Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 1676-1687.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2023.01676
• Original article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2022-12-22
Online:
2023-09-15
Published:
2023-05-31
Contact:
ZHANG Qingfang
E-mail:qingfang.zhang@ruc.edu.cn
CLC Number:
PAN Jiabing, ZHANG Qingfang. The cognitive mechanism of syllable frequency effects in speech production: A cross-language perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2023, 31(9): 1676-1687.
[1] |
端木三. (2021). 英汉音节分析及数量对比. 语言科学, 20(6), 561-588.
doi: 10.7509/j.linsci.202102.033530 |
[2] | 蒋宇宸. (2021). 音节累计词频和邻近项个数影响汉语口语词汇产生过程的认知机制 (硕士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[3] |
蒋宇宸, 蔡笑, 张清芳. (2020). θ频段( 4-8 Hz) 的活动反映了汉语口语产生中音节信息的加工. 心理学报, 52(10), 1199-1211.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.01199 |
[4] | 欧阳明昆. (2020). 汉语词汇产生过程中语义和语音提取年老化的认知神经机制 (博士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[5] |
屈青青, 刘维琳, 李兴珊. (2018). 汉语言语产生的语音加工单元——基于音位的研究. 心理科学进展, 26(9), 1535-1544.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01535 |
[6] | 史有为. (2019). 带调音节: 解释汉语的一个出发点. 华东师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 51(3), 1-17. |
[7] | 杨群. (2017). 汉语口语词汇产生中词汇通达过程的认知年老化机制 (博士学位论文). 中国人民大学, 北京. |
[8] | 杨群, 张清芳. (2015). 口语产生中词频效应、音节频率效应和语音促进效应的认知年老化. 心理科学, 38(6), 1303-1310. |
[9] | 岳源, 张清芳. (2015). 汉语口语产生中音节和音段的促进和抑制效应. 心理学报, 47(3), 319-328. |
[10] | 张清芳. (2005). 音节在语言产生中的作用. 心理科学进展, 13(6), 752-759. |
[11] |
张清芳, 王雪娇. (2020). 汉语口语词汇产生的音韵编码单元: 内隐启动范式的ERP研究. 心理学报, 52(4), 414-425.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00414 |
[12] | 张清芳, 杨玉芳. (2005). 汉语单音节词汇产生中音韵编码的单元. 心理科学, 28(2), 374-378. |
[13] |
朱晓农. (2019). 声调发生的五项前提. 语言科学, 18(6), 561-580.
doi: 10.7509/j.linsci.201705.030672 |
[14] |
Alario, F. X., Perre, L., Castel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102(3), 464-475.
pmid: 16545792 |
[15] | Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27( 2), 545-555. |
[16] |
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 233-252.
doi: 10.1080/14640748408402157 URL |
[17] |
Bürki, A. (2018). Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1973-2004.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1423-4 |
[18] |
Bürki, A., Cheneval, P. P., & Laganaro, M. (2015). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? ERP comparison of high frequency and novel syllable production. Brain and Language, 150, 90-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.006 pmid: 26367062 |
[19] | Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5(6), Article e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 |
[20] | Cai, X., Yin, Y. L., & Zhang, Q. F. (2020). The roles of syllables and phonemes during phonological encoding in Chinese spoken word production: A topographic ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 140, Article 107382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107382 |
[21] |
Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 766-780.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1038 URL |
[22] |
Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., & Price, C. J. (2006). Effect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud. Human Brain Mapping, 27(12), 963-972.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20236 pmid: 16628608 |
[23] |
Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90(1-3), 393-400.
pmid: 15172555 |
[24] |
Chen, J.-Y., Chen, T.-M., & Dell, G. S. (2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751-781.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2825 URL |
[25] | Chen, J.-Y., O’ Seaghdha, P. G., & Chen, T.-M. (2016). The primacy of abstract syllables in Chinese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42( 5), 825-836. |
[26] |
Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2011). Effect of syllabic neighbourhood as a function of syllabic neighbour length. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 951-957.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0138-1 URL |
[27] |
Cholin, J. (2008). The mental syllabary in speech production: An integration of different approaches and domains. Aphasiology, 22(11), 1127-1141.
