ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 1993, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 38-44.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

人格维度与注意分配的关系及其选拔意义

黄常新;张其吉   

  1. 航天医学工程研究所,航天医学工程研究所 北京,100094 ,北京,100094
  • 发布日期:1993-06-25 出版日期:1993-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 黄常新

RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND ATTENTION ALLOCATION AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN SELECTIONS

Huang Changxin;Zhang Qiji Institute of Space Medico-engineering, Beijing   

  • Online:1993-06-25 Published:1993-06-25

摘要: 本研究以210名男性大学生为被试,EPQ确定人格维度,微机测量注意分配,运用正交设计实验与区组实验相结合的方法综合论述了人格维度与注意分配的关系发现:E、E×N、P×E对注意分配有显著影响,N有一定影响,P和P×N的影响不显著。各影响因素的重要性顺序:E×N→P×E/E→N→P→P×N/误差,绘制了单项人格维度与注意分配关系简图。确定了三种人格维度的最佳组合型(注意分配可望最优):P1N2E1,次佳组合型:P3N2E1,最差组合型:P2N3E1,各型注意分配均值分别为0.702、0.680、0.309,本文探讨了实验结果的选拔意义,认为可从个体EPQ的结果来估测其注意分配能力,这在职业心理选拔中有重要应用价值。

关键词: 人格维度, 注意分配, 选拔, 神经质维度, 内外倾维度, 精神质维度, 正交实验

Abstract: In this research, 2100male college students were tested, whose personality dimensions were defined with Eysenck Personality Questionaire, attentionallocations were measured with the computer. Orthogonal design combinedwith group test was taken to study the relationship between personality di-mensions and the attention allocation. The results were summarized as follows: E, E×N, P×E, N had signi-ficant effects on the attention allocation, but P×N, N did not have significanteffects. The order of importance was: E×N→P×E/E→N→P→P×N/error.The figures on the relationship were made. The best combinating state (bestattention allocation) was P1N2E1, the next one was P3N2E1 and the worstone was P2N3E1. The average of the allocation were 0.702,0.680 and 0.309respectively. Moreover, the meaning of the results in selection was also discussed.The individual attention allocation could be estimated through. measuring andanalysing one's personality dimensions, which is of importance in psycholo-gical screening.

Key words: personality dimension, attention allocation, selection, orthogonal design, neuroticism, extraversion-introversion, psychoticism