3.2-M3.1 | 18.026 (6) | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
父亲温暖、儿童集体取向与亲社会行为的交叉滞后模型 | |||||||||
M4.1: 自由估计 | 4552.834 (3317) | 0.917 | 0.914 | 0.027 | |||||
M4.2: 限定交叉滞后路径相等 | 4557.380 (3323) | 0.917 | 0.914 | 0.027 | M4.2-M4.1 | 4.546 (6) | 0.603 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
[15] | Craig, L. (2006). Does father care mean fathers share?: A comparison of how mothers and fathers in intact families spend time with children. Gender & Society, 20(2), 259-281. |
[16] | Davidov, M., & Grusec, J. E. (2023). Parenting and children’s prosociality:Multiple pathways to socialization. In M. Davidov & T. Malti (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of prosociality: Development, mechanisms, promotion (pp. 361-387). Cambridge University Press. |
[17] | Davis, A. N., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. P. (2015). Perceived maternal parenting styles, cultural values, and prosocial tendencies among Mexican American youth. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 176(4), 235-252. |
[18] |
Davis, A. N., Carlo, G., Streit, C., Schwartz, S., Unger, J., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., & Szapocznik, J. (2018). Longitudinal associations between maternal involvement, cultural orientations, and prosocial behaviors among recent immigrant Latino adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(2), 460-472.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0792-3 pmid: 29248991 |
[19] |
Day, R. D., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2009). Mother and father connectedness and involvement during early adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 900-904.
doi: 10.1037/a0016438 pmid: 20001149 |
[20] | de Guzman, M. R. T., Landoy, B. V. N., Garcia, A. S., & Padasas, I. O. (2019). Parenting and the prosocial behaviors of children:Across cultures. In D. J. Laible, G. Carlo, & L. M. Padilla-Walker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development (pp. 163-177). Oxford University Press. |
[21] | Dou, D., Shek, D. T. L., & Kwok, K. H. R. (2020). Perceived paternal and maternal parenting attributes among Chinese adolescents: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8741. |
[22] | Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (Vol. 3, 7th ed., pp. 610-656). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[23] | Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(1), 18-26. |
[24] | Fabes, R. A., & Morris, S. L. (2023). Prosociality in middle childhood. In M. Davidov & T. Malti (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of prosociality: Development, mechanisms, promotion (pp. 145-162). Cambridge University Press. |
[25] | Fagan, J., Day, R., Lamb, M. E., & Cabrera, N. J. (2014). Should researchers conceptualize differently the dimensions of parenting for fathers and mothers? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 390-405. |
[26] | Farrant, B. M., Devine, T. A. J., Maybery, M. T., & Fletcher, J. (2012). Empathy, perspective taking and prosocial behaviour: The importance of parenting practices. Infant and Child Development, 21(2), 175-188. |
[1] | Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall. |
[2] |
Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75(2), 81-95.
pmid: 4870552 |
[3] | Block, J. H. (1981). The child-rearing practices report (CRPR): A set of Q items for the description of parental socialization attitudes and values. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Human Development. |
[4] | Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399. |
[5] |
Cai, H., Huang, Z., Lin, L., Zhang, M., Wang, X., Zhu, H., … Jing, Y. (2020). The psychological change of the Chinese people over the past half century: A literature review. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(10), 1599-1618.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01599 |
[蔡华俭, 黄梓航, 林莉, 张明杨, 王潇欧, 朱慧珺, … 敬一鸣. (2020). 半个多世纪来中国人的心理与行为变化——心理学视野下的研究. 心理科学进展, 28(10), 1599-1618.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01599 |
|
[6] | Carlo, G., & Bolanos, L. D. C. (2019). Traditional and culture- specific parenting of prosociality in US Latino/as. In D. J. Laible, G. Carlo, & L. M. Padilla-Walker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development. Oxford University Press. |
