Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 146-162.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2025.0146
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WENG Zhigang1, CHEN Xiaoxiao1(
), ZHANG Xiaomei1, ZHANG Ju2
Received:2024-01-09
Online:2025-01-15
Published:2024-10-28
Contact:
CHEN Xiaoxiao
E-mail:chenxiaoxiao0126@163.com
CLC Number:
WENG Zhigang, CHEN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Xiaomei, ZHANG Ju. Social presence oriented toward new human-machine relationships[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(1): 146-162.
| 要点 | 详情 |
|---|---|
| 最后检索时间 | 2000~2023年 |
| 数据来源 | (1)Web of Science核心集合, SCI&SSCI数据库 (2)中国知网数据库 |
| 检索式 | (TS = (Human-Computer Interaction) OR TS = (Human-Robot Interaction) OR TS = (Human-AI Interaction) OR TS = (AI) OR TS = (robot) OR TS = (assistant) OR TS = (agent) OR TS = (chatbot) OR TS = (avatar)) AND (TS = (social presence) OR TS = (automated social presence)) AND (PY = (2000-2023)) SU% = ('人机关系'+'人机交互'+'人工智能'+'机器人'+'聊天机器人') * '社会临场感' |
| 筛选依据 | (1)将研究方向限定为管理学、商业、心理学、社会学、计算机科学的相关方向。 (2)初筛结果为3111篇文献(中文18篇, 英文3093篇)。 (3)限定学科领域, 剔除无关与重复文献, 得到英文598篇, 中文15篇。 (4)进一步筛查管理学、心理学及交叉学科、社会学及交叉学科、计算机科学及交叉学科等领域的重点期刊后, 并逐个阅读文章标题、摘要, 对引用的重要研究进行整理与查漏补缺。 |
| 筛选结果 | 合计精炼出77篇相关文献 |
| 要点 | 详情 |
|---|---|
| 最后检索时间 | 2000~2023年 |
| 数据来源 | (1)Web of Science核心集合, SCI&SSCI数据库 (2)中国知网数据库 |
| 检索式 | (TS = (Human-Computer Interaction) OR TS = (Human-Robot Interaction) OR TS = (Human-AI Interaction) OR TS = (AI) OR TS = (robot) OR TS = (assistant) OR TS = (agent) OR TS = (chatbot) OR TS = (avatar)) AND (TS = (social presence) OR TS = (automated social presence)) AND (PY = (2000-2023)) SU% = ('人机关系'+'人机交互'+'人工智能'+'机器人'+'聊天机器人') * '社会临场感' |
| 筛选依据 | (1)将研究方向限定为管理学、商业、心理学、社会学、计算机科学的相关方向。 (2)初筛结果为3111篇文献(中文18篇, 英文3093篇)。 (3)限定学科领域, 剔除无关与重复文献, 得到英文598篇, 中文15篇。 (4)进一步筛查管理学、心理学及交叉学科、社会学及交叉学科、计算机科学及交叉学科等领域的重点期刊后, 并逐个阅读文章标题、摘要, 对引用的重要研究进行整理与查漏补缺。 |
| 筛选结果 | 合计精炼出77篇相关文献 |
| [1] | 黄敏学, 吕林祥, 毛文萱. (2023). 服务机器人拟人化策略与消费任务类型的交互影响——双重信任视角. 营销科学学报, 3(2), 115-136. |
| [2] | 刘伟. (2021). 人机融合——超越人工智能. 北京: 清华大学出版社. |
| [3] |
磨然, 方建东, 常保瑞. (2023). 从“拟人归因”到“联盟建立”: 人与聊天机器人关系对参与度的影响. 心理科学进展, 31(9), 1742-1755.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01742 |
| [4] | 戚娅玮, 李斯盛, 杨若欣, 何清华. (2023). ChatGPT热潮下的冷思考: 基于心理学算法厌恶与欣赏的视角. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 37(6), 34-41. |
| [5] | 邱海莲. (2020). 服务机器人感知属性对顾客款待体验的影响——技术补偿的视角 [博士学位论文]. 中南财经政法大学, 武汉. |
| [6] | 王海忠, 谢涛, 詹纯玉. (2021). 服务失败情境下智能客服化身拟人化的负面影响: 厌恶感的中介机制. 南开管理评论, 24(4), 194-204. |
| [7] | 王红卫, 李珏, 刘建国, 樊瑛, 马靓, 霍红,... 丁烈云. (2023). 人机融合复杂社会系统研究. 中国管理科学, 31(7), 1-21. |
| [8] | 向安玲, 许可. (2023). 人机何以交互: 理论溯源、范式演变与前景趋势. 全球传媒学刊, 10(5), 88-105. |
| [9] | 谢小云, 左玉涵, 胡琼晶. (2021). 数字化时代的人力资源管理: 基于人与技术交互的视角. 管理世界, 37(1), 200-216, 13. |
| [10] |
许丽颖, 喻丰, 邬家骅, 韩婷婷, 赵靓. (2017). 拟人化: 从“它”到“他”. 心理科学进展, 25(11), 1942-1954.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01942 |
| [11] | 薛澄岐, 王琳琳. (2021). 智能人机系统的人机融合交互研究综述. 包装工程, 42(20), 112-124, 14. |
| [12] | 余南平, 张翌然. (2023). ChatGPT/生成式人工智能对教育的影响: 大国博弈新边疆. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 41(7), 15-25. |
| [13] | Abdullah, M. H. (2004). Social presence in online conferences: What makes people “real”?. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 1-22. |
| [14] | Adam, M., Wessel, M., & Benlian, A. (2021). AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 427-445. |
| [15] | Airenti, G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: From relatedness to empathy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(1), 117-127. |
| [16] | Araujo, T. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183-89. |
| [17] | Bagozzi, R. P., Brady, M. K., & Huang, M. H. (2022). AI service and emotion. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 499-504. |
| [18] |
Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16(10), 814-819.
pmid: 16181445 |
| [19] |
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2003). Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 819-833.
