三种攻角误差符的比较研究

心理学报 ›› 1987, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 80-87. cstr: 32110.14.1987.00080

三种攻角误差符的比较研究

崔代革

中国科学院心理研究所北京

发布日期:1987-12-25 出版日期:1987-12-25

THREE SYMBOLS OF THE ANGLE—OF—ATTACK ERROR TRADE—OFF STUDIES

Cui Dai-ge Institute of Psychology:Academia Sinica

Online:1987-12-25 Published:1987-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本实验是通过计算机系统、平视显示器系统及歼-5模拟驾驶舱实现的。攻角误差符及背景画面都逼真地模拟了平视显示的动态情景。通过对被试者信号响应能力的测定,从中优选出较理想的显示方式。此外,在实验的基础上,又对飞行部队进行了调查,并取得了相似的结果。

关键词: NULL

Abstract: The experiment was carried out by using a computer system, aHead-up Display (HUD) system, and the analog control cabin of Fighter-5. The symbols of the angle-of-attack error and the picture of thebackground were all distinctly simulated with the situations of the Head-up Display in dynamic state. By means of measuring the signal-responding competence of the subjects, an optimal display pattern wasselected among several options. On the basis of the experiment, a surveywas carried out in several air force units with similar results.

Key words: NULL

崔代革. (1987). 三种攻角误差符的比较研究. 心理学报, 19(4), 80-87.

Cui Dai-ge Institute of Psychology:Academia Sinica. (1987). THREE SYMBOLS OF THE ANGLE—OF—ATTACK ERROR TRADE—OFF STUDIES. , 19(4), 80-87.

[1]	刘红艳,李爱梅,王海忠,卫海英. 不同促销方式对产品购买决策的影响—— 基于解释水平理论视角的研究[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(8): 1100-1113.
[2]	杨继平,王兴超. 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(8): 1075-1085.