“别人家的孩子”vs.平庸的自己：社会比较对独特性寻求行为的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00645

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

人们在自我评价中普遍存在着优于平均值效应, 而上行社会比较会打破这一自我评价偏差, 引发后续的补偿性消费行为。通过5个实验, 依次论证上行比较(vs.下行比较)会提升个体对独特产品选项的偏好(实验1); 其心理机制在于上行比较降低了而非下行比较提升了个体的自我独特性感知, 从而促使个体出于补偿的目的而寻求独特性(实验2a、2b和2c); 上述效应适用于经济状况这一特定比较维度, 并且在感知经济流动性的调节作用下得到强化或削弱(实验3)。研究结论对于推动社会比较和独特性寻求行为相关领域的理论进展, 指导长尾市场中企业的营销策略、帮助个体缓解上行比较的威胁均有着积极的启示价值。

关键词: 社会比较, 独特性寻求行为, 优于平均值效应, 补偿性消费, 感知经济流动性

Abstract:

Uniqueness-seeking behavior can be driven by various factors. Despite the common phenomenon that better-off individuals seem to seek more uniqueness and express individuality more frequently, no researcher has investigated whether and how social comparison influences uniqueness-seeking behavior. According to the better-than-average effect, people tend to perceive themselves better off than the average on many important dimensions and are inclined to see themselves as unique when there are no social comparisons. Building on the compensatory consumption model, we aim to investigate the impact of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior, and further examine why this effect occurs as well as when it will be attenuated or intensified.
In social comparisons, comparing upwardly (vs. downwardly) may threaten individuals’ pervasively held better-than-average self-evaluation bias, which motivates them to adjust their self-evaluations downwardly to the average. Prior research suggests that the average is mostly seen as ordinary, mediocre and unexceptional. Therefore, we infer that people comparing upwardly may experience a decreased sense of uniqueness, which drives them to seek unique options in subsequent unrelated contexts. This effect holds for many dimensions, such as economic status. In that case, perceived economic mobility acts as an important moderator. We predict that when perceived economic mobility is high, threats induced by upward comparisons will be mitigated, as are individuals’ psychological and behavioral responses. However, when perceived economic mobility is low, the responses will be intensified.
Across five experiments, we demonstrate that upward comparisons increase consumer preference for less popular scenic spots (Study 1). The psychological mechanism underlying this effect is that upward comparisons lower perceived uniqueness, leading individuals to choose minority-endorsed products to compensate for the negative self-discrepancy (studies 2a and 2c). The fundamental driving force of the main effect is that upward comparisons increase consumers’ uniqueness-seeking tendency (Study 2b). Furthermore, when comparing upwardly on economic status, consumers still show stronger preference for niche book clubs, and the effect of social comparison on perceived uniqueness and uniqueness seeking will be mitigated when perceived economic mobility is high but is strengthened when perceived economic mobility is low (Study 3).
The present research provides evidence that upward comparisons can lead to uniqueness-seeking behavior by examining the mediating role of perceived uniqueness, supporting our basic premise that individuals perceive themselves as unique when making no comparisons. In doing this, we make theoretical contributions to research on both uniqueness seeking and the strategies for coping with upward comparisons. This also sheds light on marketing strategies that enterprises can employ to increase sales of unpopular or customized products as well as coping strategies that consumers can use to alleviate threats of upward comparisons on different dimensions.

Key words: social comparison, uniqueness-seeking behavior, better-than-average effect, compensatory consumption, perceived economic mobility

中图分类号:

宫秀双, 张红红. (2020). “别人家的孩子”vs.平庸的自己：社会比较对独特性寻求行为的影响. 心理学报, 52(5), 645-658.

GONG Xiushuang, ZHANG Honghong. (2020). Outstanding others vs. mediocre me: The effect of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(5), 645-658.

