ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办：中国心理学会
　　　中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社
2025年3月18日 星期二

心理学报 ›› 2003, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02): 172-177. cstr: 32110.14.2003.00172

• • 上一篇    下一篇

内外部线索对学习判断的影响

陈功香,傅小兰   

  1. 中国科学院心理研究所，北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2002-08-02 修回日期:1900-01-01 发布日期:2003-03-30 出版日期:2003-03-30

EFFECTS OF INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC CUES ON JUDGMENT OF

Chen Gongxiang，Fu Xiaolan   

  1. (Institute of Psychology，the Chinese Academy of Sciences，Beijing 100101
  • Received:2002-08-02 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2003-03-30 Published:2003-03-30

PDF (PC)

1622

摘要： 该研究针对Koriat和Dunlosky实验研究结果的不同，通过两个实验，进一步考察内外部线索对学习判断（Judgment of learning，简称为JOL）的影响。被试为山东师大本科生63名。内部线索为词对的语义联系，两种外部线索分别是呈现时间和呈现顺序。本研究结果表明：⑴ 无论在交替呈现还是区组呈现条件下，内部线索对JOL和回忆都产生了显著影响；⑵ 呈现顺序和呈现时间可能是两种不同类型的外部线索；⑶ 不同的内外部线索对JOL有不同的交互作用；⑷ 实验二中无意义词对先呈现组的JOL大于有意义词对先呈现组的JOL，这说明JOL可能存在“锚定效应”

关键词: 学习判断, 外部线索, 内部线索

Abstract: Aiming at the difference between Koriat’s and Dunlosky’s outcomes, two experiments were conducted to further explore the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on judgment of learning (JOL). Ss were 63 undergraduates in Shandong Normal University, China. The intrinsic cue was relatedness, and the two extrinsic cues were presentation time and presentation order. The major findings were as follows: ⑴ Relatedness exerted similar effects on both JOL and recall in the two experiments. ⑵ The presentation time and the presentation order may be two different types of extrinsic cues. ⑶ There are different interactions among the different intrinsic cues and extrinsic cues. ⑷ JOL magnitude was higher when unrelated items were presented first than when related items were presented first in Experiment 2. This suggests that anchoring effects may influence JOL

Key words: JOL, intrinsic cue, extrinsic cue

中图分类号: