ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 1292-1301.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01292

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

心理距离对基线比例忽略的影响

徐富明1,2; 蒋 多3; 张 慧1; 李 欧1; 孔诗晓1; 史燕伟1   

  1. (1华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079) (2江西师范大学心理学院, 南昌 330022) (3深圳大学心理与社会学院, 深圳 518060)
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-08 发布日期:2016-10-25 出版日期:2016-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 蒋多, E-mail: duo12322@163.com; 孔诗晓, E-mail: 631788507@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571083)资助。

The effect of psychological distance on the base-rate neglect

XU Fuming1,2; JIANG Duo3; ZHANG Hui1; LI Ou1; KONG Shixiao1; SHI Yanwei1   

  1. (1 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) (2 School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China) (3 College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)
  • Received:2015-04-08 Online:2016-10-25 Published:2016-10-25
  • Contact: JIANG Duo, E-mail: duo12322@163.com; KONG Shixiao, E-mail: 631788507@qq.com

摘要:

基线比例忽略是指在不确定情境中, 个体进行判断和决策时不能充分利用或者忽略基线比例的现象。本研究通过系列情境实验探索了三种不同维度的心理距离, 即时间距离、空间距离和社会距离对基线比例忽略的影响。结果发现, 三种心理距离均能够对基线比例忽略产生影响:当时间距离、空间距离和社会距离较近时, 个体更容易表现出基线比例忽略现象; 而当时间距离、空间距离和社会距离较远时, 个体的基线比例忽略倾向减弱。

关键词: 基线比例忽略, 心理距离, 时间距离, 空间距离, 社会距离

Abstract:

The base-rate neglect refers to the phenomenon that individuals tend to underestimate or neglect base-rate information in probability judgment and decision-making. The phenomenon is widespread in daily behavioral decision-making. Since the concept of base-rate neglect has been proposed, the studies of its psychological mechanisms have reached well-documented results and conclusions. But the exploration for its influence factors turned out to be a conservative, thus few researches tried to shed light on its application. What’s more, there is little empirical study of base-rate neglect in China. Therefore, this study aims to verify the base-rate neglect in real decision-making situations, and explore how the psychological distance would affect the base-rate neglect. Study 1 carried out one experiment with 2 (temporal distance: distant vs. near) × 2 (base rate: high vs. low) between-subject design to examine the moderate effect of temporal distance. A total of 121 students were recruited. The results showed that the temporal distance affected the base-rate neglect under the selection circumstances, and that the base-rate neglect effect was weakened along with the increasing temporal distance, thus individuals tended to make probability judgments based on base rate. Similarly, study 2 explored the effect of spatial distance on the base-rate neglect with 2 (spatial distance: distant vs. near) × 2 (base rate: high vs. low) between-subject design. A total of 122 students were recruited. The results indicated that the spatial distance affected the base-rate neglect in the selection circumstances, and that the base-rate neglect effect was weakened along with the increasing spatial distance, thus individuals tended to make probability judgments based on base rate. The same with the pattern in study 1 and study 2, study 3 explored the effect of social distance on the base-rate neglect with 2 (social distance: distant vs. near) × 2 (base rate: high vs. low) between-subject design. A total of 144 students were recruited. It was found that the social distance affected the base-rate neglect in the selection circumstances, and that the base-rate neglect effect was weakened along with the increasing social distance, thus individuals tended to make probability judgments based on base rate. In sum, three studies provided consistent evidences that different dimensions of psychological distance, namely temporal distance, spatial distance and social distance could affect the relative weight according to case description information as well as base rate information in the base-rate neglect situations.

Key words: base-rate neglect, psychological distance, temporal distance, spatial distance, social distance