Advances in Psychological Science ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (12): 2102-2113.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.02102
• Regular Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
XU Kepeng1,2, YANG Lingqian1, WU Jiahong1, XUE Hong1,2, ZHANG Shuyue1,2()
Received:
2020-06-01
Online:
2020-12-15
Published:
2020-10-26
Contact:
ZHANG Shuyue
E-mail:shuyuezh@126.com
CLC Number:
XU Kepeng, YANG Lingqian, WU Jiahong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Shuyue. Application of the CNI model in the studies of moral decision[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113.
道德规范禁止行为 | 道德规范允许行为 | ||
---|---|---|---|
行为利益大于成本 | 行为利益小于成本 | 行为利益大于成本 | 行为利益小于成本 |
您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救数百人的生命。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救大约相同数量的生命。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救大约相同数量的生命。您的一位同事计划使用该疫苗, 但是您可以通过向卫生部门报告他的计划来阻止他。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救数百人的生命。您的一位同事计划使用该疫苗, 但是您可以通过向卫生部门报告他的计划来阻止他。 |
在这种情况下使用疫苗是否合适? | 在这种情况下使用疫苗是否合适? | 在这种情况下, 将您同事的计划报告给卫生部门是否合适? | 在这种情况下, 将您同事的计划报告给卫生部门是否合适? |
道德规范禁止行为 | 道德规范允许行为 | ||
---|---|---|---|
行为利益大于成本 | 行为利益小于成本 | 行为利益大于成本 | 行为利益小于成本 |
您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救数百人的生命。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救大约相同数量的生命。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救大约相同数量的生命。您的一位同事计划使用该疫苗, 但是您可以通过向卫生部门报告他的计划来阻止他。 | 您是一名高度传染性疾病爆发地区的医生。初步测试表明, 一种新疫苗由于严重的副作用, 未得到您国家卫生部门的认可。疫苗的副作用可能会导致数十名未感染者死亡, 但该疫苗将通过阻止病毒传播而挽救数百人的生命。您的一位同事计划使用该疫苗, 但是您可以通过向卫生部门报告他的计划来阻止他。 |
在这种情况下使用疫苗是否合适? | 在这种情况下使用疫苗是否合适? | 在这种情况下, 将您同事的计划报告给卫生部门是否合适? | 在这种情况下, 将您同事的计划报告给卫生部门是否合适? |
[1] | 景夏慧. (2019). 心理距离对道德判断的影响 (硕士学位论文). 山西大学, 太原. |
[2] | 康德. (1957). 道德形而上学探本: 商务印书馆. |
[3] |
唐江伟, 路红, 刘毅, 彭坚. (2015). 道德直觉决策及其机制探析. 心理科学进展, 23(10), 1830-1842.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01830 URL |
[4] | 田学红, 杨群, 张德玄, 张烨. (2011). 道德直觉加工机制的理论构想. 心理科学进展, 19(10), 1426-1433. |
[5] | 王鹏, 方平, 姜媛. (2011). 道德直觉背景下的道德决策: 影响因素探究. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 573-579. |
[6] | 肖前国, 罗乐, 余林. (2009). 推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评. 心理科学进展, 17(2), 321-324. |
[7] | 谢熹瑶, 罗跃嘉. (2009). 道德判断中的情绪因素——从认知神经科学的角度进行探讨. 心理科学进展, 17(6), 1250-1256. |
[8] | 喻丰, 彭凯平, 韩婷婷, 柴方圆, 柏阳. (2011). 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争. 心理科学进展, 19(11), 1702-1712. |
[9] | 詹泽, 吴宝沛. (2019). 无处不在的伤害: 二元论视角下的道德判断. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 132-144. |
[10] | 张红霞, 陈小莹, 王栋, 马靓, 周仁来. (2016). 学习困难儿童的事件性前瞻记忆: 多项式加工树状模型的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(5), 800-804. |
[11] | 张银花, 李红, 吴寅. (2020). 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用. 心理科学进展, 28(7), 1042-1055. |
[12] | 钟毅平, 占友龙, 李琎, 范伟. (2017). 道德决策的机制及干预研究: 自我相关性与风险水平的作用. 心理科学进展, 25(7), 1093-1102. |
[13] |
Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Conway, P. (2019). Clarifying gender differences in moral dilemma judgments: The complementary roles of harm aversion and action aversion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 353-363.
doi: 10.1177/1948550618755873 URL |
[14] | Arutyunova, K. R., & Alexandrov,Y. I. (2016). Factors of gender and age in moral judgment of actions. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 37(2), 79-91. |
[15] | Barak-Corren,N., & Bazerman,M. H. (2017). Is saving lives your task or God's? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(3), 280-296. |
[16] |
Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro,D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121(1), 154-161.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010 URL |
[17] |
Bauman, C. W., Mcgraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536-554.
doi: 10.1177/003803857400800330 URL |
[18] | Bialek, M., Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 8. |
[19] |
Brannon, S. M., Carr, S., Jin, E. S., Josephs, R. A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Exogenous testosterone increases sensitivity to moral norms in moral dilemma judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 856-866.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0641-3 URL pmid: 31332298 |
[20] |
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Scheffer, J. A., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach. Cognition, 158, 224-241.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.013 URL pmid: 27865113 |
[21] |
Cameron, C. D., Spring, V. L., & Todd, A. R. (2017). The empathy impulse: A multinomial model of intentional and unintentional empathy for pain. Emotion, 17(3), 395-411.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000266 URL pmid: 28080083 |
[22] |
Candee, D., & Puka, B. (1984). An analytic approach to resolving problems in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 10(2), 61-70.
