心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1115-1132.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01115
收稿日期:
2022-05-15
发布日期:
2023-04-21
出版日期:
2023-07-25
通讯作者:
张积家, E-mail: Zhangjj1955@163.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Hang2, FENG Xiaohui2, ZHANG Jijia1()
Received:
2022-05-15
Online:
2023-04-21
Published:
2023-07-25
摘要:
以中国14个少数民族的学生和汉族学生为被试, 考察族际通婚子女的民族内隐观、身份认同及二者对外群接触态度和中华民族共同体意识的影响。结果发现, 与族内通婚子女比, 族际通婚子女持有的民族本质论观念较低、对本民族的认同感不强烈, 但对其他民族的外群体态度和交往意愿都更积极, 在自我身份范畴化过程中更具有灵活性, 更倾向于构建归属水平更高的上位身份认同。族际通婚作为高质量的民族接触与交融形式, 对推动建立民族互嵌格局和铸牢中华民族共同体意识具有重要意义。
中图分类号:
张航, 冯晓慧, 张积家. (2023). 民族内隐观、身份认同对族际通婚子女的外群接触态度和中华民族共同体意识的影响. 心理学报, 55(7), 1115-1132.
ZHANG Hang, FENG Xiaohui, ZHANG Jijia. (2023). The influence of implicit theories and ethnic identities on the intergroup attitudes and the sense of community for the Chinese nation in the offspring of Chinese interethnic unions. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(7), 1115-1132.
研究对象 | 调查时间 | 施策单位 | 取样地点 | 有效 数据 | 回收率 | 族际通婚 子女占比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蒙古族 | 2021.09 | 呼伦贝尔学院 | 内蒙古自治区呼伦贝尔市海拉尔区 | 193 | 91.90% | 35% |
鄂伦春族 | 2021.09 | 阿里河中学、鄂伦春中学 | 内蒙古自治区呼伦贝尔市鄂伦春自治旗 | 127 | 94.07% | 71% |
拉祜族 | 2021.10 | 勐库中学、双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 244 | 94.57% | 42% |
傣族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 199 | 92.99% | 47% |
佤族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 137 | 93.84% | 40% |
布朗族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 100 | 92.59% | 45% |
白族 | 2021.10 | 应对方单位要求隐去该学校信息 | 云南省大理白族自治州 | 101 | 91.82% | 42% |
苗族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县 | 194 | 91.94% | 48% |
瑶族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、金秀民族高中 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、金秀瑶族自治县 | 300 | 94.04% | 46% |
侗族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县 | 222 | 93.28% | 46% |
壮族 | 2021.12 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、东兰民族中学、拔群中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、东兰县、环江毛南族族自治县, 金秀瑶族自治县 | 920 | 95.53% | 25% |
毛南族 | 2021.12 | 环江一中、下南中学 | 广西壮族自治区环江毛南族自治县 | 192 | 92.75% | 53% |
汉族 | 2021.12 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、涡阳一中 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、东兰县、环江毛南族族自治县、安徽省涡阳县 | 241 | 93.41% | 21% |
藏族 | 2021.12 | 甘孜州高级中学 | 四川省甘孜藏族自治州 | 204 | 91.07% | 16% |
达斡尔族 | 2022.02 | 达斡尔族中学 | 黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市梅里斯达斡尔族区 | 107 | 92.24% | 64% |
补充实验:壮族 瑶族 | 2022.04 | 龙胜中学 | 通过网络问卷平台, 学生上微机课时作答 | 146 148 | 100% | 50% |
表1 各民族被试的分布和样本量信息
研究对象 | 调查时间 | 施策单位 | 取样地点 | 有效 数据 | 回收率 | 族际通婚 子女占比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蒙古族 | 2021.09 | 呼伦贝尔学院 | 内蒙古自治区呼伦贝尔市海拉尔区 | 193 | 91.90% | 35% |
鄂伦春族 | 2021.09 | 阿里河中学、鄂伦春中学 | 内蒙古自治区呼伦贝尔市鄂伦春自治旗 | 127 | 94.07% | 71% |
拉祜族 | 2021.10 | 勐库中学、双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 244 | 94.57% | 42% |
傣族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 199 | 92.99% | 47% |
佤族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 137 | 93.84% | 40% |
布朗族 | 2021.10 | 双江一中 | 云南省双江拉祜族佤族布朗族傣族自治县 | 100 | 92.59% | 45% |
白族 | 2021.10 | 应对方单位要求隐去该学校信息 | 云南省大理白族自治州 | 101 | 91.82% | 42% |
苗族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县 | 194 | 91.94% | 48% |
瑶族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、金秀民族高中 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、金秀瑶族自治县 | 300 | 94.04% | 46% |
侗族 | 2021.11 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县 | 222 | 93.28% | 46% |