doi: 10.1177/0146167203029007002 pmid: 15018671 |
| [20] | Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Role of cognitive absorption in building user trust and experience. Psychology & Marketing, 38(4), 643-668. |
| [21] | Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. |
| [22] | Ben Mimoun, M. S., Poncin, I., & Garnier, M. (2017). Animated conversational agents and e-consumer productivity: The roles of agents and individual characteristics. Information & Management, 54(5), 545-559. |
| [23] | Bernotat, J., & Eyssel, F. (2017). A robot at home-how affect, technology commitment, and personality traits influence user experience in an intelligent robotics apartment. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 641-646). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. |
| [24] | Biocca, F., & Nowak, K. (2001). Plugging your body into the telecommunication system:Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 407-447). Hampton Press. |
| [25] | Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 632-658. |
| [26] | Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 167-175. |
| [27] | Butz, M. V. (2021). Towards strong AI. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(1), 91-101. |
| [28] | Čaić, M., Mahr, D., & Oderkerken-Schröder, G. (2019). Value of social robots in services: Social cognition perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(2), 178-205. |
| [29] | Čaić, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2018). Service robots: Value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. Journal of Service Management, 29(2), 178-205. |
| [30] | Chandra, B., & Rahman, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence and value co-creation: A review, conceptual framework and directions for future research. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 7-32. |
| [31] |
Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W. S., Gilbert, J. E., & Ross, K. (2019). Should AI-Based, conversational digital assistants employ social-or task-oriented interaction style? A task-competency and reciprocity perspective for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 315-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.048 |
| [32] | Chen, L., Zhang, D., & Hou, M. (2022). The influence of perceived social presence on the willingness to communicate in mobile medical consultations: Experimental study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(5), e31797. |
| [33] | Chen, Q., & Park, H. J. (2021). How anthropomorphism affects trust in intelligent personal assistants. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2722-2737. |
| [34] | Cheng, Y., & Jiang, H. (2020). How do AI-driven chatbots impact user experience? Examining gratifications, perceived privacy risk, satisfaction, loyalty, and continued use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 592-614. |
| [35] | Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023). Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727-1739. |
| [36] | Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., & Gloor, P. (2018). In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human-chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92(3), 539-548. |
| [37] | Crocetti, E., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2018). The interplay of personal and social identity. European Psychologist, 23(3), 210-220. |
| [38] | Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61-149. |
| [39] |
Damiano, L., & Dumouchel, P. (2018). Anthropomorphism in human-robot co-evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 468.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00468 pmid: 29632507 |
| [40] | Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24-42. |
| [41] | Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. |
| [42] |
De Visser, E. J., Pak, R., & Shaw, T. H. (2018). From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: The importance of trust repair in human-machine interaction. Ergonomics, 61(10), 1409-1427.
doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1457725 pmid: 29578376 |
| [43] |
Diel, A., & MacDorman, K. F. (2021). Creepy cats and strange high houses: Support for configural processing in testing predictions of nine uncanny valley theories. Journal of Vision, 21(4), 1-1.
doi: 10.1167/jov.21.4.1 pmid: 33792617 |
| [44] | Dignum, V. (2018). Ethics in artificial intelligence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 1-3. |
| [45] | Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3), 177-190. |
| [46] |
Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Westerman, D., & Spence, P. R. (2019). Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 308-314.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.042 |
| [47] | Edwards, C., Beattie, A. J., Edwards, A., & Spence, P. R. (2016). Differences in perceptions of communication quality between a Twitterbot and human agent for information seeking and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 666-671. |
| [48] |
Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19(2), 114-120.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02056.x pmid: 18271858 |
| [49] |
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864 pmid: 17907867 |
| [50] | Esmaeilzadeh, H., & Vaezi, R. (2022). Conscious empathic AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 549-564. |
| [51] |
Eyssel, F., & Kuchenbrandt, D. (2012). Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 724-731.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x pmid: 22103234 |
| [52] | Fakhimi, A., Garry, T., & Biggemann, S. (2023). The effects of anthropomorphised virtual conversational assistants on consumer engagement and trust during service encounters. Australasian Marketing Journal, 31(4), 314-324. |
| [53] | Fernandes, T., & Oliveira, E. (2021). Understanding consumers’ acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption. Journal of Business Research, 122, 180-191. |
| [54] | Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143-166. |
| [55] | Fox, J., & Gambino, A. (2021). Relationship development with humanoid social robots: Applying interpersonal theories to human-robot interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(5), 294-299. |
| [56] | Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M. S., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R. B., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106607. |
| [57] | Go, E., & Sundar, S. S. (2019). Humanizing chatbots: The effects of visual, identity and conversational cues on humanness perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 97, 304-316. |
| [58] | Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human-robot interaction: A survey. Foundations and Trends in Human- Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203-275. |
| [59] |
Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From "we" to "me": Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53-74.
doi: 10.1037/pspi0000019 pmid: 25938701 |
| [60] | Guadagno, R. E., Swinth, K. R., & Blascovich, J. (2011). Social evaluations of embodied agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2380-2385. |
| [61] | Guingrich, R., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2023). Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines. arXiv E-Prints, 2311. |
| [62] | Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157-169. |
| [63] | Han, E., Yin, D., & Zhang, H. (2023). Bots with feelings: Should AI agents express positive emotion in customer service?. Information Systems Research, 34(3), 1296-1311. |
| [64] | Harris-Watson, A. M., Larson, L. E., Lauharatanahirun, N., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. S. (2023). Social perception in human-AI teams: Warmth and competence predict receptivity to AI teammates. Computer in Human Behavior, 145, Article 107765. |
| [65] | Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8), 689-708. |
| [66] | Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2008). The influence of social presence on enjoyment and intention to use of a robot and screen agent by elderly users. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 33-40. |
| [67] | Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot. Virtual Reality, 14(1), 77-84. |
| [68] | Herse, S., Vitale, J., Johnston, B., & Williams, M. A. (2021). Using trust to determine user decision making & task outcome during a human-agent collaborative task. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 73-82). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. |
| [69] | Hinz, N. A., Ciardo, F., & Wykowska, A. (2019). Individual differences in attitude toward robots predict behavior in human-robot interaction. In M. A. Salichs, S. Sam Ge, E. I. Barakova, J.J. Cabibihan, A. R. Wagner, Á. Castro- González, & H. He (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 11876: Social robotics ICSR 2019 (pp. 64-73). Springer. |
| [70] | Hoc, J. M. (2001). Towards a cognitive approach to human- machine cooperation in dynamic situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(4), 509-540. |
| [71] | Hu, Q., Lu, Y., Pan, Z., Gong, Y., & Yang, Z. (2021). Can AI artifacts influence human cognition? The effects of artificial autonomy in intelligent personal assistants. International Journal of Information Management, 56, Article 102250. |
| [72] | Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172. |
| [73] | Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30-41. |
| [74] | Jeong, J., Chen, Q., Kim, N., & Lee, H. (2022). Virtual reality collaborative platform for e-learning: Analysis of student engagement and perceptions. In Proceedings of the 27th CAADRIA Conference (vol. 1, pp. 19-28). Hong Kong: Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. |
| [75] |
Jörling, M., Böhm, R., & Paluch, S. (2019). Service robots: Drivers of perceived responsibility for service outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 22(4), 404-420.