[7] | Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2011). The longitudinal relations among dimensions of parenting styles, sympathy, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(2), 116-124. |
[8] | Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. |
[9] | Chen, W., Liu, J., Li, D., & Chen, X. (2018). Developmental trajectories of early adolescents’ cultural values in the New Era: The effect of peer acceptance. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(6), 1302-1309. |
[陈万芬, 刘俊升, 李丹, 陈欣银. (2018). 新时代青少年早期文化价值观的发展轨迹:同伴接纳的作用. 心理科学, 41(6), 1302-1309.] | |
[10] | Chen, X. (2023). Socialization and socioemotional development in Chinese children. Cambridge University Press, |
[27] | Fischer, R. (2017). From values to behavior and from behavior to values. In S. Roccas & L. Sagiv (Eds.), Values and behavior: Taking a cross cultural perspective (pp. 219-235). Springer International Publishing. |
[28] |
Flujas-Contreras, J. M., García-Palacios, A., & Gómez, I. (2019). Technology-based parenting interventions for children’s physical and psychological health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(11), 1787-1798.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000692 pmid: 30977462 |
[29] | Gómez, A. S., & Duque, M. (2021). Evolution of the study on the effect of parenting on prosocial behaviours in childhood and adolescence: Systematic review. Actualidades En Psicología, 35, 49-73. |
[30] |
Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530 pmid: 18652544 |
[31] | Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2019). Parent socialization and children’s values. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent (Vol. 3, 3rd ed., pp. 762-796). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. |
[32] | Hadjar, A., Boehnke, K., Knafo, A., Daniel, E., Musiol, A.-L., Schiefer, D., & Möllering, A. (2012). Parent-child value similarity and subjective well-being in the context of migration: An exploration. Family Science, 3(1), 55-63. |
[33] | Han, X., Xia, Y., Yang, P., Li, D., Ding, X., Zhang, R., & Zhang, M. (2023). Changes in Chinese early adolescents’ group orientation and mental health from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1093128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093128 |
[34] | Hastings, P. D., Miller, J. G., & Troxel, N. R. (2015). Making good:The socialization of children’s prosocial development. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 637-660). The Guilford Press. |
[35] | Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. L., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbreck, C. A. (1986). The Teacher-Child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competences. School Psychology Review, 15(3), 393-409. |
[36] | Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. |
[37] | Hou, F., Wu, X., Zou, S., Liu, C., & Huang, B. (2018). The association between parental involvement and adolescent’s prosocial behavior: The mediating role of parent-child attachment. Psychological Development and Education, 34(4), 417-425. |
[侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. (2018). 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响: 亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(4), 417-425.] | |
[11] | Chen, X., Fu, R., & Yiu, W. Y. V. (2019). Culture and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Biology and ecology of parenting (Vol. 2, 3rd ed. pp. 448-473). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. |
[12] |
Chen, X., Liu, M., & Li, D. (2000). Parental warmth, control, and indulgence and their relations to adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 14(3), 401-419.
doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.14.3.401 pmid: 11025932 |
[13] | Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Li, Z.-y. (1995). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 531-539. |
[14] | Chen, X., Wang, L., & Liu, J. (2012). Adolescent cultural values and adjustment in the changing Chinese society. In G. Trommsdorff & X. Chen (Eds.), Values, religion, and culture in adolescent development (pp. 235-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[38] | Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. |
[39] |
Hughes, D., Rodriguez, J., Smith, E. P., Johnson, D. J., Stevenson, H. C., & Spicer, P. (2006). Parents’ ethnic- racial socialization practices: A review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42(5), 747-770.
doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.747 pmid: 16953684 |
[40] | Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Deković, M. (1997). Child rearing, prosocial moral reasoning, and prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(3), 509-527. |
[41] | Jin, G., Fu, R., Li, D., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2022). Longitudinal associations between prosociality and depressive symptoms in Chinese children: The mediating role of peer preference. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(5), 956-966. |
[42] |
Jung, H., Seo, E., Han, E., Henderson, M. D., & Patall, E. A. (2020). Prosocial modeling: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(8), 635-663.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000235 pmid: 32406697 |
[43] | Kho, C., White, R. M. B., Knight, G. P., Zhao, C., & Roche, K. M. (2023). Parental warmth and developmental change in familism values: Latinx adolescents in an emerging immigrant community. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 33(1), 202-215. |
[44] | Knight, G. P., & Carlo, G. (2012). Prosocial development among Mexican American youth. Child Development Perspectives, 6(3), 258-263. |
[45] | Köster, M., Schuhmacher, N., & Kärtner, J. (2015). A cultural perspective on prosocial development. Human Ethology Bulletin, 30(1), 71-82. |
[46] | Kou, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2006). Conceptual representation of early adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Sociological Studies, 5, 169-187. |
[寇彧, 张庆鹏. (2006). 青少年亲社会行为的概念表征研究. 社会学研究, 5, 169-187.] | |
[47] | Kuang, Y., Wang, F., & Wang, Z.-J. (2021). Social class and children’s prosociality: A study in the context of China’s dual urban-rural structure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 63-70. |
[48] | Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., P. Bowers, E., & John Geldhof, G. (2015). Positive youth development and relational- developmental-systems. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1-45). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
[49] | Li, D. (2000). Development of prosocial value orientation in primary children. Psychological Development and Education, 16(4), 20-24,37. |
[李丹. (2000). 小学儿童亲社会价值取向发展的实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 16(4), 20-24,37.] | |
[50] | Li, D., Zhou, T., Liu, J., Dai, Y., Chen, M., & Chen, X. (2018). Values of adolescent across regions in China: Relations with social, school, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(6), 1292-1301. |
[李丹, 周同, 刘俊升, 戴艳, 陈梦雪, 陈欣银. (2018). 新时代青少年价值观及其与社会、学校和心理适应的关系: 三个地域的比较. 心理科学, 41(6), 1292-1301.] | |
[51] | Li, D., Zhu, N., Xia, Y., Yang, P., Ding, X., Liu, J., … Zhang, M. (2023). The intergenerational effect of value orientation and its relations with adolescents' psychological and school adjustments. Journal of Psychological Science, 46(2), 329-338. |
[李丹, 朱宁宁, 夏艳雨, 杨盼盼, 丁雪辰, 刘俊升, … 张明浩. (2023). 价值取向的代际效应及其与青少年心理和学校适应的关系. 心理科学, 46(2), 329-338.] | |
[52] | Liu, X., Fu, R., Li, D., Liu, J., & Chen, X. (2018). Self- and group-orientations and adjustment in urban and rural Chinese children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(9), 1440-1456. |
[53] | Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., Thartori, E., Lunetti, C., Di Giunta, L., Bacchini, D., & Lansford, J. E. (2021). Longitudinal relations among maternal self-efficacy, maternal warmth, and early adolescents’ prosocial behavior. Parenting: Science and Practice, 21(1), 24-46. |
[54] | Luo, H., Liu, Q., Yu, C., & Nie, Y. (2021). Parental warmth, gratitude, and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents: The moderating effect of school climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7033. |
[55] | Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family:Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley. |
[56] | MacDonald, K. (1992). Warmth as a developmental construct: An evolutionary analysis. Child Development, 63(4), 753-773. |
[57] |
Malti, T., & Dys, S. P. (2018). From being nice to being kind: Development of prosocial behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 45-49.
doi: S2352-250X(17)30157-4 pmid: 28830006 |
[58] |
Malti, T., Ongley, S. F., Peplak, J., Chaparro, M. P., Buchmann, M., Zuffianò, A., & Cui, L. (2016). Children’s sympathy, guilt, and moral reasoning in helping, cooperation, and sharing: A 6-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 87(6), 1783-1795.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12632 pmid: 28262929 |
[59] |
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Arens, A. K., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., & Dicke, T. (2018). An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 263-280.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000393 pmid: 29172566 |
[60] | Orth, U., Meier, L. L., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Krauss, S., Messerli, D., & Robins, R. W. (2024). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods, 29(2), 421-433. |
[61] | Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2014). Parental socialization of prosocial behavior:A multidimensional approach. In L. M. Padilla- Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 131-155). Oxford University Press. |
[62] | Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., Christensen, K. J., & Yorgason, J. B. (2012). Bidirectional relations between authoritative parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(3), 400-408. |
[63] | Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551. |
[64] | Padilla-Walker, L. M., Dyer, W. J., Yorgason, J. B., Fraser, A. M., & Coyne, S. M. (2015). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers: A person-centered approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 135-150. |
[65] |
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nielson, M. G., & Day, R. D. (2016). The role of parental warmth and hostility on adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward multiple targets. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(3), 331-340.
