分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异

心理学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 687-693.

分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异

周浩,龙立荣,王燕,王忠军,吴怡,柯善玉

华中师范大学心理学院，武汉 430079 华中科技大学管理学院，武汉 430074

收稿日期:2005-01-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-09-30 发布日期:2005-09-30
通讯作者: 龙立荣

THE DIFFERENT OUTCOME OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE

Zhou Hao,Long Lirong,Wang Yan1,Wang Zhongjun,Wu Yi, Ke Shanyu

College of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China College of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2005-01-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-09-30 Online:2005-09-30
Contact: Long Lirong

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以大学生奖学金评比为例，探讨了组织公正各维度影响效果的差异。以661名大学生为被试，采用2×2×2的完全随机设计，以情境故事法（scenarios）呈现刺激，研究了奖学金评比中分配公正、程序公正、互动公正对大学生学习投入、班级荣誉感、班级归属感、与辅导员的关系的影响。结果表明，组织公正三个维度与效果变量之间存在清晰的对应影响关系：分配公正主要影响具体、以个人为参照的效果变量；程序公正主要影响与组织有关的效果变量；互动公正主要影响与上司有关的效果变量。

关键词: 组织公正, 组织不公正, 分配公正, 程序公正, 互动公正

Abstract: This study examined the different outcome of distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice in scholarship appraisal. 661 college students participated in the study, a 2×2×2completely randomized design was employed, and 8 scenarios which consisted of the information on distributive justice/injustice, procedural justice/injustice and interactional justice/injustice were used as research materials to analyze the influence of organizational justices on students’ learning attitude, class honourableness, class belongingness and relationship with life teacher. The result indicated that distributive justice had the most explanative effect on person-referenced outcomes, procedural justice had the most explanative effect on organization-referenced outcomes, and interactional justice had the most explanative effect on supervisor-referenced outcomes, respectively.

Key words: organizational justice, organizational injustice, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice

中图分类号:

B849:C93

周浩,龙立荣,王燕,王忠军,吴怡,柯善玉. (2005). 分配公正、程序公正、互动公正影响效果的差异. 心理学报, 37(05), 687-693.

Zhou Hao,Long Lirong,Wang Yan1,Wang Zhongjun,Wu Yi, Ke Shanyu. (2005). THE DIFFERENT OUTCOME OF DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE. , 37(05), 687-693.

[1]	杨林川, 马红宇, 姜海, 梁娟, 齐玲. 社会公正对权威合法性的影响：社会阶层的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 980-994.
[2]	王宇清;龙立荣;周浩. 消极情绪在程序和互动不公正感与员工偏离行为间的中介作用：传统性的调节机制[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(12): 1663-1676.
[3]	王燕,龙立荣,周浩,祖伟. 分配不公正下的退缩行为：程序公正和互动公正的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(2): 335-342.
[4]	周浩,龙立荣. 家长式领导与组织公正感的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2007, 39(05): 909-917.