ISSN 0439-755X
CN 11-1911/B
主办:中国心理学会
   中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理学报

• •    

超越“多多益善”:利他程度对道德评价的影响及调节机制

孙思捷, 赵欢欢, 皮乔, 张和云   

  1. 上海师范大学心理学院, 200234 中国
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-16 修回日期:2025-11-20 接受日期:2025-11-25
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CSH044)

Beyond “The more the better”: The impact of altruism degree on moral evaluation and its moderating mechanisms

SUN Sijie, ZHAO Huanhuan, PI Qiao, ZHANG Heyun   

  1. , 200234, China
  • Received:2025-02-16 Revised:2025-11-20 Accepted:2025-11-25

摘要: 利他行为是一种有利于他人的积极行为,但利他程度越高会被认为更道德吗?本研究基于社会视角下的利他,通过7个系列研究(N = 1798)系统探讨了利他程度与道德评价之间的关系,并深入揭示了其内部机制与边界条件。结果发现,观察者对高度利他行为的道德评价反而低于中度利他行为,教化功能感知起中介作用(研究1a、1b);通过“操纵中介作为调节”的设计,为教化功能感知的中介作用提供了因果证据(研究2a、2b);自我不确定性调节了利他程度与教化功能感知之间的关系,高自我不确定性会降低观察者对高度利他行为的教化功能感知,进而降低道德评价(研究3、4);跨实验的内部元分析进一步支持了研究结果的稳健性(研究5)。本研究揭示了新时代背景下利他行为与道德评价之间的复杂关系:利他行为并非“多多益善”,高度利他可能适得其反,深化了对利他行为社会评价的理解,并为推动社会和谐与道德建设提供了新的理论视角。

关键词: 利他行为, 道德评价, 教化功能, 自我不确定性

Abstract: Moral evaluation involves assessing the goodness or wrongness of actions and personal qualities. While altruism – defined as actions intended to enhance the well-being of others, often through resource allocation – is generally valued, a societal perspective suggests that altruistic behaviors are also expected to align with prevailing social norms. This study investigates a seemingly paradoxical phenomenon: highly altruistic behavior is sometimes evaluated as less moral than moderately altruistic behavior. We propose, drawing on the social functionalist perspective, that observers perceive highly altruistic behavior as having a weaker teaching function – that is, as being less effective in guiding social life and establishing beneficial behavioral norms – leading to lower moral evaluations. Furthermore, self-uncertainty, a negative experience stemming from doubts about one’s important traits or the unpredictability of the external environment, can influence social cognition and, consequently, moral evaluations. This research explores the relationship between altruistic behavior and moral evaluation, examining the mediating role of teaching function perception and the moderating role of self-uncertainty, to contribute to a deeper understanding of altruism and moral evaluation and promote societal harmony. Seven studies were conducted to test the hypothesized moderated mediation model. Initial evidence from scenario-based designs in Studies 1a (N = 272) and 1b (N = 296) explored the relationships among altruism degree, moral evaluation, and teaching function perception in both monetary and temporal altruism contexts. Studies 2a (N = 313) and 2b (N = 377) adopted a manipulating-of-mediating-as-a-moderator design to further test the causal relationships. Study 3 (N = 295) and Study 4 (N = 704) then examined the moderating effects of observers’ trait and state self-uncertainty, respectively. Finally, Study 5 (N = 1,798) conducted an internal meta-analysis across all experiments, providing robust validation of the overall model. Consistent with our hypotheses, we present converging evidence supporting the following propositions: (1) Highly altruistic behavior, compared to moderately altruistic behavior, received lower moral evaluations, both for the behavior itself and for the actor; (2) Perceived teaching function mediated the relationship between the degree of altruism and moral evaluation, with highly altruistic behavior diminishing the perception of teaching function and consequently reducing moral evaluation; (3) Observers’ self-uncertainty moderated the relationship between the degree of altruism and perceived teaching function, such that high self-uncertainty exacerbated the perception of reduced teaching function for highly altruistic behavior, whereas low self-uncertainty attenuated this effect; (4) The internal meta-analysis substantiated the robustness of the relationships among the degree of altruism, perceived teaching function, and moral evaluation across monetary and temporal altruism contexts. Our findings make significant contributions to the literature across several dimensions: (1) It provides empirical evidence for the societal perspective of altruism, demonstrating that moral evaluations are not solely determined by altruistic intent but are also shaped by social expectations, leading to lower evaluations of highly altruistic behavior; (2) It identifies teaching function perception as a critical mediator in the relationship between altruism degree and moral evaluation, underscoring the active role of individuals in shaping social norms through their moral judgments; and (3) It reveals the moderating role of self-uncertainty, demonstrating the dynamic interplay between individual traits and external social environments in shaping moral evaluations of altruism. These findings offer new avenues for understanding the complexities of altruism and moral evaluation, suggesting future research should explore these nuanced relationships across diverse contexts and behavioral domains.

Key words: altruistic behavior, moral evaluation, teaching function, self-uncertainty