壮族 | 2021.12 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、东兰民族中学、拔群中学 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、东兰县、环江毛南族族自治县, 金秀瑶族自治县 | 920 | 95.53% | 25% |
毛南族 | 2021.12 | 环江一中、下南中学 | 广西壮族自治区环江毛南族自治县 | 192 | 92.75% | 53% |
汉族 | 2021.12 | 龙胜实验中学、龙胜中学、涡阳一中 | 广西壮族自治区龙胜各族自治县、东兰县、环江毛南族族自治县、安徽省涡阳县 | 241 | 93.41% | 21% |
藏族 | 2021.12 | 甘孜州高级中学 | 四川省甘孜藏族自治州 | 204 | 91.07% | 16% |
达斡尔族 | 2022.02 | 达斡尔族中学 | 黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市梅里斯达斡尔族区 | 107 | 92.24% | 64% |
补充实验:壮族 瑶族 | 2022.04 | 龙胜中学 | 通过网络问卷平台, 学生上微机课时作答 | 146 148 | 100% | 50% |
变量 | 本质论1 | 民族认同 | 外群 接触态度 | 本质论2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
本质论1 | — | |||
民族认同 | 0.31 | — | ||
外群接触态度 | 0.09 | 0.28 | — | |
本质论2 | 0.46 | 0.24 | 0.15 | — |
表2 总民族样本的相关分析矩阵表(N = 3481)
变量 | 本质论1 | 民族认同 | 外群 接触态度 | 本质论2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
本质论1 | — | |||
民族认同 | 0.31 | — | ||
外群接触态度 | 0.09 | 0.28 | — | |
本质论2 | 0.46 | 0.24 | 0.15 | — |
预测变量 | 方程1: 外群接触态度 | 方程2:民族内隐观 | 方程3:民族认同 | 方程4: 外群接触态度 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |
性别 | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.64 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.30 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.17 |
年龄 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.10 | 0.03** | 0.01 | 3.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.36 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.45 |
族际通婚 | 0.29*** | 0.03 | 8.35 | −0.32*** | 0.03 | −9.34 | −0.24*** | 0.03 | −7.25 | 0.40*** | 0.03 | 11.91 |
民族内隐观 | 0.29*** | 0.02 | 18.17 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.49 | ||||||
民族认同 | 0.30*** | 0.02 | 18.01 | |||||||||
R2 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.12 | ||||||||
F | 26.15*** | 33.48*** | 111.03*** | 92.34*** |
表3 民族内隐观和民族认同的中介模型检验(N = 3841)
预测变量 | 方程1: 外群接触态度 | 方程2:民族内隐观 | 方程3:民族认同 | 方程4: 外群接触态度 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |
性别 | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.64 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.30 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.17 |
年龄 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 3.10 | 0.03** | 0.01 | 3.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.36 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.45 |
族际通婚 | 0.29*** | 0.03 | 8.35 | −0.32*** | 0.03 | −9.34 | −0.24*** | 0.03 | −7.25 | 0.40*** | 0.03 | 11.91 |
民族内隐观 | 0.29*** | 0.02 | 18.17 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.49 | ||||||
民族认同 | 0.30*** | 0.02 | 18.01 | |||||||||
R2 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.12 | ||||||||
F | 26.15*** | 33.48*** | 111.03*** | 92.34*** |
预测变量 | 方程1:外群接触态度 | 方程2:中华民族认同 | 方程3:外群接触态度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |
性别 | −0.01 | 0.12 | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.80 | −0.04 | 0.11 | −0.36 |
年龄 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 1.22 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 1.42 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.77 |
通婚 | 0.49*** | 0.11 | 4.34 | 0.39*** | 0.11 | 3.37 | 0.36** | 0.11 | 3.32 |
上位认同 | 0.34*** | 0.05 | 6.24 | ||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.18 | ||||||
F | 6.92** | 4.71** | 15.62*** |
表4 中华民族认同的中介模型检验(N = 294)
预测变量 | 方程1:外群接触态度 | 方程2:中华民族认同 | 方程3:外群接触态度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |
性别 | −0.01 | 0.12 | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.80 | −0.04 | 0.11 | −0.36 |