doi: 10.1177/1094670519842334 |
| [76] | Kim, K., Bruder, G., Maloney, D., & Welch, G. (2016). The influence of real human personality on social presence with a virtual human in augmented reality. In International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (pp. 115-122). Lisbon: The Eurographics Association. |
| [77] | Kim, K. J., Eunil, P., & Shyam, S. S. (2013). Caregiving role in human-robot interaction: A study of the mediating effects of perceived benefit and social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1799-1806. |
| [78] | Kim, W. B., & Hur, H. J. (2023). What makes people feel empathy for AI chatbots? Assessing the role of competence and warmth. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 40(17),4674-4687. |
| [79] | Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2005). Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices. Media Psychology, 7(1), 31-45. |
| [80] | Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Jin, S., & Yan, C. (2006). Can robots manifest personality? An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 754-772. |
| [81] | Lemay, D. J., Basnet, R. B., & Doleck, T. (2024). Fearing the robot apocalypse: Correlates of AI anxiety. International Journal of Learning Analytics & Artificial Intelligence for Education, 2(2), 24-33. |
| [82] | Li, B., Yao, R., & Nan, Y. (2023). How do friendship artificial intelligence chatbots (FAIC) benefit the continuance using intention and customer engagement?. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(6), 1376-1398. |
| [83] | Liehner, G. L., Biermann, H., Hick, A., Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2023). Perceptions, attitudes and trust toward artificial intelligence-an assessment of the public opinion. Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing, 782, 32-41. |
| [84] | Liu-Thompkins, Y., Okazaki, S., & Li, H. (2022). Artificial empathy in marketing interactions: Bridging the human-AI gap in affective and social customer experience. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1198-1218. |
| [85] | Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 1-19. |
| [86] | Lu, B., Fan, W., & Zhou, M. (2016). Social presence, trust, and social commerce purchase intention: An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225-237. |
| [87] | Mahmud, H., Islam, A. K. M. N., AHMED, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390-121416. |
| [88] | Malhotra, A., & Hoey, J. (2021). Emotions in socio-cultural interactive AI agents. In 2021 9th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW) (pp. 1-6). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. |
| [89] | Maroufkhani, P., Asadi, S., Ghobakhloo, M., Jannesari, M. T., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2022). How do interactive voice assistants build brands’ loyalty? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, Article 121870. |
| [90] | Mayes, E. (1998). The fantasy of internatlization in the theoretical imaginary. Representations, 62, 100-110. |
| [91] | McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). Academic Press. |
| [92] | McLean, G., Osei-Frimpong, K., & Barhorst, J. (2021). Alexa, do voice assistants influence consumer brand engagement?-Examining the role of AI powered voice assistants in influencing consumer brand engagement. Journal of Business Research, 124, 312-328. |
| [93] | Mende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019). Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 535-556. |
| [94] | Merrill, K., Kim, J., & Collins, C. (2022). AI companions for lonely individuals and the role of social presence. Communication Research Reports, 39(2), 93-103. |
| [95] | Minsky, M. (2007). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon and Schuster. |
| [96] | Morelli, S., Pazzi, V., Nardini, O., & Bonati, S. (2022). Framing disaster risk perception and vulnerability in social media communication: A literature review. Sustainability, 14(15), Article 9148. |
| [97] | Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Education Psychology, 96(1), 165-173. |
| [98] | Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33-35. |
| [99] | Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field], IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98-100. |
| [100] | Munnukka, J., Talvitie-Lamberg, K., & Maity, D. (2022). Anthropomorphism and social presence in human-virtual service assistant interactions: The role of dialog length and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, Article 107343. |
| [101] | Murphy, J., Gretzel, U., & Pesonen, J. (2019). Marketing robot services in hospitality and tourism: The role of anthropomorphism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 784-795. |
| [102] | Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81-103. |
| [103] | Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann. |
| [104] | Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. MIT Press. |
| [105] | Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5), 481-494. |
| [106] | Odekerken-Schröder, G., Mennens, K., Steins, M., & Mahr, D. (2022). The service triad: An empirical study of service robots, customers and frontline employees. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 246-292. |
| [107] | Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10(5), 1-35. |
| [108] | Oksanen, A., Savela, N., Latikka, R., & Koivula, A. (2020). Trust toward robots and artificial intelligence: An experimental approach to human-technology interactions online. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 568256. |