doi: 10.1037/fam0000157 pmid: 26414417 |
[66] | Pastorelli, C., Zuffianò, A., Lansford, J. E., Thartori, E., Bornstein, M. H., Chang, L., … Bacchini, D. (2021). Positive youth development: Parental warmth, values, and prosocial behavior in 11 cultural groups. Journal of Youth Development, 16(2-3), 379-401. |
[67] |
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 pmid: 21838546 |
[68] |
Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825-852.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015258 pmid: 25148853 |
[69] |
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90.
pmid: 27942093 |
[70] |
Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L.,... Bombi, A. S. (2018). Parental acceptance-rejection and child prosocial behavior: Developmental transactions across the transition to adolescence in nine countries, mothers and fathers, and girls and boys. Developmental Psychology, 54(10), 1881-1890.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000565 pmid: 30234339 |
[71] |
Rothenberg, W. A., Lansford, J. E., Alampay, L. P., Al-Hassan, S. M., Bacchini, D., Bornstein, M. H.,... Yotanyamaneewong, S. (2020). Examining effects of mother and father warmth and control on child externalizing and internalizing problems from age 8 to 13 in nine countries. Development and Psychopathology, 32(3), 1113-1137.
doi: 10.1017/S0954579419001214 pmid: 31865926 |
[72] | Sagiv, L., & Roccas, S. (2021). How do values affect behavior? Let me count the ways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 295-316. |
[73] | Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. (2022). Personal values across cultures. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517-46. |
[74] | Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. |
[75] | Schaefer, E. S. (1965). Children's reports of parental behavior: An inventory. Child Development, 36(2), 413-424. |
[76] |
Shavitt, S., Johnson, T. P., & Zhang, J. (2011). Horizontal and vertical cultural differences in the content of advertising appeals. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3-4), 297-310.
pmid: 25554720 |
[77] | Streit, C., Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., White, R. M. B., & Maiya, S. (2021). Relations among parenting, culture, and prosocial behaviors in U.S. Mexican youth: An integrative socialization approach. Child Development, 92(4), e383-e397. |
[78] | Tan, T. X., Yi, Z., Camras, L. A., Cheng, K., Li, Z., Sun, Y., & Chen, N. (2021). The effect of academic performance, individualistic and collectivistic orientation on Chinese youth’s adjustment. Social Psychology of Education, 24(5), 1209-1229. |
[79] | van der Storm, L., van Lissa, C. J., Lucassen, N., Helmerhorst, K. O. W., & Keizer, R. (2022). Maternal and paternal parenting and child prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis using a structural equation modeling design. Marriage & Family Review, 58(1), 1-37. |
[80] | Wang, X., Huebner, E. S., & Tian, L. (2023). Longitudinal relations among perceived parental warmth, self-esteem and social behaviours from middle childhood to early adolescence in China: Disentangling between- and within- person associations. British Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 969-990 |
[81] | Wang, X., Li, D., Chen, X., Liu, J., Dai, Y., Guo, H., & Xu, T. (2018). Adolescent values and their relations with adjustment in the changing Chinese context. Journal of Psychological Science, 41(6), 1282-1291. |
[王晓峰, 李丹, 陈欣银, 刘俊升, 戴艳, 郭虹蔓, 徐婷. (2018). 新时代青少年价值观的构成特征与适应功能研究. 心理科学, 41(6), 1282-1291.] | |
[82] | Wong, T. K. Y., Konishi, C., & Kong, X. (2021). Parenting and prosocial behaviors: A meta-analysis. Social Development, 30(2), 343-373. |