doi: 10.1080/02687030701820352 URL |
[28] | Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable- frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37( 1), 109-122. |
[29] |
Cholin, J., & Levelt, W. J. (2009). Effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency in speech production: Further evidence for syllabic units at a post-lexical level. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 662-684.
doi: 10.1080/01690960802348852 URL |
[30] |
Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99(2), 205-235.
pmid: 15939415 |
[31] | Clark, J., & Yallop, C. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. |
[32] |
Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 296-326.
doi: 10.1080/01690960701571570 URL |
[33] |
Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 974-983.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193470 URL |
[34] |
Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 369-390.
doi: 10.1080/01690960344000224 URL |
[35] |
Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 339-345.
doi: 10.3758/BF03193854 URL |
[36] | Croot, K., Lalas, G., Biedermann, B., Rastle, K., Jones, K., & Cholin, J. (2017). Syllable frequency effects in immediate but not delayed syllable naming in English. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1119-1132. |
[37] |
Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. (2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 119-132.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00008-1 URL |
[38] |
Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 195-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001 URL |
[39] | den Hollander, J., Jonkers, R., Mariën, P., & Bastiaanse, R. (2019). Identifying the speech production stages in early and late adulthood by using electroencephalography. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, Article 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00298 |
[40] |
Farrell, M. T., & Abrams, L. (2014). Picture-word interference reveals inhibitory effects of syllable frequency on lexical selection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 525-541.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.820763 URL |
[41] | Feng, C., Yue, Y., & Zhang, Q. F. (2019). Syllables are retrieved before segments in the spoken production of Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Study. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 11773. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48033-3 |
[42] |
Ferrand, L., Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1996). Masked priming of word and picture naming: The role of syllabic units. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(5), 708-723.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0037 URL |
[43] |
Hagoort, P., Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Herzog, H., Steinmetz, H., & Seitz, R. J. (1999). The neural circuitry involved in the reading of German words and pseudowords: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(4), 383-398.
pmid: 10471847 |
[44] |
Hutzler, F., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study. Brain and Language, 92(2), 138-152.
pmid: 15629488 |
[45] | Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255 |
[46] |
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 pmid: 15037128 |
[47] | Jacobs, C. L., & Dell, G. S. (2014). ‘Hotdog’, not ‘Hot’ ‘dog’: The phonological planning of compound words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29( 4), 512-523. |
[48] |
Kwon, Y. (2014). The syllable type and token frequency effect in naming task. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 25(2), 91-107.
doi: 10.19066/cogsci URL |
[49] | Laganaro, M. (2019). Phonetic encoding in utterance production: A review of open issues from 1989 to 2018. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1193-1201. |
[50] |
Laganaro, M., & Alario, F. X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178-196.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.001 URL |
[51] |
Laganaro, M., Python, G., & Toepel, U. (2013). Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: Evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls. Brain and Language, 126(2), 123-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.004 pmid: 23707932 |
[52] | Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). Timing in speech production with special reference to word form encoding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 283-295. |
[53] |
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99001776 pmid: 11301520 |
[54] |
Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50(1-3), 239-269.
pmid: 8039363 |
[55] |
Macizo, P., & Van Petten, C. (2007). Syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming of English words. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 295-331.
doi: 10.1007/s11145-006-9032-z URL |
[56] |
Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69-89.
doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8 URL |
[57] |
Miguel-Abella, R. S., Pérez-Sánchez, M. Á., Cuetos, F., Marín, J., & González-Nosti, M. (2022). SpaVerb-WN—A megastudy of naming times for 4562 Spanish verbs: Effects of psycholinguistic and motor content variables. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2640-2664.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01734-y |
[58] |
Onochie-Quintanilla, E., Defior, S. A., & Simpson, I. C. (2019). RAN and orthographic processing: What can syllable frequency tell us about this relationship?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 182, 1-17.
