心理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1049-1062.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01049
• 研究报告 • 下一篇
收稿日期:
2022-09-15
发布日期:
2023-04-21
出版日期:
2023-07-25
通讯作者:
毛伟宾, E-mail: wb_mao@163.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Hongchi, CHENG Xuan, MAO Weibin()
Received:
2022-09-15
Online:
2023-04-21
Published:
2023-07-25
摘要:
先前研究表明, 事件边界会增强边界处来源记忆、削弱跨边界的时间顺序记忆, 但对于两者之间是否存在一种权衡关系, 以及内在的、具有社会性意义的变化作为事件边界是如何影响记忆的, 尚鲜有研究。本研究以奖赏预测误差(reward prediction errors, RPE)作为事件边界, 通过两个行为实验和一个ERP实验, 探讨RPE事件边界对时间顺序记忆和来源记忆的影响。结果发现, RPE事件边界增强了边界处信息的来源记忆, 高RPE事件边界引发了记忆权衡效应; 相对于事件内/非边界条件, 跨事件/边界条件记忆的正确提取诱发出更大的N400波幅, 时间顺序记忆的激活主要集中在头皮中前部, 来源记忆的激活主要集中在头皮中后部。本研究表明, 事件边界的切分强度是影响记忆权衡效应的重要因素, N400成分可能是反映事件边界对情景记忆的整合与切分的重要指标。
中图分类号:
张弘弛, 成旋, 毛伟宾. (2023). 奖赏预测误差对时间顺序记忆和来源记忆的影响. 心理学报, 55(7), 1049-1062.
ZHANG Hongchi, CHENG Xuan, MAO Weibin. (2023). The effect of reward prediction errors on temporal order and source memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(7), 1049-1062.
测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|
时间顺序记忆 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.09 |
来源记忆 | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.63 ± 0.13 |
表1 跨事件/边界和事件内/非边界的时间顺序记忆和来源记忆正确率(M ± SD)
测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|
时间顺序记忆 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 0.59 ± 0.09 |
来源记忆 | 0.73 ± 0.10 | 0.63 ± 0.13 |
RPE转换强度 | 测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|---|
高转换强度 | 时间顺序记忆 | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 0.62 ± 0.12 |
来源记忆 | 0.71 ± 0.15 | 0.65 ± 0.15 | |
低转换强度 | 时间顺序记忆 | 0.58 ± 0.11 | 0.61 ± 0.10 |
来源记忆 | 0.71 ± 0.14 | 0.72 ± 0.14 |
表2 不同RPE转换强度的跨事件/边界和事件内/非边界的时间顺序记忆和来源记忆正确率(M ± SD)
RPE转换强度 | 测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|---|
高转换强度 | 时间顺序记忆 | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 0.62 ± 0.12 |
来源记忆 | 0.71 ± 0.15 | 0.65 ± 0.15 | |
低转换强度 | 时间顺序记忆 | 0.58 ± 0.11 | 0.61 ± 0.10 |
来源记忆 | 0.71 ± 0.14 | 0.72 ± 0.14 |
测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|
时间顺序记忆 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.08 |
来源记忆 | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.09 |
表3 跨事件/边界和事件内/非边界的时间顺序记忆和来源记忆正确率(M ± SD)
测验类型 | 跨事件/边界 | 事件内/非边界 |
---|---|---|
时间顺序记忆 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.08 |
来源记忆 | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.09 |
[1] | Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2005). The development of native Chinese affective picture system--A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(11), 719-722. |
[白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉. (2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19(11), 719-722.] | |
[2] |
Ben-Yakov, A., Smith, V., & Henson, R. (2022). The limited reach of surprise: Evidence against effects of surprise on memory for preceding elements of an event. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(3), 1053-1064.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01954-5 |
[3] |
Bladon, J. H., Sheehan, D. J., de Freitas, C. S., & Howard, M. W. (2019). In a temporally segmented experience hippocampal neurons represent temporally drifting context but not discrete segments. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(35), 6936-6952.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1420-18.2019 pmid: 31253754 |
[4] |
Braun, E. K., Wimmer, G. E., & Shohamy, D. (2018). Retroactive and graded prioritization of memory by reward. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1-12.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w |
[5] |
Carr, M. F., Jadhav, S. P., & Frank, L. M. (2011). Hippocampal replay in the awake state: A potential substrate for memory consolidation and retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 147-153.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2732 pmid: 21270783 |
[6] |
Clewett, D., & Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186-193.
