ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报 ›› 1966, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 12-20.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同照度对学习效率及视觉功能的影响(在两节自修课中实验的初步观察)

胡瑞荣   

  1. 南昌市卫生防疫站
  • 出版日期:1966-06-25 发布日期:1966-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 胡瑞荣

THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS INTENSITIES OF ILLUMINATION ON THE EFFICIENCY OF STUDY AND VISUAL ACUITY

HU JUI--JUNG   

  • Published:1966-06-25 Online:1966-06-25

摘要: <正> 问题 近年来,在开展保护学生视力工作中,改善教室人工照明是重要措施之一。各地曾对有关问题作了一些调查研究,如教室照明对视觉功能的影响、教室人工照明标准等,对改善学习环境有一定参考价值。但是,不同照度对学习(工作)效率直接影响的研究,尚属少见。 我们设想:单从视觉功能测量结果考虑教室照度,固无不可,但其照度是否能适合学习(工作)的要求,似难肯定。因儿童视觉的感受速度及视力的疲劳程度,在视近情况下,除受照度影响的一般规律外,还与各种不同的视力负荷条件(如自修中的阅读、书写、计

关键词: NULL

Abstract: Six 100 W light bulbs were set in a classroom. They were controlled with a trans-former to give the needed illuminating intensity. 42 boys and 38 girls aged 14-16 withnormal vision were choosen as subjects. Two visual scales had been used: a Snellen scale for far-vision test, calculated ac-cording to their distance from the scale (V=d/D) and a special visual scale with the sizeof its alphabets identical to that of the symbols in 1.2 line of the near-vision scale. Sswere asked to pick up within 2 minutes the assigned alphabets which were about 30 cmaway from them. The speed of reading and the proportion of errors were calculated by the number ofalphabets found correct or wrong. Experiments were carried out successively under 25,45, 55, 75 and 95 lux of average illuminating intensity falling on the desk. Only one ex-periment was done each night. Results showed that: (1) The number of alphabets picked up (speed of reading)was in direct ratio with the illumination levels, least under 25 lux with the mean 9.4(before self-study time), 6.98 (in the middle) and 2.9 (at the end), when 55 or 75 luxwas used, the speed of reading improved more rapidly, and most under 95 lux, with themean at 3 different times being 30.13, 28.82, and 26.78. Besides 25 lux, there was nosignificant difference between the time before and in the middle of study (P<0.05)among these various light levels, but there was marked difference between the middle andthe end of the study time (P<0.001). (2) Error percentage was in reverse ratio with the intensity of illumination. Errorswere most frequent under 45 lux or less, being 61.14-86.50% (limits of 95%=58.61-88.08%), about 50% under 75 lux (limits of 95%=38.62-61.88%), and only 4.01-8.58% under 95 lux. (3) Visual acuity changed with illumination levels. It is rather stable under 75 luxor more. Ss all felt very well under 95 lux, with slight discomfort under 45 lux, mostuncomfortable and inefficient under 25 lux. Some pupils complained with blurring ofvision, vertigo, eye fatigue etc., especially from the middle to the end of the study period. According to the results, it is clear that illumination of 25-45 lux causes eye fatigueand strain, while 55-75 lux is suitable for ordinary reading. Thus, 75 lux may be takenas the minimal, and 95 lux the optimal level of illumination for study.

Key words: NULL