| [109] | O’Neil, T., McNeese, N., Barron, A., & Schelble, B. (2020). Human-autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors, 64(5), 1-35. |
| [110] | O'Reilly, C., Maher, P. J., Smith, E. M., MacCarron, P., & Quayle, M. (2024). Social identity emergence in attitude interactions and the identity strengthening effects of cumulative attitude agreement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 97-117. |
| [111] | Payne, E., Dahl, A. J., & Peltier, J. (2021). Digital servitization value co-creation framework for AI services: A research agenda for digital transformation in financial service ecosystems. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(2), 200-222. |
| [112] | Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Stanescu, M. (2024). Can I trust my AI friend? The role of emotions, feelings of friendship and trust for consumers' information-sharing behavior toward AI. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 407-433. |
| [113] | Pentina, I., Hancock, T., & Xie, T. (2023). Exploring relationship development with social chatbots: A mixed-method study of replika. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, Article 107600. |
| [114] | Pereira, A., Prada, R., & Paiva, A. (2014). Improving social presence in human-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1449-1458). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. |
| [115] | Pimentel, D., Kalyanaraman, S., Lee, Y. H., & Halan, S. (2021). Voices of the unsung: The role of social presence and interactivity in building empathy in 360 video. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2230-2254. |
| [116] | Pitardi, V., & Marriott, H. R. (2021). Alexa, she's not human but... unveiling the drivers of consumers' trust in voice- based artificial intelligence. Psychology& Marketing, 38(4), 626-642. |
| [117] | Pusztahelyi, R., & Stefán, I. (2022). Household social robots-special issues relating to data protection. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies, 11(1), 95-118. |
| [118] | Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 145-182. |
| [119] | Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. |
| [120] | Roy, R., & Naidoo, V. (2021). Enhancing chatbot effectiveness: The role of anthropomorphic conversational styles and time orientation. Journal of Business Research, 126, 23-34. |
| [121] |
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 pmid: 11392867 |
| [122] | Schellen, E., & Wykowska, A. (2019). Intentional mindset toward robots-open questions and methodological challenges. Frontiers in Robot and AI, 5, 139. |
| [123] | Sheehan, B., Jin, H. S., & Gottlieb, U. (2020). Customer service chatbots: Anthropomorphism and adoption. Journal of Business Research, 115, 14-24. |
| [124] | Shin, J. G., Kim, J. B., & Kim, S. H. (2019). A framework to identify critical design parameters for enhancing user’s satisfaction in human-AI interactions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1284(1), 12036. |
| [125] | Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson Education India. |
| [126] | Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley. |
| [127] | Sun, X., & Guan, H. (2022). Research on empathic remediation mechanism of chatbots mediated by social presence and trust. In Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering (pp. 772-776). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. |
| [128] | Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model:A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73-100). MIT Press. |
| [129] | Sundar, S. S. (2020). Rise of machine agency: A framework for studying the psychology of human-AI interaction (HAII). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 74-88. |
| [130] | Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1738-1747. |
| [131] | Swan, K. P., & Shih, L. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136. |
| [132] | Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention. Macmillan. |
| [133] | Tsai, W. H. S., Liu, Y., & Chuan, C. H. (2021). How chatbots’ social presence communication enhances consumer engagement: The mediating role of parasocial interaction and dialogue. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 15(3), 460-482. |
| [134] | Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34-45. |
| [135] | Tung, V. W. S., & Au, N. M. (2018). Exploring customer experiences with robotics in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(7), 2680-2697. |
| [136] | van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S. M., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A. L., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. A. (2017). Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43-58. |
| [137] | Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. |
| [138] | Wagner, K., & Schramm-Klein, H. (2019). Alexa, are you human? Investigating anthropomorphism of digital voice assistants-a qualitative approach. In Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-17). Munich, Germany: ICIS. |
| [139] | Wienrich, C., & Latoschik, M. (2021). Extended artificial intelligence: New prospects of human-AI interaction research. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, Article 686783. |
| [140] | Wieseke, J., Geigenmüller, A., & Kraus, F. (2012). On the role of empathy in customer-employee interactions. Journal of Service Research, 15(3), 316-331. |