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.013 pmid: 29276730 |
[7] |
Clewett, D., DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2019). Transcending time in the brain: How event memories are constructed from experience. Hippocampus, 29(3), 162-183.
doi: 10.1002/hipo.23074 pmid: 30734391 |
[8] | Clewett, D., Gasser, C., & Davachi, L. (2020). Pupil-linked arousal signals track the temporal organization of events in memory. Nature Communications, 11(1), 4007. |
[9] |
Davachi, L., & DuBrow, S. (2015). How the hippocampus preserves order: The role of prediction and context. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 92-99.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.004 pmid: 25600586 |
[10] | Davis, E. E., Chemnitz, E., Collins, T. K., Geerligs, L., & Campbell, K. L. (2021). Looking the same, but remembering differently: Preserved eye-movement synchrony with age during movie watching. Psychology & Aging, 36(5), 604-615. |
[11] |
Delogu, F., Drenhaus, H., & Crocker, M. W. (2018). On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation. Memory & Cognition, 46(2), 315-325.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0766-4 URL |
[12] |
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117-1121.
pmid: 16007080 |
[13] |
Donaldson, D. I., Wheeler, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (2010). Remember the source: Dissociating frontal and parietal contributions to episodic memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 377-391.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21242 pmid: 19400677 |
[14] |
DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2013). The influence of context boundaries on memory for the sequential order of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1277-1286.
doi: 10.1037/a0034024 URL |
[15] |
Dunsmoor, J. E., Kroes, M. C., Moscatelli, C. M., Evans, M. D., Davachi, L., & Phelps, E. A. (2018). Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 291-299.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0317-4 pmid: 30221203 |
[16] |
Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243-252.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610393742 pmid: 21178116 |
[17] |
Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2014). Similarity breeds proximity: Pattern similarity within and across contexts is related to later mnemonic judgments of temporal proximity. Neuron, 81(5), 1179-1189.
doi: S0896-6273(14)00073-7 pmid: 24607235 |
[18] |
Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2021). Neural evidence for representational persistence within events. Journal of Neuroscience, 41(37), 7909-7920.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0073-21.2021 pmid: 34330773 |
[19] |
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469-495.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2660 URL |
[20] |
Gurguryan, L., Dutemple, E., & Sheldon, S. (2020). Conceptual similarity alters the impact of context shifts on temporal memory. Memory, 29(1), 11-20.
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1841240 URL |
[21] |
Hayama, H. R., Vilberg, K. L., & Rugg, M. D. (2012). Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: Evidence for a generic recollection network? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1127-1137.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00202 pmid: 22288393 |
[22] | Heusser, A. C., Ezzyat, Y., Shiff, I., & Davachi, L. (2018). Perceptual boundaries cause mnemonic trade-offs between local boundary processing and across-trial associative binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1075-1090. |
[23] |
Horner, A. J., Bisby, J. A., Wang, A., Bogus, K., & Burgess, N. (2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151-164.
doi: S0010-0277(16)30128-7 pmid: 27295330 |
[24] |
Howard, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112(1), 75-116.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.75 pmid: 15631589 |
[25] |
Jang, A. I., Nassar, M. R., Dillon, D. G., & Frank, M. J. (2019). Positive reward prediction errors during decision-making strengthen memory encoding. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(7), 719-732.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0597-3 pmid: 31061490 |
[26] |
King, D. R., & Miller, M. B. (2014). Lateral posterior parietal activity during source memory judgments of perceived and imagined events. Neuropsychologia, 53, 122-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.006 pmid: 24269856 |
[27] |
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621-647.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2011.62.issue-1 URL |
[28] |
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205.