图/表 2

参考文献 54

[1]	Alicke M. D . (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621-1630.
[2]	Alicke M. D., & Govorun O . (2005). The better-than-average effect. The Self in Social Judgment, 1, 85-106.
[3]	Alicke M. D., LoSchiavo F. M., Zerbst J., & Zhang S . (1997). The person who out performs me is a genius: Maintaining perceived competence in upward social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 781-789. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.781 URL pmid: 9325593
[4]	Allison S. T., Messick D. M., & Goethals G. R . (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7(3), 275-295.
[5]	Appel H., Gerlach A. L., & Crusius J . (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49.
[6]	Argo J. J., & Dahl D. W . (2018). Standards of beauty: The impact of mannequins in the retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 974-990.
[7]	Aspinwall L. G., & Taylor S. E . (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affect, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 708-722. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.5.708 URL pmid: 8505703
[8]	Bozkurt S., & Gligor D . (2019). Scarcity (versus popularity) cues for rejected customers: The impact of social exclusion on cue types through need for uniqueness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 275-281.
[9]	Brown J. D . (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self- enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353-376. doi: 10.1177/0146167209335298 URL pmid: 19487485
[10]	Cannon C., Goldsmith K., Roux C., & Kirmani A . (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104-127.
[11]	Chen G., Gully S. M., & Eden D . (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83.
[12]	Clark J. V., & Arkowitz H . (1975). Social anxiety and self-evaluation of interpersonal performance. Psychological Reports, 36(1), 211-221. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1975.36.1.211 URL pmid: 1121542
[13]	Collins R. L . (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51-69.
[14]	Festinger H. L . (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. doi: 10.2190/KR7A-4QB6-LXAK-V7HJ URL pmid: 955718
[15]	Fromkin H. L., & Snyder C. R . (1980). The search for uniqueness and valuation of scarcity. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 57-76). New York: Plenum.
[16]	Garcia S. M., Tor A., & Schiff T. M . (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634-650. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504114 URL pmid: 26173228
[17]	Gardner D. G., & Pierce J. L . (2010). The core self-evaluation scale: Further construct validation evidence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 291-304.
[18]	Han X., & Chi Y . (2012). The self-threat of unsolicited social comparison and its balance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(12), 1628-1640.
	[ 韩晓燕, 迟毓凯 . (2012). 自发社会比较中的威胁效应及自我平衡策略. 心理学报, 44(12), 1628-1640.]
[19]	Hayes A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
[20]	Hoegg J., Scott M. L., Morales A. C., & Dahl D. W . (2014). The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 70-78.
[21]	Hoorens V . (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 113-139.
[22]	Huang T., Liu L., Wang D., & Zhang W . (2016). Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-being. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(9), 1163-1174.
	[ 黄婷婷, 刘莉倩, 王大华, 张文海 . (2016). 经济地位和计量地位: 社会地位比较对主观幸福感的影响及其年龄差异. 心理学报, 48(9), 1163-1174.]
[23]	Jin L., He Y., Zou D., & Xu Q . (2013). How affirmational versus negational identification frames influence uniqueness- seeking behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 891-902.
[24]	Klar Y., & Giladi E. E . (1997). No one in my group can be below the group’s average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(5), 885-901. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.5.885 URL pmid: 9364753
[25]	Kraus M. W., Côté S., & Keltner D . (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716-1723. doi: 10.1177/0956797610387613 URL pmid: 20974714
[26]	Li X., & Zhang M . (2011). Images of attractive women make young females behave virtuously. In R. Ahluwalia, T. L. Chartrand, & R. K. Ratner (Eds.), NA-Advances in consumer research: Vol. 39 (pp. 797-798). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
[27]	Luhtanen R., & Crocker J . (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.
[28]	Lynn M., & Harris J . (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology & Marketing, 14(6), 601-616. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-601 URL pmid: 25468843
[29]	Mandel N., Rucker D. D., Levav J., & Galinsky A. D . (2017). The compensatory consumer behavior model: How self- discrepancies drive consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 133-146.
[30]	Markey C. N., & Markey P. M . (2010). A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. Body Image, 7(2), 165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.10.006 URL pmid: 20089464
[31]	Martin H. J., & Larsen K. S . (1976). Measurement of competitive-cooperative attitudes. Psychological Reports, 39(1), 303-306. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197701)39:1&lt;303::aid-cncr2820390147&gt;3.0.co;2-u URL pmid: 832246
[32]	McClelland D. C . (1961). The achieving society. Princenton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
[33]	Morse S., & Gergen K. J . (1970). Social comparison, self- consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 148-156. doi: 10.1037/h0029862 URL pmid: 5485940
[34]	Pleban R., & Tesser A . (1981). The effects of relevance and quality of another’s performance on interpersonal closeness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3), 278-285.
[35]	Roese N. J., & Olson J. M . (2007). Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 124-141. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00033.x URL pmid: 18552989
[36]	Rosenberg M . (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[37]	Schlosser A. E., & Levy E . (2016). Helping others or oneself: How direction of comparison affects prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 461-473.
[38]	Smeesters D., Mussweiler T., & Mandel N . (2010). The effects of thin and heavy media images on overweight and underweight consumers: Social comparison processes and behavioral implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 930-949.
[39]	Snyder C. R . (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9-24.
[40]	Snyder C. R., & Fromkin H. L . (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518-527.
[41]	Sobol K., & Darke P. R . (2014). “I’d like to be that attractive, but at least I’m smart”: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 533-540.
[42]	Tesser A., & Cornell D. P . (1991). On the confluence of self processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 501-526.
[43]	Tian K. T., Bearden W. O., & Hunter G. L . (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50-66.
[44]	Wan E. W., Xu J., & Ding Y . (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1109-1122. doi: 10.1086/674197 URL
[45]	Wan L. C., & Wyer Jr, R. S . (2015). Consumer reactions to attractive service providers: Approach or avoid? Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 578-595.
[46]	Wills T. A . (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271. URL pmid: 12374441
[47]	Yoon S., & Kim H. C . (2016). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(5), 759-772.
[48]	Yoon S., & Kim H. C . (2017). Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1141-1156.
[49]	Zheng X., Baskin E., & Peng S . (2018a). The spillover effect of incidental social comparison on materialistic pursuits. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5/6), 1107-1127.
[50]	Zheng X., Baskin E., & Peng S . (2018b). Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Business Research, 90, 196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.041 URL
[51]	Zheng X., Peng S., & Dai S . (2014). Impact of social comparison on conspicuous consumption: A psychological compensation perspective. Journal of Marketing Science, 10(3), 19-31.
	[ 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 戴珊姗 . (2014). 社会比较对炫耀性消费的影响: 心理补偿的视角. 营销科学学报, 10(3), 19-31.]
[52]	Zheng X., Peng S., & Peng L . (2015). Feeling better and becoming more benevolent: Impact of social comparison on prosocial behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(2), 243-250.
	[ 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞 . (2015). “达”则兼济天下?社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(2), 243-250.]
[53]	Zhu R., & Argo J. J . (2013). Exploring the impact of various shaped seating arrangements on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 336-349.
[54]	Zou D., Jin L., He Y., & Xu Q . (2014). The effect of the sense of power on Chinese consumers’ uniqueness-seeking behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 14-28.