年龄 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 1.22 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 1.42 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.77 |
通婚 | 0.49*** | 0.11 | 4.34 | 0.39*** | 0.11 | 3.37 | 0.36** | 0.11 | 3.32 |
上位认同 | 0.34*** | 0.05 | 6.24 | ||||||
R2 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.18 | ||||||
F | 6.92** | 4.71** | 15.62*** |
变量 | 民族本质论 | 民族认同 | 外群接触态度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
截距 | 零模型 | 零模型 | 零模型 | ||||||
σ = 0.11, Wald Z = 2.54* | σ = 0.04, Wald Z = 2.25* | σ = 0.05, Wald Z = 2.43* | |||||||
随机系数回归模型 | 随机系数回归模型 | 随机系数回归模型 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.33 | −0.23 | 0.18 | −1.3 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 1.19 |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.88 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.17 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.24 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.34 |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.31*** | −0.33 | 0.04 | −9.45*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.50*** |
随机效应 | σ = 0.12, Wald Z = 2.54* | σ = 0.03, Wald Z = 2.16* | σ = 0.06, Wald Z = 2.37* | ||||||
完整回归模型1 | 完整回归模型1 | 完整回归模型1 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | −0.22 | 0.22 | −1.03 | −0.35 | 0.19 | −1.88 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.57 |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.92 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.17 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.27 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.33 |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.41*** | −0.34 | 0.04 | −9.59*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.42*** |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
通婚率原始值 | 0.01 | 0.004 | 2.57* | 0.004 | 0.002 | 1.87* | 0.003 | 0.003 | 1.15 |
随机效应 | σ = 0.08, Wald Z = 2.41* | σ = 0.02, Wald Z = 2.02* | σ = 0.06, Wald Z = 2.27* | ||||||
完整回归模型2 | 完整回归模型2 | 完整回归模型2 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.41 | −0.36 | 0.22 | −1.677 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 3.66*** |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.58 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.28 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.23 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.32 |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.36*** | −0.34 | 0.04 | −9.52*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.40*** |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
中等通婚水平 | −0.53 | 0.21 | −2.49* | −0.21 | 0.13 | −1.65 | −0.43 | 0.15 | −2.95* |
低通婚水平 | −0.44 | 0.22 | −1.96* | −0.18 | 0.13 | −1.38 | −0.34 | 0.15 | −2.23* |
高通婚水平(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
随机效应 | σ = 0.09, Wald Z = 2.33* | σ = 0.03, Wald Z = 1.98* | σ = 0.04, Wald Z = 2.08* |
表5 族际通婚率和族际通婚水平对民族本质论、民族认同和外群体接触态度的多层回归模型
变量 | 民族本质论 | 民族认同 | 外群接触态度 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
截距 | 零模型 | 零模型 | 零模型 | ||||||
σ = 0.11, Wald Z = 2.54* | σ = 0.04, Wald Z = 2.25* | σ = 0.05, Wald Z = 2.43* | |||||||
随机系数回归模型 | 随机系数回归模型 | 随机系数回归模型 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.33 | −0.23 | 0.18 | −1.3 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 1.19 |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.88 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.17 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.24 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.34 |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.31*** | −0.33 | 0.04 | −9.45*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.50*** |