| [141] | Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018). Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907-931. |
| [142] | Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Chi, R., & Deng, G. (2022). Enhancing customer satisfaction with chatbots: The influence of anthropomorphic communication styles and anthropomorphised roles. Nankai Business Review International, 14(2), 249-271. |
| [143] | Yam, K. C., Tang, P. M., Jackson, J. C., Su, R., & Gray, K. (2023). The rise of robots increases job insecurity and maladaptive workplace behaviors: Multimethod evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(5), 850-870. |
| [144] | Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Lv, X., Ai, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Anthropomorphism and customers’ willingness to use artificial intelligence service agents. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(1), 1-23. |
| [145] | Yassien, A., Elagroudy, P., Makled, E., & Abdennadher, S. (2020). A design space for social presence in VR. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human- Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. |
| [146] | Ye, S., Ying, T., Zhou, L., & Wang, T. (2019). Enhancing customer trust in peer-to-peer accommodation: A “soft” strategy via social presence. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 79, 1-10. |
| [147] | Yen, C. J., & Tu, C. H. (2008). Online social presence: A study of score validity of the computer-mediated communication questionnaire. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(3), 297-310. |
| [148] | Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V.-S., Kunz, W., & Toporowski, W. (2021). Check-in at the Robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications. Tourism Management, 85, Article 104309. |
| [149] | Zhang, M., Gursoy, D., Zhu, Z., & Shi, S. (2021). Impact of anthropomorphic features of artificially intelligent service robots on consumer acceptance: Moderating role of sense of humor. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 3883-3905. |
| [1] | PENG Chenming, QU Yifan, GUO Xiaoling, CHEN Zengxiang. The double-edged sword effect of artificial intelligence services on consumer moral behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2025, 33(2): 236-255. |
| [2] | WU Bo, ZHANG Aojie, CAO Fei. Professional design, user design, or AI design? The psychological mechanism of the source of design effect [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(6): 995-1009. |
| [3] | HOU Hanchao, NI Shiguang, LIN Shuya, WANG Pusheng. When AI learns to empathize: Topics, scenarios, and optimization of empathy computing from a psychological perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(5): 845-858. |
| [4] | SHU Lifang, WANG Kui, WU Yueyan, CHEN Siyun. Multi-stage impacts of artificial intelligence coaches on consumers’ long-term goal pursuit and its mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(3): 451-464. |
| [5] | WANG Yongyue, HUANG Piaopiao, JIN Yanghua, BAI Xinwen, YUE Fengkai, ZHANG Fanying, GUO Zihao. Technical hollowing out of knowledge workers in the manufacturing industry in artificial intelligence context: The definition, formation and influence mechanism [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(12): 2005-2017. |
| [6] | TU Hua, ZHANG Chunmei. The causes of intimate partner violence: Attitude-based explanations from the perspective of social learning and feminist theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(11): 1898-1911. |
| [7] | YIN Meng, NIU Xiongying. Dancing with AI: AI-employee collaboration in the systemic view [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2024, 32(1): 162-176. |
| [8] | Wei Huang, Hengjiang Li, Diwei Wu, Huafu Chen, Hongmei Yan. Language Decoding for Visual Perception Based on Transformer [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(suppl.): 11-11. |
| [9] | XU Xiaobing, CHENG Lanping, SUN Hongjie. Tendency to time anthropomorphism and its impact on prosocial behavior [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1569-1582. |
| [10] | TU Yan, HAO Po, LONG Lirong. Job replacement or job transformation? Definition, consequences, and sources of technology-driven job insecurity [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(8): 1359-1373. |
| [11] | LI Xin, LIU Zhenhui, LUO Jie, JIN Tonglin, JIA Yanru, WU Yuntena. The phenomenon and mechanism of intergenerational transmission of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(7): 1254-1268. |
| [12] | CHENG Meixia, KUANG Ziyi, LENG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Yang, WANG Fuxing. Can learning by non-interactive teaching promote learning? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(5): 769-782. |
| [13] | LI Jing, WU Xuyao, YUE Lei, ZENG Xiangli, FANG Qingyuan. The impact of materialism on green consumption: Promotion or inhibition? [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(6): 1191-1204. |
| [14] | JIANG Luyuan, CAO Limei, QIN Xin, TAN Ling, CHEN Chen, PENG Xiaofei. Fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence decision-making [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(5): 1078-1092. |
| [15] | DENG Shichang, XU Qi, ZHANG Jingjing, LI Xiangqian. User acceptance mechanism and usage promotion strategy of AI services based on mind perception theory [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2022, 30(4): 723-737. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||