[83] | Xu, J., Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2020). Impact of violations of measurement invariance in cross-lagged panel mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 52(6), 2623-2645. |
[84] | Zhang, M., Yang, Y., & Kou, Y. (2015). The adolescents’ prosocial behavior and its development. Youth Studies, 4, 10-18+94. |
[张梦圆, 杨莹, 寇彧. (2015). 青少年的亲社会行为及其发展. 青年研究, 4, 10-18+94.] | |
[85] | Zhang, Q. (2012). The dimensions of measurement and mechanism of prosocial behavior from a perspective of conceptual representation [Unpublished doctorial dissertation]. Beijing Normal University. |
[张庆鹏. (2012). 概念表征视角下亲社会行为的测评维度和机制研究 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.] | |
[86] | Zhang, Q., & Kou, Y. (2008). A confirmative research on prototype concept structure of prosocial behavior endorsed by adolescents. Sociological Studies, 4, 182-202+245. |
[张庆鹏, 寇彧. (2008). 青少年亲社会行为原型概念结构的验证. 社会学研究, 4, 182-202+245.] | |
[87] |
Zhang, W., Li, X., Chen, G., & Cao, Y. (2021). The relationship between positive parenting and adolescent prosocial behaviour: The mediating role of empathy and the moderating role of the oxytocin receptor gene. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(9), 976-991.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00976 |
[张文新, 李曦, 陈光辉, 曹衍淼. (2021). 母亲积极教养与青少年亲社会行为: 共情的中介作用与OXTR基因的调节作用. 心理学报, 53(9), 976-991.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00976 |
|
[88] | Zhao, S., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2015). Maternal parenting and social, school, and psychological adjustment of migrant children in urban China. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(6), 541-551. |
[89] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942-950. |
[周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.] | |
[90] | Zhou, Z., Qu, Y., & Li, X. (2022). Parental collectivism goals and Chinese adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: The mediating role of authoritative parenting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(4), 766-779. |
[1] | 蒯玲, 卫海英, 姚琦, 肖婷文, 谢升成. 时间标志对炫耀性亲社会行为意愿的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 526-543. |
[2] | 李卉, 刘思懿, 庞怡. 社交机器人对3~5岁儿童分享行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 573-583. |
[3] | 李曦, 纪林芹, 迟晓慧, 王舒冉, 张文新, 曹衍淼. 多巴胺系统基因调节青少年同伴拒绝与亲社会行为关系: 平行潜增长模型[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 584-598. |
[4] | 聂衍刚, 陈沛, 王林欣, 喻承甫, 利振华. 父母情感温暖、自我控制与青少年亲社会行为的关系: 多基因的调节作用及父母差异[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 599-613. |
[5] | 林荣茂, 余巧华, 胡添祥, 张九妹, 叶玉珊, 连榕. 敬畏感与亲社会行为关系的三水平和结构方程模型元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(4): 631-651. |
[6] | 孙瑾, 杨静舒. 互惠利他的先行优势:品牌的互惠角色影响消费者亲社会行为[J]. 心理学报, 2025, 57(2): 315-330. |
[7] | 王天鸿, 金珊, 程子鹏, 娄宇, 谢晓非. 利他炫耀中的预测偏差:助人者低估来自旁观者的社会评价[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1210-1224. |
[8] | 王婧嫣, 张洪. 直觉还是推理?亲社会行为的决策模式与人性感知[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1225-1238. |
[9] | 石荣, 刘昌, 唐慧琳, 郝俊懿, 沈汪兵. 自发的善行:加工模式和情境紧急性影响亲社会行为[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1239-1251. |
[10] | 林靓, 徐博雅, 杨莹, 张庆鹏, 寇彧. 青少年亲社会行为的网络分析及核心维度[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(9): 1252-1265. |
[11] | 刘新燕, 伍海兰, 涂菊, 王璐. 一心多用的双刃剑效应:多任务对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(12): 1800-1820. |
[12] | 赵纤, 胡义秋, 黎志华. 脱贫家庭青少年社会流动信念与亲社会行为的纵向发展关系:城乡差异的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2024, 56(11): 1499-1511. |
[13] | 张玮玮, 陈逸群, 朱莉琪. “近朱者赤”:同伴捐赠决策信息对青少年亲社会行为的影响及公正世界信念的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(9): 1453-1464. |
[14] | 刘倩文, 王振宏. 亲子关系、感觉加工敏感性与COMT Val158Met多态性对学前儿童亲社会行为的交互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(5): 711-725. |
[15] | 段文婷, 孙启武, 王铭, 吴才智, 陈真珍. 青少年早期亲社会行为倾向、内化问题和外化问题发展级联的个体内分析[J]. 心理学报, 2022, 54(7): 813-827. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||