[1] Cai, Y., & Tu, D. B. (2015). Extension of cognitive diagnosis models based on the polytomous attributes framework and their Q-matrices designs. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(10), 1300-1308. [蔡艳, 涂冬波. (2015). 属性多级化的认知诊断模型拓展及其Q矩阵设计.心理学报, 47(10), 1300-1308.] [2] Cai Y., Zhao Y., Liu S. C., Zhang S. F., & Tu D. B. (2017). An extended polytomous cognitive diagnostic model.Journal of Psychological Science, 40(6), 1491-1497. [蔡艳, 赵洋, 刘舒畅, 张淑芳, 涂冬波. (2017). 一种优化的多级评分认知诊断模型.心理科学, 40(6), 1491-1497.] [3] Chen J.,& de la Torre, J.(2018). Introducing the general polytomous diagnosis modeling framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01474 [4] Chiu, C. Y. (2013). Statistical refinement of the Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis.Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(8), 598-618. [5] Chiu C. Y., Douglas J., & Li X. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications.Psychometrika, 74, 633-665. [6] Chiu, C. Y., & Köhn, H. F. (2015). Consistency of cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: The DINO model and the DINA model revisited. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39(6), 465-479. [7] De Carlo, L. T. (2011). On the analysis of fraction subtraction data: The DINA model, classification, latent class sizes, and the q-matrix.Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(1), 8-26. [8] De Carlo, L. T. (2012). Recognizing uncertainty in the Q-matrix via a Bayesian extension of the DINA model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(6), 447-468. [9] de la Torre, J. (2011). The Generalized DINA Model Framework.Psychometrika, 76(2), 179-199. [10] Ding S. L., Luo F., & Wang W. Y. (2014). Design of polytomous cognitively diagnostic test blueprint——For the independent and the rhombus attribute hierarchies.Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 38(3), 265-269. [丁树良, 罗芬, 汪文义. (2014). 多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计——独立型和收敛型结构.江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38(3), 265-269.] [11] Ding S. L., Luo F., Wang W. Y., LI J., & Xiong J. H. (2022). The structure of unstructured complete Q matrices and their identification.Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 46(5), 441-446. [丁树良, 罗芬, 汪文义, 李佳, 熊建华. (2022). 非结构化完备Q阵的构造与判定.江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 46(5), 441-446.] [12] Ding S. L., Luo F., Wang W. Y., & Xiong J. H. (2015). The properties of 0-1 and polytomous Reach ability matrices and their applications.Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 39(1), 64-68. [丁树良, 罗芬, 汪文义, 熊建华. (2015). 0-1和多值可达矩阵的性质及应用.江西师范大学学报:自然科学版, 39(1), 64-68.] [13] Ding S. L., Mao M. M., Wang W. Y., Luo F., & Cui Y. (2012). Evaluating the consistency of test items relative to the cognitive model for educational cognitive diagnosis.Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(11), 1535-1546. [丁树良, 毛萌萌, 汪文义, 罗芬, Cui, Y. (2012). 教育认知诊断测验与认知模型一致性的评估.心理学报, 44(11), 1535-1546.] [14] Ding S. L., Wang W. Y., & Luo F. (2014). Design of polytomous cognitively diagnostic test blueprint——For the rooted tree type.Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 38(2), 111-118. [丁树良, 汪文义, 罗芬. (2014). 多级评分认知诊断测验蓝图的设计——根树型结构.江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 38(2), 111-118.] [15] Ding S. L., Wang W. Y., & Yang S. Q. (2011). The design of cognitive diagnostic test blueprints.Journal of Psychological Science, 34(2), 258-265. [丁树良, 汪文义, 杨淑群. (2011). 认知诊断测验蓝图的设计.心理科学, 34(2), 258-265.] [16] Ding S. L., Yang S. Q., & Wang W. Y. (2010). The importance of reachability matrix in constructing cognitively diagnostic testing.Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 34(5), 490-494. [丁树良, 杨淑群, 汪文义. (2010). 可达矩阵在认知诊断测验编制中的重要作用.江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 34(5), 490-494.] [17] Fang G., Liu J., & Ying Z. (2019). On the identifiability of diagnostic classification models.Psychometrika, 84(1), 19-40. [18] Gao X. L., Gong Y., & Wang F. (2021). Research progress in polytomous cognitive diagnosis model.Journal of Psychological Science, 44(2), 457-464. [高旭亮, 龚毅, 王芳. (2021). 多级评分认知诊断模型述评.心理科学, 44(2), 457-464.] [19] Groß, J., & George, A. C. (2014). On permissible attribute classes in noncompensatory cognitive diagnosis models.Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 10(3), 100-107. [20] Gu, Y., & Xu, G. (2019). The sufficient and necessary condition for the identifiability and estimability of the DINA model.Psychometrika, 84(2), 468-483. [21] Gu, Y., & Xu, G. (2021a). Sufficient and necessary conditions for the identifiability of the Q-matrix.Statistica Sinica, 31(1), 449-472. [22] Gu Y.,& Xu, G. (2021b). Identifiability of hierarchical latent attribute models. preprintarXiv: 1906.07869v4. [23] Kang C. H., Xin T., & Tian W. (2013). Development and validation of diagnostic test for primary school arithmetic word problems.Examinations Research, 41(6), 24-43. [康春花, 辛涛, 田伟. (2013). 小学数学应用题认知诊断测验编制及效度验证.考试研究, 41(6), 24-43.] [24] Köhn, H. F., & Chiu, C. Y. (2017). A procedure for assessing the completeness of the Q-matrices of cognitively diagnostic tests.Psychometrika, 82, 112-132. [25] Köhn, H. F., & Chiu, C. Y. (2021). A unified theory of the completeness of Q-Matrices for the DINA model.Journal of Classification, 38(3), 500-518. [26] Leighton J. P.,& Gierl, M. J. (2007). Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications Cambridge University Press Theory and applications. Cambridge University Press. [27] Lin, M., & Xu, G. (2023). Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses. preprintarXiv: 2304.01363. [28] Liu J., Xu G., & Ying Z. (2012). Data-driven learning of Q-matrix.Applied Psychological Measurement, 36(7), 548-564. [29] Liu J., Xu G., & Ying Z. (2013). Theory of the self-learning Q-matrix.Bernoulli, 19, 1790-1817. [30] Ma, W. C., & de la Torre, J. (2016). A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 69(3), 253-275. [31] Madison, M. J., & Bradshaw, L. P. (2015). The effects of Q-matrix design on classification accuracy in the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(3), 491-511. [32] Ouyang, J., & Xu, G. (2022). Identifiability of latent class models with covariates.Psychometrika, 87(4), 1343-1360. [33] Sun J. N., Xin T., Zhang S. M., & de la Torre, J. (2013). A polytomous extension of the generalized distance discriminating method.Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(7), 503-521. [34] Tatsuoka, K. K. (1995). Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis: A statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 327-359. [35] Tatsuoka, K. K. (2009). Cognitive assessment: An introduction to the rule space method. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. [36] Xu, G., & Zhang, S. (2016). Identifiability of diagnostic classification models.Psychometrika, 81(3), 625-649. |