随机效应 | σ = 0.12, Wald Z = 2.54* | σ = 0.03, Wald Z = 2.16* | σ = 0.06, Wald Z = 2.37* | ||||||
完整回归模型1 | 完整回归模型1 | 完整回归模型1 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | −0.22 | 0.22 | −1.03 | −0.35 | 0.19 | −1.88 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.57 |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.08 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.92 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.17 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.27 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.33 |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.41*** | −0.34 | 0.04 | −9.59*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.42*** |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
通婚率原始值 | 0.01 | 0.004 | 2.57* | 0.004 | 0.002 | 1.87* | 0.003 | 0.003 | 1.15 |
随机效应 | σ = 0.08, Wald Z = 2.41* | σ = 0.02, Wald Z = 2.02* | σ = 0.06, Wald Z = 2.27* | ||||||
完整回归模型2 | 完整回归模型2 | 完整回归模型2 | |||||||
估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | 估计值 | SE | t | |
固定效应 | |||||||||
截距 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.41 | −0.36 | 0.22 | −1.677 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 3.66*** |
年龄 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.58 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.28 |
性别 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.23 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −1.32 |
通婚 | −0.39 | 0.03 | −11.36*** | −0.34 | 0.04 | −9.52*** | 0.26 | 0.04 | 7.40*** |
非通婚(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
中等通婚水平 | −0.53 | 0.21 | −2.49* | −0.21 | 0.13 | −1.65 | −0.43 | 0.15 | −2.95* |
低通婚水平 | −0.44 | 0.22 | −1.96* | −0.18 | 0.13 | −1.38 | −0.34 | 0.15 | −2.23* |
高通婚水平(基线) | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − | 0 | 0 | − |
随机效应 | σ = 0.09, Wald Z = 2.33* | σ = 0.03, Wald Z = 1.98* | σ = 0.04, Wald Z = 2.08* |
[1] | Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books. |
[2] | Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict:When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore, L. J. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 17-41). Cary, NCOxford University Press. |
[3] | Brewer, M. B., & Schneider, S. (1990). Social identity and social dilemmas:A double-edge sword. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and Critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatheaf. |
[4] |
Brunsma, D. L. (2005). Interracial families and the racial identification of mixed-race children: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Social Forces, 84(2), 1131-1157.
doi: 10.1353/sof.2006.0007 URL |
[5] | Chen, L. P., & Xue, L. L. (2021). Development of psychometrics-based scale for sense of community for Chinese nation. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences), 41(2), 30-38. |
[陈立鹏, 薛璐璐. (2021). 基于心理测量学的中华民族共同体意识量表的编制. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 41(2), 30-38.] | |
[6] |
Cheng, C. Y., & Lee, F. (2009). Multiracial identity integration: Perceptions of conflict and distance among multiracial individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 51-68.
doi: 10.1111/josi.2009.65.issue-1 URL |
[7] |
Cimpian, A., & Salomon, E. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(5), 461-527.