doi: 10.1126/science.7350657 pmid: 7350657 |
[29] |
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161-163.
doi: 10.1038/307161a0 |
[30] | Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainesville. In.: Tech Rep A-8. |
[31] |
Lin, J., Pype, A., Murray, S., & Boynton, G. (2010). Encoding of a scene into memory is enhanced at behaviorally relevant points in time. Journal of Vision, 10(7), 754-754.
doi: 10.1167/10.7.754 URL |
[32] |
Lisman, J., Grace, A. A., & Duzel, E. (2011). A neoHebbian framework for episodic memory; role of dopamine- dependent late LTP. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(10), 536-547.
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.07.006 pmid: 21851992 |
[33] |
Milner, B., Corsi, P., & Leonard, G. (1991). Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgements. Neuropsychologia, 29(6), 601-618.
pmid: 1944864 |
[34] |
Newtson, D., Engquist, G. A., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(12), 847-862.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.12.847 URL |
[35] |
O’Neill, J., Pleydell-Bouverie, B., Dupret, D., & Csicsvari, J. (2010). Play it again: Reactivation of waking experience and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 33(5), 220-229.
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.01.006 pmid: 20207025 |
[36] |
Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129-156.
doi: 10.1037/a0014420 pmid: 19159151 |
[37] |
Pouthas, V., Garnero, L., Ferrandez, A. M., & Renault, B. (2000). ERPs and PET analysis of time perception: Spatial and temporal brain mapping during visual discrimination tasks. Human Brain Mapping, 10(2), 49-60.
pmid: 10864229 |
[38] |
Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 269-272.
doi: 10.1177/0963721412451274 URL |
[39] | Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2014). Event cognition. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[40] |
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2017). Event boundaries in memory and cognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 133-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.006 pmid: 29270446 |
[41] |
Rouhani, N., Norman, K. A., Niv, Y., & Bornstein, A. M. (2020). Reward prediction errors create event boundaries in memory. Cognition, 203, 104269.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104269 URL |
[42] |
Roumis, D. K., & Frank, L. M. (2015). Hippocampal sharp- wave ripples in waking and sleeping states. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 6-12.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.05.001 URL |
[43] |
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593-1599.
doi: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 pmid: 9054347 |
[44] |
Siefke, B. M., Smith, T. A., & Sederberg, P. B. (2019). A context-change account of temporal distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition, 47(6), 1158-1172.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00925-5 |
[45] |
Sitnikova, T., Kuperberg, G., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 40(1), 160-164.
pmid: 12751813 |
[46] | Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. London: Oxford University Press. |
[47] |
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 1-25.
doi: 10.1146/psych.2002.53.issue-1 URL |
[48] |
van Berkum, J. J., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 701-718.
pmid: 14561457 |
[49] |
van de Ven, V., Jäckels, M., & de Weerd, P. (2022). Time changes: Timing contexts support event segmentation in associative memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(2), 568-580.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02000-0 |
[50] |
West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 363-375.
pmid: 11919001 |
[51] |
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 307-327.
doi: 10.1037/a0015305 URL |
[52] |
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind-brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273-293.
pmid: 17338600 |
[53] |
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(1), 29-58.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.29 URL |
[1] | 龙翼婷, 姜英杰, 崔璨, 岳阳. 奖赏预测误差对项目和联结记忆影响的分离:元记忆的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2023, 55(6): 877-891. |
[2] | 毛伟宾;赵浩远;东利云;白鹭. 提取诱发遗忘中的情绪记忆权衡效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1219-1228. |
[3] | 聂爱情,郭春彦,沈模卫. 图形项目记忆与位置来源提取的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(01): 50-57. |
[4] | 李娟,吴振云, ,林仲贤,韩布新. 年龄、焦虑与情节记忆之内容与来源的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(04): 461-470. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||