doi: S0022-0965(18)30435-1 pmid: 30779968 |
[59] |
O’ Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J. Y., & Chen, T. M., (2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115(2), 282-302.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001 pmid: 20149354 |
[60] |
Papoutsi, M., de Zwart, J. A., Jansma, J. M., Pickering, M. J., Bednar, J. A., & Horwitz, B. (2009). From phonemes to articulatory codes: An fMRI study of the role of Broca's area in speech production. Cerebral Cortex, 19(9), 2156-2165.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn239 URL |
[61] |
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 134-144.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.134 URL |
[62] | Perret, C., Schneider, L., Dayer, G., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Convergences and divergences between neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic data in the study of phonological and phonetic encoding: A parallel investigation of syllable frequency effects in brain-damaged and healthy speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29( 6), 714-727. |
[63] | Qu, Q. Q., Damian, M. F., & Kazanina, N. (2012). Sound- sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14265-14270. |
[64] | Qu, Q. Q., Feng, C., Hou, F. Y., & Damian, M. F. (2020). Syllables and phonemes as planning units in Mandarin Chinese spoken word production: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 146, Article 107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107559 |
[65] |
Roelofs, A. (2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 22-37.
doi: 10.1111/jpr.12050 URL |
[66] |
Schiller, N. O. (2008). The masked onset priming effect in picture naming. Cognition, 106(2), 952-962.
pmid: 17442296 |
[67] |
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 pmid: 2798649 |
[68] |
Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Processing of syllables in production and recognition tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(1), 65-78.
pmid: 17260187 |
[69] |
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9 URL |
[70] |
Tremblay, P., Deschamps, I., Bédard, P., Tessier, M. H., Carrier, M., & Thibeault, M. (2018). Aging of speech production, from articulatory accuracy to motor timing. Psychology and Aging, 33(7), 1022-1034.
doi: 10.1037/pag0000306 pmid: 30335443 |
[71] |
Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech?. Aphasiology, 15(1), 39-49.
doi: 10.1080/02687040042000115 URL |
[72] |
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9(4), 325-329.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00064 URL |
[73] |
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374-408.
doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2618 URL |
[74] |
Wang, J., Wong, W. K., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C. (2017). Primary phonological planning units in spoken word production are language-specific: Evidence from an ERP study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5815-5822.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06186-z pmid: 28724982 |
[75] |
Whiteside, S. P., & Varley, R. A. (1998). A reconceptualisation of apraxia of speech: A synthesis of evidence. Cortex, 34(2), 221-231.
pmid: 9606587 |
[76] | You, W. P., Zhang, Q. F., & Verdonschot, R. G. (2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PLoS ONE, 7(10), Article e46595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046595 |
[77] | Yu, M. X., Mo, C., & Mo, L. (2014). The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS ONE, 9(9), Article e106486. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106486 |
[78] | Zhang, Q. F., & Damian, M. F. (2019). Syllables constitute proximate units for Mandarin speakers: Electrophysiological evidence from a masked priming task. Psychophysiology, 56(4), Article e13317. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13317 |
[79] | Zhang, Q. F., & Wang, C. (2014). Syllable frequency and word frequency effects in spoken and written word production in a non-alphabetic script. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00120 |
[1] | HAN Haibin, XU Pingping, QU Qingqing, CHENG Xi, LI Xingshan. Cross-modal integration of audiovisual information in language processing [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(3): 475-489. |
[2] | WU Limei; WU Guohua; CHEN Zhuoming. The switch costs in bilingual speech production: From a single word to sentence context [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 37-48. |
[3] | YANG Qun, ZHANG Qingfanf, . Aging of Speech Production: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2072-2084. |
[4] | FANG Jie;LI Xiao-Jian. Representation of Compound Words in Lexical Access for Speech Production [J]. , 2009, 17(6): 1116-1123. |
[5] | FANG Jie;LI Xiao-Jian. Discrepancy and Rethink of Models for Homophone Representation [J]. , 2009, 17(5): 909-916. |
[6] | Li Li; Mo Lei; Wang Ruiming; Pan Jing’er. Mechanism of Lexical Access in Bilingual Speech Production [J]. , 2006, 14(5): 648-653. |
[7] | Zhang Qingfang, Yang Yufang. The Lexical Access Theory In Speech Production [J]. , 2003, 11(1): 6-11. |
[8] | Yu Lin ;Shu Hua. ON THE MAIN ISSUES OF SPEECH PRODUCTION RESEARCH IN WESTERN COUNTRIES [J]. , 2002, 10(3): 248-256. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||