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13002197 pmid: 24826999 |
[8] | Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. |
[9] |
Cuhadar, E., & Dayton, B. (2011). The social psychology of identity and inter-group conflict: From theory to practice. International Studies Perspectives, 12(3), 273-293.
doi: 10.1111/insp.2011.12.issue-3 URL |
[10] |
Diedrichs, P. C., & Barlow, F. K. (2011). How to lose weight bias fast! Evaluating a brief anti-weight bias intervention. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(4), 846-861.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02022.x pmid: 21988068 |
[11] | Du, J. (2018). Ethnic blending and development from interracial intermarriage. Journal of South-Central University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences), 38(6), 17-20. |
[杜娟. (2018). 从族际通婚看民族交融与发展. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 38(6), 17-20.] | |
[12] |
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.
doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1 URL |
[13] | Fei, X. T. (2018). The pluralistic integration patte1rn of the Chinese nation. Beijing: Minzu University of China Press. |
[费孝通. (2018). 中华民族多元一体格局. 北京: 中央民族大学出版社.] | |
[14] |
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1-26.
doi: 10.1080/14792779343000004 URL |
[15] | Gaither, S. E. (2018). The multiplicity of belonging: Pushing identity research beyond binary thinking. Self & Identity, 17(4), 443-454. |
[16] |
Gao, C., & Wan, M. (2013). The effect of essentialist theory of ethnicity on ethnic identity and stereotyping. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(2), 231-242.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00231 |
[高承海, 万明钢. (2013). 民族本质论对民族认同和刻板印象的影响. 心理学报, 45(2), 231-242.] | |
[17] | Gao, C. H., & Wan, M. G. (2018). Changing ethnic implicit view to promote ethnic interaction and ethnic relations. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 29(4), 21-26. |
[高承海, 万明钢. (2018). 改变民族内隐观可促进民族交往与民族关系. 民族教育研究, 29(4), 21-26.] | |
[18] | Guo, Z. G., & Li, R. (2008). Marriage age, number of children ever born, and the ethnic identification of children of inter-ethnic marriage: Evidence from China population census in 2000. Sociological Studies, 5, 98-116. |
[郭志刚, 李睿. (2008). 从人口普查数据看族际通婚夫妇的婚龄, 生育数及其子女的民族选择. 社会学研究, (5), 98-116.] | |
[19] |
Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 471-485.
pmid: 16513800 |
[20] |
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113-127.
doi: 10.1348/014466600164363 URL |
[21] | Haslam, N., & Whelan, J. (2008). Human natures: Psychological essentialism in thinking about differences between people. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2(3), 1297-1312. |
[22] | He, J. F. (2010). Characteristics and functions of interracial families in China and their children's ethnic identity:A case study of students from Minzu University of China. In Z. H. Yang (Ed.), Collection of ethnic studies. Beijing: Minzu University of China Press. |
[何俊芳. (2010). 中国族际通婚家庭的特点、功能及其子女的民族认同——以中央民族大学学生为例的调查与思考. 见杨筑慧 (编), 民族研究文集. 北京: 中央民族大学出版社. ] | |
[23] |
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575-604.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2002.53.issue-1 URL |
[24] | Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds. MIT Press. |
[25] |
Ho, A. K., Roberts, S. O., & Gelman, S. A. (2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639-1645.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615596436 pmid: 26330456 |
[26] | Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (2012). Advances in intergroup contact. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. |
[27] |
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223-255.
doi: 10.1080/14792772043000040 URL |
[28] |
Hong, Y. Y., Coleman, J., Chan, G., Wong, R. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Hansen, I. G.,... Fu, H. Y. (2004). Predicting intergroup bias: The interactive effects of implicit theory and social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1035-1047.
doi: 10.1177/0146167204264791 URL |
[29] |
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. D., Khan, S. S., Tewari, S., Srinivasan, N., & Stevenson, C. (2016). Explaining effervescence: Investigating the relationship between shared social identity and positive experience in crowds. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 20-32.
doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1015969 pmid: 25787295 |
[30] | Huang, F., Duan, C. R., & Bi, Z. B. (2022). Ten trends in interethnic marriage in China since the reform and opening up. Population Research, 46(2), 20-35. |
[黄凡, 段成荣, 毕忠鹏. (2022). 改革开放以来中国族际通婚变动的十大趋势. 人口研究, 46(2), 20-35.] | |
[31] | Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., and Ramirez, R. R. (2011). Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. Suitland, MA: U. S. Census Bureau. |
[32] | Lewontin, R. C. (1972). The apportionment of Human diversity. Evolutionary Biology, 6, 381-398. |
[33] | Li, X. X. (2004). Marriages between Ethnic Groups in China. Population Research, 28(3), 68-5. |
[李晓霞. (2004). 中国各民族间族际婚姻的现状分析. 人口研究, 28(3), 68-75.] | |
[34] | Li, X. X. (2010). Influence of national policy on interethnic marriage. Social Sciences in Xinjiang, 5, 105-112. |
[李晓霞. (2010). 国家政策对族际婚姻状况的影响. 新疆社会科学, 5, 105-112.] | |
[35] | Liang, M. C. (2004). An review of the factors affecting intermarriage from sociological perspective. Journal of Northwestern Ethnic Studies, 3, 173-187. |
[梁茂春. (2004). 什么因素影响族际通婚?——社会学研究视角述评. 西北民族研究, 3, 173-187.] | |
[36] |
Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2018). Boundary blurring? Racial identification among the children of interracial couples. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 677(1), 81-94.
doi: 10.1177/0002716218760507 URL |
[37] | Lu, G. (2005). Retrospect and prospect on current population development of ethnic groups in China. Social Sciences in Yunnan, (4), 98-101. |
[鲁刚. (2005). 现阶段我国少数民族人口发展的回顾与展望. 云南社会科学, (4), 98-101.] | |
[38] | Lu, G., & Zhang, Y. Q. (2014). A historical study of interracial marriages in China. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 46(2), 15-22. |
[鲁刚, 张禹青. (2014). 我国族际通婚的历史轨迹. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 46(2), 15-22.] | |
[39] | Ma, R. (2004). Sociology of ethnicity. Beijing: Peking University Press. |
[马戎. (2004). 民族社会学——社会学的族群关系研究. 北京: 北京大学出版社.] | |
[40] | Maloku, E., Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Stimulating interethnic contact in Kosovo: The role of social identity complexity and distinctiveness threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(7), 1039-1058. |
[41] |
Mandalaywala, T. M. (2020). Does essentialism lead to racial prejudice? It is not so black and white. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 59, 195-245.
doi: S0065-2407(20)30035-5 pmid: 32564794 |
[42] |
Mandalaywala, T. M., Amodio, D. M., & Rhodes, M. (2018). Essentialism promotes racial prejudice by increasing endorsement of social hierarchies. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 461-469.
doi: 10.1177/1948550617707020 URL |
[43] | Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 267-316. |
[44] | Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1982). Genetic relationship and evolution of human races. Evolutionary Biology, 14, 1-59. |
[45] | Newman, G. E., & Knobe, J. (2019). The essence of essentialism. Mind & Language, 34(5), 585-605. |
[46] | Pauker, K., Meyers, C., Sanchez, D. T., Gaither, S. E., & Young, D. M. (2018). A review of multiracial malleability: identity, categorization, and shifting racial attitudes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), 1-15. |
[47] |
Peery, D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2008). Black+white = black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19(10), 973-977.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02185.x URL |
[48] |
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65-85.
doi: 10.1146/psych.1998.49.issue-1 URL |
[49] |
Phinney, J. S., Jacoby, B., & Silva, C. (2007). Positive intergroup attitudes: The role of ethnic identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 478-490.
doi: 10.1177/0165025407081466 URL |
[50] |
Shah, J., Kruglanski, A., & Thompson, E. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 383-393.
pmid: 9731314 |
[51] | Shen, S., Jian, X. Q., & Xu, S. Y. (2019). Migrant Exogamy of the Ethnic Minorities in China. Population Research, 43(6), 64-74. |
[沈思, 简小琴, 徐世英. (2019). 我国少数民族流动人口的族际通婚现状. 人口研究, 43(6), 64-74.] | |
[52] |
Shih, M., Bonam, C., Sanchez, D., & Peck, C. (2007). The social construction of race: Biracial identity and vulnerability to stereotypes. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(2), 125-133.
doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.13.2.125 pmid: 17500601 |
[53] |
Shih, M., & Sanchez, D. T. (2009). When race becomes even more complex: Towards understanding multiracial identity and experiences. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 1-11.
doi: 10.1111/josi.2009.65.issue-1 URL |
[54] | Shih, M., Wilton, L. S., Does, S., Goodale, B. M., & Sanchez, D. T. (2019). Multiple racial identities as sources of psychological resilience. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(6), e12469. |
[55] |
Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S., & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 102-133.
doi: 10.1086/297789 URL |
[56] | Snipp, C. M. (2010). Defining race and ethnicity:The constitution, the supreme court, and the census. In H. R. Markus, & P. Moya (Eds.), Doing race: 21 essays for the 21st century (pp. 105-122). New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. |
[57] | Stonequist, E. V. (1937). The marginal man: A study in personality and culture conflict. Educational Research Bulletin, 18(2), 54-54. |
[58] | Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. |
[59] |
Toprakkiran, S., & Gordils, J. (2021). The onset of COVID-19, common identity, and intergroup prejudice. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(4), 435-451.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1918620 URL |
[60] |
Verkuyten, M. (2021). Group identity and ingroup bias: The social identity approach. Human Development, 65(5-6), 311-324.
doi: 10.1159/000519089 URL |
[61] |
Verkuyten, M., & Martinovic, B. (2012). Immigrants’ national identification: Meanings, determinants, and consequences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 6(1), 82-112.
doi: 10.1111/sipr.2012.6.issue-1 URL |
[62] | Wang, M. G., Gao, C. H., Dang, B. B., & Sa, L. (2015). The formation and development of Hui children’s in-group favoritism attitude. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(6), 1411-1418. |
[万明钢, 高承海, 党宝宝, 撒丽. (2015). 回族儿童族群偏爱态度的形成与发展. 心理科学, 38(6), 1411-1418.] | |
[63] | Wang, M. K. (2006). On Chinese borderlands: Historical memory and ethnic identity. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press. |
[王明珂. (2006). 华夏边缘:历史记忆与族群认同. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.] | |
[64] | Wu, X. W., & Dao, W. H. (2022). The structural characteristics of interethnic marriage in China: An investigation based on social networks analysis. Population Research, 46(2), 3-19. |
[巫锡炜, 刀玮皓. (2022). 中国各民族族际通婚的结构特征: 基于社会网络分析的考察. 人口研究, 46(2), 3-19.] | |
[65] |
Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross- group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 73-90.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73 URL |
[66] | Yang, X. l., Liu, L., Zhao, X., & Shi, J. X. (2014). The effect of psychological essentialism of ethnicity on cross-ethnic interaction. Journal of Psychological Science, 37(2), 394-399. |
[杨晓莉, 刘力, 赵显, 史佳鑫. (2014). 民族本质论对跨民族交往的影响——以中国内地的藏族大学生为例. 心理科学, 37(2), 394-399.] | |
[67] | Yu, H. T., & Jin, S. H. (2015). Ethnic concept of minority college students in Xinjiang and its influential factors. Education Research Monthly, (5), 82-88. |
[于海涛, 金盛华. (2015). 新疆少数民族大学生的民族观及其影响因素. 教育学术月刊, (5), 82-88.] | |
[68] | Zhang, J. J., & Feng, X. H. (2021). Psychological construction and influencing factors of the identity of the Chinese national community. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 32(2), 5-14. |
[张积家, 冯晓慧. (2021). 中华民族共同体认同的心理建构与影响因素. 民族教育研究, 32(2), 5-14.] | |
[69] | Zhou, H., & Long, L. R. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942-942. |
[周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.] |
[1] | 万明钢,王亚鹏. 藏族大学生的民族认同[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(01): 83-88. |
[2] | 成子娟,侯杰泰. 相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性[J]. 心理学报, 2002, 34(01): 82-89. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||