doi: 10.1136/jme.10.2.61 URL pmid: 6234395 |
[23] |
Capraro, V., & Sippel, J. (2017). Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents. Cognitive Processing, 18(4), 399-405.
doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0822-9 URL pmid: 28597324 |
[24] |
Cipolletti, H., McFarlane, S., & Weissglass, C. (2016). The moral foreign-language effect. Philosophical Psychology, 29(1), 23-40.
doi: 10.1080/09515089.2014.993063 URL |
[25] |
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216-235.
doi: 10.1037/a0031021 URL pmid: 23276267 |
[26] | Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 2(2), 152-161. |
[27] |
Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696-713.
doi: 10.1177/0146167215575731 URL pmid: 25840987 |
[28] |
Gardner, M. (2016). The trolley problem mysteries. Ethics, 126(4), 1105-1110.
doi: 10.1086/686061 URL |
[29] |
Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hutter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 343-376.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000086 URL pmid: 28816493 |
[30] | Gawronski,B., & Brannon,S. M. (2020). Power and moral dilemma judgments: Distinct effects of memory recall versus social roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 86, 15. |
[31] |
Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J. B., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion, 18(7), 989-1008.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000399 URL pmid: 29389208 |
[32] | Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J. B., Friesdorf, R., & Hutter, M. . (2016). Understanding responses to moral dilemmas: Deontological inclinations, utilitarian inclinations, and general action tendencies. In J. P. Forgas, L. Jussim, & P. A. M. Van Lange (Eds.), Social psychology of morality (pp. 91-110). New York, NY: Psychology Press. |
[33] |
Gold, N., Pulford, B. D., & Colman, A. M. (2014). The outlandish, the realistic, and the real: Contextual manipulation and agent role effects in trolley problems. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 10.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00010 URL pmid: 24478742 |
[34] |
Greene, J. D. (2003). From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 846-849.
doi: 10.1038/nrn1224 URL pmid: 14523384 |
[35] |
Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 322-323.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 URL pmid: 17625951 |
[36] |
Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nvstrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004 URL pmid: 18158145 |
[37] |
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027 URL |
[38] |
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
doi: 10.1126/science.1062872 URL pmid: 11557895 |
[39] |
Hutter,M., & Klauer,K. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27(1), 116-159.
doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1212966 URL |
[40] |
Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521-537.
doi: 10.1037/a0013779 URL pmid: 19254101 |
[41] |
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). 'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005 URL pmid: 25460392 |
[42] |
Körner, A., Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Using the CNI model to investigate individual differences in moral dilemma judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16.
doi: 10.1177/0146167205277097 URL pmid: 16317185 |
[43] |
Kroneisen,M., & Heck,D. W. (2019). Interindividual differences in the sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Relating basic personality traits to the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14.
doi: 10.1177/0146167202238368 URL pmid: 15272956 |
[44] |
Larsen, E. M., Ospina, L. H., Cuesta-Diaz, A., Vian-Lains, A., Nitzburg, G. C., Mulaimovic, S., … Burdick, K. E. (2019). Effects of childhood trauma on adult moral decision- making: Clinical correlates and insights from bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 244, 180-186.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.002 URL pmid: 30343121 |
[45] |
McPhetres, J., Conway, P., Hughes, J. S., & Zuckerman, M. (2018). Reflecting on God's will: Reflective processing contributes to religious peoples' deontological dilemma responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 301-314.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.013 URL |
[46] |
Meissner, F., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the implicit association test: The ReAL model for the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 45-69.
doi: 10.1037/a0030734 URL pmid: 23148698 |
[47] | Mill, J. S. (1992). On Liberty And Utilitarianism. New York, NY: Bantam Books. |
[48] |
Nadarevic, L., & Erdfelder, E. (2011). Cognitive processes in implicit attitude tasks: An experimental validation of the Trip Model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 254-268.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.776 URL |
[49] |
Shin, H. I., & Kim, J. (2017). Foreign language effect and psychological distance. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1339-1352.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9498-7 URL pmid: 28516209 |
[50] | Starcke, K., Ludwig, A. C., & Brand, M. (2012). Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 61-68. |
[51] |
Suessenbach,F., & Moore,A. B. (2015). Individual differences in the explicit power motive predict "utilitarian" choices in moral dilemmas, especially when this choice is self-beneficial. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 297-302.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.031 URL |
[52] |
Szekely, R. D., Opre, A., & Miu, A. C. (2015). Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas. Personality and Individual Differences, 79, 104-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.036 URL |
[53] |
Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204-217.
doi: 10.5840/monist197659224 URL pmid: 11662247 |
[54] | Tinghog, G., Andersson, D., Bonn, C., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Koppel, L., & Vastfjall, D. (2016). Intuition and moral decision-making-The effect of time pressure and cognitive load on moral judgment and altruistic behavior. Plos One, 11(10), 19. |
[55] |
Zhang, L. S., Kong, M., Li, Z. Q., Zhao, X., & Gao, L. P. (2018). Chronic stress and moral decision-making: An exploration with the CNI model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 6.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006 URL pmid: 29403416 |
[1] | LIU Chuanjun, LIAO Jiangqun. The development of empirical paradigms and their theoretical values in moral dilemma research [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(8): 1508-1520. |
[2] | YUAN Xiaojing, LIU Chang. Moral intuition is moral but not objective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2021, 29(11): 2083-2090. |
[3] | ZHANG Yinhua, LI Hong, WU Yin. The application of computational modelling in the studies of moral cognition [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055. |
[4] | LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin. Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430. |
[5] | ZHONG Yiping, ZHAN Youlong, LI Jin, FAN Wei. Study on the mechanism and intervention of moral decision: Effects of self-relevance and risk level [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||